Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

MVHumanNet++: A Large-scale Dataset of Multi-view Daily Dressing Human Captures with Richer Annotations for 3D Human Digitization

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MVHumanNet++ claims the largest multi-view human capture dataset to date, with 4,500 identities, 9,000 outfits, and 645.1 million annotated frames, and shows that downstream reconstruction and generation models improve as training data…

desk verdict MVHumanNet++ is a modest but real extension of the authors' CVPR 2024 dataset; the scale is valuable, but pseudo-label quality in loose clothing and internal inconsistencies need work before I'd trust the annotations fully. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.01838 v1 pith:CDD7KL6E submitted 2025-05-03 cs.CV

Chenghong Li , Hongjie Liao , Yihao Zhi , Xihe Yang , Zhengwentai Sun , Jiahao Chang , Shuguang Cui , Xiaoguang Han This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords multi-viewdataset3DhumandigitizationcaptureSMPL/SMPLXannotationneuralrenderinggenerationnormalanddepthmaps
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

MVHumanNet++ sets out to give the 3D human community the kind of large-scale resource that powered large language models and text-to-image models: 4,500 people in everyday clothing, captured by synchronized multi-view camera rigs, yielding 9,000 outfits, 60,000 motion sequences, and 645.1 million frames. Alongside raw images it provides masks, camera parameters, 2D and 3D keypoints, SMPL/SMPLX body-model parameters, action labels, textual descriptions, and newly added normal and depth maps. The paper's central claim is that this scale is what has been missing: pilot experiments show action-recognition accuracy, generalizable neural rendering and Gaussian-splatting reconstruction, text-driven human image generation, and 3D generative models all improve as more of the dataset is used for training. A sympathetic reader would take the contribution as evidence that human-centric 3D tasks can move from per-subject optimization to data-driven generalization, provided the automatic annotation pipeline holds up across daily clothing.

What carries the argument

The central object is the MVHumanNet++ dataset itself: a synchronized multi-view capture arrangement (48 cameras at up to 12MP in the primary rig and 24 cameras at 5MP in the secondary rig) plus a largely automatic annotation pipeline. The pipeline runs in stages: human masks are produced by a human-vision segmentation model and refined by a contour post-processing algorithm, 2D keypoints and multi-view triangulation give 3D skeletons, a multi-view body-model fitting procedure is regularized by a variational body-pose prior to prevent twisted joints, and normal estimates feed a Gaussian-splatting surface optimization whose rendered depth becomes the dataset's depth maps. The work of this machinery is to turn raw multi-view video into a reusable, ready-to-train asset: the claimed value is that any downstream model improves predictably as more of these annotated outfits are fed in.

What would settle it

Take a random sample of sequences with loose-fitting clothing (wide skirts, open jackets, loose trousers), hand-correct the masks on a few hundred frames, and measure how often the largest-contour step erases a detached limb, a flapping hem, or a separate garment piece; also compare the Gaussian-splatting-rendered depth maps against multi-view stereo or structured-light depth on a subset. If the error rate is high or the depth errors are systematic, the claimed utility of the annotations for reconstruction across all 9,000 outfits fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that a deliberately ordinary-data capture strategy, everyday outfits, 500 action types, two outfits per person, and short motion sequences in a calibrated 48- or 24-camera dome, can scale human performance capture to sizes an order of magnitude beyond the closest prior multi-view human dataset, and that the resulting annotations (masks, cameras, keypoints, SMPL/SMPLX parameters, text, normal maps, depth maps) convert that raw scale into measurable gains across 2D and 3D human tasks. Concretely, it reports that generalizable human reconstruction models trained on 5,000 outfits outperform the same models trained on 100 or 2,000 outfits, that pretraining on the dataset and fine-tuning on a smaller public benchmark beats training on that benchmark from scratch, that regenerated SMPL/SMPLX fits with a body-pose prior remove twisting artifacts and improve per-subject animatable reconstruction, and that generative models for 2D, 3D, and multi-view humans improve in image quality scores as training subjects increase. It frames the dataset as the current largest-scale 3D human dataset.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the fully automatic annotation pipeline, automatically segmented human masks, triangulated keypoints, body-model fitting with a pose prior, and rendered normal and depth maps, produces labels accurate enough for every one of the 9,000 outfits, including loose clothing, without per-frame ground-truth checks; in particular, the mask post-processing step that keeps only the largest outer contour can silently erase body parts that appear detached in loose garments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Scaling training data from 100 to 5,000 outfits raises novel-view synthesis quality for generalizable neural rendering and Gaussian-splatting reconstruction methods, with image-quality scores improving for both scene-level and human-prior baselines.
  • A model pretrained on MVHumanNet++ and then fine-tuned on a smaller public human benchmark outperforms the same model trained on that benchmark from scratch.
  • The improved SMPL/SMPLX fits, regularized by a body-pose prior, yield higher-fidelity per-subject animatable Gaussian reconstruction than the earlier annotation version.
  • Text-conditioned, pose-conditioned human image generation and multi-view human generative models both improve when trained on the larger split of the dataset rather than the smaller split.
  • The dataset's rendered depth maps can serve as supervision for generalizable human reconstruction, reducing depth ambiguity when reconstructing humans from unconstrained image pairs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the mask and pose annotations are accurate on loose clothing, the dataset's 60,000 labeled motion sequences could support video-level generative models of humans, not just single-frame reconstruction, a use the paper does not demonstrate.
  • Editorial inference: because the depth maps are rendered from the same Gaussian-splatting fits that reconstruction models learn from, downstream gains on depth-supervised tasks may partly reflect alignment between training labels and model family rather than ground-truth geometry; a natural stress test is evaluating on independently captured depth.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's pattern of performance improving with scale on every tested task suggests the dataset may behave like a scaling-law resource for human digitization, but the experiments cover only 62% of the data, so whether the trend continues on the full 4,500 identities is untested.
  • Editorial inference: the manual text descriptions paired with multi-view images could be used for text-driven avatar generation and retrieval, an application the paper leaves mostly implicit beyond image generation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces MVHumanNet++, a multi-view human capture dataset claimed to contain 4,500 human identities, 9,000 daily outfits, 60,000 motion sequences, and 645.1 million frames recorded with 48 or 24 synchronized RGB cameras. The dataset is advertised with annotations including human masks, camera parameters, 2D/3D keypoints, SMPL/SMPLX parameters, text descriptions, and newly added normal and depth maps. The authors describe the capture hardware, the recruitment and motion-protocol design, an automated annotation pipeline (Sapiens masks, OpenPose keypoints, EasyMocap SMPL fitting with VPoser, and 2DGS-rendered normal/depth maps), and a series of pilot studies on action recognition, generalizable NeRF and 3DGS reconstruction, text-driven image generation, generative models, and fine-tuning DUSt3R, reporting that larger training subsets yield improved downstream performance.

