Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 166 references

Meeting Patients Where They're At: Toward the Expansion of Chaplaincy Care into Online Spiritual Care Communities

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Professional spiritual care can be extended into anonymous online support communities, but only partially, according to a study of 22 chaplains.

desk verdict First real HCI/CSCW study of professional chaplains in anonymous online support communities; transparent methods and a useful Care Loop model, but the 'Applicable Online' taxonomy labels are based on unsent draft replies and should be read as hypotheses. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11366 v2 pith:CH7E4GLM submitted 2025-06-12 cs.HC cs.CY

Alemitu Bezabih , Shadi Nourriz , Anne-Marie Snider , Rosalie Rauenzahn , George Handzo , C. Estelle Smith This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HCcs.CY
keywords spiritualcarechaplaincyonlinehealthcommunitiesReddittelechaplaincyGroundedTheoryLoopwhole-person
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that professional spiritual care, traditionally delivered in person at the bedside, can be partially and usefully extended into anonymous, asynchronous text-based online communities such as Reddit support subreddits. Based on interviews and user-testing sessions with 22 chaplains, it identifies which established chaplaincy techniques appear transferable online, which do not, and five new techniques the online setting calls for. It also proposes a 'Care Loop' model in which institution-based formal care and platform-based community care feed patients back and forth, so online contact raises awareness of chaplaincy while clinical care remains the anchor for deeper needs. The value of the claim, if right, is a concrete design direction for expanding access to spiritual care for people who cannot or will not reach a hospital chaplain. The paper is careful to treat online care as complementary, not equivalent, to in-person presence.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a pair of analytical tools. The first is the Advocate Health Care Taxonomy of Chaplaincy (AHCTC), a 100-item classification of chaplaincy activities into intended effects, methods, and interventions; the paper uses it to sort observed online behaviors into 'applicable online,' 'challenging to apply online,' and newly observed techniques. The second is the Care Loop model, a two-way referral structure that links institutionally based formal care with platform-based community care so that patients can enter spiritual care either online or in person and move between the two as needs change. Reddit support subreddits serve as the concrete study setting that elicits chaplains' judgments about these techniques.

What would settle it

A field experiment in which trained chaplains actually respond to posts in a support community, with user outcomes compared against a no-chaplain control condition, would settle whether the classified techniques produce the intended effects; if drafted-care behaviors do not replicate or users report no benefit, the taxonomy's online-applicability claims would be overstated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is an evidence-informed map of how chaplaincy work might transfer to online spiritual care communities. Analyzing chaplains' drafted replies to real Reddit posts through the Advocate Health Care Taxonomy of Chaplaincy, the paper finds thirteen existing techniques—including offering emotional support, active listening, asking guided questions, and prayer for healing—that seem applicable online, while conveying a calming presence and compassionate touch are seen as fundamentally hard to deliver through text. It also identifies five techniques not in the taxonomy, such as educating users on reply behaviors and apologizing on behalf of other commenters, suggesting online care is not just old care with new tools. The paper's main constructive claim is the Care Loop model: anonymous, asynchronous community care can initiate and supplement formal chaplaincy, and formal care must be ready to receive users redirected from online spaces when their needs exceed what a forum can hold.

Load-bearing premise

The study's classification of techniques as 'applicable online' rests on chaplains drafting replies that were never actually sent, so the evidence is about what chaplains intend to do in a simulated interaction rather than what real online spiritual care accomplishes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If a hospital or health system adopts the Care Loop, chaplains could run verified, credentialed accounts in support communities and redirect at-risk users to formal care.
  • Designers of online health communities would have a concrete checklist of chaplaincy techniques that can be encouraged in text-based interactions and a warning that presence and touch cannot be replaced online.
  • Chaplaincy training and certification bodies would need to add online-specific techniques, such as teaching reply behaviors and apologizing for others' harmful comments, to existing curricula.
  • The AHCTC or a successor taxonomy would need updating to include digital and asynchronous care activities and to connect with spiritual assessment and outcome measures.
  • Online spiritual care is positioned as an access-expanding complement, so healthcare payment models would need to compensate chaplains for time spent in community settings, not just bedside visits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The study's technique map is based on intentions, not outcomes; a natural next step would be field trials that actually submit chaplain replies and measure user responses, which the paper does not do.
  • If the Care Loop works, peer volunteers and moderators in existing support communities could be trained by chaplains, effectively scaling professional standards without requiring a chaplain in every thread.
  • The emphasis on anonymity suggests future online spiritual care designs might separate public anonymous support from private identified follow-up, with the loop as the bridge between them.
  • The paper's chaplain-only perspective leaves open whether users actually want professional presence in peer spaces; user-side studies could shift the design priorities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper reports an exploratory mixed-methods study with N=22 professional chaplains and spiritual care providers in the US, combining semi-structured interviews with user-testing sessions in which participants explored live Reddit support communities and composed (but did not submit) draft replies to original posts. The authors use Grounded Theory Method for the interview and session data, and the Advocate Health Care Taxonomy of Chaplaincy (AHCTC) to classify the behaviors expressed in the draft replies. The paper's main contributions are (1) an introduction of professional chaplaincy and spiritual care as an underexplored area for CSCW/HCI, (2) empirical findings on chaplains' perspectives toward technology and prospective Online Spiritual Care Communities (OSCCs), and (3) a proposed 'Care Loop' model that integrates institutionally-based formal care with platform-based community care, along with design implications for OSCCs. The paper is transparent about its methods, preregistered at OSF, and makes de-identified data publicly available.

