Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Elastic Curves via Geometric Mechanics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Elastic curves are length critical points at fixed area and volume.

desk verdict A genuinely new discrete elastica formulation from the isoperimetric characterization, with solid self-contained proofs and convincing numerics; the Hamiltonian-flow section rests on an unproved spectral gap the authors explicitly flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29654 v1 pith:C63F3VZJ submitted 2026-07-31 math.DG cs.GRmath-phmath.MPmath.SG

Oliver Gross , Rohit Jammula , Albert Chern This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGcs.GRmath-phmath.MPmath.SG MSC 53A0453D2049K1037K1065D18
keywords elasticcurveselasticaisoperimetriccharacterizationgeometricmechanicsmomentummapMarsden–WeinsteinformdiscretedifferentialgeometryHamiltoniancurveflows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a new characterization of elastic curves (the equilibrium shapes of thin elastic rods): a curve is elastic precisely when it is a critical point of length with the area vector and volume vector held fixed. Because length, area, and volume are first-order integral quantities, this isoperimetric formulation lowers the order of the variational problem from fourth to second order. These same quantities are defined canonically on polygonal curves by integrating over the straight edges, so the discrete definition needs no discretized curvature, torsion, or material frames. The paper identifies the area and volume vectors as the momentum variables (the conserved charges) of rigid-motion symmetry, giving the constraints a mechanical meaning. The same momentum structure generates a discrete Marsden–Weinstein pre-symplectic form, which yields Hamiltonian analogues of tangent, vortex-filament, and mKdV flows on polygons.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the triple of first-order integrals (length L, area vector A = 1/2 ∮ γ×γ′ ds, volume vector V = 1/3 ∮ γ×(γ×γ′) ds) together with the Marsden–Weinstein form Ω(ξ,η) = ∫ det(ξ, η, γ′) ds. Under an orientation-preserving rigid motion (Q,c), the pair (V,A) transforms by the coadjoint action of SE(3), which is exactly the transformation law of momenta; restricting to the monodromy centralizer gives a momentum map whose components are the admissible constraints. The paper proves that stationarity of L with these components fixed is equivalent to the classical elastica equation, and then transfers the integral formulas to polygons by exact edgewise integration. The discret

What would settle it

Compute the generalized eigenvalues of Ω X = λ M X for a sequence of polygons refining a fixed smooth curve; if the N smallest eigenvalues do not stay separated from the ±i branches (the spectral gap closes), the discrete vortex-filament and mKdV vector fields are ill-defined. A second decisive test: refine a polygonal solution of the discrete isoperimetric problem and check that the vertex curves converge to a smooth elastica at the expected quadratic rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Core claim: a curve is elastic iff it is a stationary point of length at fixed monodromy-compatible area and volume vectors. The paper proves this for smooth quasi-periodic curves (Theorem 2.5) and identifies the area/volume pair as the momentum map of the rigid-motion centralizer, transforming by the coadjoint action of SE(3). Evaluating the same integral formulas edgewise on the piecewise-linear interpolant makes the discrete area and volume satisfy exactly the same transformation laws, so discrete elastic curves can be defined as critical points of discrete length at fixed discrete momentum — no discretized curvature, torsion, or frames. The pulled-back Marsden–Weinstein form is a discret

