Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 144 references

A Critical Analysis of Deployed Use Cases for Quantum Key Distribution and Comparison with Post-Quantum Cryptography

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read QKD gives little security advantage over PQC in most real deployments.

desk verdict A careful, genuinely useful per-use-case audit of real QKD deployments that mostly supports its skeptical conclusion, with one honest boundary condition about unstated security requirements. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04009 v2 pith:CJ4GSWM5 submitted 2025-02-06 cs.CR

Nick Aquina , Bruno Cimoli , Soumya Das , Kathrin Hövelmanns , Fiona Johanna Weber , Chigo Okonkwo , Simon Rommel , Boris Škorić
show 2 more authors
Idelfonso Tafur Monroy Sebastian Verschoor
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CR
keywords QuantumKeyDistributionPost-QuantumCryptographysecurityevaluationone-timepadeverlastingconfidentialitypost-compromiseharvest-now-decrypt-latertrustednodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper assembles eleven documented, fiber-based QKD deployments and asks, use case by use case, whether QKD actually buys anything that post-quantum cryptography or simply pre-shared keys would not. Its central conclusion is that in most of these deployments QKD provides very limited or no advantage: the security that matters comes from AES or authentication mechanisms that are computational anyway, and the QKD layer mostly adds cost, distance limits, and trusted-node requirements. The exceptions are short-distance links where QKD keys feed a one-time pad, which can give everlasting confidentiality against an attacker of unlimited computational power, such as the genome-data case. If the paper is right, current QKD marketing overstates the technology's practical security value, and decision-makers should generally migrate to PQC while treating QKD as a niche option for specific short-haul, high-sensitivity links.

What carries the argument

The analytical instrument is a three-question checklist applied to each deployment: how is the QKD key used (which cipher and protocol), what does the network topology look like (direct fiber, trusted nodes, distance), and what security guarantees are actually claimed and delivered? Applying the checklist separates the QKD layer from the surrounding cryptography, so the comparison with PQC and pre-shared keys runs on equal terms. The central distinction that carries the verdict is whether the QKD key feeds a one-time pad or a computationally secure cipher like AES, since only the former can claim security against an unbounded adversary.

What would settle it

The verdict would be falsified by a documented, accurately described QKD deployment whose stated threat model explicitly requires everlasting confidentiality against a computationally unbounded adversary, or post-compromise security without any computational assumptions, at a distance and scale where trusted-courier pre-shared keys are infeasible and PQC's computational assumptions are deemed unacceptable. If such a deployment is found and its requirements verified, it would fall outside the paper's conclusion that QKD offers no advantage in most use cases.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's claim is that once you examine what the QKD-generated key is actually used for—which cipher, which network topology, which security goals, and which auxiliary cryptography—the information-theoretic appeal of QKD disappears in most real deployments. In the analyzed cases, QKD is typically paired with AES-256 or a similar computationally secure cipher, so the overall system is no stronger than its computational components; in authentication-only cases, the authenticated channel QKD requires could do the job directly; and in backup and secret-sharing cases, pre-shared keys are a cheaper and at least as secure alternative. The two cases the authors regard as more sensible—genome data and genome distance sharing—use QKD with a one-time pad, and even there a pre-shared key of sufficient size would provide the same everlasting confidentiality.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the security requirements stated in the public reports of each deployment are complete, so no real deployment has an unstated requirement—such as post-compromise security without computational assumptions—that QKD alone could satisfy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In most documented fiber use cases, replacing QKD with PQC key establishment preserves the same practical security while reducing cost and implementation complexity.
  • Authentication-only deployments do not need QKD at all; the authentication mechanism that secures the QKD channel can authenticate the data directly.
  • For point-to-point links between fixed, physically accessible sites, pre-shared keys loaded on cheap storage are a viable and sometimes stronger alternative to QKD, including for one-time-pad encryption.
  • Hybrid QKD-plus-AES systems are vulnerable to downgrade if the quantum channel can be interrupted, so availability fallbacks can silently remove the QKD contribution.
  • Only use cases that genuinely need long-term confidentiality against a computationally unbounded adversary, and can live with short distances, are places where QKD with OTP earns its keep.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same checklist could be turned into a screening tool for future QKD proposals: a proponent would have to name the cipher, the data lifetime, and the threat model before the deployment is judged.
  • If the harvest-now-decrypt-later threat is the real driver, the paper's logic implies that the primary value of QKD lies in protecting data that must stay secret for decades; for most corporate and government data, PQC with conservative assumptions may already meet that bar.
  • A testable extension would be to score a larger corpus of QKD use cases, including satellite and free-space links, against the same three questions to see whether the short-distance one-time-pad pattern generalizes.
  • The paper's critique of the smart-grid authentication case suggests that advertised information-theoretic authentication, when implemented with AES-GMAC, is actually computational, so claims in future deployments should be checked against the concrete MAC construction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper surveys eleven documented, fiber-based QKD deployments and analyzes each in terms of key usage, network topology, and achievable security guarantees, comparing them against classical alternatives such as pre-shared keys and post-quantum authenticated key exchange. It concludes that in most analyzed use cases QKD provides very limited or no advantage over these alternatives, with the main exceptions being short-distance links that use QKD-generated keys for one-time-pad encryption (e.g., genome data transfer, Section 6.6, and genome distance sharing, Section 6.11). The paper also corrects vendor overclaims, notably that AES-GMAC is not information-theoretically secure (Section 6.10), and emphasizes that QKD requires an authenticated classical channel and does not by itself protect data at rest.

