Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 107 references

A first look at rocky exoplanets with JWST

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The first JWST surveys of rocky exoplanets have not yet found a single confirmed atmosphere, and the thermal emission data point toward bare rocks or very thin atmospheres on the hot planets observed so far.

desk verdict A solid, well-caveated review that will become the field's status-quo citation; the ensemble average is illustrative, not load-bearing. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00933 v1 pith:C6SAJ7N5 submitted 2025-07-01 astro-ph.EP

Laura Kreidberg , Kevin B. Stevenson This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords rockyexoplanetatmospheresJWSTtransmissionspectroscopythermalemissionsecondaryeclipseM-dwarfplanetscarbondioxidestellarcontamination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper synthesizes the first JWST results on rocky exoplanets and argues that, despite milestones such as the most precise transmission spectra to date and the first thermal emission detections of rocky worlds below 800 K, no atmosphere has been conclusively detected. In transmission, the best spectra rule out hydrogen-rich and cloud-free water-rich compositions, but the features of heavier, more plausible atmospheres remain below the noise, and some tentative detections may be stellar contamination. In thermal emission, the seven measured planets all show daysides close to the theoretical maximum for a zero-albedo bare rock, with an ensemble average of $0.95 \pm 0.01$ times that maximum, consistent with bare rock surfaces or atmospheres thinner than about 10 bar. The paper therefore concludes that thick, CO$_2$-rich atmospheres are generally absent from the hot, close-in sample, which would imply a limited initial volatile inventory or very early atmospheric escape. This matters because whether small planets retain atmospheres is the central unknown for their habitability.

What carries the argument

The central quantitative object is the dayside brightness temperature measured during a secondary eclipse, when the planet passes behind its star, normalized to the theoretical maximum for a zero-albedo bare rock, $T_{\mathrm{B,max}}$. The paper compares seven such measurements against models of full heat redistribution and of a 10-bar pure CO$_2$ atmosphere, using the heat-redistribution parameter $f$: a bare rock with no day-to-night transport has a hot dayside, while a thick atmosphere redistributes heat and cools the dayside. In transmission, the matching machinery is the atmospheric scale height $H$, the characteristic vertical length of the atmosphere, which shrinks as mean molecular weight rises; all spectra are normalized in units of $H$ to compare feature amplitudes, and the proposed 'five scale height challenge' sets the precision target for detecting CO$_2$ in a nitrogen-dominated atmosphere at 4.3 µm.

What would settle it

A JWST/MIRI eclipse observation of a hot rocky planet showing a 15-µm brightness temperature well below the $0.95 \pm 0.01$ bare-rock ensemble average together with a hotter 12.8-µm point would indicate a thick CO$_2$ atmosphere with a thermal inversion, falsifying the paper's no-thick-atmosphere conclusion. The joint 15-µm phase curve of TRAPPIST-1b and c described in the paper would also falsify the bare-rock picture for at least one planet if it detects substantial day-night heat redistribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that JWST's first look at rocky exoplanets has produced precise spectra yet no definitive atmospheric detection. The published transmission spectra are mostly flat or ambiguous: flat spectra for TOI-836b, LHS 475b, GJ 341b, and L 98-59c cannot distinguish clouds, high-mean-molecular-weight atmospheres, or airless surfaces, while tentative water features on GJ 486b and GJ 1132b and a possible sulfur feature on L 98-59d are either marginal or plausibly caused by unocculted starspots. Emission measurements of seven planets—TRAPPIST-1b and c, GJ 1132b, GJ 486b, GJ 367b, LTT 1445Ab, and LHS 1478b—show hot daysides near the zero-albedo bare-rock maximum; the ensemble is consistent with a relative brightness temperature of $0.95 \pm 0.01$ times that maximum, which corresponds to a Bond albedo of $0.15 \pm 0.03$ if the planets are airless. These data are compatible with bare rocks or atmospheres with surface pressure below about 10 bar and, assuming cloud-free atmosphere models, generally rule out thick CO$_2$-rich atmospheres; for TRAPPIST-1c, Venus-like CO$_2$ compositions are disfavored even when sulfuric-acid clouds are included. The absence of strong CO$_2$ features leads the authors to infer a limited initial volatile inventory or early atmospheric escape, and they frame a 'five scale height challenge' as the precision needed to detect CO$_2$ in a nitrogen-rich atmosphere.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on treating the seven published eclipse measurements as equally reliable; if the instrument noise that affected one of them, or the multiple possible interpretations of two others, are underestimated, the average temperature that rules out thick atmospheres could move.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the ensemble result holds, thick CO$_2$-rich atmospheres like Venus's are rare or absent on hot, close-in rocky planets, implying that large volatile inventories were either never delivered or were lost very early in these planets' lives.
  • The bare-rock interpretation implies a low Bond albedo of $0.15 \pm 0.03$ for the sample, consistent with dark basaltic surfaces, so thermal emission is a relatively efficient probe for the hottest rocky planets.
  • Future atmospheric detections are more likely for cooler planets on the atmosphere-retaining side of the cosmic shoreline and for transmission spectra pushed to the five-scale-height precision level, rather than for more eclipses of these hot targets.
  • Stellar contamination from unocculted starspots and faculae, not instrument noise, is emerging as the main obstacle to precise transmission spectra of M-dwarf rocky planets; back-to-back transit observations of multi-planet systems offer a promising correction.
  • Flat transmission spectra alone cannot distinguish high-altitude clouds, high-mean-molecular-weight atmospheres, or bare rock surfaces, so multi-wavelength eclipse photometry and phase curves are needed to break this degeneracy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that if the bare-rock pattern holds for additional hot rocky planets, the default outcome of formation around M dwarfs at high irradiation is severe volatile depletion, which would shift the search for habitable atmospheres toward cooler planets and earlier-type host stars than the current sample.
  • A testable extension the paper does not develop: measuring eclipse color ratios, such as 12.8 versus 15 µm, can separate a bare rock from a CO$_2$ emission feature produced by a thermal inversion, so even one additional multi-band eclipse of a hot rocky planet would sharpen the ensemble constraint.
  • We infer that the five-scale-height challenge is achievable on the brightest targets within a few JWST cycles; if those deeper transmission spectra still show no molecular features, the conclusion that rocky M-dwarf planets rarely retain atmospheres would be substantially strengthened.
  • If thick CO$_2$ atmospheres are genuinely absent while CO$_2$ is expected to resist escape, then the volatile budget of rocky planet formation may be the binding constraint, and atmospheric escape models would need to explain how even heavy species are removed before a thick atmosphere can accumulate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a review-style synthesis, by two leading observers, of the first JWST results on rocky exoplanet atmospheres. Section 1 covers transmission spectroscopy: the authors find that current spectra, though the most precise ever obtained for rocky planets, are sensitive only to cloud-free, water-rich (mu = 18 g/mol) compositions; none of the published spectra reaches the precision needed to detect features in N2-, O2-, or CO2-dominated atmospheres, and the tentative detections (GJ 486b, GJ 1132b, L 98-59d, LHS 1140b) are either consistent with stellar contamination or not yet confirmed. Section 2 covers thermal emission: seven planets have published eclipse measurements, the daysides are hot (ensemble weighted mean TB = 0.95 +/- 0.01 x TB,max, chi^2_nu = 1.9, 7 dof), which the authors interpret as consistent with bare rocks or low surface pressure (< 10 bar) atmospheres, and thick CO2-rich atmospheres are generally disfavored assuming cloud-free models. Section 3 discusses implications for volatile inventories and escape, proposes a 'five scale height challenge' for future transmission spectroscopy, and notes the limits of current data, including stellar contamination and cloud degeneracies.