Load-bearing premise

The Hamiltonian-flow construction assumes that the near-zero spectral subspace of the discrete Marsden–Weinstein operator correctly identifies discrete reparametrizations and remains separated from the ±i branches under refinement; this is only verified numerically and is left without proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Elastic curves can be computed as solutions of a second-order constrained minimization (length at fixed area/volume) instead of a fourth-order bending-energy problem, giving better conditioning and quadratic convergence under refinement.
  • The isoperimetric definition applies unchanged to quasi-periodic curves with arbitrary monodromy, unifying closed and open elastica and determining exactly which components of area and volume are well-defined.
  • Polygonal elastic curves inherit the exact SE(3) momentum transformation laws, so the same solver handles all resolutions and monodromy types without curvature or frame discretizations.
  • The discrete Marsden–Weinstein form yields Hamiltonian tangent, vortex-filament, and mKdV flows whose shape preservation and invariants are better than local advection or conformal-flow alternatives in the tested examples.
  • The discrete tangent orbits reproduce the pendulum phase portrait of the classical top analogy directly from the isoperimetric solve, without integrating a separate pendulum equation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the observed spectral gap of the discrete Marsden–Weinstein operator is proved, the Hamiltonian construction would extend to the entire localized-induction hierarchy, not just the three low-order flows, giving a uniform structure-preserving discretization of integrable curve dynamics.
  • Because the isoperimetric formulation uses only first-order integrals, the same momentum-map argument may carry over to curves in other space forms, to rods with variable bending stiffness, or to higher-dimensional elastic objects, where no curvature-free discrete definition currently exists.
  • The visual agreement with sphere-inversion surface constructions suggests a discrete surface theory could be built on these polygonal elastica, but the paper leaves the variational meaning open.
  • The exactness of the discrete momentum map could make this the basis for practical constrained rod optimization in graphics and fabrication, where avoiding curvature estimates is a computational advantage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an isoperimetric characterization of elastic curves: a curve is elastic iff it is a critical point of length under fixed area and volume vectors, interpreted as momentum variables for the rigid-motion symmetries of quasi-periodic curves. It then transfers this structure to polygonal curves by defining discrete area, volume, and Marsden–Weinstein forms through exact integration over piecewise-linear interpolants. Discrete elastica are defined as critical points of discrete length on equal-edge-length polygons with fixed discrete momentum (Definition 4.4, Eq. (19)). The same discrete pre-symplectic form is used to define Hamiltonian tangent, vortex-filament, and mKdV flows on polygons. Appendices C–J contain first-principles proofs of the main smooth and discrete structural results, and numerical experiments validate convergence and conservation properties.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper gives a genuinely curvature-free variational definition of discrete elastica, avoids auxiliary discretizations of curvature/frames, and connects smooth and discrete theories through a common momentum-map and Marsden–Weinstein structure. The main smooth theorem is not borrowed as a black box: Appendix E rederives the quasi-periodic case, and the momentum-map statements are proven in Appendices I–J. The discrete definition has no fitted parameters and yields low-order, well-conditioned optimization problems with quadratic convergence in the reported experiments. The weakest advertised contribution is the Hamiltonian-flow section, which relies on an unproved spectral-gap assumption; this limits the strength of the claims about vortex-filament and mKdV polygon flows but does not affect the isoperimetric elastica definition or the momentum-map characterization.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.1.3–6.3.3 and §8] The discrete Hamiltonian flows are built on the assumption that the spectrum of J_γ splits into N near-zero modes R_γ and 2N branches near ±i, and that R_γ represents discrete reparametrizations. This is supported only numerically (Fig. 14); §8 explicitly states that this splitting 'awaits a rigorous proof' and that such a result 'would in turn control the convergence of the discrete Hamiltonian vector fields built on this spectral gap.' The vortex-filament field in Eq. (28) discards the first N singular modes and inverts the retained block; if the gap closes under refinement or R_γ does not align with reparametrization, the pseudo-inverse is uncontrolled and the Hamiltonian vector fields are not well-defined. Because Hamiltonian polygon flows are an advertised contribution, this is load-bearing. The authors should either prove the spectral gap for the curve classes treated or explicitly
  2. [§7.2.4 and §7.2.3] The paper itself states that the vector fields 'can also depend on how the near-kernel modes are selected or removed, especially at low resolution'. This mode-selection sensitivity is not quantified, and the conservation plots in §7.2.3 report residual rates without a convergence study under refinement. The claim that the Marsden–Weinstein structure 'yields novel approaches to Hamiltonian dynamics' is therefore stronger than the current evidence. I ask for at least a quantitative N-dependence study of the spectral gap and of the conservation defects, or a correspondingly hedged claim.
  3. [§4.3, Proposition 4.2] The proof that the discrete Marsden–Weinstein form is closed is compressed: the sentence about boundary terms at interior vertices canceling is terse. The pullback argument dΩ_MW = d(I^*Ω_MW)=I^*(dΩ_MW)=0 is rigorous once the ambient space of piecewise-linear curves is fixed, but the text should state this clearly so a reader does not confuse the finite-dimensional discrete form with the infinite-dimensional smooth one.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.3, Eq. (18)] The matrix stencil for Ω is clear, but it would help to state explicitly that Ω, like the mass matrix M_γ, depends on γ and must be reassembled at each curve; this is implicit in the notation but worth saying for reproducibility.
  2. [§6.1.2] The caption of Fig. 14 should specify the normalization of the plotted eigenvalues (imaginary parts of the mass-representative spectrum) and how the near-zero cluster is separated from the ±i branches. A threshold-free description in terms of the first N singular values of the mass-coordinate SVD would make the numerical experiment reproducible.
  3. [§2.1.2, Eq. (3)] The notation 'Z_1 = e^{-iΦ_W}W_1' is informal; the right-hand side should read 'the vector obtained by rotating W_1 by angle −Φ_W in the normal plane'. This is a minor clarity issue but may confuse readers not familiar with the complex notation.
  4. [§6.3.2] The definition of X_L^⊥ uses the symbol (·)_⊥ both for removal of R_γ and in the SVD truncation; the parenthetical warning is helpful. It would also be useful to state that discarding 'the first N modes' is an empirical choice tied to the observed spectral gap and not a derived result.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circularity in the main derivation; self-citations are background and the central isoperimetric theorem is re-proved internally.

