Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Supersymmetric zeta functions and determinants

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Supersymmetric zeta functions turn BPS spectral data into anomaly coefficients and central charges.

desk verdict Systematic zeta-function reformulation of index asymptotics; the new central-charge extraction rests on an unproven but explicitly flagged identification. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.22822 v2 pith:C7SYDFY6 submitted 2025-11-28 hep-th

Yu Nakayama , Tadashi Okazaki This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords supersymmetriczetafunctiondeterminantindexCardy-likelimitCasimirenergycentralchargesanomalycoefficientsBPSdegeneracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces supersymmetric zeta functions and supersymmetric determinants, new spectral objects built from supersymmetric indices via Mellin and Laplace transforms. It claims that the residues and special values of these zeta functions are universally determined by the anomaly coefficients of superconformal field theories, and conversely that those coefficients can be extracted from the zeta functions alone. The central bridge is the proposed identity E_SUSY = ½ Z(−1,0), which connects a zeta value to the supersymmetric Casimir energy. The authors verify the proposal across many free, interacting, and non-Lagrangian examples in two, four, and six dimensions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the supersymmetric zeta function Z(s,z), defined as a Dirichlet series over BPS charges with a shift z, together with its associated supersymmetric determinant D(z)=exp[∂_s Z(s,z)|_{s=0}]. Residues of Z at positive integers s=k encode the leading 1/β^k terms in the Cardy-like limit of the index, while the derivative at s=0 gives the constant term that appears in both the index asymptotics and the degeneracy growth. The identity E_SUSY = ½ Z(−1,0) is the load-bearing mechanism that turns special zeta values into Casimir energies.

What would settle it

Take a single-particle index of a known interacting superconformal field theory, compute Z(−1,0) from its zeta function, and compare ½ Z(−1,0) with the supersymmetric Casimir energy obtained by independent localization or anomaly-polynomial methods; any mismatch beyond the free-field cases would disprove the universal bridge.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper defines Z(s,z) = Tr(−1)^F (Δ+z)^{−s}, summed over BPS states, and D(z)=exp[∂_s Z(s,z)|_{s=0}], and shows how they encode the spectrum of a supersymmetric theory. It proposes that poles of Z(s,z) at positive integers give the Cardy-like growth of the supersymmetric index, with residues fixed by anomaly coefficients, and that special values at negative integers give regularized energy moments. The main claim is that Z(s,z) provides a new spectral-language route to previously known universal data: residues at s=1,2,… match 't Hooft anomaly coefficients, Z(−1,0) is twice the supersymmetric Casimir energy, and Z(0,0) gives the logarithmic correction in the index. These relations let cen

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the supersymmetric Casimir energy equals half of the zeta value Z(−1,0) is assumed to hold for interacting and non-Lagrangian theories, even though it is only explicitly checked in free theories.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the proposed relations hold, central charges and anomaly coefficients of any SCFT can be read off directly from its single-particle index, bypassing localization or Lagrangian descriptions.
  • The Cardy-like limits of supersymmetric indices become consequences of the analytic structure of Z(s,z), offering a unified explanation across 2d, 4d, and 6d.
  • The supersymmetric determinant provides a new probe of vacuum stability: a vanishing or divergent vacuum exponent D(0) is proposed to signal supersymmetry breaking or absence of a normalizable vacuum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The identity E_SUSY = ½ Z(−1,0) is verified only for free theories; extending it to all interacting and non-Lagrangian theories is the crucial step that would make central-charge extraction from spectral data fully rigorous.
  • Since Z(s,z) is defined from the plethystic logarithm of the index, the approach could be adapted to flavored or higher-sheet indices, potentially giving a spectral derivation of black-hole entropy counting.
  • The connection between Z(−1,0) and Casimir energy suggests that other negative-integer values, such as Z(−2,0), might encode higher-order scheme-independent energy moments that have not yet been explored.
  • A direct numerical test on a known interacting SCFT with independently computed Casimir energy would settle whether the factor of 1/2 is universal or an artifact of the free-field checks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'supersymmetric zeta functions' Z(s,z) and 'supersymmetric determinants' D(z) associated with the plethystic logarithm (single-particle index) of supersymmetric indices. It derives Mellin-transform relations between the zeta functions and the Cardy-like asymptotics of indices, and between the determinants and the constant term in that asymptotics. It then proposes two universal claims: (i) residues and special values of these zeta functions are determined by anomaly coefficients/central charges of superconformal field theories, and (ii) conversely, anomaly coefficients and central charges can be read off from the zeta functions, using the relation E_SUSY = 1/2 Z(-1,0) (Eq. 2.76). The bulk of the paper computes these zeta functions and determinants for a large number of 2d, 4d, and 6d theories, including free multiplets, SYM, minimal models, and Argyres-Douglas theories, and checks the proposed relations against known central charges.

Significance. If the proposed relations hold, the paper offers a new spectral-language bridge between BPS counting data and conformal anomaly data, with potential applications to Cardy-like limits, Casimir energies, and the 'spectral extraction' of central charges for non-Lagrangian theories. The paper is explicit and computationally rich: it provides concrete zeta functions, determinants, residues, and zeta values for dozens of theories, and in all examples where the comparison is possible it reproduces previously known central charges and anomaly coefficients. These checks give the conjectures nontrivial support. However, the core universal relations are presented as proposals or observations rather than derivations, and the argument that the 'converse' extraction is actually independent of the input data is not fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.4.4, Eq. (2.76)] The central bridge E_SUSY = 1/2 Z(-1,0) is introduced as a 'non-trivial relation' and checked explicitly only for free theories via Kim's regularized trace (2.77)-(2.78). For interacting and non-Lagrangian theories, including the AD theories in §5.2.5-5.2.8, this relation is used as a working assumption to convert zeta values into central charges. But for such theories the single-particle index is a plethystic-logarithm generating function, not literally the one-particle spectrum, so the zeta-regularized first moment is not manifestly the supersymmetric Casimir energy. This is load-bearing for the paper's 'converse' claim: without a derivation or an independent check of (2.76) beyond free fields, the extraction of central charges from zeta values rests on an unproved conjecture. Please either provide a derivation (e.g., from the anomaly polynomial / equivariant integral framework) or exp
  2. [§5.1, Eq. (5.8); §5.2, Eq. (5.140); §6, Eqs. (6.7)-(6.10)] The universal residue-to-anomaly identities (5.8), (5.140), (6.7)-(6.9) and the special-value formula (6.10) are not derived in this paper; they are imported from earlier Cardy-limit / anomaly computations (di Pietro-Komargodski, etc.) or 'observed' from the examples. The 6d formula (6.10) in particular is checked only for free hyper/tensor/vector multiplets. Since the headline claim includes the converse statement that anomaly coefficients can be 'calculated from' the zeta functions, the paper should state clearly that the zeta functions reproduce, rather than independently derive, these anomaly relations. As written, the converse is a rearrangement of previously known input, not a new spectral derivation. Please either prove the relevant universal relations from the zeta-function formalism or temper the converse claim accordingly.
  3. [§2.4.3 and §4.1.1] The asymptotic degeneracy formula (2.64) contains a constant term Z(0,0)' = log D(0) whose determination from growth data is ambiguous, as the authors themselves note in §2.4.3 and as the numerical example in §4.1.1 shows (the ratio of asymptotic to exact value approaches 2, not 1, for large n). This does not affect the leading poles, but it means that special values such as Z(0,0)' and D(0) cannot be robustly extracted from the asymptotic growth of coefficients without additional input. Since the paper emphasizes the spectral origin of the zeta values, the authors should either resolve this ambiguity or clearly mark it as an obstruction to the 'read off from growth data' aspect of their program.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (2.7)] The Mellin-transform derivation uses both q and t as integration variables, which can confuse; please use a single dummy variable and clarify the contour/regularization of the exchange of sum and integral.
  2. [§4.1.1, Eq. (4.32)] The asymptotic formula contains a factor sin(pi r/2) even though it is then evaluated at r=1; please indicate whether this factor is meant to be kept for general r or is a typo.
  3. [§5.2.5, table (5.270)] The table would be easier to read if the columns 'c_4d' and 'a_4d' included the numerical values for the smallest k, as the corresponding table in §5.2.7 does; currently only the closed forms are given.
  4. [General] The paper is very long and contains many examples; a summary table or flowchart collecting the universal formulas (residue/anomaly relations, E_SUSY = 1/2 Z(-1,0)) and the status of each (derived vs. observed vs. conjectured) would greatly improve readability and would make the paper's foundational assumptions more transparent.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