Significance. If the results are taken as formative evidence, the paper addresses a genuine gap in CSCW/HCI: almost no prior work has engaged professional chaplains as stakeholders in sociotechnical design. The qualitative findings on chaplains' receptivity, concerns, and envisioned roles (RQ1 and RQ3) are rich, well-supported by participant quotes, and likely to be of interest to researchers of online health communities, moderation, and digital healthcare. The Care Loop model and the associated design implications are reasonable synthetic contributions that could guide future work. However, the strength of the RQ2 contribution—the claim that specific chaplaincy techniques are 'Applicable Online'—is weakened by the fact that the underlying data are unsent draft replies composed under researcher observation, and by the post hoc and partial application of the AHCTC taxonomy. In its current form, the RQ2 evidence is more suggestive than confirmatory, and the paper should either temper the language around Table 3 or frame the 'Applicable Online' categorizations as hypotheses for future validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2 Part II, §5.2, Table 3] The 'Applicable Online' labels in Table 3 are presented as empirical observations, but they are based entirely on draft replies that participants composed during researcher-guided sessions and never actually submitted. As described in §4.2 Part II, these comments had no real recipient, no follow-up, no community response, and no outcome measurement; they therefore capture intended behavior under observation rather than enacted online care. The paper partially acknowledges this in §6.4.2, but the table's categorical labels and the design implications in §6.1.2 (e.g., verified flairs, ranking professional responses, moderation roles) treat the feasibility of these techniques as established. I recommend reframing Table 3 as a set of 'candidate online-applicable techniques' based on chaplains' reported intentions, and explicitly stating that validation in real online interactions is needed before these techniques are used as design requirements.
  2. [§4.3.1, §6.4.2] The AHCTC taxonomy was applied post hoc and only to a subset of the data: the paper states that clusters of behavior were first identified inductively and then re-labeled with AHCTC terms, and that participants were not systematically asked about all 100 AHCTC items (§6.4.2). Consequently, the presence of an item in Table 3 tells us only that that behavior appeared in the unsent drafts; the absence of the other 85 items is uninformative about whether those techniques are applicable online. The current presentation, with columns labeled 'Applicable Online' and 'Challenging to Apply Online,' invites the reader to think of Table 3 as a comprehensive mapping, which it is not. I recommend adding a clear statement that the table is an illustrative, non-exhaustive list of behaviors that emerged, not a systematic evaluation of the full taxonomy.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table 3] There are a few typos in the example quotes and descriptions, such as 'totaly' for 'totally' in the 'Demonstrate caring and concern' row and 'inaccessibile' in §5.1.2; these should be corrected.
  2. [§5.2, Table 3] Several taxonomy items have very low observed frequencies (e.g., 'Provide sacred reading(s)' with 2, 'Encourage self-care' with 1, 'Collaborate with care team member' with 1, 'Apologize' with 1). For these items, the example serves more as an illustrative instance than as a robust pattern; the text should acknowledge that the frequency counts are descriptive and not inferential.
  3. [§6.1.1] The 'Care Loop' model would benefit from a more explicit account of how the two-way referral process would operate in practice, particularly for anonymous users; the paper currently describes the model at a high level and leaves open questions that may be better addressed in future work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: central claims rest on participant data and an external taxonomy, not on self-referential construction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is empirical, not formal: RQ1 and RQ3 themes are induced from chaplain interviews, RQ2 classifications come from coding chaplains' unsent replies against the externally developed AHCTC taxonomy, and the Care Loop model is a design synthesis of those findings. The only self-referential element is adopting the senior author's previously published definition of spiritual support in Section 3.2 as an interview stimulus in Section 4.2 Part I and Appendix A.3; because the paper makes no claim to validate that definition and none of the RQ2 labels or design implications are forced by it, this is not load-bearing. The AHCTC is an independent external taxonomy, not authored by the present team, and Table 3's 'Applicable Online' labels are observational codes of participant behavior rather than consequences of the taxonomy. Section 6.4.2 explicitly limits the taxonomy's role and acknowledges that not all items were queried, which is a validity caveat rather than circularity. No equation or fitted parameter is involved, and the weakest premise (unsent draft replies standing for enacted online care) is an external-validity limitation, not a circular reduction. Therefore, the paper's contributions remain self-contained with respect to the circularity concerns enumerated in the review criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The paper's contributions are conceptual and qualitative. It introduces the OSCC construct, the Care Loop model, and five new taxonomy items without numerical fitting, but each is grounded only in the small interview/user-testing sample. The main non-empirical inputs are the AHCTC taxonomy, the Reddit site assumption, and the validity of unsent draft replies.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Anonymity and text-based asynchrony on Reddit represent the class of future Online Spiritual Care Communities.
    Reddit is chosen as the study site in §3.3 based on its anonymous, asynchronous, text-based affordances; the generalizability of findings to other platforms is assumed but not demonstrated.
  • domain assumption The Advocate Health Care Taxonomy of Chaplaincy (AHCTC) is a valid classification for mapping online spiritual care behaviors.
    The paper uses the 2015 AHCTC to label reply behaviors in §4.3.1 and acknowledges in §6.4.2 that it is outdated and imperfect.
  • ad hoc to paper Unsubmitted draft replies composed in research sessions are valid indicators of how chaplains would provide care online.
    The user testing protocol in §4.2 Part II records participants' composed replies without submitting them; the results in §5.2 treat these as evidence of online applicability.
  • domain assumption The prior definition of spiritual support by Smith et al. (2021), co-authored by the senior author, is an appropriate stimulus for interviews.
    Participants were shown this definition in §4.2 Part I to anchor discussions; using an author's own prior definition introduces a mild self-referential framing.
invented entities (3)
  • Online Spiritual Care Community (OSCC)
    purpose: A prospective online space where professional chaplains provide or support spiritual care, used as the study's organizing target construct.
    Introduced in the abstract and throughout; no implemented system or empirical validation exists yet.
  • Care Loop model
    purpose: A two-way referral relationship between institutionally-based formal care and platform-based community care to expand access and awareness.
    Proposed in §6.1.1 and Figure 4 based on participant concerns; not validated with outcomes.
  • Five new chaplaincy taxonomy items
    purpose: Expand AHCTC for online contexts: encourage seeking support, provide practical advice, share own experiences, educate on reply behaviors, and apologize for other users.
    Derived in §5.2.3 from low-frequency draft replies (mostly 1-2 occurrences) and not validated as distinct, effective techniques.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Meeting Patients Where They're At: Toward the Expansion of Chaplaincy Care into Online Spiritual Care Communities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CH7E4GLM

@misc{pith2026250611366,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Meeting Patients Where They're At: Toward the Expansion of Chaplaincy Care into Online Spiritual Care Communities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CH7E4GLM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11366}
}
read the original abstract

Despite a growing need for spiritual care in the US, it is often under-served, inaccessible, or misunderstood, while almost no prior work in CSCW/HCI research has engaged with professional chaplains and spiritual care providers. This interdisciplinary study aims to develop a foundational understanding of how spiritual care may (or may not) be expanded into online spaces -- especially focusing on anonymous, asynchronous, and text-based online communities. We conducted an exploratory mixed-methods study with chaplains (N=22) involving interviews and user testing sessions centered around Reddit support communities to understand participants' perspectives on technology and their ideations about the role of chaplaincy in prospective Online Spiritual Care Communities (OSCCs). Our Grounded Theory Method analysis highlighted benefits of OSCCs including: meeting patients where they are at; accessibility and scalability; and facilitating patient-initiated care. Chaplains highlighted how their presence in OSCCs could help with shaping peer interactions, moderation, synchronous chats for group care, and redirecting to external resources, while also raising important feasibility concerns, risks, and needs for future design and research. We used an existing taxonomy of chaplaincy techniques to show that some spiritual care strategies may be amenable to online spaces, yet we also exposed the limitations of technology to fully mediate spiritual care and the need to develop new online chaplaincy interventions. Based on these findings, we contribute the model of a ``Care Loop'' between institutionally-based formal care and platform-based community care to expand access and drive greater awareness and utilization of spiritual care. We also contribute design implications to guide future work in online spiritual care.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11366 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Advocate Health Care Taxonomy of Chaplaincy (AHCTC) Framework, with Proposed Extensions. Blue categories were [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Baylor Scott & White Interface for Requesting Prayer or Chaplain Visit. Screenshot captured June 2024 from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Example screenshots depicting participants’ prospective responses to live original posts. All text in red boxes is paraphrased [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The Care Loop Model. Integrating institutionally-based formal care (left) with platform-based community care (right) requires [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

166 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wilcox, Ritu Sharma, Rachel Hill, Emily Pantalone, Johannes Thrul, Jacob C

    Smisha Agarwal, Madhu Jalan, Holly C. Wilcox, Ritu Sharma, Rachel Hill, Emily Pantalone, Johannes Thrul, Jacob C. Rainey, and Karen A. Robinson. 2022.Evaluation of Mental Health Mobile Applications. Technical Report. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). https://doi.org/10.23970/AHRQEPCTB41

    work page doi:10.23970/ahrqepctb41 2022

  2. [2]

    Ahluwalia, Brian G

    Sangeeta C. Ahluwalia, Brian G. Vegetabile, Maria Orlando Edelen, Claude Messan Setodji, Anthony Rodriguez, Adam Scherling, Jessica Phillips, Carrie M. Farmer, Jordan M. Harrison, Julia Bandini, Wenjing Huang, Lucy Schulson, Anne Walling, Sarah Dalton, Monique Martineau, Owen Hall, Danielle Schlang, Melissa A. Bradley, and Katherine Ast. 2022. MACRA Palli...

    2022

  3. [3]

    Phillips, and Meera Agar

    Naseem Ahmadpour, Phillip Gough, Melanie Lovell, Philip Austin, Philip Poronnik, Wendy Qi Zhang, Judy Kay, Bob Kummerfeld, Tim Luckett, Martin Brown, Jane L. Phillips, and Meera Agar. 2023. How can HCI support end-of-life care? Critical perspectives on sociotechnical imaginaries for palliative care. InExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human...