full rationale

The principal claim—smooth quasi-periodic elastica are critical points of length at fixed monodromy-compatible area/volume (Theorem 2.5, Corollary 2.6)—is not imported from the self-cited Chern et al. [2020] paper. Appendix E proves it from the classical bending-energy Euler–Lagrange equation: Lemma E.3 shows Eq. (32) is equivalent to the standard elastica equation Eq. (5), and Theorem 2.5 uses only compactly supported variations and boundary-cancellation computations. The discrete theory is explicitly a construction: A, V, and ΩMW are defined as pullbacks of the continuous integrals through piecewise-linear interpolation (Section 4.2, Eqs. (16)–(18)), so their transformation laws are inherited, not fitted. Definition 4.4 is a definition of discrete elastica, not a prediction obtained by fitting. No fitted parameter is fed to the numerical method; the optimization (Eqs. (19)–(23)) uses analytic gradients of L and of the momentum constraints. The Hamiltonian-flow section depends on the assumption that the discrete Marsden–Weinstein operator has a separated near-zero spectral subspace R_γ representing reparametrizations; this is only observed numerically and is explicitly left unproved in §8 ('awaits a rigorous proof'), with sensitivity noted in §7.2.4. That is an acknowledged correctness/well-posedness limitation for the vortex-filament and mKdV flows, not a circular derivation. The paper's self-citations (Chern et al. 2020; Pinkall and Gross 2024) provide background and the original observation, but the load-bearing equivalence is re-derived, so they do not make the argument circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted free parameters enter the central derivation; monodromy and momentum data are prescribed inputs to the variational problems. The main axioms are standard variational calculus and smoothness/quasi-periodicity assumptions. The equal-edge gauge is an added discrete modeling choice, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard calculus of variations: fundamental lemma, integration by parts on quasi-periodic curves.
    Used throughout Appendix E for first-variation computations and boundary cancellation.
  • domain assumption Curves are smooth arc-length parametrized immersions; pure half-turn monodromy is excluded.
    Section 2.1 and Section 2.3.1; the half-turn case is excluded because its centralizer has an additional disconnected component.
  • ad hoc to paper Discrete arc-length gauge: discrete elastica are restricted to equal edge lengths (M_g^arc).
    Definition 4.4 and Eq. (19); polygons lack reparametrization invariance, so equal-edge constraints are imposed to fix the gauge. This is a modeling choice rather than a consequence of the smooth theory.
  • domain assumption Discrete mKdV holonomy assumes adjacent polygon edges are not antiparallel.
    Section 6.3.3: discrete parallel transport by minimal rotation requires a well-defined shorter great-circle arc between edge directions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Elastic Curves via Geometric Mechanics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C63F3VZJ

@misc{pith2026260729654,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Elastic Curves via Geometric Mechanics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C63F3VZJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29654}
}
read the original abstract