One definitional redundancy in the Casimir-energy bridge; no load-bearing circularity in the main zeta-function derivation.

  1. self definitional [§2.4.4, eqs. (2.35)–(2.36) and (2.76)–(2.78); used in §5.2.5–5.2.8]
    "By comparing the supersymmetric Casimir energies studied in the literature with our computation of the supersymmetric zeta values in various examples, we find that a non-trivial relation exists: ESUSY = 1/2 Z(−1,0) ... For free theories ... (2.76) reproduces the formulae ... originally pointed out by Kim [59], where ... ESUSY = 1/2 Tr(−1)F ∆ ... It can be evaluated from the single-particle index i(q) as ESUSY = 1/2 lim q→1− q ∂/∂q i(q), which turns out to be compatible with (2.76)."

    By the paper’s own definitions, Z(s,z) is built from the same single-particle index i(q)=Σ δ(ν)q^ν ((2.35)–(2.36)), so Z(−1,0)=Σ δ(ν)ν is exactly the regularized first moment appearing in Kim’s formula (2.78). Thus (2.76) is not an independent relation discovered from the zeta formalism; it is Kim’s one-particle trace formula rewritten in zeta notation. When the paper later uses (2.76) to convert Z_Schur(−1,0) into central charges for non-Lagrangian AD theories (§5.2.5–5.2.8), the output is the same single-particle spectral moment relabeled as a prediction, unless the Kim-type identification is independently established for those theories. The paper does not do this; it checks consistency against known central charges.

full rationale

The paper’s central zeta-function machinery is not circular: the Mellin-transform relation between the supersymmetric index and Z(s,z), the residue-to-Cardy-limit dictionary (2.47), and the asymptotic degeneracy formulae are derived from the stated definitions. The identifications of residues with anomaly coefficients and of special values with central charges are explicitly imported from or checked against prior external work (e.g., [44,45,50,66,139]) and are presented as proposals/observations rather than as first-principles derivations. The main caveat is the bridge ESUSY = ½Z(−1,0): for the single-particle index, Z(−1,0) is literally the regularized first moment of the same trace used in Kim’s formula, so the relation is a notational re-expression of an existing result, not a new discovery. Its extension to non-Lagrangian theories is an unproved assumption, and the resulting central-charge extractions are consistency checks against known values. That is a correctness/assumption concern, not a hidden circularity: the paper is transparent about proposing the relation and does not use the target central charges as input to compute the zeta functions. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain and no fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. Overall, apart from the definitional redundancy in (2.76), the derivation chain has independent content and is benchmarked externally.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central relations rest on: (i) Mellin/Tauberian theorems (standard), (ii) Barnes residue formulas (standard), (iii) imported Cardy-limit/anomaly results, (iv) the proposed bridge (2.76), and (v) conjectural single-particle indices for AD theories. The paper contributes the synthesis and the catalog, not the individual ingredients; free mixing parameters are adjusted to match known central charges in several examples.

free parameters (3)
  • R_x, R_w (2d N=(0,2) trial R-symmetry mixing coefficients) = 0 (after c-extremization gives negative central charges in several cases)
    Used to obtain correct central charges via Sacchi's prescription in §4.1.6-4.1.9; the values are chosen to match known results rather than derived.
  • B (4d N=1 U(1)_B mixing coefficient) = 0
    Fixed by a-maximization in §5.1.3-5.1.4 to reproduce known central charges.
  • α (generalized Schur parameter) = free; α=1 is ordinary Schur
    Not fitted, but varies; affects residues Z_Schurα = 2α etc. in §5.2.1.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Meromorphic continuation and polynomial-growth bounds (2.37) for zeta functions of single-particle indices
    Required for the contour-shift derivation of (2.47); not proved for all theories considered, only assumed (stated in §2.4.1).
  • ad hoc to paper E_SUSY = ½ Z(−1,0) (eq. 2.76)
    Proposed, checked in free theories; used for non-Lagrangian theories §2.4.4 and §5.2.5-5.2.8.
  • domain assumption Universal residue-anomaly relations: (4.11), (5.8), (6.7)-(6.9) from [44,45,50]
    Imported from prior Cardy-limit literature; not re-derived from zeta functions.
  • domain assumption Plethystic logarithm/exponential represents the index's single-particle content
    Standard in SUSY index theory; invoked in §2.4.
  • domain assumption Conjectural dualities and single-particle indices for AD theories / J^h∨[k] (from [137,126,128])
    Inputs for §5.2.5-5.2.9; if wrong, the computed zeta values and central charges change.
  • standard math Barnes zeta residue and special-value formulas (B.1)-(B.4), (C.17)-(C.18)
    Used throughout for residues and Z(−1,0).
  • standard math Wiener-Ikehara and Meinardus theorems
    Used in §2.2 and §2.4.3 for asymptotic degeneracy.
invented entities (2)
  • Zeta-index Z(0,0)
    purpose: Coefficient of log β in Cardy-like limit; proposed to encode complex dimension of the quantum Coulomb branch (4d)
    Interpretation is borrowed from earlier work [45,47]; no independent handle.
  • Vacuum exponent D(0)
    purpose: Criterion: D(0)=0 SUSY breaking, D(0)=∞ no stable vacuum (eq. 3.8)
    Proposed; only example-based support (Polonyi vs non-compact bosons).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Supersymmetric zeta functions and determinants." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C7SYDFY6

