Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Effective cosmic density field reconstruction with convolutional neural network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.10538 v1 pith:C43NCTMF submitted 2023-06-18 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.IM
keywords densityreconstructionfieldmethodnetworkreconstructedalgorithmalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present a cosmic density field reconstruction method that augments the traditional reconstruction algorithms with a convolutional neural network (CNN). Following Shallue $\&$ Eisenstein (2022), the key component of our method is to use the $\textit{reconstructed}$ density field as the input to the neural network. We extend this previous work by exploring how the performance of these reconstruction ideas depends on the input reconstruction algorithm, the reconstruction parameters, and the shot noise of the density field, as well as the robustness of the method. We build an eight-layer CNN and train the network with reconstructed density fields computed from the Quijote suite of simulations. The reconstructed density fields are generated by both the standard algorithm and a new iterative algorithm. In real space at $z=0$, we find that the reconstructed field is $90\%$ correlated with the true initial density out to $k\sim 0.5 h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, a significant improvement over $k\sim 0.2 h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ achieved by the input reconstruction algorithms. We find similar improvements in redshift space, including an improved removal of redshift space distortions at small scales. We also find that the method is robust across changes in cosmology. Additionally, the CNN removes much of the variance from the choice of different reconstruction algorithms and reconstruction parameters. However, the effectiveness decreases with increasing shot noise, suggesting that such an approach is best suited to high density samples. This work highlights the additional information in the density field beyond linear scales as well as the power of complementing traditional analysis approaches with machine learning techniques.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On the Relation Between Field-Level Posteriors, Correlators, and their Likelihoods

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A general non-perturbative field-level posterior is constructed and expanded around its Gaussian limit to express Fisher information in terms of connected correlators, recovering standard results for power spectrum an...

  2. Standard Reconstruction Shifts the Optimal Input Scale for CNN-Based Density-Field Reconstruction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Applying standard reconstruction before a CNN shifts the optimal input cube for z=10 density reconstruction from ~150-200 h^-1 Mpc to ~38-114 h^-1 Mpc, and a single post-reconstruction CNN beats dual-scale CNN inputs.

  3. The Linear Point Standard Ruler with DESI DR1 and DR2 Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Linear-point distance measurements on DESI DR1/DR2 galaxy samples agree with template-based BAO measurements once a cosmology-dependent smearing correction is applied.

  4. Non-Gaussian Galaxy Stochasticity and the Noise-Field Formulation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Galaxy stochasticity in EFT of large-scale structure reduces to nonlinear couplings of one Gaussian noise field, yielding a samplable field-level likelihood that stabilizes the inferred noise amplitude.

Pith tools