Elastic curves are the mathematical shapes of thin elastic rods in equilibrium, with deep connections to mechanics, geometry, and computer graphics. Traditionally described as stationary points of bending energy under length and torsion constraints, their rich theory admits many equivalent characterizations. We develop a new one from the viewpoint of geometric mechanics. Our main contribution relies on a lesser-known isoperimetric characterization: a curve is elastic if and only if it is a critical point of the length functional under fixed area and volume vectors. We show that these constraints transform naturally under orientation-preserving rigid body motions, identifying them as momentum variables for these symmetries. This structure suggests a new discrete theory. We show that the low-order integral quantities length, area, and volume vectors are all naturally defined for polygonal curves, leaving the same transformation laws exactly satisfied. The resulting definition of discrete elastic curves in terms of the isoperimetric characterization restricted to discrete polygonal curves is variational, structure-preserving, and requires no auxiliary discretizations of curvature or material frames. Finally, the same structure carries the Marsden--Weinstein form, a canonical (pre-)symplectic structure on the space of curves, to polygonal curves. This yields novel approaches to Hamiltonian dynamics on discrete space curves, including tangent, vortex-filament, and modified Korteweg--de Vries flows.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.29654 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We compute elastic curves from an isoperimetric characterization of smooth elastica that carries over to polygonal curves without requiring auxiliary discretizations of curvature or material frames. The resulting lower-order variational problem can be optimized directly over polygon vertices, is better conditioned, and produces consistent curves across resolutions, providing a canonical notion of discrete elastica t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kirchhoff’s analogy identifies the tangent indicatrix of an elastic space curve with the motion of a Lagrange top (equivalently, a symmetric gyroscope under gravity), whose reduced dynamics are governed by a pendulum equation. A different line preserves the integrable-system characterizations instead. The discrete integrable geometry of curves and lattices was developed in this direction by Doliwa and Santini [1999]… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Under the localized-induction equation, an elastic curve evolves by an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (21 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A quasi-periodic curve with screw monodromy repeats by a rotation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A rigid motion ℎ generally changes the monodromy of a quasi￾periodic curve from 𝑔 to ℎ𝑔ℎ−1 . In the translational example shown, ℎ rotates the translation direction ®𝑏, so ℎ ◦ 𝛾 ∉ M𝑔. Thus only rigid motions in 𝑍 (𝑔) preserve M𝑔. A rigid motion need not preserve the sp…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A quasi-periodic curve with translational monodromy is represented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The intrinsic components of the area vector depend on the mon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The component of the area vector in the projection direction records [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The corresponding component of the volume vector measures the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Evaluating the projected-area formula on the piecewise-linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Exact integration along polygon edges gives a discrete volume vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The two rows show polygonal length minimizers at prescribed area [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Left: Our discrete elastica converge quadratically to the smooth reference solution under refinement. Right: The reduced Hessian of our isoperimetric formulation stays far better conditioned, growing like 𝑁 2 against 𝑁 4 for the bending-energy baseline, as their secon…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The spectrum of J𝛾 is purely imaginary, and for a planar circle, a trefoil knot, and a generic space curve alike it splits under refinement into 𝑁 eigenvalues near 0 along the discrete reparametrization directions and 2𝑁 eigenvalues in two branches approaching ±𝑖, one…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: On the planar bunny, MacCormack advection and the local Möbius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: On a low-resolution fourfold-symmetric elastica, MacCormack [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Evolution of an initially elliptical polygon under the vortex-filament [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The isoperimetric formulation is solved with an augmented La [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_18.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: On a planar star-shaped curve, the Hamiltonian tangent flow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_20.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Solving the discrete isoperimetric problem with prescribed quasi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_19.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Since our theory is formulated for quasi-periodic polygonal curves, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_21.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: mKdV flow. Finally, we test two qualitative signatures of the smooth mKdV flow. The flow preserves spherical curves and admits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: In the continuous theory, the mKdV flow of a spherical space curve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: A cylinder over a planar free elastic curve is a Willmore surface, a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_23.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references

  1. [1]

    S. S. Antman. 2005.Nonlinear Problems of Elasticity(2 ed.). Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol

    2005

  2. [8]

    Constrained Willmore surfaces.Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ.32, 2 (2008), 263–277. R. Casati and F. Bertails-Descoubes

    2008

  3. [12]

    InACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Conference Proceedings

    Interactive Hair Simulation on the GPU using ADMM. InACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Conference Proceedings. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 24, 11 pages. A. Derouet-Jourdan, F. Bertails-Descoubes, G. Daviet, and J. Thollot

    2023

  4. [13]

    Graph.32, 6, Article 159 (2013), 10 pages

    Inverse Dynamic Hair Modeling with Frictional Contact.ACM Trans. Graph.32, 6, Article 159 (2013), 10 pages. A. Derouet-Jourdan, F. Bertails-Descoubes, and J. Thollot

    2013

  5. [19]

    The Design Space of Kirchhoff Rods.ACM Trans. Graph. 42, 5, Article 171 (2023), 20 pages. H. Hasimoto

    2023

  6. [23]

    Skew parallelogram nets and universal factorization.J. Phys. A58, 25 (2025), 255205. T. Hoffmann, J. Steinmeier, and G. Szewieczek

    2025

  7. [25]

    InACM SIGGRAPH 2025 Conference Papers

    Stable Cosserat Rods. InACM SIGGRAPH 2025 Conference Papers. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. G. Kirchhoff

