pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.14446 · v2 · pith:CDAKLSU2new · submitted 2026-02-16 · ✦ hep-th

Quantum criticality and mixed-state entanglement in holographic superconductor--insulator transitions

Zhe Yang , Fang-Jing Cheng , Guoyang Fu , Yi Ling , Peng Liu , Jian-Pin Wu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 13:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords holographic superconductivitysuperconductor-insulator transitionquantum criticalityentanglement wedge cross-sectionmixed-state entanglementp-wave superconductorquantum phase transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

The entanglement wedge cross-section detects quantum criticality at holographic superconductor-insulator transitions while holographic entanglement entropy does not.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines a holographic Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion p-wave superconductor that undergoes a transition to an insulator at a quantum critical point. Tracking the superconducting energy gap shows that the gap closes and insulating features appear near the point because enhanced quantum fluctuations suppress the order, but only when the condensate is aligned with the direction of broken translational symmetry. Holographic entanglement entropy at large scales is dominated by the infrared geometry and thermal entropy, rendering it insensitive to the transition along the temperature direction. By contrast the entanglement wedge cross-section responds to deformations throughout the bulk geometry and exhibits clear critical scaling, making it a robust diagnostic of the quantum phase transition in mixed states.

Core claim

Approaching the quantum critical point in the aligned EMDA p-wave model closes the superconducting gap and induces incipient insulating features due to enhanced quantum fluctuations suppressing the order. Holographic entanglement entropy for large configurations is controlled by the infrared geometry and thus largely insensitive to entanglement along the temperature direction. The entanglement wedge cross-section, however, is governed by deformations of the entire bulk and displays pronounced critical scaling, providing a robust diagnostic of the quantum phase transition in mixed states.

What carries the argument

Entanglement wedge cross-section, a mixed-state entanglement measure that responds to deformations of the entire bulk geometry rather than being limited to the infrared region.

If this is right

  • The superconducting gap closes at the quantum critical point only for aligned condensate orientation, indicating fluctuation-driven suppression.
  • Holographic entanglement entropy at large scales remains insensitive to the transition because it is controlled by infrared geometry.
  • The entanglement wedge cross-section provides a robust mixed-state diagnostic through its critical scaling behavior.
  • The contrast arises because the cross-section senses bulk deformations globally while entropy is infrared-dominated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Mixed-state entanglement measures may outperform standard entropy probes in other holographic models of quantum phase transitions.
  • The alignment requirement suggests that real condensed-matter superconductor-insulator systems could be tested by tuning anisotropy or lattice directions.
  • Choosing bulk-global versus infrared-local observables could guide entanglement-based diagnostics in broader studies of quantum criticality.
  • Extensions to finite charge density or different symmetry-breaking patterns might yield additional scaling relations for the cross-section.

Load-bearing premise

The holographic EMDA p-wave model with condensate orientation aligned to the translational symmetry breaking direction accurately captures the physical superconductor-insulator transition and the suppression of order by quantum fluctuations.