@misc{pith2026251122822,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Supersymmetric zeta functions and determinants},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C7SYDFY6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.22822}
}
read the original abstract

We define supersymmetric zeta functions and supersymmetric determinants, which can reveal spectral properties complementary to those captured by the supersymmetric indices. They play a crucial role in analyzing the Cardy-like behaviors of the supersymmetric indices and the supersymmetric Casimir energies associated with the supersymmetric partition functions. We investigate a variety of examples of the supersymmetric zeta functions and determinants for two-, four-, and six-dimensional supersymmetric field theories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.22822 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The vacuum exponent D 2d (0, 2) chiralr NS (0). It is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The vacuum exponent D 2d (0, 2) Fermir NS (0). 4.1.3 2d N = (0, 2) vector multiplet The elliptic genus of the 2d N = (0, 2) U(1) vector multiplet is I 2d (0, 2) vec NS (q) = (q) 2 ∞. (4.46) The single-particle index is i 2d (0, 2) vec NS (q) = − 2q 1 − q . (4.47) We have the supersymmetric zeta function Z 2d (0, 2) vec NS (s, z) = −2ζ(s, 1 + z). (4.48) It has a simple pole at s = 1 with residue Ress=1Z 2d (0, 2) vec… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The vacuum exponent D 2d (2, 2) chiralr NS (0). 4.2.2 2d N = (2, 2) vector multiplet The N = (2, 2) U(1) vector multiplet can be viewed as the twisted chiral multiplet of the left-moving R-charge r = +1. The elliptic genus in the NSNS sector is given by combining the indices of the N = (0, 2) vector multiplet and the N = (0, 2) chiral multiplet of R-charge +1 I 2d (2, 2) vec NS (y; q) = (q) 2 ∞ (q 1 2 y; q)∞(q 1 2 y… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The vacuum exponent D4d N = 1 chiralr (0; 1, 1). When one introduces a mass term W = λΦ 2 , the chiral multiplet has R-charge r = 1. The theory has a single supersymmetric vacuum. The supersymmetric index (5.14) is equal to 1 and the supersymmetric zeta function (5.18)…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The special value ζ ′ (−1, a). (see e.g. [158, 159]). For example, we have ζ ′ (−1, 1 6 ) = log(12) 144 − π 12√ 3 + ψ (1)( 1 3 ) 8 √ 3π + 1 6  1 12 − log A  = 0.0704526 . . . , (C.10) ζ ′ (−1, 1 4 ) = G 4π − 1 8  1 12 − log A  = 0.0935679 . . . , (C.11) ζ ′ (−1, 1 …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interior zeros of supersymmetric indices

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Interior zeros of a supersymmetric index exist iff its arithmetic coefficients δ(ν) grow exponentially at rate set by the nearest zero, detectable from finitely many q-series terms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

162 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The Index of elliptic operators. 1,

    M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, “The Index of elliptic operators. 1,”Annals Math.87(1968) 484–530

    1968

  2. [2]

    Supersymmetry and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, “Supersymmetry and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem,” Commun. Math. Phys.90(1983) 161

    1983

  3. [3]

    Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,

    E. Witten, “Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,”Commun. Math. Phys.121(1989) 351–399

    1989

  4. [4]

    The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Can one hear the shape of a drum?

    M. Kac, “Can one hear the shape of a drum?”Amer. Math. Monthly73no. 4, part II, (1966) 1–23.https://doi.org/10.2307/2313748

    doi:10.2307/2313748 1966

  6. [6]

    The Geometric dual of a-maximisation for Toric Sasaki-Einstein manifolds,

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and S.-T. Yau, “The Geometric dual of a-maximisation for Toric Sasaki-Einstein manifolds,”Commun. Math. Phys.268(2006) 39–65, arXiv:hep-th/0503183

    arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and volume minimisation,

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and S.-T. Yau, “Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and volume minimisation,”Commun. Math. Phys.280(2008) 611–673, arXiv:hep-th/0603021. 111

    arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Dual Giant Gravitons in Sasaki-Einstein Backgrounds,

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “Dual Giant Gravitons in Sasaki-Einstein Backgrounds,”Nucl. Phys. B759(2006) 292–319,arXiv:hep-th/0608060

    arXiv 2006

Show all 162 references
  1. [9]

    Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,

    E. Witten, “Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,”Nucl. Phys. B202 (1982) 253

    1982

  2. [10]

    An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,

    J. Kinney, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla, and S. Raju, “An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,”Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209–254,arXiv:hep-th/0510251

    2007 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories,

    C. Romelsberger, “Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories,”Nucl. Phys. B747(2006) 329–353,arXiv:hep-th/0510060

    2006 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Elliptic genera and N=2 superconformal field theory,

    T. Kawai, Y. Yamada, and S.-K. Yang, “Elliptic genera and N=2 superconformal field theory,”Nucl. Phys. B414(1994) 191–212, arXiv:hep-th/9306096

    1994 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Elliptic hypergeometric integrals and ’t Hooft anomaly matching conditions,

    V. P. Spiridonov and G. S. Vartanov, “Elliptic hypergeometric integrals and ’t Hooft anomaly matching conditions,”JHEP06(2012) 016,arXiv:1203.5677 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [14]

    On a modular property of N=2 superconformal theories in four dimensions,

    S. S. Razamat, “On a modular property of N=2 superconformal theories in four dimensions,”JHEP10(2012) 191,arXiv:1208.5056 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Polynomial identities, indices, and duality for the N=1 superconformal model SM(2,4nu),

    A. Berkovich, B. M. McCoy, and W. P. Orrick, “Polynomial identities, indices, and duality for the N=1 superconformal model SM(2,4nu),”J. Statist. Phys. 83(1996) 795,arXiv:hep-th/9507072

    1996 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Temperature-reflection symmetry,

    G. Basar, A. Cherman, D. A. McGady, and M. Yamazaki, “Temperature-reflection symmetry,”Phys. Rev. D91no. 10, (2015) 106004, arXiv:1406.6329 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Ueber die Zahlπ. ∗),

    F. Lindemann, “Ueber die Zahlπ. ∗),”Math. Ann.20no. 2, (1882) 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01446522

    doi

  10. [18]