Significance. If the dataset is released with the claimed scale and usable annotation quality, it would be a valuable community resource for human-centric 3D vision, filling a gap between small-scale multi-view human datasets and large-scale object datasets. The paper's pilot studies provide a concrete demonstration of scaling benefits across several representative tasks, and the addition of normal and depth pseudo-labels is a useful extension over the original MVHumanNet. However, the significance rests on two unverified pillars: the exact scale and composition of the dataset (several counts are internally inconsistent) and the reliability of the automated annotations, especially for loose clothing, which is the regime the paper explicitly targets. The extensive experimental section is a strength, but the lack of quantitative annotation validation weakens the central claim.

major comments (5)
  1. [§1 and §3.2] The paper gives inconsistent counts of motion sequences. Section 1 states each participant is recorded in 'seven different motion sequences', while Section 3.2 describes a protocol of 12 action sets per participant (six in the first outfit and six in the second) plus in-place A-pose rotations. Neither the abstract's 60,000 motion sequences nor Table 1's 'Actions' column of 500 can be derived from these numbers (4,500 × 7 = 31,500; 4,500 × 12 = 54,000; with rotations the total would differ again). Please define what constitutes a 'motion sequence' (e.g., one performance of one action on one side, or a full outfit session) and reconcile all reported counts in the text, abstract, and Table 1.
  2. [§3.3, Algorithm 1] Algorithm 1's mask-enhancement step discards all outer contours except the largest one. In loose clothing, the exact regime where the authors note Sapiens masks 'often exhibit noticeable artifacts', human silhouettes can split into multiple connected components (e.g., an arm separated by a segmentation error or a flared skirt occluding the legs). The procedure would delete those components rather than merge them, possibly erasing genuine body parts. Because these masks feed the normal/depth generation (via 2DGS), any mask-conditioned fitting, and the released annotations, this post-processing choice is load-bearing. The paper provides only qualitative visualization (Figs. 6, 8, 9) and no quantitative evaluation (e.g., IoU against manual masks on a sample stratified by garment type, or a multi-view consistency check). Without such validation, the claim that MVHumanNet++ provides reliable masks for 3D human digitization across 9,000 daily outfits is not established.
  3. [§3.3, Depth Maps and §4.4] The depth maps are rendered from 2D Gaussian Splatting (2DGS) that was itself refined using Sapiens normal maps, and these same depth maps are then used as pseudo-labels to supervise EVA-Gaussian's depth estimator. The paper does not evaluate the accuracy or consistency of the depth pseudo-labels directly, for example by checking multi-view depth agreement or comparing rendered depth against a small set of manual/geometric ground-truth depth on controlled captures. Since the depth maps are presented as a new annotation modality that is 'a reliable source of geometric information', the absence of any direct geometric validation makes it impossible to assess their contribution independently of the downstream rendering metrics.
  4. [Table 1 and Introduction] The '#Actions' column in Table 1 is ambiguous and the comparison with DNA-Rendering is unverifiable. The MVHumanNet++ text says the dataset contains 500 motion types, while the abstract reports 60,000 motion sequences; Table 1 lists '500' in the #Actions column for MVHumanNet++ and '1187' for DNA-Rendering, yet the introduction claims MVHumanNet++ surpasses DNA-Rendering 'by an order of magnitude in terms of motion'. If #Actions counts action types, 500 < 1187; if it counts sequences, the column mixes units across datasets. Please specify the metric and use consistent units in all comparative statements.
  5. [Abstract and Conclusion] The abstract and introduction state that MVHumanNet++ 'is publicly available' at a URL, while the Conclusion says 'We plan to release the MVHumanNet++ dataset with annotations publicly'. These two statements directly contradict each other regarding the dataset's availability status. Please correct this inconsistency and clarify whether the dataset is currently downloadable and under what terms.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains several typos and ungrammatical phrases, including 'the emergency of' (should be 'the emergence of'), 'comparsion' in the caption of Fig. 7, and 'we refer human prior' in Section 4.2. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [References] References [25] and [87] are the same paper (Pavlakos et al., 'Expressive body capture') and should be merged or cross-referenced. Also, reference [24] contains a typo 'T oG' instead of 'TOG'.
  3. [§4, first paragraph] The text says experiments used '62% of the available data' and '2800 identities ... amounting to a total of 5500 sets', but 2800 identities × 2 outfits would give 5600 sets. The relation between 2800 identities, 5500 sets, and the 62% figure should be clarified.
  4. [§4.1] The action-recognition experiment reports training on 'approximately 4000 outfits' and testing on '400 outfits', whereas other experiments in Section 4 use 5500 outfits. Please clarify whether these are intentional subsets and how they relate to the overall 62% split.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Mild, acknowledged pseudo-label loop in depth maps; core dataset-scale claim is independent and not circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3.3 (Depth Maps); Sec. 4.4 (Generalizable 3DGS Reconstruction for Human)]
    "Inspired by the aforementioned normal-refined 2DGS results, we use 2D Gaussian primitives and multi-view camera parameters to render human depth maps for each view. ... For EVA-Gaussian, we pretrain a depth estimator using rendered human depth maps as ground truth in the first stage, which is then used for Gaussian parameter prediction in the second stage."