What would settle it

A direct calculation or simulation in the same model showing that the entanglement wedge cross-section fails to display critical scaling near the quantum critical point, or that the energy gap does not close when the condensate is aligned.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.14446 by Fang-Jing Cheng, Guoyang Fu, Jian-Pin Wu, Peng Liu, Yi Ling, Zhe Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Both first and second order superconducting phase transitions occur when the temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Phase diagrams in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Temperature dependence of the superconducting gap ∆( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Scaling of the energy gap ∆ with temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The schematic of the numerical solving the asymmetric EWCS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The behavior of the HEE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Entropy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The behavior of the first derivative of HEE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: EWCS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The behavior of the first derivative of EWCS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Schematic illustration of the geometric prescriptions for HEE and EWCS. Left panel: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study quantum criticality in a holographic Einstein--Maxwell--Dilaton--Axion (EMDA) p-wave superconductor exhibiting a superconductor--insulator transition (SIT). By tracking the superconducting energy gap, we show that approaching the quantum critical point (QCP) closes the gap and induces incipient insulating features, indicating that enhanced quantum fluctuations suppress superconducting order and trigger the SIT. We suggest that this behavior occurs only when the condensate orientation is aligned with the direction of translational symmetry breaking. To probe the transition, we employ two holographic indicators: holographic entanglement entropy (HEE) and the entanglement wedge cross-section (EWCS), the latter being a mixed-state entanglement measure. In contrast to HEE, which for sufficiently large configuration is dominated by the thermal entropy and is therefore largely insensitive to entanglement along the temperature direction, EWCS displays pronounced critical scaling and provides a robust diagnostic of the quantum phase transition (QPT). We attribute this contrast to the fact that HEE at large scales is controlled by the infrared (IR) geometry, whereas EWCS is governed by deformations of the entire bulk. Our results establish EWCS as a robust probe of holographic quantum criticality in mixed states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies quantum criticality in a holographic Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion (EMDA) p-wave superconductor model that exhibits a superconductor-insulator transition (SIT). Tracking the superconducting energy gap shows gap closure at the quantum critical point (QCP) when the condensate is aligned with the translational symmetry breaking direction, which the authors interpret as suppression of order by quantum fluctuations. Holographic entanglement entropy (HEE) and entanglement wedge cross-section (EWCS) are computed as probes; the paper reports that EWCS exhibits pronounced critical scaling near the QPT while large-scale HEE is largely insensitive, attributing the difference to HEE being IR-geometry dominated and EWCS being sensitive to deformations throughout the bulk geometry.

Significance. If the numerical results and the proposed mechanism hold, the work would establish EWCS as a mixed-state entanglement diagnostic capable of capturing quantum criticality in holographic SIT models where standard HEE fails at large scales. The observation that the SIT requires specific condensate alignment with the axion-induced breaking direction is a concrete, testable feature of the EMDA setup that could guide further holographic constructions of quantum phase transitions.

major comments (1)
  1. The central attribution that EWCS is governed by deformations of the entire bulk while large-scale HEE is controlled by the IR geometry (and therefore insensitive to temperature-direction entanglement) is load-bearing for the claimed contrast in critical scaling. The manuscript does not report the radial turning points, embedding functions, or decomposed UV/IR contributions for the EWCS surfaces (which connect two entanglement wedges) versus the HEE surfaces in the same EMDA background. Without such explicit verification or a controlled parameter variation that isolates bulk deformations while holding the IR fixed, the numerical contrast could arise from the mixed-state definition of EWCS or from fitting choices near the QCP rather than the proposed geometric mechanism.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the specific EMDA coupling values and axion strength used to realize the SIT, to allow readers to assess how tuned the setup is.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our work concerning quantum criticality in the holographic EMDA p-wave superconductor model. We address the major comment in detail below and have prepared revisions to enhance the clarity and support for our conclusions regarding the contrasting behaviors of HEE and EWCS.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central attribution that EWCS is governed by deformations of the entire bulk while large-scale HEE is controlled by the IR geometry (and therefore insensitive to temperature-direction entanglement) is load-bearing for the claimed contrast in critical scaling. The manuscript does not report the radial turning points, embedding functions, or decomposed UV/IR contributions for the EWCS surfaces (which connect two entanglement wedges) versus the HEE surfaces in the same EMDA background. Without such explicit verification or a controlled parameter variation that isolates bulk deformations while holding the IR fixed, the numerical contrast could arise from the mixed-state definition of EWCS or from fitting choices near the QCP rather than the proposed geometric mechanism.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. We acknowledge that the manuscript would benefit from more explicit details on the extremal surfaces to support the geometric interpretation. Accordingly, in the revised manuscript we will include figures or tables reporting the radial turning points for both the HEE and EWCS surfaces at representative parameter values near the QCP. We will also provide the embedding functions and a breakdown of the UV and IR contributions to the areas. This analysis will show that the EWCS surface extends through a broader range of the bulk compared to the large-scale HEE, which hugs the IR. To rule out fitting artifacts, we will supplement the critical scaling plots with additional data points and discuss the numerical precision. We maintain that the difference stems from the distinct geometric sensitivities inherent to the two quantities, with EWCS probing mixed-state correlations across the bulk. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on explicit holographic computations