    Irrationalit´ e deζ2 etζ3,

    R. Ap´ ery, “Irrationalit´ e deζ2 etζ3,” No. 61, pp. 11–13. 1979. Luminy Conference on Arithmetic

    1979

  11. [19]

    La fonction zˆ eta de Riemann prend une infinit´ e de valeurs irrationnelles aux entiers impairs,

    T. Rivoal, “La fonction zˆ eta de Riemann prend une infinit´ e de valeurs irrationnelles aux entiers impairs,”C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math.331 no. 4, (2000) 267–270.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4442(00)01624-4. 112

    2000 doi

  12. [20]

    One of the numbersζ(5),ζ(7),ζ(9),ζ(11) is irrational,

    V. V. Zudilin, “One of the numbersζ(5),ζ(7),ζ(9),ζ(11) is irrational,” Uspekhi Mat. Nauk56no. 4(340), (2001) 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1070/RM2001v056n04ABEH000427

    2001 doi

  13. [21]

    The Exact superconformal R symmetry maximizes a,

    K. A. Intriligator and B. Wecht, “The Exact superconformal R symmetry maximizes a,”Nucl. Phys. B667(2003) 183–200,arXiv:hep-th/0304128

    2003 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Rationality in four dimensions,

    L. Rastelli and B. C. Rayhaun, “Rationality in four dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D 109no. 10, (2024) 105018,arXiv:2308.06312 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Large AdS black holes from QFT,

    S. Choi, J. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Nahmgoong, “Large AdS black holes from QFT,”arXiv:1810.12067 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Quantum Black Hole Entropy from 4d Supersymmetric Cardy formula,

    M. Honda, “Quantum Black Hole Entropy from 4d Supersymmetric Cardy formula,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 2, (2019) 026008,arXiv:1901.08091 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Cardy-like asymptotics of the 4dN= 4 index and AdS 5 blackholes,

    A. Arabi Ardehali, “Cardy-like asymptotics of the 4dN= 4 index and AdS 5 blackholes,”JHEP06(2019) 134,arXiv:1902.06619 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    A 4dN= 1 Cardy Formula,

    J. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Song, “A 4dN= 1 Cardy Formula,”JHEP01(2021) 025,arXiv:1904.03455 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    The asymptotic growth of states of the 4dN= 1 superconformal index,

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli, and S. Murthy, “The asymptotic growth of states of the 4dN= 1 superconformal index,”JHEP08(2019) 120, arXiv:1904.05865 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Entropy function from toric geometry,

    A. Amariti, I. Garozzo, and G. Lo Monaco, “Entropy function from toric geometry,”Nucl. Phys. B973(2021) 115571,arXiv:1904.10009 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Asymptotic growth of the 4dN= 4 index and partially deconfined phases,

    A. Arabi Ardehali, J. Hong, and J. T. Liu, “Asymptotic growth of the 4dN= 4 index and partially deconfined phases,”JHEP07(2020) 073, arXiv:1912.04169 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Sub-leading Structures in Superconformal Indices: Subdominant Saddles and Logarithmic Contributions,

    A. Gonz´ alez Lezcano, J. Hong, J. T. Liu, and L. A. Pando Zayas, “Sub-leading Structures in Superconformal Indices: Subdominant Saddles and Logarithmic Contributions,”JHEP01(2021) 001,arXiv:2007.12604 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    The SCI ofN= 4 USp(2N c) and SO(Nc) SYM as a matrix integral,

    A. Amariti, M. Fazzi, and A. Segati, “The SCI ofN= 4 USp(2N c) and SO(Nc) SYM as a matrix integral,”JHEP06(2021) 132,arXiv:2012.15208 [hep-th]. 113

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    EFT and the SUSY Index on the 2nd Sheet,

    D. Cassani and Z. Komargodski, “EFT and the SUSY Index on the 2nd Sheet,”SciPost Phys.11(2021) 004,arXiv:2104.01464 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ogg,Modular forms and Dirichlet series

    A. Ogg,Modular forms and Dirichlet series. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam, 1969

    1969

  26. [34]

    Ein Satz aus der Theorie der unendlichen Reihen,

    A. Tauber, “Ein Satz aus der Theorie der unendlichen Reihen,”Monatsh. Math. Phys.8no. 1, (1897) 273–277.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01696278

    doi

  27. [35]

    An extension of landau’s theorem in the analytical theory of numbers,

    S. Ikehara, “An extension of landau’s theorem in the analytical theory of numbers,”Journal of Mathematics and physics10no. 1-4, (1931) 1–12

    1931

  28. [36]

    On the theory of the multiple gamma function,

    E. W. Barnes, “On the theory of the multiple gamma function,”Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc.19(1904) 374–425

    1904

  29. [37]

    Hirzebruch,Neue topologische Methoden in der algebraischen Geometrie

    F. Hirzebruch,Neue topologische Methoden in der algebraischen Geometrie. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, (N.F.), Heft 9. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-G¨ ottingen-Heidelberg, 1956

    1956

  30. [38]

    Relations for Bernoulli-Barnes numbers and Barnes zeta functions,

    A. Bayad and M. Beck, “Relations for Bernoulli-Barnes numbers and Barnes zeta functions,”Int. J. Number Theory10no. 5, (2014) 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793042114500298

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    Modular operads,

    E. Getzler and M. M. Kapranov, “Modular operads,”Compositio Math.110 no. 1, (1998) 65–126.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000245600345

    1998 doi

  32. [40]

    Ivi´ c,The Riemann zeta-function

    A. Ivi´ c,The Riemann zeta-function. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY,

  33. [41]

    E. C. Titchmarsh,The theory of the Riemann zeta-function. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, second ed., 1986. Edited and with a preface by D. R. Heath-Brown

    1986

  34. [42]

    Erd´ elyi, W

    A. Erd´ elyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. G. Tricomi,Higher transcendental functions. Vol. I. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., Inc., Melbourne, FL, 1981. Based on notes left by Harry Bateman, With a preface by Mina Rees, With a foreword by E. C. Watson, Reprint of the...