    The depth maps are not measured independently: they are rendered from a 2DGS fit that was itself regularized by Sapiens normal pseudo-labels derived from the same multi-view RGB frames. EVA-Gaussian's depth estimator is then pretrained with these rendered depths as 'ground truth,' so the depth it predicts is, by construction, a reproduction of the 2DGS/Sapiens geometry rather than a novel measurement. Any downstream claim that EVA-Gaussian 'benefits' from these depth labels inherits the same pseudo-label source. That said, the paper explicitly labels the depth as pseudo-labels, and the reported novel-view metrics use held-out RGB images, so the loop is acknowledged, localized, and not the basis of the dataset's core scale claim.

full rationale

MVHumanNet++ is a dataset paper; its central claims are empirical scale statistics (4,500 identities, 9,000 outfits, 645.1M frames) and pilot-study demonstrations that training on more data improves downstream models. These claims are evaluated with held-out identities/views and standard metrics (PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS, FID, action accuracy), so they do not reduce to the dataset's own definitions. The self-citations to the authors' CVPR 2024 MVHumanNet paper are descriptive (mask pipeline origin, EasyMocap usage) and not load-bearing for the new contributions. The one genuinely circular element is the depth/normal loop: Sapiens normals derived from the same RGB frames regularize 2DGS; depth maps are rendered from that 2DGS; and those rendered depths are used as pseudo-label supervision for EVA-Gaussian's depth estimator. Because the paper calls these labels 'pseudo' and does not use them as the final evaluation ground truth for novel-view synthesis, this is a minor, acknowledged circular loop rather than a forced derivation. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz-smuggling, or renamed-known-result pattern is present. Score 2 reflects the mild pseudo-label loop; the core largest-scale-dataset claim remains independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on the reliability of off-the-shelf annotation models and on the accuracy of the reported dataset statistics. No new physical entities or mathematical axioms are introduced. The only explicit tuning parameter is the hole-area threshold in the mask post-processing, which is not quantified.

free parameters (1)
  • Thold (hole area threshold) = not reported
    Algorithm 1 uses a threshold Thold to decide which holes in masks to fill automatically; the value affects mask quality for loose clothing, but the paper does not state it.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Off-the-shelf models (Sapiens, OpenPose, EasyMocap, VPoser) produce sufficiently accurate annotations on 645M frames without per-frame human review.
    Sec. 3.3 builds the entire annotation pipeline on these models; no quantitative validation against ground truth is provided.
  • domain assumption Depth maps rendered from normal-refined 2DGS accurately represent scene depth so they can serve as pseudo-labels.
    Sec. 3.3, Depth Maps: depth is rendered from 2DGS primitives, and Sec. 4.4 uses these depth maps to pretrain EVA-Gaussian's depth estimator; the error of these maps is not measured.
  • domain assumption The multi-view capture systems remain synchronized and calibrated across six months of collection.
    Sec. 3.1 and 3.3: calibration is performed at the beginning, middle, and end of each day, but calibration drift is not quantified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MVHumanNet++: A Large-scale Dataset of Multi-view Daily Dressing Human Captures with Richer Annotations for 3D Human Digitization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CDD7KL6E

@misc{pith2026250501838,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MVHumanNet++: A Large-scale Dataset of Multi-view Daily Dressing Human Captures with Richer Annotations for 3D Human Digitization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CDD7KL6E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.01838}
}
read the original abstract