full rationale

The paper computes HEE and EWCS numerically in the EMDA p-wave holographic model near the SIT QCP, observes a contrast in critical scaling, and offers an interpretive attribution to IR vs. full-bulk control. No quoted equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The results are presented as outcomes of the bulk metric solutions and extremal surface calculations rather than tautological redefinitions or load-bearing self-references. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the model's action and AdS/CFT dictionary without internal circular reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the AdS/CFT correspondence mapping boundary quantum criticality to bulk geometry, plus numerical solutions of the EMDA equations tuned for the SIT. No independent evidence for the alignment condition or gap closure is provided beyond the model itself.

free parameters (1)
  • EMDA coupling constants and axion strength
    These are adjusted to realize the superconductor-insulator transition and aligned condensate orientation; their specific values control the observed gap closure and critical scaling.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence
    The study maps the boundary quantum system and its entanglement to classical gravity solutions in the bulk.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5752 in / 1331 out tokens · 39714 ms · 2026-05-21T13:32:21.961301+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    & Keimer, B

    Sachdev, S. & Keimer, B. Quantum criticality. Physics Today.64, 29-35 (2011)

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    & Schofield, A

    Coleman, P. & Schofield, A. Quantum criticality. Nature.433, 226-229 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    & Steglich, F

    Gegenwart, P., Si, Q. & Steglich, F. Quantum criticality in heavy-fermion metals. Nature Physics.4, 186-197 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    & Abbamonte, P

    Phillips, P., Hussey, N. & Abbamonte, P. Stranger than metals. Science.377, eabh4273 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Quantum phase transitions

    Sachdev, S. Quantum phase transitions. Physics World.12, 33 (1999)

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    & Others Characterizing a non-equilibrium phase transition on a quantum computer

    Chertkov, E., Cheng, Z., Potter, A., Gopalakrishnan, S., Gatterman, T., Gerber, J., Gilmore, K., Gresh, D., Hall, A., Hankin, A. & Others Characterizing a non-equilibrium phase transition on a quantum computer. Nature Physics.19, 1799-1804 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    & Vedral, V

    Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A. & Vedral, V. Entanglement in many-body systems. Reviews Of Modern Physics.80, 517-576 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    & Fazio, R

    Osterloh, A., Amico, L., Falci, G. & Fazio, R. Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition. Nature.416, 608-610 (2002)

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    & Chuang, I

    Nielsen, M. & Chuang, I. Quantum computation and quantum information. (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2010) 20

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Quantum information theory

    Wilde, M. Quantum information theory. (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Quantum information: an introduction

    Hayashi, M. Quantum information: an introduction. (Springer, 2006)

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    & Werner, R

    Vidal, G. & Werner, R. Computable measure of entanglement. Physical Review A.65, 032314 (2002)

    work page 2002

  13. [13]

    Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex

    Plenio, M. Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex. Physical Review Letters.95, 090503 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    & Horodecki, K

    Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. & Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement.Reviews Of Modern Physics.81, 865-942 (2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity

    Hooft, G. Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. ArXiv Preprint Gr-qc/9310026. (1993)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1993

  16. [16]

    The world as a hologram

    Susskind, L. The world as a hologram. Journal Of Mathematical Physics.36, 6377-6396 (1995)

    work page 1995

  17. [17]

    The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity

    Maldacena, J. The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. International Journal Of Theoretical Physics.38, 1113-1133 (1999)

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    Witten, E. Anti de Sitter space and holography. ArXiv Preprint Hep-th/9802150. (1998)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  19. [19]