    1981

  35. [43]

    Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories,

    J. L. Cardy, “Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories,”Nucl. Phys. B270(1986) 186–204. 114

    1986

  36. [44]

    (0, 2) trialities,

    A. Gadde, S. Gukov, and P. Putrov, “(0, 2) trialities,”JHEP03(2014) 076, arXiv:1310.0818 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cardy formulae for SUSY theories ind= 4 andd= 6,

    L. Di Pietro and Z. Komargodski, “Cardy formulae for SUSY theories ind= 4 andd= 6,”JHEP12(2014) 031,arXiv:1407.6061 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    On the superconformal index of Argyres–Douglas theories,

    M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, “On the superconformal index of Argyres–Douglas theories,”J. Phys. A49no. 1, (2016) 015401, arXiv:1505.05884 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  39. [47]

    High-temperature asymptotics of supersymmetric partition functions,

    A. Arabi Ardehali, “High-temperature asymptotics of supersymmetric partition functions,”JHEP07(2016) 025,arXiv:1512.03376 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Superconformal Index, BPS Monodromy and Chiral Algebras,

    S. Cecotti, J. Song, C. Vafa, and W. Yan, “Superconformal Index, BPS Monodromy and Chiral Algebras,”JHEP11(2017) 013,arXiv:1511.01516 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    6d superconformal Cardy formulas,

    J. Nahmgoong, “6d superconformal Cardy formulas,”JHEP02(2021) 092, arXiv:1907.12582 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Proving the 6d Cardy Formula and Matching Global Gravitational Anomalies,

    C.-M. Chang, M. Fluder, Y.-H. Lin, and Y. Wang, “Proving the 6d Cardy Formula and Matching Global Gravitational Anomalies,”SciPost Phys.11 no. 2, (2021) 036,arXiv:1910.10151 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Universal asymptotics for high energy CFT data,

    N. Benjamin, J. Lee, H. Ooguri, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Universal asymptotics for high energy CFT data,”JHEP03(2024) 115, arXiv:2306.08031 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Asymptotic Formulaae in Combinatory Analysis,

    G. H. Hardy and S. Ramanujan, “Asymptotic Formulaae in Combinatory Analysis,”Proc. London Math. Soc. (2)17(1918) 75–115. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-17.1.75

    1918 doi

  45. [53]

    Asymptotische Aussagen ¨ uber Partitionen,

    G. Meinardus, “Asymptotische Aussagen ¨ uber Partitionen,”Math. Z.59 (1954) 388–398.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01180268

    1954 doi

  46. [54]

    A Meinardus theorem with multiple singularities,

    B. L. Granovsky and D. Stark, “A Meinardus theorem with multiple singularities,”Comm. Math. Phys.314no. 2, (2012) 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-012-1526-8

    2012 doi

  47. [55]

    M2-branes and plane partitions,

    T. Okazaki, “M2-branes and plane partitions,”JHEP07(2022) 028, arXiv:2204.01973 [hep-th]. 115

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Asymptotic Degeneracies of M2-Brane SCFTs,

    H. Hayashi, T. Nosaka, and T. Okazaki, “Asymptotic Degeneracies of M2-Brane SCFTs,”Commun. Math. Phys.405no. 7, (2024) 171, arXiv:2307.02901 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Operator bases,S-matrices, and their partition functions,

    B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia, and H. Murayama, “Operator bases,S-matrices, and their partition functions,”JHEP10(2017) 199,arXiv:1706.08520 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    EFT Asymptotics: the Growth of Operator Degeneracy,

    T. Melia and S. Pal, “EFT Asymptotics: the Growth of Operator Degeneracy,” SciPost Phys.10no. 5, (2021) 104,arXiv:2010.08560 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    The Complete superconformal index for N=6 Chern-Simons theory,

    S. Kim, “The Complete superconformal index for N=6 Chern-Simons theory,” Nucl. Phys. B821(2009) 241–284,arXiv:0903.4172 [hep-th]. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 864, 884 (2012)]

    2009 arXiv

  52. [60]

    M5-branes from gauge theories on the 5-sphere,

    H.-C. Kim and S. Kim, “M5-branes from gauge theories on the 5-sphere,” JHEP05(2013) 144,arXiv:1206.6339 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Localization on Hopf surfaces,

    B. Assel, D. Cassani, and D. Martelli, “Localization on Hopf surfaces,”JHEP 08(2014) 123,arXiv:1405.5144 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Supersymmetric counterterms from new minimal supergravity,

    B. Assel, D. Cassani, and D. Martelli, “Supersymmetric counterterms from new minimal supergravity,”JHEP11(2014) 135,arXiv:1410.6487 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  55. [63]

    The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a squashed S 1 x S3,

    D. Cassani and D. Martelli, “The gravity dual of supersymmetric gauge theories on a squashed S 1 x S3,”JHEP08(2014) 044,arXiv:1402.2278 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Comments on the Casimir energy in supersymmetric field theories,

    J. Lorenzen and D. Martelli, “Comments on the Casimir energy in supersymmetric field theories,”JHEP07(2015) 001,arXiv:1412.7463 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  57. [65]

    The Casimir Energy in Curved Space and its Supersymmetric Counterpart,

    B. Assel, D. Cassani, L. Di Pietro, Z. Komargodski, J. Lorenzen, and D. Martelli, “The Casimir Energy in Curved Space and its Supersymmetric Counterpart,”JHEP07(2015) 043,arXiv:1503.05537 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Supersymmetric Casimir Energy and the Anomaly Polynomial,

    N. Bobev, M. Bullimore, and H.-C. Kim, “Supersymmetric Casimir Energy and the Anomaly Polynomial,”JHEP09(2015) 142,arXiv:1507.08553 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  59. [67]

    The character of the supersymmetric Casimir energy,

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “The character of the supersymmetric Casimir energy,”JHEP08(2016) 117,arXiv:1512.02521 [hep-th]. 116

    2016 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Supersymmetric Casimir energy andSL(3,Z) transformations,

    F. Br¨ unner, D. Regalado, and V. P. Spiridonov, “Supersymmetric Casimir energy andSL(3,Z) transformations,”JHEP07(2017) 041, arXiv:1611.03831 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  61. [69]

    The holographic supersymmetric Casimir energy,

    P. Benetti Genolini, D. Cassani, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “The holographic supersymmetric Casimir energy,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 2, (2017) 021902, arXiv:1606.02724 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Holographic renormalization and supersymmetry,

    P. Benetti Genolini, D. Cassani, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, “Holographic renormalization and supersymmetry,”JHEP02(2017) 132, arXiv:1612.06761 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Supercurrent anomalies in 4d SCFTs,

    I. Papadimitriou, “Supercurrent anomalies in 4d SCFTs,”JHEP07(2017) 038,arXiv:1703.04299 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Quantum corrections to central charges and supersymmetric Casimir energy in AdS3/CFT2,

    A. Arabi Ardehali, F. Larsen, J. T. Liu, and P. Szepietowski, “Quantum corrections to central charges and supersymmetric Casimir energy in AdS3/CFT2,”JHEP07(2019) 071,arXiv:1811.12367 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Supersymmetric Casimir energy onN= 1 conformal supergravity backgrounds,

    P. Panopoulos and I. Papadimitriou, “Supersymmetric Casimir energy onN= 1 conformal supergravity backgrounds,”JHEP04(2024) 029, arXiv:2312.17740 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Multiple sine functions and Selberg zeta functions,

    N. Kurokawa, “Multiple sine functions and Selberg zeta functions,”Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci.67no. 3, (1991) 61–64. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.pja/1195512182