Significance. The synthesis, if accepted, provides a coherent and timely status report on a flagship JWST science theme. The paper's strengths are its explicit conditionality (the CO2 exclusion is tied to cloud-free models, with the TRAPPIST-1c cloudy case cited), its transparent reporting of the ensemble statistic (chi^2_nu and dof are given, and the paper notes the result is driven by the four hottest, most precise planets), its public data release of binned spectra on Zenodo, and its concrete, falsifiable proposal (the five scale height challenge). The review is faithful to the cited literature and appropriately cautious about tentative detections and systematics. Its principal limitations are inherent to a synthesis: the ensemble average weights heterogeneous measurements equally, and the quantitative elements (the 0.95 +/- 0.01 ratio and the derived albedo) are illustrative rather than decisive, since the qualitative conclusion is supported independently by the most precise individual eclipses.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3 Discussion; Materials and Methods] The paper's only quantitative derivation in the Discussion states that the mean brightness-temperature ratio 0.95 +/- 0.01 x TB,max 'corresponds to' a Bond albedo of AB = 0.15 +/- 0.03. The conversion is not shown in the text. Using the standard relation AB = 1 - (TB/TB,max)^4 in the Mansfield et al. (2019) framework that is cited for the normalization (Materials and Methods, Eq. 6 of ref. 107) yields AB about 0.19 +/- 0.03, which is roughly 0.04 higher than the quoted central value. If a bandpass color correction or a non-unity surface emissivity is responsible for the difference, that assumption should be stated; otherwise the value should be corrected or re-derived. This is a local issue that does not change the qualitative bare-rock interpretation, but as printed the reported albedo is not reproducible from the information given.
  2. [Section 2 Thermal emission, Fig. 4] The weighted average is quoted with chi^2_nu = 1.9 and 7 degrees of freedom, which is consistent with 8 data points and 1 fitted parameter, i.e., the fit treats the two TRAPPIST-1b bandpass measurements (12.8 and 15 microns) as independent and includes LHS 1478b even though its eclipse measurement is flagged as affected by instrument systematics. If the two TRAPPIST-1b points are not independent (the 12.8 and 15 micron eclipse depths are analyzed jointly in Ducrot et al. 2025), the effective number of degrees of freedom and the reported consistency ('1.8 sigma') change. Please state the assumed covariance and, as a robustness check, recompute the ensemble mean and albedo with TRAPPIST-1b collapsed to a single point and with LHS 1478b excluded.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Fig. 4 caption] The phrase 'consistent within 1.8 sigma' is ambiguous: it could mean the maximum residual of any individual planet from the weighted mean, or the normal-equivalent significance of the chi^2_nu = 1.9 goodness-of-fit (7 dof); please state explicitly which quantity the 1.8 sigma refers to.
  2. [Section 1 Transmission] The comparison between GJ 341b (11 ppm average uncertainty) and GJ 486b (3.8 scale heights average uncertainty) should state that both figures are computed at the same uniform 50 nm binning, so the reader can compare them directly.
  3. [References] Many journal names and author names are corrupted in the reference list (e.g., 'A@AND@A' instead of 'A&A' in refs 5, 6, 13, 15, 26, 33, 41, 45, 47, 59, 62, 68, 72, 75, 80, 91, 94, 101, 103, 105; 'RAS T ech. Instruments' in ref 93; 'Y aeger' in refs 40 and 51); these must be corrected in the published version.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption says 'The gray regions, which are 5H in height,' but the figure appears to show a single gray band labeled 5 scale heights; please make the plural/singular usage consistent and clarify whether the band marks the vertical (relative transit depth) scale or the horizontal scale.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is a synthesis of externally published measurements, and its new quantitative summaries are descriptive rather than derived from its own assumptions.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no step in which a claimed prediction or first-principles result is equivalent to its inputs by construction. The paper is a review/synthesis: the transmission and emission constraints are taken from externally published, independently reduced JWST measurements (e.g., refs 49, 54, 61, 73–80), not derived in this manuscript. The one new quantitative element — the ensemble brightness temperature 0.95 ± 0.01 × T_B,max — is a weighted average of those published values, normalized by Equation 6 of Mansfield et al. (2019), an external formula; it is descriptive, and the paper explicitly says it is driven by the most precise individual measurements and flags LHS 1478b's systematics. The Bond albedo 0.15 ± 0.03 is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction; it is a stated algebraic consequence of adopting the bare-rock model, and the paper immediately lists degeneracies with surface texture and wavelength-dependent albedo. The central qualitative conclusions are explicitly conditional ("assuming cloud-free atmosphere models") and independently supported by the cited eclipse analyses; the TRAPPIST-1c cloud-inclusive constraint is also cited. The "five scale height challenge" is a proposed observing goal, not a result derived from the authors' assumptions. Self-citations (Kreidberg et al. 2019; Wordsworth & Kreidberg 2022; Morley et al. 2017) supply background and prior work, but they are not load-bearing: no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' own previous papers to force the conclusions. Accordingly, the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities; the analysis re-normalizes published measurements and compares them to published model grids. The axioms are standard domain assumptions inherited from the cited literature.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption 10 bar marks the boundary between thin and thick atmospheres, at which full day-to-night heat redistribution is expected (Koll 2022)
    Used to define 'thick' atmospheres and interpret dayside temperatures as surface pressure proxies.
  • domain assumption Figure 3 normalizes transmission spectra to scale heights assuming a pure nitrogen atmosphere (µ=28)
    Presentation choice; affects the interpretation of which compositions are detectable.
  • domain assumption The 10-bar pure CO2 atmosphere model grid from Malik et al. (2019) with full heat redistribution, no clouds, surface albedo 0.1, and host star Teff=3200K is used as the reference for disfavoring thick CO2 atmospheres
    The conclusion that CO2-rich atmospheres are ruled out depends on this model grid.
  • domain assumption The cosmic shoreline concept (Zahnle & Catling 2017) is used to argue which planets are likely to retain atmospheres
    Used to motivate observing cooler planets; the shoreline is qualitative and its location for other stars is poorly known, as acknowledged.
  • domain assumption The Transit Light Source effect is assumed to be the dominant source of stellar contamination, and contamination corrections from the cited papers are accepted
    The interpretation of featureless and slightly featured spectra depends on these corrections.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A first look at rocky exoplanets with JWST." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C6SAJ7N5

