REVIEW
Copula Correlation: An Equitable Dependence Measure and Extension of Pearson's Correlation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Copula Correlation: An Equitable Dependence Measure and Extension of Pearson's Correlation
read the original abstract
In Science, Reshef et al. (2011) proposed the concept of equitability for measures of dependence between two random variables. To this end, they proposed a novel measure, the maximal information coefficient (MIC). Recently a PNAS paper (Kinney and Atwal, 2014) gave a mathematical definition for equitability. They proved that MIC in fact is not equitable, while a fundamental information theoretic measure, the mutual information (MI), is self-equitable. In this paper, we show that MI also does not correctly reflect the proportion of deterministic signals hidden in noisy data. We propose a new equitability definition based on this scenario. The copula correlation (Ccor), based on the L1-distance of copula density, is shown to be equitable under both definitions. We also prove theoretically that Ccor is much easier to estimate than MI. Numerical studies illustrate the properties of the measures.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.