Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Human-In-The-Loop Machine Learning for Safe and Ethical Autonomous Vehicles: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12548 v3 pith:CCONFNW5 submitted 2024-08-22 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learningethicalhuman-in-the-loopcomplexhumanmachineplanningprinciples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine Learning (ML) has become central to Autonomous Vehicles (AVs), supporting perception, prediction, planning, control, and decision-making in dynamic environments. However, achieving full autonomy in cluttered and complex scenarios, such as intricate intersections, diverse scenes, varied trajectories, and complex missions, remains challenging; moreover, data labeling is still a major bottleneck. These limitations motivate Human-in-the-Loop Machine Learning (HITL-ML), in which human input is incorporated through validation, annotation, task organization, reward design, action correction, preference feedback, and supervisory intervention. To advance safe and ethical autonomy, this paper presents a tutorial survey of HITL-ML for AVs, focusing on Curriculum Learning (CL), Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learning (HITL-RL), Human-in-the-Loop Large Language Models (HITL-LLMs), Active Learning (AL), and ethical principles. We first review CL methods that structure training from simple to complex tasks, covering navigation, path planning, obstacle avoidance, data collection, landing, intersection handling, motion planning, and UAV swarm coordination. We then examine HITL-RL through reward shaping, action injection, demonstrations, preference-based feedback, and interactive learning, emphasizing improved learning efficiency, safer policy exploration, and real-time intervention. Next, we review HITL-LLM through collaboration and oversight and specify key challenges. After that, we discuss AL for perception, anomaly detection, semantic mapping, object detection, vehicle recognition, and security-related classification. Ethical principles are reviewed as technical requirements for transparency, accountability, human oversight, safety, security, regulatory compliance, and reliability of human input.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AdaptBot: Combining LLM with Knowledge Graphs and Human Input for Generic-to-Specific Task Decomposition and Knowledge Refinement

    cs.RO 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM+knowledge-graph+human-in-the-loop framework improves simulated task-completion success over LLM-only and LLM+KG baselines, though the human oracle inflates the reported gains.

Pith tools