REVIEW 1 cited by
Quantitative Evaluation of Performance and Validity Indices for Clustering the Web Navigational Sessions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Clustering techniques are widely used in Web Usage Mining to capture similar interests and trends among users accessing a Web site. For this purpose, web access logs generated at a particular web site are preprocessed to discover the user navigational sessions. Clustering techniques are then applied to group the user session data into user session clusters, where intercluster similarities are minimized while the intra cluster similarities are maximized. Since the application of different clustering algorithms generally results in different sets of cluster formation, it is important to evaluate the performance of these methods in terms of accuracy and validity of the clusters, and also the time required to generate them, using appropriate performance measures. This paper describes various validity and accuracy measures including Dunn's Index, Davies Bouldin Index, C Index, Rand Index, Jaccard Index, Silhouette Index, Fowlkes Mallows and Sum of the Squared Error (SSE). We conducted the performance evaluation of the following clustering techniques: k-Means, k-Medoids, Leader, Single Link Agglomerative Hierarchical and DBSCAN. These techniques are implemented and tested against the Web user navigational data. Finally their performance results are presented and compared.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cleanse: Uncertainty Estimation Approach Using Clustering-based Semantic Consistency in LLMs
Cleanse detects hallucinated LLM answers by computing the share of hidden-embedding cosine similarity that falls inside semantic clusters, and it beats several baselines in AUROC across four models and two QA benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.