In this era, the success of large language models and text-to-image models can be attributed to the driving force of large-scale datasets. However, in the realm of 3D vision, while significant progress has been achieved in object-centric tasks through large-scale datasets like Objaverse and MVImgNet, human-centric tasks have seen limited advancement, largely due to the absence of a comparable large-scale human dataset. To bridge this gap, we present MVHumanNet++, a dataset that comprises multi-view human action sequences of 4,500 human identities. The primary focus of our work is on collecting human data that features a large number of diverse identities and everyday clothing using multi-view human capture systems, which facilitates easily scalable data collection. Our dataset contains 9,000 daily outfits, 60,000 motion sequences and 645 million frames with extensive annotations, including human masks, camera parameters, 2D and 3D keypoints, SMPL/SMPLX parameters, and corresponding textual descriptions. Additionally, the proposed MVHumanNet++ dataset is enhanced with newly processed normal maps and depth maps, significantly expanding its applicability and utility for advanced human-centric research. To explore the potential of our proposed MVHumanNet++ dataset in various 2D and 3D visual tasks, we conducted several pilot studies to demonstrate the performance improvements and effective applications enabled by the scale provided by MVHumanNet++. As the current largest-scale 3D human dataset, we hope that the release of MVHumanNet++ dataset with annotations will foster further innovations in the domain of 3D human-centric tasks at scale. MVHumanNet++ is publicly available at https://kevinlee09.github.io/research/MVHumanNet++/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.01838 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We introduce MVHumanNet++, a large-scale dataset of multi-view human images with unprecedented scale in human subjects, daily outfits, motion sequences and frames. Top left and right: Examples of multi-view poses featuring different human identities with various daily dressing in our dataset. Top middle: Our multi-view capture system includes 48 cameras of 12MP resolution. Bottom: Comprehensive visualization of all … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The distribution of performers’ attributes. The gender, age, weight, and height of performers are recorded and carefully controlled. The statistical analysis of these attributes reflects a diverse range among the performers involved in MVHumanNet++ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The garment type and color distribution of outfits of performers. Diverse colors and types of dressing are required for each invited performer. The statistical results show the wide coverage of daily clothes. 3.1 Multi-view Synchronized Capture System We collected all the data using two sets of synchronized indoor video capture systems. The primary framework of the capture system consists of 48 high-definition indus… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A text description example. The description contains various information, such as age, height, garment and hairstyle. capabilities of their actions. Conversely, no restrictions are imposed on performers’ weight or height, as these variables are deemed to have minimal i…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Data annotation pipeline. The manual and automatic annotation pipeline for action localization, text description, masks, 2D/3D keypoints, parametric models, normal maps and depth maps. system operate at 30 frames per second, further enhancing the quality of motion sequ…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mask processing visualization. From left to right in each column are the input image, SAM segmentation result, Sapiens segmentation result, and final mask after post-processing. extensive research and applications in 3D digital human community, we conducted pre-process…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: SMPLX comparsion results. The zoom-in boxes with blue dot lines show the annotation quality before optimization and the pink ones show quality improvements. Previous SMPLX estimation results show ankle twisting and self-intersection artifacts in the left column images,…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normal visualization. From left to right of each column are the original image, Sapiens estimated normal, 2DGS rendered normal without Sapiens normal, and 2DGS rendered normal with Sapiens normal input [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Depth visualization. Visual results of depth maps rendered from normal-refined 2DGS. action recognition. As the dataset expands from single￾view 2D data to multi-view 3D data, existing algorithms may encounter new challenges. In Sec. 4.2 and Sec. 4.4, we demonstrate ex…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Qualitative comparison of IBRNet and GPNeRF on the test set of HuMMan. Without finetuning, the models only trained on MVHumanNet++ may suffer from domain gap. With some time for finetuning, the models outperform the ones trained merely on the train set of HuMMan. SMPL…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The novel view synthesis results of IBRNet and GPNeRF on unseen data of MVHumanNet++. GT means ground truth. The number of 100, 2000, and 5000 indicate the respective quantities of outfits utilized during the training process. Animatable Gaussians as the baseline meth…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The visualization results of Animatable Gaussians for both novel view and novel pose synthesis. GT denotes ground truth, Orig refers to the original version of SMPLX, and New refers to the updated SMPLX from MVHumanNet++. GT Orig New Orig template New template [PITH_…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The visualization results of Animatable Gaussians [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Novel view synthesis results of LaRa on the test data of MVHumanNet++. GT means ground truth. The number of 100, 2000, and 5000 indicate the respective quantities of outfits utilized during the training process. 4.5 Text-driven Image Generation MVHumanNet++ is able to…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Novel view synthesis results of EVA-Gaussian trained on MVHumanNet++. GT means ground truth. The number of 100, 2000, and 5000 indicate the respective quantities of outfits utilized during the training process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Visualize the results of StyleGAN2 trained with MVHumanNet++. We randomly sample latent codes from Gaussian distribution and obtain the results. Number of Subjects FID↓ StyleGAN2 [98] GET3D [41] 3000 14.05 41.54 5500 7.08 (-6.97) 25.12 (-16.42) TABLE 8: Quantitative c…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The visualization results of GET3D trained with MVHumanNet++ rendered by Blender [100]. The first and third rows represent the geometry, while the second and fourth row shows the texture corresponding to geometry. facial results are particularly sensitive and may suff…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: The visualization results of DUSt3R fine-tuned on MVHumanNet++. We visualize the colored point cloud from two input images. 5 CONCLUSIONS In this work, we present MVHumanNet++, a large-scale multi-view dataset containing 4,500 human identities, 9,000 daily outfits and…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 4DHumanDiff: Direct Text-to-4DGS Generation for Consistent 360-Degree Dynamic Humans

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A diffusion model trained on 60,000 fitted 4D Gaussian Splatting human clips generates text-prompted, view-consistent dynamic humans directly in 4D, over 10x faster than video-first pipelines.

  2. Online Neural Space Time Memory for Dynamic Novel View Synthesis

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Neural Space-Time Memory (NSTM) decouples low-frequency memory updates from per-frame synthesis with cross-view attention, enabling real-time minute-long dynamic novel view synthesis from multi-view streams.

  3. AnchorCrafter: Animate Cyber-Anchors Selling Your Products via Human-Object Interacting Video Generation

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AnchorCrafter adds multi-view object appearance conditioning, depth-based object motion, and hand mesh control to a pose-guided human video diffusion model, letting a cyber-anchor interact with a customized product in...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Segment anything,

    A. Kirillov, E. Mintun, N. Ravi, H. Mao, C. Rolland, L. Gustafson, T. Xiao, S. Whitehead, A. C. Berg, W.-Y. Lo, P . Dollar, and R. Girshick, “Segment anything,” in ICCV, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models,

    C. Schuhmann, R. Beaumont, R. Vencu, C. Gordon, R. Wightman, M. Cherti, T. Coombes, A. Katta, C. Mullis, M. Wortsman et al., “Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P . Esser, and B. Ommer, “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in CVPR, 2022

    2022

  4. [4]

    Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3d objects,

    M. Deitke, D. Schwenk, J. Salvador, L. Weihs, O. Michel, E. Van- derBilt, L. Schmidt, K. Ehsani, A. Kembhavi, and A. Farhadi, “Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3d objects,” in CVPR, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Objaverse-xl: A universe of 10m+ 3d objects,

    M. Deitke, R. Liu, M. Wallingford, H. Ngo, O. Michel, A. Kusupati, A. Fan, C. Laforte, V . Voleti, S. Y. Gadre et al. , “Objaverse-xl: A universe of 10m+ 3d objects,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05663 , 2023

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Mvimgnet: A large-scale dataset of multi-view images,

    X. Yu, M. Xu, Y. Zhang, H. Liu, C. Ye, Y. Wu, Z. Yan, C. Zhu, Z. Xiong, T. Liang et al. , “Mvimgnet: A large-scale dataset of multi-view images,” in CVPR, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Zero-1-to-3: Zero-shot one image to 3d object,

    R. Liu, R. Wu, B. Van Hoorick, P . Tokmakov, S. Zakharov, and C. Vondrick, “Zero-1-to-3: Zero-shot one image to 3d object,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 9298–9309

    2023

  8. [8]