    1991

  67. [75]

    Multiple sine functions,

    N. Kurokawa and S.-y. Koyama, “Multiple sine functions,”Forum Math.15 no. 6, (2003) 839–876.https://doi.org/10.1515/form.2003.042

    2003 doi

  68. [76]

    Quantum KZ equation with —q— = 1 and correlation functions of the XXZ model in the gapless regime,

    M. Jimbo and T. Miwa, “Quantum KZ equation with —q— = 1 and correlation functions of the XXZ model in the gapless regime,”J. Phys. A29 (1996) 2923–2958,arXiv:hep-th/9601135

    1996 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Elliptic genera of two-dimensional N=2 gauge theories with rank-one gauge groups,

    F. Benini, R. Eager, K. Hori, and Y. Tachikawa, “Elliptic genera of two-dimensional N=2 gauge theories with rank-one gauge groups,”Lett. Math. Phys.104(2014) 465–493,arXiv:1305.0533 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Elliptic Genera of 2dN= 2 Gauge Theories,

    F. Benini, R. Eager, K. Hori, and Y. Tachikawa, “Elliptic Genera of 2dN= 2 Gauge Theories,”Commun. Math. Phys.333no. 3, (2015) 1241–1286, arXiv:1308.4896 [hep-th]. 117

    2015 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c-extremization,

    F. Benini and N. Bobev, “Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c-extremization,”JHEP06(2013) 005,arXiv:1302.4451 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Fivebranes and 4-manifolds,

    A. Gadde, S. Gukov, and P. Putrov, “Fivebranes and 4-manifolds,”Prog. Math.319(2016) 155–245,arXiv:1306.4320 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Localization for nonabelian group actions,

    L. C. Jeffrey and F. C. Kirwan, “Localization for nonabelian group actions,” Topology34no. 2, (1995) 291–327

    1995

  74. [82]

    (0,4) dualities,

    P. Putrov, J. Song, and W. Yan, “(0,4) dualities,”JHEP03(2016) 185, arXiv:1505.07110 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  75. [83]

    On the reduction of 4dN= 1 theories onS 2,

    A. Gadde, S. S. Razamat, and B. Willett, “On the reduction of 4dN= 1 theories onS 2,”JHEP11(2015) 163,arXiv:1506.08795 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  76. [84]

    IR duality in 2DN= (0,2) gauge theory with noncompact dynamics,

    M. Dedushenko and S. Gukov, “IR duality in 2DN= (0,2) gauge theory with noncompact dynamics,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 6, (2019) 066005, arXiv:1712.07659 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Exact two-dimensional superconformal R-symmetry and c-extremization,

    F. Benini and N. Bobev, “Exact two-dimensional superconformal R-symmetry and c-extremization,”Phys. Rev. Lett.110no. 6, (2013) 061601, arXiv:1211.4030 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  78. [86]

    New 2dN= (0, 2) dualities from four dimensions,

    M. Sacchi, “New 2dN= (0, 2) dualities from four dimensions,”JHEP12 (2020) 009,arXiv:2004.13672 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Exact superpotentials, quantum vacua and duality in supersymmetric SP(N(c)) gauge theories,

    K. A. Intriligator and P. Pouliot, “Exact superpotentials, quantum vacua and duality in supersymmetric SP(N(c)) gauge theories,”Phys. Lett. B353(1995) 471–476,arXiv:hep-th/9505006

    1995 arXiv

  80. [88]

    2d dualities from 4d,

    J. Jiang, S. Nawata, and J. Zheng, “2d dualities from 4d,”SciPost Phys.18 no. 6, (2025) 180,arXiv:2407.17350 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  81. [89]

    The long flow to freedom,

    O. Aharony, S. S. Razamat, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “The long flow to freedom,”JHEP02(2017) 056,arXiv:1611.02763 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [90]

    A proposal for nonabelian mirrors,

    W. Gu and E. Sharpe, “A proposal for nonabelian mirrors,” arXiv:1806.04678 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Two-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories with exceptional gauge groups,

    Z. Chen, W. Gu, H. Parsian, and E. Sharpe, “Two-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories with exceptional gauge groups,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.24no. 1, (2020) 67–123,arXiv:1808.04070 [hep-th]. 118

    2020 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Notes on two-dimensional pure supersymmetric gauge theories,

    W. Gu, E. Sharpe, and H. Zou, “Notes on two-dimensional pure supersymmetric gauge theories,”JHEP04(2021) 261,arXiv:2005.10845 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Elliptic Genera of Pure Gauge Theories in Two Dimensions with Semisimple Non-Simply-Connected Gauge Groups,

    R. Eager and E. Sharpe, “Elliptic Genera of Pure Gauge Theories in Two Dimensions with Semisimple Non-Simply-Connected Gauge Groups,”Commun. Math. Phys.387no. 1, (2021) 267–297,arXiv:2009.03907 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Representations of simple Lie groups with regular rings of invariants,

    G. W. Schwarz, “Representations of simple Lie groups with regular rings of invariants,”Invent. Math.49no. 2, (1978) 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403085

    1978 doi

  87. [95]

    Algebraic stacks,

    T. L. G´ omez, “Algebraic stacks,”Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci.111no. 1, (2001) 1–31.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829538

    2001 doi

  88. [96]

    Notes on gauging noneffective group actions,

    T. Pantev and E. Sharpe, “Notes on gauging noneffective group actions,” arXiv:hep-th/0502027

    arXiv

  89. [97]

    GLSM’s for Gerbes (and other toric stacks),

    T. Pantev and E. Sharpe, “GLSM’s for Gerbes (and other toric stacks),”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.10no. 1, (2006) 77–121,arXiv:hep-th/0502053

    2006 arXiv

  90. [98]

    String compactifications on Calabi-Yau stacks,

    T. Pantev and E. Sharpe, “String compactifications on Calabi-Yau stacks,” Nucl. Phys. B733(2006) 233–296,arXiv:hep-th/0502044

    2006 arXiv

  91. [99]

    On the Landau-Ginzburg description of N=2 minimal models,

    E. Witten, “On the Landau-Ginzburg description of N=2 minimal models,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 4783–4800,arXiv:hep-th/9304026

    1994 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Elliptic genera and the Landau-Ginzburg approach to N=2 orbifolds,

    P. Di Francesco, O. Aharony, and S. Yankielowicz, “Elliptic genera and the Landau-Ginzburg approach to N=2 orbifolds,”Nucl. Phys. B411(1994) 584–608,arXiv:hep-th/9306157

    1994 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Catastrophes and the Classification of Conformal Theories,

    C. Vafa and N. P. Warner, “Catastrophes and the Classification of Conformal Theories,”Phys. Lett. B218(1989) 51–58

    1989

  94. [102]

