Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Study on Multimodal and Interactive Explanations for Visual Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.00431 v1 pith:CEEUQU7P submitted 2020-03-01 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords explanationsaccuracypredictionansweringapproachesattentioneffectivenessexplanation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Explainability and interpretability of AI models is an essential factor affecting the safety of AI. While various explainable AI (XAI) approaches aim at mitigating the lack of transparency in deep networks, the evidence of the effectiveness of these approaches in improving usability, trust, and understanding of AI systems are still missing. We evaluate multimodal explanations in the setting of a Visual Question Answering (VQA) task, by asking users to predict the response accuracy of a VQA agent with and without explanations. We use between-subjects and within-subjects experiments to probe explanation effectiveness in terms of improving user prediction accuracy, confidence, and reliance, among other factors. The results indicate that the explanations help improve human prediction accuracy, especially in trials when the VQA system's answer is inaccurate. Furthermore, we introduce active attention, a novel method for evaluating causal attentional effects through intervention by editing attention maps. User explanation ratings are strongly correlated with human prediction accuracy and suggest the efficacy of these explanations in human-machine AI collaboration tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explainable and Interpretable Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey maps the field of MLLM explainability and interpretability into data, model, and training and inference perspectives.

  2. Explainable AI the Latest Advancements and New Trends

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of explainable AI methods and a speculative proposal that meta-reasoning in reward space can explain AI decisions.

Pith tools