@misc{pith2026250700933,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A first look at rocky exoplanets with JWST},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C6SAJ7N5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00933}
}
abstract

Rocky exoplanet characterization has been a top priority for early James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) science operations. Several milestones have been achieved, including the most precise rocky planet transmission spectra measured to date, and the first detection of thermal emission for rocky worlds below 800 Kelvin. Despite these advances, no atmospheres have been definitively detected. Several transmission spectra show tentative evidence for molecular absorption features, but these hints are marginally significant and the spectra may be affected by stellar contamination. Features from many plausible atmospheres, including those dominated by oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide, are below the current noise level. Meanwhile, the emerging picture from thermal emission spectra is that the planets have hot daysides, consistent with either a bare rock composition or low surface pressure atmospheres (< 10 bar). Higher surface pressures and high carbon dioxide abundances are generally ruled out, assuming cloud-free atmosphere models. The absence of strong CO$_2$ features hints at a limited initial volatile inventory or rapid atmospheric escape during the planets' early lifetimes. Taken together, these results motivate a push towards higher precision data, as well as observations of cooler planets that may be more likely to retain atmospheres. As a goal for future transmission spectroscopy, we suggest a "five scale height challenge," to achieve the precision necessary to detect CO$_2$ features in nitrogen-rich atmospheres. Detecting rocky planet atmospheres remains challenging, but with JWST's excellent performance and a continuing investment of telescope time, we are optimistic these uncharted atmospheres will be detected in coming years.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00933 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Rocky planets with approved JWST transit and eclipse observations in Cycles 1 – 4, relative to their escape velocity and lifetime X-ray and UV (XUV) irradiation (adapated from 29). Cumulative XUV radiation is normalized relative to that of the Earth. The XUV flux is calculated for a constant system age; a reasonable assumption given that the majority of XUV flux is emitted in the first Gyr of the stars’ lifetimes. T… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Best-fit model to an empirical transmission spectrum of the cloudless Earth in units of scale height, H (adapted from (40)). Different colors indicate the contributions from various molecules. Despite its relatively low abundance, CO2 has the most prominent spectral features (at 2.7 and 4.3 µm), making it an ideal molecule to search for in exoplanet atmospheres. The strength of different absorption peaks is sensitiv… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows a family portrait of currently published transmission spectra. The planets are sorted by tempera￾ture, ranging from Teq = 170−870 K, and are normalized by their respective atmospheric scale heights assuming a pure nitrogen atmosphere (µ = 28 g/mol). Thus far, none of these planets have the requisite precision to detect an Earth-like atmosphere (shown in blue); however, the 1 2 3 4 5 Wavelength ( m) 0 40 80 120… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: JWST measurements of dayside brightness temperature for rocky planets, compared to predictions from theoretical models. The values are normalized relative to the theoretical maximum dayside temperature for a bare rock at each equilibrium temperature, and the twin…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    As illustrated in Figure 2, planets have a larger transit depth at wavelengths where the atmosphere is more opaque (42)