    & Schalm, K

    Zaanen, J., Liu, Y., Sun, Y. & Schalm, K. Holographic duality in condensed matter physics. (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    & Erdmenger, J

    Ammon, M. & Erdmenger, J. Gauge/gravity duality: Foundations and applications. (Cam- bridge University Press, 2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Applied holography: a practical mini-course

    Baggioli, M. Applied holography: a practical mini-course. (Springer, 2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    AdS/CFT duality user guide

    Natsuume, M. AdS/CFT duality user guide. (Springer, 2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    & Takayanagi, T

    Ryu, S. & Takayanagi, T. Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from the anti–de Sitter Space/Conformal Field Theory Correspondence. Physical Review Letters.96, 181602 (2006)

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    & Zhang, Y

    Cai, R., He, S., Li, L. & Zhang, Y. Holographic entanglement entropy in P-wave supercon- ductor phase transition. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2012, 1-19 (2012)

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    & Pan, Q

    Peng, Y. & Pan, Q. Holographic entanglement entropy in general holographic superconductor models. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2014, 1-15 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    & Xian, Z

    Ling, Y., Liu, P., Niu, C., Wu, J. & Xian, Z. Holographic entanglement entropy close to quantum phase transitions. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2016, 1-9 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Ling, Y., Liu, P. & Wu, J. Characterization of quantum phase transition using holographic entanglement entropy. Physical Review D.93, 126004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    & Takayanagi, T

    Umemoto, K. & Takayanagi, T. Entanglement of purification through holographic duality. 21 Nature Physics.14, 573-577 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    & Zhou, Y

    Umemoto, K. & Zhou, Y. Entanglement of purification for multipartite states and its holo- graphic dual. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2018, 1-27 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    & Faulkner, T

    Dutta, S. & Faulkner, T. A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2021, 1-49 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    & Ryu, S

    Kudler-Flam, J. & Ryu, S. Entanglement negativity and minimal entanglement wedge cross sections in holographic theories. Physical Review D.99, 106014 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    & P¨ onni, A

    Jokela, N. & P¨ onni, A. Notes on entanglement wedge cross sections. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2019, 1-28 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    & Sahraei, M

    Vasli, M., Mohammadi Mozaffar, M., Babaei Velni, K. & Sahraei, M. Holographic study of reflected entropy in anisotropic theories. Physical Review D.107, 026012 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    & Zhong, H

    Camargo, H., Nandy, P., Wen, Q. & Zhong, H. Balanced partial entanglement and mixed state correlations. SciPost Physics.12, 137 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    & Horowitz, G

    Hartnoll, S., Herzog, C. & Horowitz, G. Holographic superconductors. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2008, 015 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Introduction to holographic superconductors

    Horowitz, G. Introduction to holographic superconductors. From Gravity To Thermal Gauge Theories: The AdS/CFT Correspondence: The AdS/CFT Correspondence. pp. 313-347 (2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    & Horowitz, G

    Hartnoll, S., Herzog, C. & Horowitz, G. Building a holographic superconductor. Physical Review Letters.101, 031601 (2008)

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    & Yang, R

    Cai, R., Li, L., Li, L. & Yang, R. Introduction to holographic superconductor models. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy.58, 1-46 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Energy gap in superconductors measured by electron tunneling

    Giaever, I. Energy gap in superconductors measured by electron tunneling. Physical Review Letters.5, 147 (1960)

    work page 1960

  40. [40]

    & Shen, Z

    Hashimoto, M., Vishik, I., He, R., Devereaux, T. & Shen, Z. Energy gaps in high-transition- temperature cuprate superconductors. Nature Physics.10, 483-495 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Probing the electronic structure of complex systems by ARPES

    Damascelli, A. Probing the electronic structure of complex systems by ARPES. Physica Scripta.2004, 61 (2004)

