REVIEW 1 cited by
Super-Human Performance in Online Low-latency Recognition of Conversational Speech
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Achieving super-human performance in recognizing human speech has been a goal for several decades, as researchers have worked on increasingly challenging tasks. In the 1990's it was discovered, that conversational speech between two humans turns out to be considerably more difficult than read speech as hesitations, disfluencies, false starts and sloppy articulation complicate acoustic processing and require robust handling of acoustic, lexical and language context, jointly. Early attempts with statistical models could only reach error rates over 50% and far from human performance (WER of around 5.5%). Neural hybrid models and recent attention-based encoder-decoder models have considerably improved performance as such contexts can now be learned in an integral fashion. However, processing such contexts requires an entire utterance presentation and thus introduces unwanted delays before a recognition result can be output. In this paper, we address performance as well as latency. We present results for a system that can achieve super-human performance (at a WER of 5.0%, over the Switchboard conversational benchmark) at a word based latency of only 1 second behind a speaker's speech. The system uses multiple attention-based encoder-decoder networks integrated within a novel low latency incremental inference approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cocktail-Party Audio-Visual Speech Recognition
A model fine-tuned on a new silent-face-aware audio-visual dataset achieves 39.2% WER in extreme cocktail-party noise, a 67% relative reduction over the prior baseline's 119%.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.