REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Deep learning has produced state-of-the-art results for a variety of tasks. While such approaches for supervised learning have performed well, they assume that training and testing data are drawn from the same distribution, which may not always be the case. As a complement to this challenge, single-source unsupervised domain adaptation can handle situations where a network is trained on labeled data from a source domain and unlabeled data from a related but different target domain with the goal of performing well at test-time on the target domain. Many single-source and typically homogeneous unsupervised deep domain adaptation approaches have thus been developed, combining the powerful, hierarchical representations from deep learning with domain adaptation to reduce reliance on potentially-costly target data labels. This survey will compare these approaches by examining alternative methods, the unique and common elements, results, and theoretical insights. We follow this with a look at application areas and open research directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Towards a Problem-Oriented Domain Adaptation Framework for Machine Learning
A domain adaptation framework classifying problems into five causal shift scenarios, with solution recommendations and a user study showing improved scenario identification.
-
Bayesian Generative Models for Knowledge Transfer in MRI Semantic Segmentation Problems
Using a VAE-learned prior over convolutional filters from a source MRI dataset improves small-data tumor segmentation over pre-training and random initialization, per BRATS2018 experiments.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.