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Almutairi, Sulaiman Al Mashrafi, and Talib Al Kalbani

    Hilal Al Shamsi, Abdullah G. Almutairi, Sulaiman Al Mashrafi, and Talib Al Kalbani. 2020. Implications of Language Barriers for Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Oman Medical Journal35, 2 (April 2020), e122. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.40

    work page doi:10.5001/omj.2020.40 2020

  5. [5]

    Tawfiq Ammari, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Daniel Romero. 2019. Self-declared Throwaway Accounts on Reddit: How Platform Affordances and Shared Norms enable Parenting Disclosure and Support.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 135:1–135:30. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3359237

    doi:10.1145/3359237 2019

  6. [6]

    Gowri Anandarajah and Ellen Hight. 2001. Spirituality and Medical Practice: Using the HOPE Questions as a Practical Tool for Spiritual Assessment. American Family Physician63, 1 (Jan. 2001), 81–89. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2001/0101/p81.html

    2001

  7. [7]

    Anietie Andy. 2021. Studying How Individuals Who Express the Feeling of Loneliness in an Online Loneliness Forum Communicate in a Nonloneliness Forum: Observational Study.JMIR Formative Research5, 7 (July 2021), e28738. https://doi.org/10.2196/28738

    work page doi:10.2196/28738 2021

  8. [8]

    Krendl, Bryan P

    James Marcus Arnaez, Anne C. Krendl, Bryan P. McCormick, Zhongxue Chen, and Andrea K. Chomistek. 2020. The association of depression stigma with barriers to seeking mental health care: a cross-sectional analysis.Journal of Mental Health29, 2 (March 2020), 182–190. https: //doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1644494 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org...

    arXiv 2020

Show all 166 references
  1. [9]

    Balboni, Tyler J

    Tracy A. Balboni, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Stephanie D. Doan-Soares, Katelyn N. G. Long, Betty R. Ferrell, George Fitchett, Harold G. Koenig, Paul A. Bain, Christina Puchalski, Karen E. Steinhauser, Daniel P. Sulmasy, and Howard K. Koh. 2022. Spirituality in Serious Illness and H...

    2022

  2. [10]

    Balboni, Lauren C

    Tracy A. Balboni, Lauren C. Vanderwerker, Susan D. Block, M. Elizabeth Paulk, Christopher S. Lathan, John R. Peteet, and Holly G. Prigerson. 2007. Religiousness and Spiritual Support Among Advanced Cancer Patients and Associations With End-of-Life Treatment Preferences and Qua...

    2007 doi

  3. [11]

    Luke Balcombe and Diego De Leo. 2022. Human-Computer Interaction in Digital Mental Health.Informatics9, 1 (March 2022), 14. https: //doi.org/10.3390/informatics9010014 Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Jiajun Bao, Junjie Wu, Yiming Zhang, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, and David Jurgens. 2021. Conversations Gone Alright: Quantifying and Predicting Prosocial Outcomes in Online Conversations. InProceedings of the Web Conference 2021. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY,...

    2021

  5. [13]

    Bingley, and Sarah G

    Lynn Bassett, Amanda F. Bingley, and Sarah G. Brearley. 2018. The contribution of silence to spiritual care at the end of life: a phenomenological exploration from the experience of palliative care chaplains.Journal for the Study of Spirituality8, 1 (Jan. 2018), 34–48. https:/...

    2018

  6. [14]

    Gibbons, Scott D

    Karen Besterman-Dahan, Susanne W. Gibbons, Scott D. Barnett, and Edward J. Hickling. 2012. The Role of Military Chaplains in Mental Health Care of the Deployed Service Member.Military Medicine177, 9 (Sept. 2012), 1028–1033. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00071

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    A. T. Boisen. 1936.The exploration of the inner world. A study of mental disorder and religious experience. Willett, Clark, Oxford, England. Pages: xi, 322

    1936

  8. [16]

    Dew, Harold G

    Raphael Bonelli, Rachel E. Dew, Harold G. Koenig, David H. Rosmarin, and Sasan Vasegh. 2012. Religious and Spiritual Factors in Depression: Review and Integration of the Research.Depression Research and Treatment2012 (2012), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/962860

    2012 doi

  9. [17]

    Puchalski

    Tami Borneman, Betty Ferrell, and Christina M. Puchalski. 2010. Evaluation of the FICA Tool for Spiritual Assessment.Journal of Pain and Symptom Management40, 2 (Aug. 2010), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.019

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    Braam and Harold G

    Arjan W. Braam and Harold G. Koenig. 2019. Religion, spirituality and depression in prospective studies: A systematic review.Journal of Affective Disorders257 (Oct. 2019), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.063

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Elizabeth Brown. 2023. Will AI ever become spiritual? A Hospital Chaplaincy perspective.Practical Theology16, 6 (Nov. 2023), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2023.2242940 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073X.2023.2242940

    2023

  12. [20]

    Tatjana Buklijaš. 2008. Medicine and Society in the Medieval Hospital.Croatian medical journal49, 2 (April 2008), 151–154. https://doi.org/10. 3325/cmj.2008.2.151

    2008

  13. [21]

    Dellavalle

    Talayesa Buntinx-Krieg, Joseph Caravaglio, Renee Domozych, and Robert P. Dellavalle. 2017. Dermatology on Reddit: elucidating trends in dermatologic communications on the world wide web.Dermatology Online Journal23, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5070/D3237035730

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Ruth A Bush, Alexa Pérez, Tanja Baum, Caroline Etland, and Cynthia D Connelly. 2018. A systematic review of the use of the electronic health record for patient identification, communication, and clinical support in palliative care.JAMIA Open1, 2 (Oct. 2018), 294–303. https: //...

    2018 doi

  15. [24]

    Duane Campbell, Jeanene (Gigi) Robison, and Judi Allyn Godsey. 2023. Standardized Spiritual Screening Increases Chaplain Referrals Through the EMR: A Nurse-Chaplain Collaboration for Holistic Acute Healthcare.Journal of Holistic Nursing41, 1 (March 2023), 30–39. https://doi.or...

    2023

  16. [25]

    Advocate Health Care. 2014. Chaplaincy Taxonomy User’s Guide (ver. 1)

    2014

  17. [26]

    Sumner, Corinne David-Ferdon, Tahirah Ahmad, and Munmun De Choudhury

    Stevie Chancellor, Steven A. Sumner, Corinne David-Ferdon, Tahirah Ahmad, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2021. Suicide Risk and Protective Factors in Online Support Forum Posts: Annotation Scheme Development and Validation Study.JMIR Mental Health8, 11 (Nov. 2021), e24471. https://d...

    2021 doi

  18. [27]

    Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Mattia Samory, Shagun Jhaver, Hunter Charvat, Amy Bruckman, Cliff Lampe, Jacob Eisenstein, and Eric Gilbert

  19. [28]

    Army Chaplain Corps

    U.S. Army Chaplain Corps. 2015. U.S. Army Chaplain Corps. https://armyhistory.org/u-s-army-chaplain-corps/

    2015

  20. [29]

    Munmun De Choudhury and Sushovan De. 2014. Mental Health Discourse on reddit: Self-Disclosure, Social Support, and Anonymity. InEighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8075

    2014

  21. [30]

    Caroline Claisse and Abigail C Durrant. 2023. ‘Keeping our Faith Alive’: Investigating Buddhism Practice during COVID-19 to Inform Design for the Online Community Practice of Faith. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Ge...

    2023

  22. [31]

    Nathalie Colineau and Cécile Paris. 2010. Talking about your health to strangers: understanding the use of online social networks by patients.New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia16, 1-2 (April 2010), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2010.496131 Publisher: Taylor & ...

    2010

  23. [32]

    Coombs, Wyatt E

    Nicholas C. Coombs, Wyatt E. Meriwether, James Caringi, and Sophia R. Newcomer. 2021. Barriers to healthcare access among U.S. adults with mental health challenges: A population-based study.SSM - Population Health15 (Sept. 2021), 100847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100847

    2021

  24. [33]

    Cooper, Christian A

    Denise C. Cooper, Christian A. Evans, Sharmila A. Chari, Marjorie S. Campbell, and Tim Hoyt. 2023. Military chaplains and mental health clinicians: Overlapping roles and collaborative opportunities.Psychological Services20, 1 (2023), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000661 P...