    Lrm: Large reconstruction model for single image to 3d,

    Y. Hong, K. Zhang, J. Gu, S. Bi, Y. Zhou, D. Liu, F. Liu, K. Sunkavalli, T. Bui, and H. Tan, “Lrm: Large reconstruction model for single image to 3d,” 2023

    2023

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    https://renderpeople.com/

  2. [10]

    Function4d: Real-time human volumetric capture from very sparse consumer rgbd sensors,

    T. Yu, Z. Zheng, K. Guo, P . Liu, Q. Dai, and Y. Liu, “Function4d: Real-time human volumetric capture from very sparse consumer rgbd sensors,” in CVPR, 2021, pp. 5746–5756

    2021

  3. [11]

    Neural body: Implicit neural representations with structured latent codes for novel view synthesis of dynamic humans,

    S. Peng, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, Q. Wang, Q. Shuai, H. Bao, and X. Zhou, “Neural body: Implicit neural representations with structured latent codes for novel view synthesis of dynamic humans,” in CVPR, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Hu- man3.6m: Large scale datasets and predictive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments,

    C. Ionescu, D. Papava, V . Olaru, and C. Sminchisescu, “Hu- man3.6m: Large scale datasets and predictive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1325– 1339, 2013

    2013

  5. [13]

    Ai choreographer: Music conditioned 3d dance generation with aist++,

    R. Li, S. Yang, D. A. Ross, and A. Kanazawa, “Ai choreographer: Music conditioned 3d dance generation with aist++,” in ICCV, 2021

    2021

  6. [14]

    Generalizable neural performer: Learning robust radiance fields for human novel view synthesis,

    W. Cheng, S. Xu, J. Piao, C. Qian, W. Wu, K.-Y. Lin, and H. Li, “Generalizable neural performer: Learning robust radiance fields for human novel view synthesis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11798 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Dna-rendering: A diverse neural actor repository for high-fidelity human-centric rendering,

    W. Cheng, R. Chen, S. Fan, W. Yin, K. Chen, Z. Cai, J. Wang, Y. Gao, Z. Yu, Z. Lin et al., “Dna-rendering: A diverse neural actor repository for high-fidelity human-centric rendering,” in ICCV, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Humanrf: High-fidelity neural radiance fields for humans in motion,

    M. I¸ sık, M. Rünz, M. Georgopoulos, T. Khakhulin, J. Starck, L. Agapito, and M. Nießner, “Humanrf: High-fidelity neural radiance fields for humans in motion,” ACM T ransactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 42, no. 4, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    Panoptic studio: A massively multiview system for social motion capture,

    H. Joo, H. Liu, L. Tan, L. Gui, B. Nabbe, I. Matthews, T. Kanade, S. Nobuhara, and Y. Sheikh, “Panoptic studio: A massively multiview system for social motion capture,” in ICCV, 2015

    2015

  10. [18]

    Monocular 3d human pose estimation in the wild using improved cnn supervision,

    D. Mehta, H. Rhodin, D. Casas, P . Fua, O. Sotnychenko, W. Xu, and C. Theobalt, “Monocular 3d human pose estimation in the wild using improved cnn supervision,” in International conference on 3D vision (3DV) . IEEE, 2017

    2017

  11. [19]

    Multi-view neural human rendering,

    M. Wu, Y. Wang, Q. Hu, and J. Yu, “Multi-view neural human rendering,” in CVPR, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Neural actor: Neural free-view synthesis of human actors with pose control,

    L. Liu, M. Habermann, V . Rudnev, K. Sarkar, J. Gu, and C. Theobalt, “Neural actor: Neural free-view synthesis of human actors with pose control,” ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) , vol. 40, no. 6, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Humbi: A large multiview dataset of human body expressions,

    Z. Yu, J. S. Yoon, I. K. Lee, P . Venkatesh, J. Park, J. Yu, and H. S. Park, “Humbi: A large multiview dataset of human body expressions,” in CVPR, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Structured local radiance fields for human avatar modeling,

    Z. Zheng, H. Huang, T. Yu, H. Zhang, Y. Guo, and Y. Liu, “Structured local radiance fields for human avatar modeling,” in CVPR, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Humman: Multi-modal 4d human dataset for versatile sensing and modeling,

    Z. Cai, D. Ren, A. Zeng, Z. Lin, T. Yu, W. Wang, X. Fan, Y. Gao, Y. Yu, L. Pan et al. , “Humman: Multi-modal 4d human dataset for versatile sensing and modeling,” in European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    SMPL: A skinned multi-person linear model,

    M. Loper, N. Mahmood, J. Romero, G. Pons-Moll, and M. J. Black, “SMPL: A skinned multi-person linear model,” ACM T ransactions on Graphics(T oG), vol. 34, no. 6, 2015

    2015

  17. [25]

    Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image,

    G. Pavlakos, V . Choutas, N. Ghorbani, T. Bolkart, A. A. Osman, D. Tzionas, and M. J. Black, “Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image,” in CVPR, 2019

    2019

  18. [26]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,

    B. Mildenhall, P . P . Srinivasan, M. Tancik, J. T. Barron, R. Ra- mamoorthi, and R. Ng, “Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis,” in ECCV, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    B. Kerbl, G. Kopanas, T. Leimkühler, and G. Drettakis, “3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.” ACM T rans. Graph., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 139–1, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Dust3r: Geometric 3d vision made easy,

    S. Wang, V . Leroy, Y. Cabon, B. Chidlovskii, and J. Revaud, “Dust3r: Geometric 3d vision made easy,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 20 697–20 709

    2024

  21. [29]

    Mvhumannet: A large-scale dataset of multi-view daily dressing human captures,

    Z. Xiong, C. Li, K. Liu, H. Liao, J. Hu, J. Zhu, S. Ning, L. Qiu, C. Wang, S. Wang et al., “Mvhumannet: A large-scale dataset of multi-view daily dressing human captures,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 19 801–19 811

    2024

  22. [30]