    New N=2 Superconformal Field Theories and Superstring Compactification,

    Y. Kazama and H. Suzuki, “New N=2 Superconformal Field Theories and Superstring Compactification,”Nucl. Phys. B321(1989) 232–268

    1989

  95. [103]

    Characterization of N=2 Superconformal Models Generated by Coset Space Method,

    Y. Kazama and H. Suzuki, “Characterization of N=2 Superconformal Models Generated by Coset Space Method,”Phys. Lett. B216(1989) 112–116

    1989

  96. [104]

    Fusion rings and geometry,

    D. Gepner, “Fusion rings and geometry,”Commun. Math. Phys.141(1991) 381–411. 119

    1991

  97. [105]

    A 1/n Expandable Series of Nonlinear Sigma Models with Instantons,

    A. D’Adda, M. Luscher, and P. Di Vecchia, “A 1/n Expandable Series of Nonlinear Sigma Models with Instantons,”Nucl. Phys. B146(1978) 63–76

    1978

  98. [106]

    Confinement and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in CP**n-1 Models with Quarks,

    A. D’Adda, P. Di Vecchia, and M. Luscher, “Confinement and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in CP**n-1 Models with Quarks,”Nucl. Phys. B152 (1979) 125–144

    1979

  99. [107]

    Instantons, the Quark Model, and the 1/n Expansion,

    E. Witten, “Instantons, the Quark Model, and the 1/n Expansion,”Nucl. Phys. B149(1979) 285–320

    1979

  100. [108]

    Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions,

    E. Witten, “Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B403 (1993) 159–222,arXiv:hep-th/9301042

    1993 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Applications of the Superconformal Index for Protected Operators and q-Hypergeometric Identities to N=1 Dual Theories,

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Applications of the Superconformal Index for Protected Operators and q-Hypergeometric Identities to N=1 Dual Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B818(2009) 137–178,arXiv:0801.4947 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Nonperturbative formulas for central functions of supersymmetric gauge theories,

    D. Anselmi, D. Z. Freedman, M. T. Grisaru, and A. A. Johansen, “Nonperturbative formulas for central functions of supersymmetric gauge theories,”Nucl. Phys. B526(1998) 543–571,arXiv:hep-th/9708042

    1998 arXiv

  103. [111]

    The Genesis of the Double Gamma Functions,

    E. W. Barnes, “The Genesis of the Double Gamma Functions,”Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.31(1899) 358–381. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s1-31.1.358

    doi

  104. [112]

    High-Temperature Expansion of Supersymmetric Partition Functions,

    A. Arabi Ardehali, J. T. Liu, and P. Szepietowski, “High-Temperature Expansion of Supersymmetric Partition Functions,”JHEP07(2015) 113, arXiv:1502.07737 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  105. [113]

    On the Barnes double zeta and Gamma functions,

    M. Spreafico, “On the Barnes double zeta and Gamma functions,”J. Number Theory129no. 9, (2009) 2035–2063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2009.03.005

    2009 doi

  106. [114]

    Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations,

    D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, “Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations,”JHEP05(2008) 012,arXiv:0803.1467 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Generalization of the Massive Scalar Multiplet Coupling to the Supergravity,

    J. Polonyi, “Generalization of the Massive Scalar Multiplet Coupling to the Supergravity,”

  108. [116]

    Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,

    N. Seiberg, “Electric - magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories,”Nucl. Phys. B435(1995) 129–146,arXiv:hep-th/9411149. 120

    1995 arXiv

  109. [117]

    On the elliptic beta function,

    V. P. Spiridonov, “On the elliptic beta function,”Uspekhi Mat. Nauk56 no. 1(337), (2001) 181–182. https://doi.org/10.1070/rm2001v056n01ABEH000374

    2001 doi

  110. [118]

    Central charges of N=2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,

    A. D. Shapere and Y. Tachikawa, “Central charges of N=2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,”JHEP09(2008) 109,arXiv:0804.1957 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  111. [119]

    The 4d Superconformal Index from q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills,

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, “The 4d Superconformal Index from q-deformed 2d Yang-Mills,”Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 241602, arXiv:1104.3850 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials,

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat, and W. Yan, “Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials,”Commun. Math. Phys.319(2013) 147–193, arXiv:1110.3740 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories,

    C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao, “Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories,”JHEP01(2016) 040,arXiv:1506.00265 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Infrared Computations of Defect Schur Indices,

    C. Cordova, D. Gaiotto, and S.-H. Shao, “Infrared Computations of Defect Schur Indices,”JHEP11(2016) 106,arXiv:1606.08429 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  115. [123]

    3D TFTs from 4dN= 2 BPS particles,

    D. Gaiotto and H. Kim, “3D TFTs from 4dN= 2 BPS particles,”JHEP03 (2025) 173,arXiv:2409.20393 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Generalized Schur partition functions and RG flows,

    A. Deb and S. S. Razamat, “Generalized Schur partition functions and RG flows,”arXiv:2506.13764 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular differential equations,

    C. Beem and L. Rastelli, “Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular differential equations,”JHEP08(2018) 114,arXiv:1707.07679 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Schur sector of Argyres-Douglas theory andW-algebra,

    D. Xie and W. Yan, “Schur sector of Argyres-Douglas theory andW-algebra,” SciPost Phys.10no. 3, (2021) 080,arXiv:1904.09094 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  119. [127]

    4dN= 2 SCFTs and lisse W-algebras,

    D. Xie and W. Yan, “4dN= 2 SCFTs and lisse W-algebras,”JHEP04(2021) 271,arXiv:1910.02281 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  120. [128]

    New rank-2 Argyres-Douglas theory,

    J. Kaidi and M. Martone, “New rank-2 Argyres-Douglas theory,”Phys. Rev. D 104no. 8, (2021) 085004,arXiv:2104.13929 [hep-th]. 121

    2021 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,”Commun. Math. Phys.336 no. 3, (2015) 1359–1433,arXiv:1312.5344 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Chern-Simons theories with defects, Rogers-Ramanujan type functions and eta-products,

    T. Okazaki and D. J. Smith, “Chern-Simons theories with defects, Rogers-Ramanujan type functions and eta-products,”arXiv:2408.07893 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  123. [131]

    Macdonald Identities and Exact Formulas for Superconformal Indices in Super Yang-Mills Theories,

    Y. L¨ u, “Macdonald Identities and Exact Formulas for Superconformal Indices in Super Yang-Mills Theories,”arXiv:2511.08468 [hep-th]

  124. [132]

    New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory,

    P. C. Argyres and M. R. Douglas, “New phenomena in SU(3) supersymmetric gauge theory,”Nucl. Phys. B448(1995) 93–126,arXiv:hep-th/9505062