    2023 doi

  25. [34]

    Nassir Ghaemi, and Andrea Amerio

    Luigi Costantini, Cesira Pasquarella, Anna Odone, Maria Eugenia Colucci, Alessandra Costanza, Gianluca Serafini, Andrea Aguglia, Martino Belvederi Murri, Vlasios Brakoulias, Mario Amore, S. Nassir Ghaemi, and Andrea Amerio. 2021. Screening for depression in primary care with P...

    2021 doi

  26. [35]

    Coventry, Nick Meader, Hollie Melton, Melanie Temple, Holly Dale, Kath Wright, Marylène Cloitre, Thanos Karatzias, Jonathan Bisson, Neil P

    Peter A. Coventry, Nick Meader, Hollie Melton, Melanie Temple, Holly Dale, Kath Wright, Marylène Cloitre, Thanos Karatzias, Jonathan Bisson, Neil P. Roberts, Jennifer V. E. Brown, Corrado Barbui, Rachel Churchill, Karina Lovell, Dean McMillan, and Simon Gilbody. 2020. Psycholo...

    2020

  27. [36]

    Cutrona and Julie A

    Carolyn E. Cutrona and Julie A. Suhr. 1992. Controllability of Stressful Events and Satisfaction With Spouse Support Behaviors.Communication Research19, 2 (April 1992), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019002002

    1992 doi

  28. [37]

    Cyr, Anna G

    Melissa E. Cyr, Anna G. Etchin, Barbara J. Guthrie, and James C. Benneyan. 2019. Access to specialty healthcare in urban versus rural US populations: a systematic literature review.BMC Health Services Research19, 1 (Dec. 2019), 974. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4815-5

    2019 doi

  29. [38]

    More Spiritual Health Professionals Provide Different Care

    Rocío de Diego-Cordero, Ángeles C. López-Tarrida, Carmen Linero-Narváez, and José María Galán González-Serna. 2023. “More Spiritual Health Professionals Provide Different Care”: A Qualitative Study in the Field of Mental Health.Healthcare11, 3 (Jan. 2023), 303. https: //doi.or...

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    Andrew S. Denney. 2018. Prison Chaplains: Perceptions of Criminality, Effective Prison Programming Characteristics, and the Role of Religion in the Desistance from Crime.American Journal of Criminal Justice43, 3 (Sept. 2018), 694–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9425-3

    2018 doi

  31. [40]

    I hate you. I love you. I’m sorry. I miss you

    Dylan Thomas Doyle, Charlie Blue R. Brahm, and Jed R. Brubaker. 2024. "I hate you. I love you. I’m sorry. I miss you. " Understanding Online Grief Expression Through Suicide Bereavement Letter-Writing Practices.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.8, CSCW1 (April 2024), 69:1–69:27....

    2024 doi

  32. [41]

    Song L. L. Duimel, Annemiek J. Linn, Ellen M. A. Smets, Eline S. Smit, and Julia C. M. van Weert. 2023. Profiling Cancer Patients Based on Their Motives for Seeking Informational and Emotional Support Online.Health Communication38, 14 (Dec. 2023), 3223–3237. https: //doi.org/1...

    2023

  33. [42]

    Edenfield, Jared S

    Avery C. Edenfield, Jared S. Colton, and Steve Holmes. 2019. Always Already Geopolitical: Trans Health Care and Global Tactical Technical Communication.Journal of Technical Writing and Communication49, 4 (Oct. 2019), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281619871211 Publisher:...

    2019 doi

  34. [43]

    Kathryn Levy Feldman. 2011. The Spirit of Caring.THE PENNSYLV ANIA GAZETTE(2011)

    2011

  35. [44]

    Ferrell, George Handzo, Tina Picchi, Christina Puchalski, and William E

    Betty R. Ferrell, George Handzo, Tina Picchi, Christina Puchalski, and William E. Rosa. 2020. The Urgency of Spiritual Care: COVID-19 and the Critical Need for Whole-Person Palliation.Journal of Pain and Symptom Management60, 3 (Sept. 2020), e7–e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ...

    2020 doi

  36. [45]

    Casey Fiesler, Jialun Jiang, Joshua McCann, Kyle Frye, and Jed Brubaker. 2018. Reddit Rules! Characterizing an Ecosystem of Governance.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media12, 1 (June 2018). https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/1...

    2018

  37. [46]

    George Fitchett, Anna Pierson, Christine Hoffmeyer, Dirk Labuschagne, Aoife Lee, Stacie Levine, Sean Omahony, Karen Pugliese, and Nancy Waite

  38. [47]

    Judy Fleischman. 2016. Telechaplaincy: Best Practices for Telehealth Chaplaincy Care. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ 53acafeee4b00b01999974b2/t/5ae902edf950b7f108f379e7/1525220078430/Fleischman_HCCN_2016Conf_Telechaplaincy+FINAL.pdf

    2016

  39. [48]

    Judy Fleischman. 2017. TeleChaplaincy: Expanding the Reach of Patient-Centered Care. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ 53acafeee4b00b01999974b2/t/5ae903712b6a28d38239d3c9/1525220210758/FleischmanJ+HCCN+2017+WorkshopB3+.pdf

    2017

  40. [49]

    Tim Ford and Alexander Tartaglia. 2006. The Development, Status, and Future of Healthcare Chaplaincy:.Southern Medical Journal99, 6 (June 2006), 675–679. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.smj.0000220893.37354.1e

    2006

  41. [50]

    Ossebaard, Saskia M

    Julia EWC van Gemert-Pijnen, Nicol Nijland, Maarten van Limburg, Hans C. Ossebaard, Saskia M. Kelders, Gunther Eysenbach, and Erwin R. Seydel. 2011. A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies.Journal of Medical Internet Research13, 4 (Dec. 20...

    2011 doi

  42. [51]

    Marie-José H. E. Gijsberts, Anke I. Liefbroer, René Otten, and Erik Olsman. 2019. Spiritual Care in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Recent European Literature.Medical Sciences7, 2 (Feb. 2019), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci7020025 Number: 2 Publisher: Multidisc...

    2019 doi

  43. [52]

    Giles and Julie Newbold

    David C. Giles and Julie Newbold. 2011. Self- and Other-Diagnosis in User-Led Mental Health Online Communities.Qualitative Health Research21, 3 (March 2011), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310381388 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc

    2011 doi

  44. [53]

    Bri Gordon. 2023. MILITARY CHAPLAINS: THEIR VITAL ROLE IN OUR MILITARY. https://militaryreach.auburn.edu/research-in-action- detail?resourceid=dcc75f4e-1c36-46b8-8904-93eb8691608d

    2023

  45. [54]

    Hall and Richard A

    Eric J. Hall and Richard A. Powell. 2021. Valuing the Spiritual.Journal of Religion and Health60, 3 (2021), 1430–1435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943- 021-01206-9

    2021 doi

  46. [55]

    Handzo, Mark Cobb, Cheryl Holmes, Ewan Kelly, and Shane Sinclair

    George F. Handzo, Mark Cobb, Cheryl Holmes, Ewan Kelly, and Shane Sinclair. 2014. Outcomes for Professional Health Care Chaplaincy: An International Call to Action.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy20, 2 (April 2014), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2014.902713 Publishe...

    2014

  47. [56]

    Haque, Ferdaus Kawsar, Md

    Munirul M. Haque, Ferdaus Kawsar, Md. Adibuzzaman, Sheikh I. Ahamed, Richard Love, Rumana Dowla, David Roe, Tahmina Ferdousy, and Reza Selim. 2014. Findings of mobile based palliative care system: towards formulating a generic framework for measuring QoL. InProceedings of the ...

    2014

  48. [57]

    Ho, Christopher D

    Jim Q. Ho, Christopher D. Nguyen, Richard Lopes, Stephen C. Ezeji-Okoye, and Ware G. Kuschner. 2018. Spiritual Care in the Intensive Care Unit: A Narrative Review.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine33, 5 (May 2018), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066617712677 Publisher: S...