    Generative adversarial nets,

    I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “Generative adversarial nets,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , Z. Ghahra- mani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, and K. Weinberger, Eds., 2014

    2014

  23. [31]

    Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks,

    P . Isola, J.-Y. Zhu, T. Zhou, and A. A. Efros, “Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    A style-based generator archi- tecture for generative adversarial networks,

    T. Karras, S. Laine, and T. Aila, “A style-based generator archi- tecture for generative adversarial networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2019, pp. 4401–4410

    2019

  25. [33]

    Deepsdf: Learning continuous signed distance functions for shape representation,

    J. J. Park, P . Florence, J. Straub, R. Newcombe, and S. Lovegrove, “Deepsdf: Learning continuous signed distance functions for shape representation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2019, pp. 165–174

    2019

  26. [34]

    Occupancy networks: Learning 3d reconstruction in function space,

    L. Mescheder, M. Oechsle, M. Niemeyer, S. Nowozin, and A. Geiger, “Occupancy networks: Learning 3d reconstruction in function space,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2019, pp. 4460–4470

    2019

  27. [35]

    Learning implicit fields for generative shape modeling,

    Z. Chen and H. Zhang, “Learning implicit fields for generative shape modeling,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2019, pp. 5939–5948

    2019

  28. [36]

    Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding,

    T. Müller, A. Evans, C. Schied, and A. Keller, “Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding,” ACM T ransactions on Graphics (T oG), vol. 41, no. 4, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Insetgan for full-body image generation,

    A. Frühstück, K. K. Singh, E. Shechtman, N. J. Mitra, P . Wonka, and J. Lu, “Insetgan for full-body image generation,” in CVPR, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Pifu: Pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution clothed human digitization,

    S. Saito, Z. Huang, R. Natsume, S. Morishima, A. Kanazawa, and H. Li, “Pifu: Pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution clothed human digitization,” in ICCV, 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    Neural human performer: Learning generalizable radiance fields for human performance rendering,

    Y. Kwon, D. Kim, D. Ceylan, and H. Fuchs, “Neural human performer: Learning generalizable radiance fields for human performance rendering,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Efficient geometry-aware 3d generative adversarial networks,

    E. R. Chan, C. Z. Lin, M. A. Chan, K. Nagano, B. Pan, S. De Mello, O. Gallo, L. J. Guibas, J. Tremblay, S. Khamis et al. , “Efficient geometry-aware 3d generative adversarial networks,” in Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Get3d: A generative model of high quality 3d textured shapes learned from images,

    J. Gao, T. Shen, Z. Wang, W. Chen, K. Yin, D. Li, O. Litany, Z. Gojcic, and S. Fidler, “Get3d: A generative model of high quality 3d textured shapes learned from images,” Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Eva3d: Compo- sitional 3d human generation from 2d image collections,

    F. Hong, Z. Chen, Y. Lan, L. Pan, and Z. Liu, “Eva3d: Compo- sitional 3d human generation from 2d image collections,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.04888, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Humangen: Generating human radiance fields with explicit 14 priors,

    S. Jiang, H. Jiang, Z. Wang, H. Luo, W. Chen, and L. Xu, “Humangen: Generating human radiance fields with explicit 14 priors,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    Get3dhuman: Lifting stylegan-human into a 3d generative model using pixel-aligned reconstruction priors,

    Z. Xiong, D. Kang, D. Jin, W. Chen, L. Bao, S. Cui, and X. Han, “Get3dhuman: Lifting stylegan-human into a 3d generative model using pixel-aligned reconstruction priors,” in ICCV, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Stylegan-human: A data-centric odyssey of human generation,

    J. Fu, S. Li, Y. Jiang, K.-Y. Lin, C. Qian, C. C. Loy, W. Wu, and Z. Liu, “Stylegan-human: A data-centric odyssey of human generation,” in ECCV. Springer, 2022

    2022

  38. [46]

    Pifuhd: Multi-level pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution 3d human digitization,

    S. Saito, T. Simon, J. Saragih, and H. Joo, “Pifuhd: Multi-level pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution 3d human digitization,” in CVPR, 2020

    2020

  39. [47]

    Text2human: Text-driven controllable human image generation,

    Y. Jiang, S. Yang, H. Qiu, W. Wu, C. C. Loy, and Z. Liu, “Text2human: Text-driven controllable human image generation,” ACM T ransactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1–11, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Avatarclip: Zero-shot text-driven generation and animation of 3d avatars,

    F. Hong, M. Zhang, L. Pan, Z. Cai, L. Yang, and Z. Liu, “Avatarclip: Zero-shot text-driven generation and animation of 3d avatars,” ACM T ransactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1–19, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agar- wal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P . Mishkin, J. Clark et al. , “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” in International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 2021, pp. 8748–8763

    2021

  42. [50]

    Deepfashion: Powering robust clothes recognition and retrieval with rich annotations,

    Z. Liu, P . Luo, S. Qiu, X. Wang, and X. Tang, “Deepfashion: Powering robust clothes recognition and retrieval with rich annotations,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2016, pp. 1096–1104

    2016

  43. [51]

    Dwnet: Dense warp-based network for pose-guided human video generation,

    P . Zablotskaia, A. Siarohin, B. Zhao, and L. Sigal, “Dwnet: Dense warp-based network for pose-guided human video generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.09139 , 2019

    1910 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gaussianavatar: Towards realistic human avatar modeling from a single video via animatable 3d gaussians,

    L. Hu, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, B. Zhou, B. Liu, S. Zhang, and L. Nie, “Gaussianavatar: Towards realistic human avatar modeling from a single video via animatable 3d gaussians,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 634–644

    2024

  45. [53]

    Gauhuman: Articulated gaussian splatting from monocular human videos,

    S. Hu, T. Hu, and Z. Liu, “Gauhuman: Articulated gaussian splatting from monocular human videos,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 20 418–20 431

    2024

  46. [54]

