Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

BlenderGym: Benchmarking Foundational Model Systems for Graphics Editing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.01786 v1 pith:C52QVDZV submitted 2025-04-02 cs.GR cs.LG

classification cs.GRcs.LG
keywords editingtasksblendergymgraphicsinferencescalinggenerationprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

3D graphics editing is crucial in applications like movie production and game design, yet it remains a time-consuming process that demands highly specialized domain expertise. Automating this process is challenging because graphical editing requires performing a variety of tasks, each requiring distinct skill sets. Recently, vision-language models (VLMs) have emerged as a powerful framework for automating the editing process, but their development and evaluation are bottlenecked by the lack of a comprehensive benchmark that requires human-level perception and presents real-world editing complexity. In this work, we present BlenderGym, the first comprehensive VLM system benchmark for 3D graphics editing. BlenderGym evaluates VLM systems through code-based 3D reconstruction tasks. We evaluate closed- and open-source VLM systems and observe that even the state-of-the-art VLM system struggles with tasks relatively easy for human Blender users. Enabled by BlenderGym, we study how inference scaling techniques impact VLM's performance on graphics editing tasks. Notably, our findings reveal that the verifier used to guide the scaling of generation can itself be improved through inference scaling, complementing recent insights on inference scaling of LLM generation in coding and math tasks. We further show that inference compute is not uniformly effective and can be optimized by strategically distributing it between generation and verification.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LL3M: Large Language 3D Modelers

    cs.GR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM system generates editable 3D assets as Blender Python code, using documentation retrieval and visual self-critique to refine results.

  2. BlenderFusion: 3D-Grounded Visual Editing and Generative Compositing

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dual-stream diffusion model trained with Blender-render conditioning, source masking, and object jittering performs 3D-grounded multi-object editing and compositing better than existing baselines on three video datasets.

Pith tools