    Transmission Spectroscopy Transmission spectra measure the wavelength-dependent size of a planet during its transit. As illustrated in Figure 2, planets have a larger transit depth at wavelengths where the atmosphere is more opaque (42). The amplitude of spectral features is set by 4 5 6 7 8 910 20 30 40 Escape Velocity (km/s) 100 101 102 103 Cumulative X...

  2. [2]

    To measure thermal emission, the typical approach is to observe a secondary eclipse, when the planet passes behind the star

    Thermal emission Thermal emission measurements are complementary to transmission spectroscopy. To measure thermal emission, the typical approach is to observe a secondary eclipse, when the planet passes behind the star. This enables an estimate of the brightness temperature of the planet’s dayside, due to the drop in flux during the eclipse. Full-orbit ph...

  3. [3]

    five scale height challenge

    Discussion and Future Prospects In its first few years, JWST has achieved several observational milestones for rocky exoplanets, including the most precise transmission spectra to date and the first thermal emission detection for planets below 800 Kelvin. Nevertheless, despite these breakthroughs, JWST still has not definitively detected an atmosphere on ...

    2025

  4. [4]

    ApJ 807, 45 (2015)

    CD Dressing, D Charbonneau, The Occurrence of Potentially Habitable Planets Orbiting M Dwarfs Estimated from the Full Kepler Dataset and an Empirical Measurement of the Detection Sensitivity. ApJ 807, 45 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Astrophys

    EA Petigura, GW Marcy, AW Howard, A Plateau in the Planet Population below Twice the Size of Earth. Astrophys. J. 770, 69 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    C Dorn, et al., Can we constrain the interior structure of rocky exoplanets from mass and radius measurements? A@AND@A 577, A83 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    ApJ 924, 134 (2022)

    DDB Koll, A Scaling for Atmospheric Heat Redistribution on Tidally Locked Rocky Planets. ApJ 924, 134 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    J de Wit, et al., A combined transmission spectrum of the Earth-sized exoplanets TRAPPIST -1 b and c.Nature 537, 69–72 (2016)

    2016

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    J de Wit, et al., Atmospheric reconnaissance of the habitable-zone Earth-sized planets orbiting TRAPPIST -1.Nat. Astron. 2, 214–219 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    AJ 156, 42 (2018)

    H Diamond-Lowe, Z Berta-Thompson, D Charbonneau, EMR Kempton, Ground-based Optical Transmission Spectroscopy of the Small, Rocky Exoplanet GJ 1132b. AJ 156, 42 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    HR Wakeford, TJ Wilson, KB Stevenson, NK Lewis, Exoplanet Atmosphere Forecast: Observers Should Expect Spectroscopic Transmission Features to be Muted to 33%. Res. Notes Am. Astron. Soc . 3, 7 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    AJ 160, 27 (2020)

    H Diamond-Lowe, Z Berta-Thompson, D Charbonneau, J Dittmann, EMR Kempton, Simultaneous Optical Transmission Spectroscopy of a Terrestrial, Habitable-zone Exoplanet with Two Ground-based Multiobject Spectrographs. AJ 160, 27 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    AJ 160, 188 (2020)

    H Diamond-Lowe, D Charbonneau, M Malik, EMR Kempton, Y Beletsky, Optical Transmission Spectroscopy of the Terrestrial Exoplanet LHS 3844b from 13 Ground-based Transit Observations. AJ 160, 188 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    AJ 161, 44 (2021)

    B Edwards, et al., Hubble WFC3 Spectroscopy of the Habitable-zone Super-Earth LHS 1140 b. AJ 161, 44 (2021)

    2021

  7. [16]

    LJ Garcia, et al., HST/WFC3 transmission spectroscopy of the cold rocky planet TRAPPIST -1h.A@AND@A 665, A19 (2022)

    2022

  8. [17]

    Nature 573, 87–90 (2019)

    L Kreidberg, et al., Absence of a thick atmosphere on the terrestrial exoplanet LHS 3844b. Nature 573, 87–90 (2019)