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    & Damascelli, A

    Boschini, F., Zonno, M. & Damascelli, A. Time-resolved ARPES studies of quantum materials. Reviews Of Modern Physics.96, 015003 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    & Lindroos, M

    Bansil, A. & Lindroos, M. Importance of matrix elements in the ARPES spectra of BISCO. Physical Review Letters.83, 5154 (1999) 22

    work page 1999

  44. [44]

    & Vegh, D

    Liu, H., McGreevy, J. & Vegh, D. Non-Fermi liquids from holography. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, And Cosmology.83, 065029 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    & Mezei, M

    Iqbal, N., Liu, H. & Mezei, M. Lectures on holographic non-Fermi liquids and quantum phase transitions. String Theory And Its Applications: TASI 2010 From MeV To The Planck Scale. pp. 707-815 (2012)

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    experi- ments

    Faulkner, T., Horowitz, G., McGreevy, J., Roberts, M. & Vegh, D. Photoemission “experi- ments” on holographic superconductors. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2010, 1-25 (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    & Vegh, D

    Faulkner, T., Liu, H., McGreevy, J. & Vegh, D. Emergent quantum criticality, Fermi surfaces, and AdS 2. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, And Cosmology.83, 125002 (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    & Hartnoll, S

    Donos, A. & Hartnoll, S. Interaction-driven localization in holography. Nature Physics.9, 649-655 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    & Sachdev, S

    Hartnoll, S., Lucas, A. & Sachdev, S. Holographic quantum matter. (MIT Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    & Gauntlett, J

    Donos, A. & Gauntlett, J. Novel metals and insulators from holography. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2014, 1-26 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    & Kiritsis, E

    Donos, A., Gout´ eraux, B. & Kiritsis, E. Holographic metals and insulators with helical sym- metry. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2014, 1-42 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    & Yang, R

    Cai, R., Li, L., Li, L. & Yang, R. Towards complete phase diagrams of a holographic P-wave superconductor model. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2014, 1-43 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    & Zeng, H

    Nie, Z., Cai, R., Gao, X. & Zeng, H. Competition between the s-wave and p-wave super- conductivity phases in a holographic model. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2013, 1-16 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    & Shen, C

    Li, L., Cai, R., Li, L. & Shen, C. Entanglement entropy in a holographic p-wave superconductor model. Nuclear Physics B.894pp. 15-28 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    & Liu, P

    Yang, Z., Cheng, F., Niu, C., Zhang, C. & Liu, P. The mixed-state entanglement in holographic p-wave superconductor model. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2023, 1-23 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Fu, G., Wang, X., Liu, P., Zhang, D., Kuang, X. & Wu, J. A novel holographic quantum phase transition and butterfly velocity. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2022, 1-17 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Gong, H., Fu, G., Liu, P., Chen, C., Kuang, X. & Wu, J. Diagnosing quantum phase transitions via holographic entanglement entropy at finite temperature. The European Physical Journal C.83, 1042 (2023) 23

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    & Avishai, Y

    Dubi, Y., Meir, Y. & Avishai, Y. Nature of the superconductor–insulator transition in disor- dered superconductors. Nature.449, 876-880 (2007)

    work page 2007

  59. [59]

    & Markovi´ c, N

    Goldman, A. & Markovi´ c, N. Superconductor-insulator transitions in the two-dimensional limit. (American Institute of Physics,1998)

    work page 1998

  60. [60]

    & Dolgopolov, V

    Gantmakher, V. & Dolgopolov, V. Superconductor–insulator quantum phase transition. Physics-Uspekhi.53, 1 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    & Boˇ zovi´ c, I

    Bollinger, A., Dubuis, G., Yoon, J., Pavuna, D., Misewich, J. & Boˇ zovi´ c, I. Superconduc- tor–insulator transition in La2- x Sr x CuO4 at the pair quantum resistance. Nature.472, 458-460 (2011)

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    Non-Fermi liquid from a charged black hole: A critical Fermi ball