    Gart: Gaussian articulated template models,

    J. Lei, Y. Wang, G. Pavlakos, L. Liu, and K. Daniilidis, “Gart: Gaussian articulated template models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 19 876–19 887

    2024

  47. [55]

    Animatable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling,

    Z. Li, Z. Zheng, L. Wang, and Y. Liu, “Animatable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 19 711–19 722

    2024

  48. [56]

    Ash: Animatable gaussian splats for efficient and photoreal human rendering,

    H. Pang, H. Zhu, A. Kortylewski, C. Theobalt, and M. Habermann, “Ash: Animatable gaussian splats for efficient and photoreal human rendering,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 1165–1175

    2024

  49. [57]

    Gps-gaussian: Generalizable pixel-wise 3d gaussian splatting for real-time human novel view synthesis,

    S. Zheng, B. Zhou, R. Shao, B. Liu, S. Zhang, L. Nie, and Y. Liu, “Gps-gaussian: Generalizable pixel-wise 3d gaussian splatting for real-time human novel view synthesis,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 19 680–19 690

    2024

  50. [58]

    Generaliz- able human gaussians for sparse view synthesis,

    Y. Kwon, B. Fang, Y. Lu, H. Dong, C. Zhang, F. V . Carrasco, A. Mosella-Montoro, J. Xu, S. Takagi, D. Kim et al. , “Generaliz- able human gaussians for sparse view synthesis,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2025, pp. 451–468

    2025

  51. [59]

    Eva-gaussian: 3d gaussian-based real-time human novel view synthesis under diverse camera settings,

    Y. Hu, Z. Liu, J. Shao, Z. Lin, and J. Zhang, “Eva-gaussian: 3d gaussian-based real-time human novel view synthesis under diverse camera settings,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01425 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Faust: Dataset and evaluation for 3d mesh registration,

    F. Bogo, J. Romero, M. Loper, and M. J. Black, “Faust: Dataset and evaluation for 3d mesh registration,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2014

    2014

  53. [61]

    Dynamic faust: Registering human bodies in motion,

    F. Bogo, J. Romero, G. Pons-Moll, and M. J. Black, “Dynamic faust: Registering human bodies in motion,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2017

    2017

  54. [62]

    Detailed, ac- curate, human shape estimation from clothed 3d scan sequences,

    C. Zhang, S. Pujades, M. J. Black, and G. Pons-Moll, “Detailed, ac- curate, human shape estimation from clothed 3d scan sequences,” in CVPR, 2017

    2017

  55. [63]

    Cross-view action modeling, learning and recognition,

    J. Wang, X. Nie, Y. Xia, Y. Wu, and S.-C. Zhu, “Cross-view action modeling, learning and recognition,” in CVPR, 2014

    2014

  56. [64]

    Ntu rgb+ d 120: A large-scale benchmark for 3d human activity understanding,

    J. Liu, A. Shahroudy, M. Perez, G. Wang, L.-Y. Duan, and A. C. Kot, “Ntu rgb+ d 120: A large-scale benchmark for 3d human activity understanding,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2019

    2019

  57. [65]

    Ntu rgb+ d: A large scale dataset for 3d human activity analysis,

    A. Shahroudy, J. Liu, T.-T. Ng, and G. Wang, “Ntu rgb+ d: A large scale dataset for 3d human activity analysis,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2016, pp. 1010–1019

    2016

  58. [66]

    AMASS: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes,

    N. Mahmood, N. Ghorbani, N. F. Troje, G. Pons-Moll, and M. J. Black, “AMASS: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes,” in International Conference on Computer Vision , 2019

    2019

  59. [67]

    http://mocap.cs.cmu.edu/

  60. [68]

    H. G. Sai Charan Mahadevan, Karunanidhi Durai Ku-mar, https: //mocap.cs.sfu.ca/

  61. [69]

    Icon: Implicit clothed humans obtained from normals,

    Y. Xiu, J. Yang, D. Tzionas, and M. J. Black, “Icon: Implicit clothed humans obtained from normals,” in CVPR, 2022

    2022

  62. [70]

    Snarf: Differentiable forward skinning for animating non-rigid neural implicit shapes,

    X. Chen, Y. Zheng, M. J. Black, O. Hilliges, and A. Geiger, “Snarf: Differentiable forward skinning for animating non-rigid neural implicit shapes,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2021, pp. 11 594–11 604

    2021

  63. [71]

    Deephuman: 3d human reconstruction from a single image,

    Z. Zheng, T. Yu, Y. Wei, Q. Dai, and Y. Liu, “Deephuman: 3d human reconstruction from a single image,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , 2019

    2019

  64. [72]

    Deepmulticap: Performance capture of multiple characters using sparse multiview cameras,

    Y. Zheng, R. Shao, Y. Zhang, T. Yu, Z. Zheng, Q. Dai, and Y. Liu, “Deepmulticap: Performance capture of multiple characters using sparse multiview cameras,” in ICCV, 2021

    2021

  65. [73]

    X-avatar: Expressive human avatars,

    K. Shen, C. Guo, M. Kaufmann, J. J. Zarate, J. Valentin, J. Song, and O. Hilliges, “X-avatar: Expressive human avatars,” in CVPR, 2023

    2023

  66. [74]

    High-fidelity 3d human digitization from single 2k resolution images,

    S.-H. Han, M.-G. Park, J. H. Yoon, J.-M. Kang, Y.-J. Park, and H.-G. Jeon, “High-fidelity 3d human digitization from single 2k resolution images,” in CVPR, 2023

    2023

  67. [75]

    Learning to dress 3d people in generative clothing,

    Q. Ma, J. Yang, A. Ranjan, S. Pujades, G. Pons-Moll, S. Tang, and M. J. Black, “Learning to dress 3d people in generative clothing,” in CVPR, 2020

    2020

  68. [76]

    https://web.twindom.com/

  69. [77]

    https://secure.axyz-design.com/

  70. [78]

    https://3dpeople.com/

  71. [79]