    2019

  9. [18]

    A@AND@A 664, A79 (2022)

    S Zieba, et al., K2 and Spitzer phase curves of the rocky ultra-short-period planet K2-141 b hint at a tenuous rock vapor atmosphere. A@AND@A 664, A79 (2022)

    2022

  10. [19]

    ApJL 937, L17 (2022)

    IJM Crossfield, et al., GJ 1252b: A Hot Terrestrial Super-Earth with No Atmosphere. ApJL 937, L17 (2022)

    2022

  11. [20]

    Nature 532, 207–209 (2016)

    BO Demory, et al., A map of the large day-night temperature gradient of a super-Earth exoplanet. Nature 532, 207–209 (2016)

    2016

  12. [21]

    The Astron

    I Angelo, R Hu, A case for an atmosphere on super-earth 55 cancri e. The Astron. J . 154, 232 (2017)

    2017

  13. [22]

    ApJ 849, 152 (2017)

    M Hammond, RT Pierrehumbert, Linking the Climate and Thermal Phase Curve of 55 Cancri e. ApJ 849, 152 (2017)

    2017

  14. [23]

    AJ 164, 204 (2022)

    SJ Mercier, L Dang, A Gass, NB Cowan, TJ Bell, Revisiting the Iconic Spitzer Phase Curve of 55 Cancri e: Hotter Dayside, Cooler Nightside, and Smaller Phase Offset. AJ 164, 204 (2022)

    2022

  15. [24]

    ApJL 948, L20 (2023)

    R Hu, F Gaillard, ES Kite, Narrow Loophole for H2-Dominated Atmospheres on Habitable Rocky Planets around M Dwarfs. ApJL 948, L20 (2023)

    2023

  16. [25]

    Astrobiology 7, 85–166 (2007)

    J Scalo, et al., M Stars as Targets for Terrestrial Exoplanet Searches And Biosignature Detection. Astrobiology 7, 85–166 (2007)

    2007

  17. [26]

    Astrobiology 7, 30–65 (2007)

    JC Tarter, et al., A Reappraisal of The Habitability of Planets around M Dwarf Stars. Astrobiology 7, 30–65 (2007)

    2007

  18. [27]

    PhR 663, 1 (2016)

    AL Shields, S Ballard, JA Johnson, The habitability of planets orbiting M-dwarf stars. PhR 663, 1 (2016)

    2016

  19. [28]

    Astrobiology 18, 630–662 (2018)

    VS Meadows, et al., Exoplanet Biosignatures: Understanding Oxygen as a Biosignature in the Context of Its Environment. Astrobiology 18, 630–662 (2018)

    2018

  20. [29]

    ARA@AND@A 60, 159–201 (2022)

    R Wordsworth, L Kreidberg, Atmospheres of Rocky Exoplanets. ARA@AND@A 60, 159–201 (2022)

    2022

  21. [30]

    S Inutsuka, Y Aikawa, T Muto, K Tomida, M Tamura

    T Lichtenberg, LK Schaefer, M Nakajima, RA Fischer, Geophysical Evolution During Rocky Planet Formation in Protostars and Planets VII , Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, eds. S Inutsuka, Y Aikawa, T Muto, K Tomida, M Tamura. Vol. 534, p. 907 (2023)

    2023

  22. [31]

    arXiv e-prints p

    T Lichtenberg, Y Miguel, Super-Earths and Earth-like Exoplanets. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2405.04057 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  23. [32]

    ApJ 843, 122 (2017)

    KJ Zahnle, DC Catling, The Cosmic Shoreline: The Evidence that Escape Determines which Planets Have Atmospheres, and what this May Mean for Proxima Centauri B. ApJ 843, 122 (2017)

    2017

  24. [33]

    AJ 135, 785–795 (2008)

    AA West, et al., Constraining the Age-Activity Relation for Cool Stars: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 5 Low-Mass Star Spectroscopic Sample. AJ 135, 785–795 (2008)

    2008

  25. [34]

    Astrobiology 15, 119–143 (2015)

    R Luger, R Barnes, Extreme Water Loss and Abiotic O2Buildup on Planets Throughout the Habitable Zones of M Dwarfs. Astrobiology 15, 119–143 (2015)

    2015

  26. [35]

    E Bolmont, et al., Water loss from terrestrial planets orbiting ultracool dwarfs: implications for the planets of TRAPPIST -1.MNRAS 464, 3728–3741 (2017)

    2017

  27. [36]

    M Turbet, et al., Modeling climate diversity, tidal dynamics and the fate of volatiles on TRAPPIST -1 planets.A@AND@A 612, A86 (2018)

    2018

  28. [37]

    MNRAS 489, 196–204 (2019)

    EJR Macdonald, NB Cowan, An empirical infrared transit spectrum of Earth: opacity windows and biosignatures. MNRAS 489, 196–204 (2019)

    2019

  29. [38]

    ApJ 850, 121 (2017)

    CV Morley, L Kreidberg, Z Rustamkulov, T Robinson, JJ Fortney, Observing the Atmospheres of Known Temperate Earth-sized Planets with JWST. ApJ 850, 121 (2017)

    2017

  30. [39]

    AP Lincowski, et al., Evolved Climates and Observational Discriminants for the TRAPPIST -1 Planetary System.ApJ 867, 76 (2018)

