REVIEW 2 cited by
Actions for Gravity, with Generalizations: A Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Related to the classical Ashtekar Hamiltonian, there have been discoveries regarding new classical actions for gravity in (2+1)- and (3+1)-dimensions, and also generalizations of Einstein's theory of gravity. In this review, I will try to clarify the relations between the new and old actions for gravity, and also give a short introduction to the new generalizations. The new results/treatments in this review are: 1. A more detailed constraint analysis of the Hamiltonian formulation of the Hilbert- Palatini Lagrangian in (3+1)-dimensions. 2. The canonical transformation relating the Ashtekar- and the ADM-Hamiltonian in (2+1)-dimensions is given. 3. There is a discussion regarding the possibility of finding a higher dimensional Ashtekar formulation. There are also two clarifying figures (in the beginning of chapter 2 and 3, respectively) showing the relations between different action-formulations for Einstein gravity in (2+1)- and (3+1)-dimensions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generators of Local Lorentz Transformation in ADM-Vielbein Formalism of Gravitational Relativity
In the tetrad (ADM-vielbein) form of general relativity, the authors build first-class constraints that generate the full local Lorentz group (rotations plus boosts) and verify the Lorentz algebra, but only for N=1, Ni=0.
-
Different types of torsion and their effect on the dynamics of fields
In VEP formalism the off-shell spin connection admits a one-parameter family of conformal transformations interpolating between Nieh-Yan and conformally invariant torsion; dynamically generated torsion lacks well-defi...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.