REVIEW 1 cited by
Dynamic Function Market Maker
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Decentralised automated market makers (AMMs) have gained significant attention recently. We propose an adaptive and automated Dynamic Function Market Maker (DFMM) that addresses challenges in this space. Our DFMM protocol includes a data aggregator and an order routing mechanism. It synchronises price-sensitive market information, asserting the principle of one price, and ensuring market efficiency. The data aggregator includes a virtual order book, asserting efficient asset pricing by staying synchronised with information from external venues, including competitors. The protocol's rebalancing and order routing method optimises inventory risk through arbitrageurs, who are more likely to assist DFMM, enhancing protocol stability. DFMM incorporates protective buffers with non-linear derivative instruments to manage risk and mitigate losses caused by market volatility. The protocol employs an algorithmic accounting-asset, connecting all pools and resolving the issue of segregated pools and risk transfer. The settlement process is entirely protocol-driven, maximising risk management efficiency, and eliminating subjective market risk assessments. In essence, DFMM offers a fully automated, decentralised, and robust solution for automated market making. It aims to provide long-term viability and stability in an asset class that demands robustness.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
IntraLayer: A Platform of Digital Finance Platforms
IntraLayer is a proposed decentralized hub that aggregates data, value, and liquidity across blockchains, but the paper provides only an unsolved framework rather than a working result.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.