    2018

  31. [40]

    G Ortenzi, et al., Mantle redox state drives outgassing chemistry and atmospheric composition of rocky planets. Sci. Reports 10, 10907 (2020)

    2020

  32. [41]

    (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC), (2023)

    E National Academies of Sciences, Medicine, Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s . (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC), (2023)

    2023

  33. [42]

    SP Quanz, et al., Large Interferometer For Exoplanets (LIFE). I. Improved exoplanet detection yield estimates for a large mid-infrared space-interferometer mission. A@AND@A 664, A21 (2022)

    2022

  34. [43]

    PSJ 4, 170 (2023)

    J Lustig-Y aeger, VS Meadows, D Crisp, MR Line, TD Robinson, Earth as a Transiting Exoplanet: A Validation of Transmission Spectroscopy and Atmospheric Retrieval Methodologies for Terrestrial Exoplanets. PSJ 4, 170 (2023)

    2023

  35. [44]

    Y B ´etr´emieux, L Kaltenegger, Impact of Atmospheric Refraction: How Deeply can We Probe Exo-Earth’s Atmospheres during Primary Eclipse Observations? ApJ 791, 7 (2014)

    2014

  36. [45]

    HJ Deeg, JA Belmonte

    L Kreidberg, Exoplanet Atmosphere Measurements from Transmission Spectroscopy and Other Planet Star Combined Light Observations in Handbook of Exoplanets , eds. HJ Deeg, JA Belmonte. p. 100 (2018)

    2018

  37. [46]

    S Seager

    S Seager, JJ Lissauer, Introduction to Exoplanets , ed. S Seager. pp. 3–13 (2010)

    2010

  38. [47]

    Astrophys

    L Kaltenegger, WA Traub, Transits of Earth-like Planets. Astrophys. J. 698, 519–527 (2009)

    2009

  39. [48]

    Astrobiology 5, 706–725 (2005)

    A Segura, et al., Biosignatures from Earth-Like Planets Around M Dwarfs. Astrobiology 5, 706–725 (2005)

    2005

  40. [49]

    ApJ 809, 57 (2015)

    S Rugheimer, L Kaltenegger, A Segura, J Linsky, S Mohanty, Effect of UV Radiation on the Spectral Fingerprints of Earth-like Planets Orbiting M Stars. ApJ 809, 57 (2015)

    2015

  41. [50]

    A@AND@A 624, A49 (2019)

    F Wunderlich, et al., Detectability of atmospheric features of Earth-like planets in the habitable zone around M dwarfs. A@AND@A 624, A49 (2019)

    2019

  42. [51]

    Photochemical Responses

    JL Grenfell, et al., Potential Biosignatures in Super-Earth Atmospheres II. Photochemical Responses. Astrobiology 13, 415–438 (2013)

    2013

  43. [52]

    ApJL 948, L11 (2023)

    SE Moran, et al., High Tide or Riptide on the Cosmic Shoreline? A Water-rich Atmosphere or Stellar Contamination for the Warm Super-Earth GJ 486b from JWST Observations. ApJL 948, L11 (2023)

    2023

  44. [53]

    AJ 167, 216 (2024)

    L Alderson, et al., JWST COMPASS: NIRSpec/G395H Transmission Observations of the Super-Earth TOI-836b. AJ 167, 216 (2024)

    2024

  45. [54]

    J Lustig-Y aeger, et al., A JWST transmission spectrum of the nearby Earth-sized exoplanet LHS 475 b. Nat. Astron. 7, 1317–1328 (2023)

    2023

  46. [55]

    AJ 167, 90 (2024)

    J Kirk, et al., JWST/NIRCam Transmission Spectroscopy of the Nearby Sub-Earth GJ 341b. AJ 167, 90 (2024)

    2024

  47. [56]

    arXiv e-prints p

    N Scarsdale, et al., JWST COMPASS: The 3-5 Micron Transmission Spectrum of the Super-Earth L 98-59 c. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2409.07552 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  48. [57]

    ApJL 959, L9 (2023)

    EM May, et al., Double Trouble: Two Transits of the Super-Earth GJ 1132 b Observed with JWST NIRSpec G395H. ApJL 959, L9 (2023)

    2023

  49. [59]

    arXiv e-prints p

    D Apai, et al., Understanding Stellar Contamination in Exoplanet Transmission Spectra as an Essential Step in Small Planet Characterization. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:1803.08708 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  50. [60]

    AJ 162, 300 (2021)

    T Barclay, et al., Stellar Surface Inhomogeneities as a Potential Source of the Atmospheric Signal Detected in the K2-18b Transmission Spectrum. AJ 162, 300 (2021)

    2021

  51. [62]

    ApJL 955, L22 (2023)

    O Lim, et al., Atmospheric Reconnaissance of TRAPPIST -1 b with JWST/NIRISS: Evidence for Strong Stellar Contamination in the Transmission Spectra. ApJL 955, L22 (2023)

    2023

  52. [63]

    K Vida, Z K ˝ov´ari, A P´al, K Ol´ah, L Kriskovics, Frequent Flaring in the TRAPPIST -1 System—Unsuited for Life? ApJ 841, 124 (2017)