    2018 doi

  49. [58]

    David R. Hodge. 2006. A template for spiritual assessment: a review of the JCAHO requirements and guidelines for implementation.Social Work 51, 4 (Oct. 2006), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/51.4.317

    2006 doi

  50. [59]

    Howard and Ruth P

    Michael D. Howard and Ruth P. Cox. 2008. Collaborative Intervention: A Model for Coordinated Treatment of Mental Health Issues within a Ground Combat Unit.Military Medicine173, 4 (April 2008), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.173.4.339

    2008 doi

  51. [60]

    Martha R. Jacobs. 2008. What Are We Doing Here?: Chaplains in Contemporary Health Care.Hastings Center Report38, 6 (2008), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.0.0079

    2008 doi

  52. [61]

    Jane Jeuland, George Fitchett, Dena Schulman-Green, and Jennifer Kapo. 2017. Chaplains Working in Palliative Care: Who They Are and What They Do.Journal of Palliative Medicine20, 5 (May 2017), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2016.0308

    2017

  53. [62]

    Shagun Jhaver, Iris Birman, Eric Gilbert, and Amy Bruckman. 2019. Human-Machine Collaboration for Content Regulation: The Case of Reddit Automoderator.ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.26, 5 (July 2019), 31:1–31:35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338243

    2019 doi

  54. [63]

    Yueyi Jiang, Yunfan Jiang, Liu Leqi, and Piotr Winkielman. 2022. Many Ways to Be Lonely: Fine-Grained Characterization of Loneliness and Its Potential Changes in COVID-19.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media16 (May 2022), 405–416. https://do...

    2022 doi

  55. [64]

    Sverre Urnes Johnson, Pål Gunnar Ulvenes, Tuva Øktedalen, and Asle Hoffart. 2019. Psychometric Properties of the General Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Scale in a Heterogeneous Psychiatric Sample.Frontiers in Psychology10 (Aug. 2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01713 ...

    2019

  56. [65]

    Kairam, Melissa C

    Sanjay R. Kairam, Melissa C. Mercado, and Steven A. Sumner. 2022. A Social-Ecological Approach to Modeling Sense of Virtual Community (SOVC) in Livestreaming Communities.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 356:1–356:35. https: //doi.org/10...

    2022 doi

  57. [66]

    Estelle Smith, and Loren Terveen

    Avleen Kaur, C. Estelle Smith, and Loren Terveen. 2021. Sway Together, Stay Together: Visualizing Spiritual Support Networks Through the SoulGarden Prototype. InCompanion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. https://dl...

    2021

  58. [67]

    Williams, Laura Haye, and Julie Cerel

    Ramakanth Kavuluru, María Ramos-Morales, Tara Holaday, Amanda G. Williams, Laura Haye, and Julie Cerel. 2016. Classification of Helpful Comments on Online Suicide Watch Forums. InProceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and ...

    2016

  59. [68]

    Kawsar, Md Munirul Haque, Mohammad Adibuzzaman, Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed, Md Uddin, Richard Love, David Roe, Rumana Dowla, T

    Ferdaus A. Kawsar, Md Munirul Haque, Mohammad Adibuzzaman, Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed, Md Uddin, Richard Love, David Roe, Rumana Dowla, T. Ferdousy, Reza Selim, and Syed Hossain. 2012. e-ESAS: improving quality of life for breast cancer patients in developing countries. InProceedings...

    2012

  60. [69]

    Elizabeth Palmer Kelly, Maryanna Klatt, Jacqueline Caputo, and Timothy M. Pawlik. 2024. A single-arm pilot of MyInspiration: a novel digital resource to support spiritual needs of patients undergoing cancer-directed surgery.Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Mu...

    2024 doi

  61. [70]

    McEniry, Sarah Friedman, Jennifer Kent, Joseph D

    Allison Kestenbaum, Kelly A. McEniry, Sarah Friedman, Jennifer Kent, Joseph D. Ma, and Eric J. Roeland. 2022. Spiritual AIM: assessment and documentation of spiritual needs in patients with cancer.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy28, 4 (2022), 566–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/...

    2022

  62. [71]

    Alexandra Kitson, Petr Slovak, and Alissa N. Antle. 2024. Supporting Cognitive Reappraisal With Digital Technology: A Content Analysis and Scoping Review of Challenges, Interventions, and Future Directions. InProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Syst...

    2024

  63. [72]

    Robert Klitzman, Gabrielle Di Sapia Natarelli, Elizaveta Garbuzova, Stephanie Sinnappan, and Jay Al-Hashimi. 2023. Muslim patients in the U.S. confronting challenges regarding end-of-life and palliative care: the experiences and roles of hospital chaplains.BMC Palliative Care2...

    2023 doi

  64. [73]

    Raymond Kluender, Neale Mahoney, Francis Wong, and Wesley Yin. 2021. Medical Debt in the US, 2009-2020.JAMA326, 3 (July 2021), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.8694

    2021

  65. [74]

    Kaylee Payne Kruzan, Kofoworola D. A. Williams, Jonah Meyerhoff, Dong Whi Yoo, Linda C. O’Dwyer, Munmun De Choudhury, and David C. Mohr. 2022. Social media-based interventions for adolescent and young adult mental health: A scoping review.Internet Interventions30 (Dec. 2022), ...

    2022

  66. [75]

    Kuzheleva-Sagan and Natalya A

    Irina P. Kuzheleva-Sagan and Natalya A. Suchkova. 2016. Designing trust in the Internet services.AI & SOCIETY31, 3 (Aug. 2016), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0622-7

    2016 doi

  67. [76]

    Soonho Kwon, Dong Whi Yoo, and Younah Kang. 2024. Spiritual AI: Exploring the Possibilities of a Human-AI Interaction Beyond Productive Goals. InExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/ ...

    2024

  68. [77]

    Dirk Labuschagne, Patricia Palmer, Allison DeLaney, Kristen Schenk, and George Fitchett. 2024. Development of the ONC-5: A quantifiable assessment of spiritual concerns for adult oncology patients.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy0, 0 (2024), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0885...

    2024

  69. [78]

    Tabatabaei, Kamran Tavakol, Majid Naghipour, Alireza Rostami, and Fatemeh Moghbeli

    Mostafa Langarizadeh, Mohsen S. Tabatabaei, Kamran Tavakol, Majid Naghipour, Alireza Rostami, and Fatemeh Moghbeli. 2017. Telemental Health Care, an Effective Alternative to Conventional Mental Care: a Systematic Review.Acta Informatica Medica25, 4 (Dec. 2017), 240–246. https:...

    2017 doi

  70. [79]

    Carlos Laranjeira, Maria Anjos Dixe, and Ana Querido. 2023. Perceived Barriers to Providing Spiritual Care in Palliative Care among Professionals: A Portuguese Cross-Sectional Study.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health20, 12 (June 2023), 6121. http...

    2023

  71. [80]

    Sun Young Lee and Robert Hawkins. 2010. Why Do Patients Seek an Alternative Channel? The Effects of Unmet Needs on Patients’ Health-Related Internet Use.Journal of Health Communication15, 2 (March 2010), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730903528033 Publisher: Taylor & Fr...

    2010 doi

  72. [81]

    Hanlin Li, Brent Hecht, and Stevie Chancellor. 2022. Measuring the Monetary Value of Online Volunteer Work.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media16 (May 2022), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19318

    2022 doi

  73. [82]

    Xueying Liu, Shiaofen Fang, George Mohler, Joan Carlson, and Yunyu Xiao. 2022. Time-to-event modeling of subreddits transitions to r/SuicideWatch. In2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). 974–979. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA5569...

    2022

  74. [83]

    Katelyn N. G. Long, Xavier Symons, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Tracy A. Balboni, David H. Rosmarin, Christina Puchalski, Teresa Cutts, Gary R. Gunderson, Ellen Idler, Doug Oman, Michael J. Balboni, Laura S. Tuach, and Howard K. Koh. 2024. Spirituality As A Determinant Of Health: Eme...

    2024

  75. [84]

    Low, Laurie Rumker, Tanya Talkar, John Torous, Guillermo Cecchi, and Satrajit S

    Daniel M. Low, Laurie Rumker, Tanya Talkar, John Torous, Guillermo Cecchi, and Satrajit S. Ghosh. 2020. Natural Language Processing Reveals Vulnerable Mental Health Support Groups and Heightened Health Anxiety on Reddit During COVID-19: Observational Study.Journal of Medical I...