    2025

  8. [34]

    Graph.40, 6, Article 271 (2021), 15 pages

    Generalized Deployable Elastic Geodesic Grids.ACM Trans. Graph.40, 6, Article 271 (2021), 15 pages. U. Pinkall

    2021

Show all 43 references
  1. [40]

    ACM Comput

    Lifted Curls: A Model for Tightly Coiled Hair Simulation.Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact. Tech.6, 2, Article 1 (2023), 19 pages. D. A. Singer

    2023

  2. [41]

    Proc.1002, 1 (2008), 3–32

    Lectures on Elastic Curves and Rods.AIP Conf. Proc.1002, 1 (2008), 3–32. The MathWorks Inc. 2025.MATLAB Optimization Toolbox version: 25.2 (R2025b). Natick, Massachusetts, United States. E.-H. Tjaden. 1991.Einfache elastische Kurven. Ph. D. Dissertation. Technische Universität...

    2008

  3. [42]

    Graph.42, 4 (2023), 1–15

    Computational Exploration of Multistable Elastic Knots.ACM Trans. Graph.42, 4 (2023), 1–15. M. Wardetzky, M. Bergou, D. Harmon, D. Zorin, and E. Grinspun

    2023

  4. [43]

    Aided Geom

    Discrete Quadratic Curvature Energies.Comput. Aided Geom. Des.24, 8–9 (2007), 499–518. A Normal Form of the Monodromy Lemma A.1.For any 𝑔=(𝑅, ®𝑏)∈SE(

    2007

  5. [107]

    Springer, New York. B. Audoly and Y. Pomeau. 2010.Elasticity and Geometry: From Hair Curls to the Non-linear Response of Shells. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Q. Becker, S. Suzuki, Y. Ren, D. Pellis, J. Panetta, and M. Pauly

    2010

  6. [1906]

    Sul moto d’un liquido indefinito con un filetto vorticoso di forma qualunque.Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo22 (1906), 117–135. L.-J. Dandy, M. Vidulis, Y. Ren, and M. Pauly

    1906

  7. [1908]

    Sull’attrazione esercitata da una linea materiale in punti prossimi alla linea stessa.Rend. R. Acc. Lincei17 (1908), 3–15. R. Levien. 2008.The elastica: a mathematical history. Technical Report. UCB/EECS- 2008-103, EECS Department, University of California at Berkeley. J. E. M...

    1908

  8. [1971]

    Motion of a vortex filament and its relation to elastica.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.31, 1 (1971), 293–294. H. Hasimoto

    1971

  9. [1972]

    A soliton on a vortex filament.J. Fl. Mech.51, 3 (1972), 477–485. L. Heller

    1972

  10. [1975]

    There is More than One Way to Frame a Curve.Amer. Math. Monthly 82, 3 (1975), 246–251. A. I. Bobenko, J. M. Sullivan, P. Schröder, and G. M. Ziegler (Eds.). 2008.Discrete Differential Geometry. Oberwolfach Seminars, Vol

    1975

  11. [1983]

    D7, 1-3 (1983), 305–323

    Coadjoint orbits, vortices, and Clebsch variables for incompressible fluids.Phys. D7, 1-3 (1983), 305–323. J. Nocedal and S. J Wright. 2006.Numerical optimization. Springer. D. K. Pai

    1983

  12. [1984]

    The Total Squared Curvature of Closed Curves.J. Diff. Geom.20, 1 (1984), 1–22. J. Langer and D. A. Singer

    1984

  13. [1985]

    Math.81, 2 (1985), 379–386

    Hopf tori in S 3.Invent. Math.81, 2 (1985), 379–386. U. Pinkall and O. Gross. 2024.Differential Geometry: From Elastic Curves to Willmore Surfaces. Birkhäuser. U. Pinkall, B. Springborn, and S. Weißmann

    1985

  14. [1991]

    Rediscovery of Da Rios equations.Nature352, 6336 (1991), 561–562. R. L. Ricca and F. Maggioni

    1991

  15. [1996]

    Lagrangian Aspects of the Kirchhoff Elastic Rod.SIAM Rev.38, 4 (1996), 605–618. T. Levi-Civita

    1996

  16. [1998]

    Spontaneous Helix Hand Reversal and Tendril Perversion in Climbing Plants.Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 7 (1998), 1564–1567. O. Gross, U. Pinkall, and M. Wahl

    1998

  17. [1999]