    2017

  53. [64]

    arXiv e-prints p

    A Gressier, et al., Hints of a sulfur-rich atmosphere around the 1.6 R ⊕ Super-Earth L98-59 d from JWST NIRSpec G395H transmission spectroscopy. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2408.15855 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  54. [65]

    A@AND@A 653, A41 (2021)

    ODS Demangeon, et al., Warm terrestrial planet with half the mass of Venus transiting a nearby star. A@AND@A 653, A41 (2021)

    2021

  55. [66]

    ApJL 970, L2 (2024)

    C Cadieux, et al., Transmission Spectroscopy of the Habitable Zone Exoplanet LHS 1140 b with JWST/NIRISS. ApJL 970, L2 (2024)

    2024

  56. [67]

    ApJL 968, L22 (2024)

    M Damiano, A Bello-Arufe, J Y ang, R Hu, LHS 1140 b Is a Potentially Habitable Water World. ApJL 968, L22 (2024)

    2024

  57. [68]

    Icarus 225, 781–793 (2013)

    DI Shestopalov, LF Golubeva, EA Cloutis, Optical maturation of asteroid surfaces. Icarus 225, 781–793 (2013)

    2013

  58. [69]

    ApJ 886, 142 (2019)

    M Malik, et al., Analyzing Atmospheric Temperature Profiles and Spectra of M Dwarf Rocky Planets. ApJ 886, 142 (2019)

    2019

  59. [70]

    Icarus 101, 108–128 (1993)

    JF Kasting, DP Whitmire, RT Reynolds, Habitable Zones around Main Sequence Stars. Icarus 101, 108–128 (1993)

    1993

  60. [71]

    ApJ 703, 1884–1889 (2009)

    S Seager, D Deming, On the Method to Infer an Atmosphere on a Tidally Locked Super Earth Exoplanet and Upper Limits to GJ 876d. ApJ 703, 1884–1889 (2009)

    2009

  61. [72]

    F Selsis, RD Wordsworth, F Forget, Thermal phase curves of nontransiting terrestrial exoplanets. I. Characterizing atmospheres. A@AND@A 532, A1 (2011)

    2011

  62. [73]

    ApJ 825, 99 (2016)

    DDB Koll, DS Abbot, Temperature Structure and Atmospheric Circulation of Dry Tidally Locked Rocky Exoplanets. ApJ 825, 99 (2016)

    2016

  63. [74]

    ApJ 886, 140 (2019)

    DDB Koll, et al., Identifying Candidate Atmospheres on Rocky M Dwarf Planets via Eclipse Photometry. ApJ 886, 140 (2019)

    2019

  64. [75]

    ApJS 179, 484–508 (2008)

    BMS Hansen, On the Absorption and Redistribution of Energy in Irradiated Planets. ApJS 179, 484–508 (2008)

    2008

  65. [76]

    Nature 618, 39–42 (2023)

    TP Greene, et al., Thermal emission from the Earth-sized exoplanet TRAPPIST -1 b using JWST. Nature 618, 39–42 (2023)

    2023

  66. [77]

    Nature 620, 746–749 (2023)

    S Zieba, et al., No thick carbon dioxide atmosphere on the rocky exoplanet TRAPPIST -1 c. Nature 620, 746–749 (2023)

    2023

  67. [78]

    E Ducrot, et al., Combined analysis of the 12.8 and 15 µm JWST/MIRI eclipse observations of TRAPPIST -1 b.Nat. Astron. 9, 358–369 (2025)

    2025

  68. [79]

    arXiv e-prints p

    Q Xue, et al., JWST Thermal Emission of the Terrestrial Exoplanet GJ 1132b. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2408.13340 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  69. [80]

    arXiv e-prints p

    M Weiner Mansfield, et al., No Thick Atmosphere on the Terrestrial Exoplanet Gl 486b. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2408.15123 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  70. [81]

    ApJL 961, L44 (2024)

    M Zhang, et al., GJ 367b Is a Dark, Hot, Airless Sub-Earth. ApJL 961, L44 (2024)

    2024

  71. [82]

    arXiv e-prints p

    P Wachiraphan, et al., The Thermal Emission Spectrum of the Nearby Rocky Exoplanet LTT 1445A b from JWST MIRI/LRS. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2410.10987 (2024)

    2024

  72. [83]

    A@AND@A 695, A171 (2025)

    PC August, et al., Hot Rocks Survey I: A possible shallow eclipse for LHS 1478 b. A@AND@A 695, A171 (2025)

    2025

  73. [84]

    Astrobiology 2, 153–181 (2002)

    DJ Des Marais, et al., Remote Sensing of Planetary Properties and Biosignatures on Extrasolar Terrestrial Planets. Astrobiology 2, 153–181 (2002)

    2002

  74. [85]

    ARA@AND@A 55, 433–485 (2017)

    L Kaltenegger, How to Characterize Habitable Worlds and Signs of Life. ARA@AND@A 55, 433–485 (2017)

    2017

  75. [86]

    Astrobiology 18, 739–778 (2018)

    Y Fujii, et al., Exoplanet Biosignatures: Observational Prospects. Astrobiology 18, 739–778 (2018)

    2018

  76. [87]

    ApJL 955, L7 (2023)

    AP Lincowski, et al., Potential Atmospheric Compositions of TRAPPIST -1 c Constrained by JWST/MIRI Observations at 15 µm. ApJL 955, L7 (2023)