    2020 doi

  76. [85]

    Wilson, and William L

    Paul Benjamin Lowry, David W. Wilson, and William L. Haig. 2014. A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Source Credibility Theory Applied to Logo and Website Design for Heightened Credibility and Consumer Trust.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction30, 1 (Jan. 2014)...

    2014

  77. [86]

    Estelle Smith, Lu He, Saumik Narayanan, Robert A

    Haiwei Ma, C. Estelle Smith, Lu He, Saumik Narayanan, Robert A. Giaquinto, Roni Evans, Linda Hanson, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2017. Write for Life: Persisting in Online Health Communities Through Expressive Writing and Social Support.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.1, CSCW (Dec. 2...

    2017 doi

  78. [87]

    Wendy MacCaull, Heather Jewers, and Markus Latzel. 2010. Using an interdisciplinary approach to develop a knowledge-driven careflow management system for collaborative patient-centred palliative care. InProceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium (IHI...

    2010

  79. [88]

    Markum, Sara Wolf, Caroline Claisse, and Michael Hoefer

    Robert B. Markum, Sara Wolf, Caroline Claisse, and Michael Hoefer. 2024. Mediating the Sacred: Configuring a Design Space for Religious and Spiritual Tangible Interactive Artifacts. InProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied In...

    2024

  80. [89]

    Kevin Massey, Marilyn JD Barnes, Dana Villines, Julie D Goldstein, Anna Lee Hisey Pierson, Cheryl Scherer, Betty Vander Laan, and Wm Thomas Summerfelt. 2015. What do I do? Developing a taxonomy of chaplaincy activities and interventions for spiritual care in intensive care uni...

    2015 doi

  81. [90]

    What Do I Do? Developing a Taxonomy of Chaplaincy Activities and Interventions for Spiritual Care in ICU Palliative Care

    Kevin Massey and Wm Thomas Summerfelt. 2012. Growing the Field of Chaplaincy in Palliative Care: “What Do I Do? Developing a Taxonomy of Chaplaincy Activities and Interventions for Spiritual Care in ICU Palliative Care. ”

    2012

  82. [91]

    Janet McKee. 1988. Holistic health and the critique of western medicine.Social Science & Medicine26, 8 (Jan. 1988), 775–784. https://doi.org/10. 1016/0277-9536(88)90171-2

    1988

  83. [92]

    Ailsa McLellan, Keana Schmidt-Waselenchuk, Kari Duerksen, and Erica Woodin. 2022. Talking back to mental health stigma: An exploration of YouTube comments on anti-stigma videos.Computers in Human Behavior131 (June 2022), 107214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107214

    2022

  84. [93]

    Lane, and Stephen Tueller

    Jessica Kelley Morgan, Laurel Hourani, Marian E. Lane, and Stephen Tueller. 2016. Help-Seeking Behaviors Among Active-Duty Military Personnel: Utilization of Chaplains and Other Mental Health Service Providers.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy22, 3 (July 2016), 102–117. https:...

    2016

  85. [94]

    Morris and Rosalind Picard

    Robert R. Morris and Rosalind Picard. 2014. Crowd-powered positive psychological interventions.The Journal of Positive Psychology9, 6 (Nov. 2014), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.913671

    2014

  86. [95]

    Morris, Stephen M

    Robert R. Morris, Stephen M. Schueller, and Rosalind W. Picard. 2015. Efficacy of a Web-Based, Crowdsourced Peer-To-Peer Cognitive Reappraisal Platform for Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of Medical Internet Research17, 3 (2015), e72. https://doi.org/10.2196/jm...

    2015 doi

  87. [96]

    Balfour Mount. 1993. Whole person care: Beyond psychosocial and physical needs.American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®10, 1 (Jan. 1993), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/104990919301000109 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc. Manuscript submitted to ACM 32 Bezabih et al

    1993 doi

  88. [97]

    Michael Muller. 2014. Curiosity, Creativity, and Surprise as Analytic Tools: Grounded Theory Method. InWays of Knowing in HCI, Judith S. Olson and Wendy A. Kellogg (Eds.). Springer, New York, NY, 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_2

    2014 doi

  89. [98]

    Priya Nambisan. 2011. Information seeking and social support in online health communities: impact on patients’ perceived empathy.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association18, 3 (May 2011), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000058

    2011 doi

  90. [99]

    Paul Nash, Emma Roberts, Sally Nash, Kathryn Darby, and Aftab Ahmed Parwaz. 2019. Adapting the Advocate Health Care Taxonomy of Chaplaincy for a Pediatric Hospital Context: A Pilot Study.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy25, 2 (2019), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.201...

    2019

  91. [100]

    Naslund, Ameya Bondre, John Torous, and Kelly A

    John A. Naslund, Ameya Bondre, John Torous, and Kelly A. Aschbrenner. 2020. Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice.Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science5, 3 (Sept. 2020), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00134-x

    2020 doi

  92. [101]

    Nieuwsma, George L

    Jason A. Nieuwsma, George L. Jackson, Mark B. DeKraai, Denise J. Bulling, William C. Cantrell, Jeffrey E. Rhodes, Mark J. Bates, Keith Ethridge, Marian E. Lane, Wendy N. Tenhula, Sonja V. Batten, and Keith G. Meador. 2014. Collaborating Across the Departments of Veterans Affai...

    2014 doi

  93. [102]

    Steve Nolan. 2011. Hope beyond (redundant) hope: how chaplains work with dying patients.Palliative Medicine25, 1 (Jan. 2011), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216310380297

    2011 doi

  94. [103]

    James E. Norman. 2002. Personal difficulties and educational underachievement: The contribution of pastoral care and school Chaplaincy.Irish Educational Studies(March 2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/0332331020210106 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group

    2002 doi

  95. [104]

    Estelle Smith

    Shadi Nourriz, Alemitu Bezabih, and C. Estelle Smith. 2024. On the Design Risks of Empathy Fatigue. InProceedings of the 3rd Empathy-Centric Design Workshop: Scrutinizing Empathy Beyond the Individual (EmpathiCH ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, Honolulu HI USA, 34–39...

    2024

  96. [105]

    Johanna Nurmi, Keegan Knittle, Todor Ginchev, Fida Khattak, Christopher Helf, Patrick Zwickl, Carmina Castellano-Tejedor, Pilar Lusilla-Palacios, Jose Costa-Requena, Niklas Ravaja, and Ari Haukkala. 2020. Engaging Users in the Behavior Change Process With Digitalized Motivatio...

    2020 doi

  97. [106]

    O’Leary, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, and Timothy Bickmore

    Teresa K. O’Leary, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, and Timothy Bickmore. 2024. ‘Something I Can Lean On’: A Qualitative Evaluation of a Virtual Palliative Care Counselor for Patients with Life-Limiting Illnesses. InExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Com...

    2024

  98. [107]

    Erik Olsman. 2022. Witnesses of hope in times of despair: chaplains in palliative care. A qualitative study.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy28, 1 (Jan. 2022), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2020.1727602

    2022

  99. [108]

    Pauletta Otis. 2009. An Overview of the U.s. Military Chaplaincy: A Ministry of Presence and Practice.The Review of Faith & International Affairs7, 4 (Dec. 2009), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2009.9523410 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274...

    2009

  100. [109]

    Piret Paal, Yousef Helo, and Eckhard Frick. 2015. Spiritual Care Training Provided to Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review.Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling69, 1 (March 2015), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542305015572955 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd STM

    2015 doi

  101. [110]

    Barbara Pesut, Shane Sinclair, George Fitchett, Madeleine Greig, and Sarah E. Koss. 2016. Health Care Chaplaincy: A Scoping Review of the Evidence 2009–2014.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy22, 2 (April 2016), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2015.1133185 Publisher: Rou...