    Lee, S. Non-Fermi liquid from a charged black hole: A critical Fermi ball. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, And Cosmology.79, 086006 (2009)

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    & Gauntlett, J

    Donos, A. & Gauntlett, J. Holographic Q-lattices. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2014, 1-18 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    & Xian, Z

    Ling, Y., Liu, P., Niu, C., Wu, J. & Xian, Z. Holographic Superconductor on Q-lattice. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2015, 1-18 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    & Xian, Z

    Ling, Y., Liu, P., Niu, C., Wu, J. & Xian, Z. Holographic fermionic system with dipole coupling on Q-lattice. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2014, 1-17 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    Dynamical gap driven by Yukawa coupling in holography

    Wu, J. Dynamical gap driven by Yukawa coupling in holography. The European Physical Journal C.79, 691 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    Pseudogap from ARPES experiment: three gaps in cuprates and topological superconductivity

    Kordyuk, A. Pseudogap from ARPES experiment: three gaps in cuprates and topological superconductivity. Low Temperature Physics.41, 319-341 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    & Others Transient electronic structure and melting of a charge density wave in TbTe3

    Schmitt, F., Kirchmann, P., Bovensiepen, U., Moore, R., Rettig, L., Krenz, M., Chu, J., Ru, N., Perfetti, L., Lu, D. & Others Transient electronic structure and melting of a charge density wave in TbTe3. Science.321, 1649-1652 (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    & Others The origin of multiple superconducting gaps in MgB2

    Souma, S., Machida, Y., Sato, T., Takahashi, T., Matsui, H., Wang, S., Ding, H., Kaminski, A., Campuzano, J., Sasaki, S. & Others The origin of multiple superconducting gaps in MgB2. Nature.423, 65-67 (2003)

    work page 2003

  70. [70]

    & Others ARPES detection of superconducting gap sign in unconventional superconductors

    Gao, Q., Bok, J., Ai, P., Liu, J., Yan, H., Luo, X., Cai, Y., Li, C., Wang, Y., Yin, C. & Others ARPES detection of superconducting gap sign in unconventional superconductors. Nature Communications.15, 4538 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    & Carbotte, J

    Hwang, J., Nicol, E., Timusk, T., Knigavko, A. & Carbotte, J. High energy scales in the optical 24 self-energy of the cuprate superconductors. Physical Review Letters.98, 207002 (2007)

    work page 2007

  72. [72]

    & Zhang, Y

    Cai, R., He, S., Li, L. & Zhang, Y. Holographic entanglement entropy in insula- tor/superconductor transition. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2012, 1-18 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    & Liu, P

    Huang, Y., Shi, Z., Niu, C., Zhang, C. & Liu, P. Mixed state entanglement for holographic axion model. The European Physical Journal C.80, 426 (2020)

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    Liu, P., Yang, Z., Niu, C., Zhang, C. & Wu, J. Mixed-state entanglement for AdS Born-Infeld theory. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2023, 1-25 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Liu, P. & Wu, J. Mixed state entanglement and thermal phase transitions. Physical Review D.104, 046017 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    & Takayanagi, T

    Nishioka, T., Ryu, S. & Takayanagi, T. Holographic entanglement entropy: an overview. Journal Of Physics A: Mathematical And Theoretical.42, 504008 (2009)

    work page 2009

  77. [77]

    & Myers, R

    Casini, H., Huerta, M. & Myers, R. Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2011, 1-41 (2011)

    work page 2011

  78. [78]

    Liu, P., Ling, Y., Niu, C. & Wu, J. Entanglement of purification in holographic systems. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2019, 1-22 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    & Withers, B

    Andrade, T. & Withers, B. A simple holographic model of momentum relaxation. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2014, 1-20 (2014)

    work page 2014

  80. [80]

    & Kiritsis, E

    Gout´ eraux, B. & Kiritsis, E. Generalized holographic quantum criticality at finite density. Journal Of High Energy Physics.2011, 1-58 (2011)

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.