REVIEW 2 cited by
Vivisecting the Dissection: On the Role of Trusted Components in BFT Protocols
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
A recent paper by Gupta et al. (EuroSys'23) challenged the usefulness of trusted component (TC) based Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) protocols to lower the replica group size from $3f+1$ to $2f+1$, identifying three limitations of such protocols and proposing that TCs should be used instead to improve the performance of BFT protocols. Here, we point out flaws in both arguments and advocate that the most worthwhile use of TCs in BFT protocols is indeed to make them as resilient as crash fault-tolerant (CFT) protocols, which can tolerate up to $f$ faulty replicas using $2f+1$ replicas.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Hard Shell, Reliable Core: Improving Resilience in Replicated Systems with Selective Hybridization
ShellFT enables selective Byzantine fault tolerance at the granularity of individual protocol micro-replicas, reducing diversification costs to 29-46% of baseline compared with full hybrid approaches.
-
Not eXactly Byzantine: Efficient and Resilient TEE-Based State Machine Replication
NxBFT is a TEE-based, asynchronous, leaderless DAG consensus protocol that achieves the highest throughput in the authors' comparison against MinBFT and Chained-Damysus for up to 40 replicas, at the cost of higher lat...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.