    2016

  102. [111]

    Schneider

    Lara Guedes de Pinho, César Fonseca, Łukasz Gawęda, Manuel Lopes, and Brooke C. Schneider. 2024. Editorial: Non-pharmacological interventions for mental disorders.Frontiers in Psychology15 (March 2024). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363348 Publisher: Frontiers

    2024

  103. [112]

    David B. Plummer. 1996. Chaplaincy: The Greatest Story Never Told.Journal of Pastoral Care50, 1 (March 1996), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 002234099605000101 Publisher: SAGE Publications

    1996

  104. [113]

    Emmanuelle Poncin, Brigitte Niquille, Guy Jobin, Charles Benaim, and Etienne Rochat. 2020. What Motivates Healthcare Professionals’ Referrals to Chaplains, and How to Help Them Formulate Referrals that Accurately Reflect Patients’ Spiritual Needs?Journal of Health Care Chaplai...

    2020

  105. [114]

    Prinster, C

    Gale H. Prinster, C. Estelle Smith, Chenhao Tan, and Brian C. Keegan. 2024. Community Archetypes: An Empirical Framework for Guiding Research Methodologies to Reflect User Experiences of Sense of Virtual Community on Reddit.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction8...

    2024 doi

  106. [115]

    Nicholas Proferes, Naiyan Jones, Sarah Gilbert, Casey Fiesler, and Michael Zimmer. 2021. Studying Reddit: A Systematic Overview of Disciplines, Approaches, Methods, and Ethics.Social Media + Society7, 2 (April 2021), 20563051211019004. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019004...

    2021 doi

  107. [116]

    Christina Puchalski, Betty Ferrell, Rose Virani, Shirley Otis-Green, Pamela Baird, Janet Bull, Harvey Chochinov, George Handzo, Holly Nelson- Becker, Maryjo Prince-Paul, Karen Pugliese, and Daniel Sulmasy. 2009. Improving the Quality of Spiritual Care as a Dimension of Palliat...

    2009

  108. [117]

    Raymond De Vries, Nancy Berlinger, and Wendy Cadge. 2008. Lost in Translation: The Chaplain’s Role in Health Care.Hastings Center Report38, 6 (2008), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.0.0081

    2008 doi

  109. [118]

    Record, Will R

    Rachael A. Record, Will R. Silberman, Joshua E. Santiago, and Taewook Ham. 2018. I Sought It, I Reddit: Examining Health Information Engagement Behaviors among Reddit Users.Journal of Health Communication23, 5 (May 2018), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1465493 ...

    2018

  110. [119]

    Monet Rice-Jalloh

    K. Monet Rice-Jalloh. 2022. Zooming to the Scene: Higher Education Chaplaincy and Hybrid Digital Care.Journal of Pastoral Theology32, 1 (Jan. 2022), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10649867.2022.2059228 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10649867.2022.2059228

    2022

  111. [120]

    Rosmarin, Joseph S

    David H. Rosmarin, Joseph S. Bigda-Peyton, Dost Öngur, Kenneth I. Pargament, and Thröstur Björgvinsson. 2013. Religious coping among psychotic patients: Relevance to suicidality and treatment outcomes.Psychiatry Research210, 1 (Nov. 2013), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ps...

    2013 doi

  112. [121]

    Lucy Rushton. 2014. What are the barriers to spiritual care in a hospital setting?British Journal of Nursing23, 7 (April 2014), 370–374. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2014.23.7.370 Publisher: Mark Allen Group

    2014 doi

  113. [122]

    Linda Rykkje, Margrethe Bakstad Søvik, Linda Ross, Wilfred McSherry, Pamela Cone, and Tove Giske. 2022. Educational interventions and strategies for spiritual care in nursing and healthcare students and staff: A scoping review.Journal of Clinical Nursing31, 11-12 (2022), 1440–...

    2022 doi

  114. [123]

    Rosa Scardigno and Giuseppe Mininni. 2020. An authentic feeling? Religious experience through Q&A websites.Archive for the Psychology of Religion42, 2 (July 2020), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672420917451 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

    2020 doi

  115. [124]

    Nathan Schneider. 2022. Admins, mods, and benevolent dictators for life: The implicit feudalism of online communities.New Media & Society24, 9 (Sept. 2022), 1965–1985. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820986553 Publisher: SAGE Publications

    2022 doi

  116. [125]

    Jessica Schroeder, Chelsey Wilkes, Kael Rowan, Arturo Toledo, Ann Paradiso, Mary Czerwinski, Gloria Mark, and Marsha M. Linehan. 2018. Pocket Skills: A Conversational Mobile Web App To Support Dialectical Behavioral Therapy. InProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Fa...

    2018

  117. [126]

    Britta Schulte, Philipp Graf, Lena Franzkowiak, and Eva Hornecker. 2020. Hospital Beds, Robot Priests and Huggables: A (Fictional) Review of Commercially Available Care Robots. InProceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shap...

    2020

  118. [127]

    Chad E. Seales. 2012. Corporate Chaplaincy and the American Workplace.Religion Compass6, 3 (2012), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749- 8171.2012.00340.x _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2012.00340.x

    2012

  119. [128]

    Joseph Seering, Geoff Kaufman, and Stevie Chancellor. 2022. Metaphors in moderation.New Media & Society24, 3 (March 2022), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820964968

    2022 doi

  120. [129]

    Kraut, and Diyi Yang

    Raj Sanjay Shah, Faye Holt, Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Aastha Agarwal, Yi-Chia Wang, Robert E. Kraut, and Diyi Yang. 2022. Modeling Motivational Interviewing Strategies on an Online Peer-to-Peer Counseling Platform.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CSCW2 (Nov...

    2022 doi

  121. [130]

    Michele Shields, Allison Kestenbaum, and Laura B. Dunn. 2015. Spiritual AIM and the work of the chaplain: A model for assessing spiritual needs and outcomes in relationship.Palliative and Supportive Care13, 1 (Feb. 2015), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951513001120

    2015 doi

  122. [131]

    Shane Sinclair, Shelley Raffin Bouchal, Harvey Chochinov, Neil Hagen, and Susan McClement. 2012. Spiritual care: how to do it.BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care2, 4 (Dec. 2012), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000191

    2012 doi

  123. [132]

    Petr Slovak and Sean A. Munson. 2024. HCI Contributions in Mental Health: A Modular Framework to Guide Psychosocial Intervention Design. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642624

    2024

  124. [133]

    Estelle Smith

    C. Estelle Smith. 2022. Sacred be thy tech: thoughts (and prayers) on integrating spirituality in technology for health and well-being.Interactions 29, 4 (July 2022), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543893

    2022 doi

  125. [134]

    Estelle Smith, Irfanul Alam, Chenhao Tan, Brian C

    C. Estelle Smith, Irfanul Alam, Chenhao Tan, Brian C. Keegan, and Anita L. Blanchard. 2022. The Impact of Governance Bots on Sense of Virtual Community: Development and Validation of the GOV-BOTs Scale.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 4...

    2022 doi

  126. [135]

    Estelle Smith, Avleen Kaur, Katie Z

    C. Estelle Smith, Avleen Kaur, Katie Z. Gach, Loren Terveen, Mary Jo Kreitzer, and Susan O’Conner-Von. 2021. What is Spiritual Support and How Might It Impact the Design of Online Communities?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1–42. http...

    2021 doi

  127. [136]

    Estelle Smith, Shamika Klassen, Gale H

    C. Estelle Smith, Shamika Klassen, Gale H. Prinster, Chenhao Tan, and Brian C. Keegan. 2024. Governance of the Black Experience on Reddit: r/BlackPeopleTwitter as a Case Study in Supporting Sense of Virtual Community for Black Users.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Int...

    2024

  128. [137]

    Estelle Smith, William Lane, Hannah Miller Hillberg, Daniel Kluver, Loren Terveen, and Svetlana Yarosh

    C. Estelle Smith, William Lane, Hannah Miller Hillberg, Daniel Kluver, Loren Terveen, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2021. Effective Strategies for Crowd- Powered Cognitive Reappraisal Systems: A Field Deployment of the Flip*Doubt Web Application for Mental Health.Proceedings of the ACM...