    Recursion in Curve Geometry.N. Y. J. Math.5 (1999), 25–51. J. Langer and D. A. Singer

    1999

  18. [2002]

    STRANDS: Interactive Simulation of Thin Solids using Cosserat Models. Comput. Graph. Forum21, 3 (2002), 347–352. J. Panetta, M. Konaković-Luković, F. Isvoranu, E. Bouleau, and M. Pauly

    2002

  19. [2003]

    Res.33, 4 (2003), 333–356

    Leapfrogging vortex rings: Hamiltonian structure, geometric phases and discrete reduction.Fluid Dyn. Res.33, 4 (2003), 333–356. A. Shi, H. Wu, J. Parr, A. M. Darke, and T. Kim

    2003

  20. [2005]

    DNA Mechanics.Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng.7, 1 (2005), 21–53. M. Bergou, M. Wardetzky, S. Robinson, B. Audoly, and E. Grinspun

    2005

  21. [2006]

    InACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers

    Super- helices for predicting the dynamics of natural hair. InACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers. ACM, 1180–1187. R. L. Bishop

    2006

  22. [2007]

    A new doubly discrete analogue of smoke ring flow and the real time simulation of fluid flow.J. Phys. A40, 42 (2007), 12563–12576. Y. Ren, U. Kusupati, J. Panetta, F. Isvoranu, D. Pellis, T. Chen, and M. Pauly

    2007

  23. [2008]

    Graph.27, 3 (2008)

    Discrete Elastic Rods.ACM Trans. Graph.27, 3 (2008). F. Bertails, B. Audoly, M.-P. Cani, B. Querleux, F. Leroy, and J.-L. Lévêque

    2008

  24. [2010]

    Graph.29, 6, Article 137 (2010), 10 pages

    Stable Inverse Dynamic Curves.ACM Trans. Graph.29, 6, Article 137 (2010), 10 pages. A. Doliwa and P. M. Santini

    2010

  25. [2013]

    Super Space Clothoids.ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4, Article 48 (2013), 12 pages. A. Chern, F. Knöppel, F. Pedit, and U. Pinkall

    2013

  26. [2014]

    Constrained Willmore Tori and Elastic Curves in 2-Dimensional Space Forms.Commun. Anal. Geom.22, 2 (2014), 343–369. T. Hoffmann

    2014

  27. [2018]

    Forward and Inverse Problems in the Mechanics of Soft Filaments.R. Soc. Open Sci.5, 6 (2018), 171628. A. Goriely and M. Tabor

    2018

  28. [2019]

    Graph.38, 4 (2019)

    X-Shells: A new class of deployable beam structures.ACM Trans. Graph.38, 4 (2019). S. Pillwein, K. Leimer, M. Birsak, and P. Musialski

    2019

  29. [2020]

    Graph.39, 4, Article 125 (2020), 12 pages

    On Elastic Geodesic Grids and Their Planar to Spatial Deployment.ACM Trans. Graph.39, 4, Article 125 (2020), 12 pages. S. Pillwein and P. Musialski

    2020

  30. [2021]

    Graph.40 (2021), 1–20

    The design space of plane elastic curves.ACM Trans. Graph.40 (2021), 1–20. C. Hafner and B. Bickel

    2021

  31. [2022]

    Graph.41, 4, Article 152 (2022), 15 pages

    Umbrella Meshes: Elastic Mechanisms for Freeform Shape Deployment.ACM Trans. Graph.41, 4, Article 152 (2022), 15 pages. R. L. Ricca

    2022

  32. [2023]

    Graph.42, 6, Article 173 (2023), 17 pages

    C-shells: Deployable Gridshells with Curved Beams.ACM Trans. Graph.42, 6, Article 173 (2023), 17 pages. C. J. Benham and S. P. Mielke

    2023

  33. [2024]

    Graph.43, 6, Article 214 (2024), 13 pages

    Tencers: Tension-Constrained Elastic Rods.ACM Trans. Graph.43, 6, Article 214 (2024), 13 pages. G. Daviet

    2024

  34. [2025]

    Studies in Appl

    Elastic Curves With Variable Bending Stiffness. Studies in Appl. Math.155, 2 (2025), e70097. C. Hafner and B. Bickel

    2025

  35. [2026]

    Discrete curve theory in space forms: planar elastic and area-constrained elastic curves.Beit. Alg. Geom.67 (2026), 503–548. J. Hsu, T. Wang, K. Wu, and C. Yuksel

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.