    1995 arXiv

  125. [133]

    New N=2 superconformal field theories in four-dimensions,

    P. C. Argyres, M. R. Plesser, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, “New N=2 superconformal field theories in four-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B461(1996) 71–84,arXiv:hep-th/9511154

    1996 arXiv

  126. [134]

    General Argyres-Douglas Theory,

    D. Xie, “General Argyres-Douglas Theory,”JHEP01(2013) 100, arXiv:1204.2270 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,”Adv. Math.234(2013) 239–403, arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Classification of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5 branes,

    Y. Wang and D. Xie, “Classification of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5 branes,”Phys. Rev. D94no. 6, (2016) 065012,arXiv:1509.00847 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Vertex operator algebras of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5-branes,

    J. Song, D. Xie, and W. Yan, “Vertex operator algebras of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5-branes,”JHEP12(2017) 123,arXiv:1706.01607 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Superconformal indices of generalized Argyres-Douglas theories from 2d TQFT,

    J. Song, “Superconformal indices of generalized Argyres-Douglas theories from 2d TQFT,”JHEP02(2016) 045,arXiv:1509.06730 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Chiral algebra of the Argyres-Douglas theory from M5 branes,

    D. Xie, W. Yan, and S.-T. Yau, “Chiral algebra of the Argyres-Douglas theory from M5 branes,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 6, (2021) 065003,arXiv:1604.02155 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  132. [140]

    R-Twisting and 4d/2d Correspondences,

    S. Cecotti, A. Neitzke, and C. Vafa, “R-Twisting and 4d/2d Correspondences,” arXiv:1006.3435 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  133. [141]

    N=2 dualities,

    D. Gaiotto, “N=2 dualities,”JHEP08(2012) 034,arXiv:0904.2715 [hep-th]. 122

    2012 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Nilpotent orbits and codimension-two defects of 6d N=(2,0) theories,

    O. Chacaltana, J. Distler, and Y. Tachikawa, “Nilpotent orbits and codimension-two defects of 6d N=(2,0) theories,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28 (2013) 1340006,arXiv:1203.2930 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  135. [143]

    A remark on boundary level admissible representations,

    V. G. Kac and M. Wakimoto, “A remark on boundary level admissible representations,”C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris355no. 2, (2017) 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2017.01.008

    2017 doi

  136. [144]

    Central charges and RG flow of strongly-coupled N=2 theory,

    D. Xie and P. Zhao, “Central charges and RG flow of strongly-coupled N=2 theory,”JHEP03(2013) 006,arXiv:1301.0210 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Indices for Superconformal Field Theories in 3,5 and 6 Dimensions,

    J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla, and S. Raju, “Indices for Superconformal Field Theories in 3,5 and 6 Dimensions,”JHEP02(2008) 064, arXiv:0801.1435 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Perturbative partition function for squashedS 5,

    Y. Imamura, “Perturbative partition function for squashedS 5,”PTEP2013 no. 7, (2013) 073B01,arXiv:1210.6308 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Instantons on the 5-sphere and M5-branes,

    H.-C. Kim, J. Kim, and S. Kim, “Instantons on the 5-sphere and M5-branes,” arXiv:1211.0144 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  140. [148]

    Superconformal Partition Functions and Non-perturbative Topological Strings,

    G. Lockhart and C. Vafa, “Superconformal Partition Functions and Non-perturbative Topological Strings,”JHEP10(2018) 051, arXiv:1210.5909 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Anomaly polynomial of general 6d SCFTs,

    K. Ohmori, H. Shimizu, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, “Anomaly polynomial of general 6d SCFTs,”PTEP2014no. 10, (2014) 103B07, arXiv:1408.5572 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Comments on string dynamics in six-dimensions,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Comments on string dynamics in six-dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B471(1996) 121–134,arXiv:hep-th/9603003

    1996 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Small E(8) instantons and tensionless noncritical strings,

    O. J. Ganor and A. Hanany, “Small E(8) instantons and tensionless noncritical strings,”Nucl. Phys. B474(1996) 122–140,arXiv:hep-th/9602120

    1996 arXiv

  144. [152]

    6d Conformal Matter,

    M. Del Zotto, J. J. Heckman, A. Tomasiello, and C. Vafa, “6d Conformal Matter,”JHEP02(2015) 054,arXiv:1407.6359 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Supersymmetric R´ enyi entropy and Anomalies in 6d (1,0) SCFTs,

    S. Yankielowicz and Y. Zhou, “Supersymmetric R´ enyi entropy and Anomalies in 6d (1,0) SCFTs,”JHEP04(2017) 128,arXiv:1702.03518 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Modified elliptic gamma functions and 6d superconformal indices,

    V. P. Spiridonov, “Modified elliptic gamma functions and 6d superconformal indices,”Lett. Math. Phys.104(2014) 397–414,arXiv:1211.2703 [hep-th]. 123

    2014 arXiv

  147. [155]

    What Maxwell Theory in D<>4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance,

    S. El-Showk, Y. Nakayama, and S. Rychkov, “What Maxwell Theory in D<>4 teaches us about scale and conformal invariance,”Nucl. Phys. B848(2011) 578–593,arXiv:1101.5385 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Five-brane effective action inM-theory.,

    E. Witten, “Five-brane effective action inM-theory.,”J. Geom. Phys.22 (1997) 103–133,arXiv:hep-th/9610234

    1997 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Wsymmetry in six dimensions,

    C. Beem, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “Wsymmetry in six dimensions,” JHEP05(2015) 017,arXiv:1404.1079 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  150. [158]

    A class of logarithmic integrals,

    V. Adamchik, “A class of logarithmic integrals,” inProceedings of the 1997 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (Kihei, HI), pp. 1–8. ACM, New York, 1997.https://doi.org/10.1145/258726.258736

    1997

  151. [159]

    Derivatives of the Hurwitz zeta function for rational arguments,

    J. Miller and V. S. Adamchik, “Derivatives of the Hurwitz zeta function for rational arguments,”J. Comput. Appl. Math.100no. 2, (1998) 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(98)00193-9

    1998 doi

  152. [160]

    Asymptotic series for double zeta, double gamma, and Hecke L-functions,

    K. Matsumoto, “Asymptotic series for double zeta, double gamma, and Hecke L-functions,”Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.123no. 3, (1998) 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004197002168

    1998 doi

  153. [161]

    Shintani-Barnes zeta and gamma functions,

    E. Friedman and S. Ruijsenaars, “Shintani-Barnes zeta and gamma functions,” Adv. Math.187no. 2, (2004) 362–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2003.07.020. 124

    2004 doi

  154. [2003]

    Theory and applications, Reprint of the 1985 original [Wiley, New York; MR0792089 (87d:11062)]

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.