    2023

  77. [88]

    ApJL 737, L18 (2011)

    JN Winn, et al., A Super-Earth Transiting a Naked-eye Star. ApJL 737, L18 (2011)

    2011

  78. [89]

    ApJ 860, 122 (2018)

    A Crida, R Ligi, C Dorn, Y Lebreton, Mass, Radius, and Composition of the Transiting Planet 55 Cnc e: Using Interferometry and Correlations. ApJ 860, 122 (2018)

    2018

  79. [90]

    MNRAS 484, 712–727 (2019)

    C Dorn, JHD Harrison, A Bonsor, TO Hands, A new class of Super-Earths formed from high-temperature condensates: HD219134 b, 55 Cnc e, WASP-47 e. MNRAS 484, 712–727 (2019)

    2019

  80. [91]

    ApJL 909, L22 (2021)

    ES Kite, L Schaefer, Water on Hot Rocky Exoplanets. ApJL 909, L22 (2021)

    2021

  81. [92]

    ApJL 922, L4 (2021)

    C Dorn, T Lichtenberg, Hidden Water in Magma Ocean Exoplanets. ApJL 922, L4 (2021)

    2021

  82. [93]

    Nature 630, 609–612 (2024)

    R Hu, et al., A secondary atmosphere on the rocky exoplanet 55 Cancri e. Nature 630, 609–612 (2024)

    2024

  83. [94]

    A@AND@A 690, A159 (2024)

    JA Patel, et al., JWST reveals the rapid and strong day-side variability of 55 Cancri e. A@AND@A 690, A159 (2024). Kreidberg et al. PNAS — August 19, 2025 — vol. XXX — no. XX — 9 3 DISCUSSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

    2024

  84. [95]

    ApJ 853, 122 (2018)

    BV Rackham, D Apai, MS Giampapa, The Transit Light Source Effect: False Spectral Features and Incorrect Densities for M-dwarf Transiting Planets. ApJ 853, 122 (2018)

    2018

  85. [96]

    RAS T ech

    BV Rackham, et al., The effect of stellar contamination on low-resolution transmission spectroscopy: needs identified by NASA’s Exoplanet Exploration Program Study Analysis Group 21. RAS T ech. Instruments 2, 148–206 (2023)

    2023

  86. [97]

    AD Rathcke, et al., Stellar Contamination Correction Using Back-to-back Transits of TRAPPIST -1 b and c.ApJL 979, L19 (2025)

    2025

  87. [98]

    The Astrophys

    R Hu, BL Ehlmann, S Seager, Theoretical spectra of terrestrial exoplanet surfaces. The Astrophys. J. 752, 7 (2012)

    2012

  88. [99]

    ApJL 974, L7 (2024)

    MA Fortin, et al., Lava Worlds Surface Measurements at High Temperatures. ApJL 974, L7 (2024)

    2024

  89. [100]

    arXiv e-prints p

    K Paragas, et al., A New Spectral Library for Modeling the Surfaces of Hot, Rocky Exoplanets. arXiv e-prints p. arXiv:2502.04433 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  90. [101]

    ApJ 765, 131 (2013)

    RK Kopparapu, et al., Habitable Zones around Main-sequence Stars: New Estimates. ApJ 765, 131 (2013)

    2013

  91. [102]

    MNRAS 495, 1–11 (2020)

    J Madden, L Kaltenegger, How surfaces shape the climate of habitable exoplanets. MNRAS 495, 1–11 (2020)

    2020

  92. [103]

    A@AND@A 614, A18 (2018)

    C Dorn, L Noack, AB Rozel, Outgassing on stagnant-lid super-Earths. A@AND@A 614, A18 (2018)

    2018

  93. [104]

    Astrobiology 18, 873–896 (2018)

    BJ Foley, AJ Smye, Carbon Cycling and Habitability of Earth-Sized Stagnant Lid Planets. Astrobiology 18, 873–896 (2018)

    2018

  94. [105]

    A@AND@A 631, A103 (2019)

    DJ Bower, et al., Linking the evolution of terrestrial interiors and an early outgassed atmosphere to astrophysical observations. A@AND@A 631, A103 (2019)

    2019

  95. [106]

    ApJ 861, 38 (2018)

    JL Grenfell, et al., Limitation of Atmospheric Composition by Combustion-Explosion in Exoplanetary Atmospheres. ApJ 861, 38 (2018)

    2018

  96. [107]

    ApJ 703, 905–909 (2009)

    F Tian, Thermal Escape from Super Earth Atmospheres in the Habitable Zones of M Stars. ApJ 703, 905–909 (2009)

    2009

  97. [108]

    KE Teixeira, CV Morley, BJ Foley, CT Unterborn, The Carbon-deficient Evolution of TRAPPIST -1c.ApJ 960, 44 (2024)

    2024

  98. [109]

    K France, et al., The MUSCLES Treasury Survey. I. Motivation and Overview.ApJ 820, 89 (2016)

    2016

  99. [110]

    ApJ 886, 141 (2019)

    M Mansfield, et al., Identifying Atmospheres on Rocky Exoplanets through Inferred High Albedo. ApJ 886, 141 (2019). 10 — www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.XXXXXXXXXX Kreidberg et al

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.