    2021 doi

  129. [138]

    I Cannot Do All of This Alone

    C. Estelle Smith, Zachary Levonian, Haiwei Ma, Robert Giaquinto, Gemma Lein-Mcdonough, Zixuan Li, Susan O’conner-Von, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2020. "I Cannot Do All of This Alone": Exploring Instrumental and Prayer Support in Online Health Communities.ACM Transactions on Computer...

    2020 doi

  130. [139]

    Estelle Smith, Hannah Miller Hillberg, and Zachary Levonian

    C. Estelle Smith, Hannah Miller Hillberg, and Zachary Levonian. 2023. Thoughts and Prayers: How the Release of New Reactions on CaringBridge Reshapes Supportive Communication in Health Crises.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction7, CSCW2 (Sept. 2023), 1–39. http...

    2023 doi

  131. [141]

    Anja Thieme, Maryann Hanratty, Maria Lyons, Jorge Palacios, Rita Faia Marques, Cecily Morrison, and Gavin Doherty. 2023. Designing Human- centered AI for Mental Health: Developing Clinically Relevant Applications for Online CBT Treatment.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Inte...

    2023 doi

  132. [142]

    Fiona Timmins, Sílvia Caldeira, Maryanne Murphy, Nicolas Pujol, Greg Sheaf, Elizabeth Weathers, Jacqueline Whelan, and Bernadette Flanagan

  133. [143]

    Tracy J. Trothen. 2022. Replika: Spiritual Enhancement Technology?Religions13, 4 (April 2022), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040275 Number: 4 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

    2022 doi

  134. [144]

    Urban, Cinda Amyx, and Antonio Lorenzon

    Glen L. Urban, Cinda Amyx, and Antonio Lorenzon. 2009. Online Trust: State of the Art, New Frontiers, and Research Potential.Journal of Interactive Marketing23, 2 (May 2009), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2009.03.001 Publisher: SAGE Publications

    2009 doi

  135. [145]

    https://doi.org/10

    The Role of the Healthcare Chaplain: A Literature Review.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy24, 3 (July 2018), 87–106. https://doi.org/10. 1080/08854726.2017.1338048

    2018

  136. [146]

    Larry VandeCreek and Arthur M. Lucas. 2014.The Discipline for Pastoral Care Giving: Foundations for Outcome Oriented Chaplaincy. Routledge. Google-Books-ID: Vi_GBQAAQBAJ

    2014

  137. [147]

    Steven Waller, Lars Dzikus, and Robin Hardin. 2023. Collegiate Sport Chaplaincy: Problems and Promise.Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics 1, 1 (Dec. 2023). https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/jiia/vol1/iss1/18

    2023

  138. [148]

    Anne van Meerveld, Donna Wielinga, Els Versluis, and Linda V. 2017. The role of anonymity in discussing social anxiety online: A comparative platform analysis of Facebook and Reddit. https://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/blog/2017/10/24/the-role-of-anonymity-in-discussing-social- ...

    2017

  139. [149]

    Ye Diana Wang and Henry H. Emurian. 2005. An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications.Computers in Human Behavior21, 1 (Jan. 2005), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.008

    2005 doi

  140. [150]

    Shen Wang-Qin and Chen Hong-Lin. 2018. Nurse Staffs’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices toward Palliative Care in China: a Cross-Sectional Survey. InProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (ICMHI ’18). Association for Computing Machin...

    2018

  141. [151]

    Xiaohui Wang, Jingyuan Shi, and Hanxiao Kong. 2021. Online Health Information Seeking: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Health Communication36, 10 (Aug. 2021), 1163–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1748829 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.20...

    2021

  142. [152]

    White, Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee, J’Aime C

    Kelsey B. White, Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee, J’Aime C. Jennings, Seyed Karimi, Christopher E. Johnson, and George Fitchett. 2023. Provision of chaplaincy services in U.S. hospitals: A strategic conformity perspective.Health Care Management Review48, 4 (Dec. 2023), 342. https: //doi....

    2023 doi

  143. [153]

    Fabian Winiger. 2022. The changing face of spiritual care: current developments in telechaplaincy.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy0, 0 (March 2022), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2022.2040895 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2022.2040895

    2022

  144. [154]

    Eugene Weinstein. 1965. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Erving Goffman.Amer. J. Sociology70, 5 (March 1965), 636–636. https://doi.org/10.1086/223949 Publisher: The University of Chicago Press

    1965 doi

  145. [155]

    Frank Woggon, Matthew Arlyck, Stephenie Maddox Hill, and Leslie Small Stokes. 2022. The development of an outcome oriented and research informed spiritual care assessment and documentation form for the electronic health record in an adult hospital setting.Jour- nal of Health C...

    2022

  146. [156]

    Sara Wolf, Frauke Moerike, Simon Luthe, Ilona Nord, and Jörn Hurtienne. 2022. Spirituality at the Breakfast Table: Experiences of Christian Online Worship Services. InExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’22). Association ...

    2022

  147. [157]

    Fabian Winiger and Petra Sprik. 2023. Navigating challenges in telechaplaincy: A thematic analysis of an international conference.Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy(Dec. 2023), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2023.2294680

    2023

  148. [158]

    Tanja Wolf and Birgit Feldbauer-Durstmüller. 2018. Workplace chaplaincy: a literature review.Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion15, 1 (Jan. 2018), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2017.1385514

    2018

  149. [159]

    Yaden, Cassondra L

    David B. Yaden, Cassondra L. Batz-Barbarich, Vincent Ng, Hoda Vaziri, Jessica N. Gladstone, James O. Pawelski, and Louis Tay. 2022. A Meta-Analysis of Religion/Spirituality and Life Satisfaction.Journal of Happiness Studies23, 8 (Dec. 2022), 4147–4163. https://doi.org/10.1007/...

    2022 doi

  150. [160]

    Sara Wolf, Benedikt Steinmüller, Frauke Mörike, Simon Luthe, and Jörn Hurtienne. 2023. The God-I-Box: Iteratively Provotyping Technology- Mediated Worship Services. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’23). Association for Computing Mach...

    2023

  151. [161]

    William Young. 2022. Virtual Pastor: Virtualization, AI, and Pastoral Care.Theology and Science20, 1 (Jan. 2022), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14746700.2021.2012915 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2021.2012915

    2022

  152. [162]

    Zhang, Grant Hugh, and Michael S

    Amy X. Zhang, Grant Hugh, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2020. PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 365–378....

    2020

  153. [163]

    Andrew Chixiao Yang. 2019. The Role of Color in Palliative Care for Children. InProceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology (ICBBT ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1145...

    2019

  154. [164]

    Kenne, NhatHai Phan, and Wei-Shinn Ku

    Jianfeng Zhu, Ruoming Jin, Deric R. Kenne, NhatHai Phan, and Wei-Shinn Ku. 2024. User Dynamics and Thematic Exploration in r/Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights From Overlapping r/SuicideWatch Users.Journal of Medical Internet Research26, 1 (May 2024), e53968. ht...

    2024 doi

  155. [165]

    spiritual support

    Wenxue Zou, Lu Tang, Mi Zhou, and Xinyu Zhang. 2024. Self-disclosure and received social support among women experiencing infertility on reddit: A natural language processing approach.Computers in Human Behavior154 (May 2024), 108159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108159 ...

    2024

  156. [166]

    Yuxiang Chris Zhao, Mengyuan Zhao, and Shijie Song. 2022. Online Health Information Seeking Among Patients With Chronic Conditions: Integrating the Health Belief Model and Social Support Theory.Journal of Medical Internet Research24, 11 (Nov. 2022), e42447. https://doi.org/ 10...

    2022 doi

  157. [2018]

    2018), 1–25

    The Internet’s Hidden Rules: An Empirical Study of Reddit Norm Violations at Micro, Meso, and Macro Scales.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274301

    2018 doi

  158. [2019]

    Development of the PC-7, a Quantifiable Assessment of Spiritual Concerns of Patients Receiving Palliative Care Near the End of Life.Journal of Palliative Medicine23 (Sept. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2019.0188

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.