    Articulated mesh animation from multi-view silhouettes,

    D. Vlasic, I. Baran, W. Matusik, and J. Popovi´ c, “Articulated mesh animation from multi-view silhouettes,” ACM T ransactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2008

    2008

  72. [80]

    Dynamic shape capture using multi-view photometric stereo,

    D. Vlasic, P . Peers, I. Baran, P . Debevec, J. Popovi´ c, S. Rusinkiewicz, and W. Matusik, “Dynamic shape capture using multi-view photometric stereo,” in ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2009 papers , 2009, pp. 1–11

    2009

  73. [81]

    Aist dance video database: Multi-genre, multi-dancer, and multi-camera database for dance information processing

    S. Tsuchida, S. Fukayama, M. Hamasaki, and M. Goto, “Aist dance video database: Multi-genre, multi-dancer, and multi-camera database for dance information processing.” in ISMIR, 2019

    2019

  74. [82]

    Real-time deep dynamic characters,

    M. Habermann, L. Liu, W. Xu, M. Zollhoefer, G. Pons-Moll, and C. Theobalt, “Real-time deep dynamic characters,” ACM T ransactions on Graphics (T oG), vol. 40, no. 4, 2021

    2021

  75. [83]

    Deepcap: Monocular human performance capture using weak supervision,

    M. Habermann, W. Xu, M. Zollhofer, G. Pons-Moll, and C. Theobalt, “Deepcap: Monocular human performance capture using weak supervision,” in CVPR, 2020

    2020

  76. [84]

    Sapiens: Foundation for human vision models,

    R. Khirodkar, T. Bagautdinov, J. Martinez, S. Zhaoen, A. James, P . Selednik, S. Anderson, and S. Saito, “Sapiens: Foundation for human vision models,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2024, pp. 206–228

    2024

  77. [85]

    Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields,

    Z. Cao, T. Simon, S.-E. Wei, and Y. Sheikh, “Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields,” in CVPR, 2017, pp. 7291–7299

    2017

  78. [86]

    Easymocap - make human motion capture easier

    E. Contributors, “Easymocap - make human motion capture easier.” Github, 2021, https://github.com/zju3dv/EasyMocap

    2021

  79. [87]

    Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image,

    G. Pavlakos, V . Choutas, N. Ghorbani, T. Bolkart, A. A. Osman, D. Tzionas, and M. J. Black, “Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , 2019

    2019

  80. [88]

    Wonder3d: Single image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion,

    X. Long, Y.-C. Guo, C. Lin, Y. Liu, Z. Dou, L. Liu, Y. Ma, S.-H. Zhang, M. Habermann, C. Theobalt et al. , “Wonder3d: Single image to 3d using cross-domain diffusion,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2024, pp. 9970–9980

    2024

  81. [89]

    Stablenormal: Reducing diffusion variance for stable and sharp normal,

    C. Ye, L. Qiu, X. Gu, Q. Zuo, Y. Wu, Z. Dong, L. Bo, Y. Xiu, and X. Han, “Stablenormal: Reducing diffusion variance for stable and sharp normal,” ACM T ransactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1–18, 2024

    2024

  82. [90]

    2d gaussian splatting for geometrically accurate radiance fields,

    B. Huang, Z. Yu, A. Chen, A. Geiger, and S. Gao, “2d gaussian splatting for geometrically accurate radiance fields,” in ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 conference papers , 2024, pp. 1–11

    2024

  83. [91]

    Implicit functions in feature space for 3d shape reconstruction and completion,

    J. Chibane, T. Alldieck, and G. Pons-Moll, “Implicit functions in feature space for 3d shape reconstruction and completion,” in 15 Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 6970–6981

    2020

  84. [92]

    Channel- wise topology refinement graph convolution for skeleton-based action recognition,

    Y. Chen, Z. Zhang, C. Yuan, B. Li, Y. Deng, and W. Hu, “Channel- wise topology refinement graph convolution for skeleton-based action recognition,” in ICCV, 2021

    2021

  85. [93]

    Infogcn: Representation learning for human skeleton-based action recognition,

    H.-g. Chi, M. H. Ha, S. Chi, S. W. Lee, Q. Huang, and K. Ramani, “Infogcn: Representation learning for human skeleton-based action recognition,” in CVPR, 2022

    2022

  86. [94]

    Learning discriminative represen- tations for skeleton based action recognition,

    H. Zhou, Q. Liu, and Y. Wang, “Learning discriminative represen- tations for skeleton based action recognition,” in ICCV, 2023

    2023

  87. [95]

    Geometry-guided progressive nerf for generalizable and efficient neural human rendering,

    M. Chen, J. Zhang, X. Xu, L. Liu, Y. Cai, J. Feng, and S. Yan, “Geometry-guided progressive nerf for generalizable and efficient neural human rendering,” in ECCV. Springer, 2022, pp. 222–239

    2022

  88. [96]

    Ibrnet: Learning multi-view image-based rendering,

    Q. Wang, Z. Wang, K. Genova, P . P . Srinivasan, H. Zhou, J. T. Barron, R. Martin-Brualla, N. Snavely, and T. Funkhouser, “Ibrnet: Learning multi-view image-based rendering,” in CVPR, 2021

    2021

  89. [97]

    Lara: Efficient large-baseline radiance fields,

    A. Chen, H. Xu, S. Esposito, S. Tang, and A. Geiger, “Lara: Efficient large-baseline radiance fields,” in European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 338–355

    2024

  90. [98]

    Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan,

    T. Karras, S. Laine, M. Aittala, J. Hellsten, J. Lehtinen, and T. Aila, “Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 8110–8119

    2020

  91. [99]

    Mv- dream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d generation,

    Y. Shi, P . Wang, J. Ye, M. Long, K. Li, and X. Yang, “Mv- dream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16512, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Blender - a 3d modelling and rendering package,

    B. O. Community, “Blender - a 3d modelling and rendering package,” Blender Foundation, 2018, http://www.blender.org

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.