Significance. If its conclusions are accepted, the paper provides a useful decision-making resource for the ongoing QKD-versus-PQC debate. Its strengths are the careful separation of computational, information-theoretic, and quantum-information-theoretic security notions; the explicit treatment of the authenticated-channel requirement for QKD; the identification of backup use cases as protecting only data in transit; and the systematic per-use-case comparison with pre-shared keys and PQC in Table 5. The paper is not circular: it draws on external sources and protocol-composition analysis rather than deriving its conclusions from its own assumptions. The main risk is overgeneralization, because the analysis is conditional on the completeness of vendor-documented security goals and on the restriction to sufficiently documented fiber-based deployments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 7 (and Sections 5, 6.6, 6.11)] The central conclusion that "in most [use cases], QKD provides very limited or no advantage" is load-bearingly conditional on treating the security goals reported in vendor and project documents as complete. Section 7 itself concedes that QKD can provide post-compromise security (PCS) without computational assumptions, and Section 2.4 notes that pre-shared keys do not provide PCS or on-demand key refresh. For the two use cases the paper rates most favorably (genome data, 6.6, and genome distance sharing, 6.11), the only substantive advantage of QKD over physically exchanged OTP key material is the on-demand generation of fresh OTP keys, which is exactly the PCS-related property that pre-shared keys lack. Since absence of PCS from vendor documents is not evidence of absence from operational requirements, the paper should add an explicit sensitivity discussion: for each row, state whether a PCS or on-demand-ITS-key-refresh requirement would flip the recommendation, and qualify the abstract and conclusion accordingly.
  2. [Section 4 and Appendix A] The sample is restricted to fiber-based deployments with sufficient public documentation; satellite QKD and poorly documented projects are explicitly excluded in Section 4 and Appendix A. This is a reasonable scope decision, but the abstract's "comprehensive security evaluation" and the conclusion's unqualified "in most [use cases]" should carry this limitation forward. For example, the conclusions cannot be read as applying to satellite QKD or to deployments whose security goals are not publicly documented. I recommend adding one sentence to the abstract and conclusion stating that the findings apply only to the documented fiber-based use cases analyzed in the paper.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.6 and Table 3] The statement that "most modern protocols offer PCS as a matter of course" is stronger than warranted; standard TLS 1.3 provides forward secrecy, but post-compromise security generally requires an explicit ratcheting mechanism such as in Signal. Please qualify this claim.
  2. [Section 6.11, footnote 2] The computed number of phylogenetic-tree key sets per year appears to be off by a factor of two relative to the stated 18.6·10^3 bits per calculation; please reconcile the arithmetic.
  3. [Throughout] Please correct typographical errors: "Continuos Variable" (Table 2 and Section 2.8), "T able" in table captions, "commerical" (Table 2), "Tokohu" (Section 4.6), and "Tosiba" (reference [96]).
  4. [Section 6.11] The first sentence after the analysis says "same conclusions as for the genome distance sharing use case (6.6)"; this should refer to the genome data use case (6.6), not to genome distance sharing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's comparative verdict is an external, use-case-by-use-case assessment, not a derivation from its own inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript does not derive a prediction from fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or a self-citation chain. Its central conclusion—that in most analyzed use cases QKD provides very limited or no advantage over PQC or pre-shared keys—is reached by applying a stated methodology (Section 5) to independently sourced vendor reports, project deliverables, and standards documents (Section 4). For each use case, Section 6 identifies the security goal, the protocol composition actually deployed, and then compares against classical alternatives listed in Table 5; the comparison in Section 3 characterizes pre-shared keys, QKD+OTP, QKD+AES, and AKE+symmetric encryption by their security properties without assuming the conclusion. The paper explicitly flags the one property where QKD has a theoretical edge—post-compromise security without computational assumptions—and notes that none of the analyzed use cases list it as a requirement (Section 7). That is a boundary condition on the argument, not a circular reduction. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, and the cited government position papers and standards are external evidence used for context, not load-bearing self-citations. The analysis is self-contained as a critical evaluation; the main correctness risk is the completeness of vendor-documented security requirements, which is an evidential limitation rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. Its central claim rests on standard cryptographic assumptions (hardness of LWE/hash/code problems for PQC, correctness of quantum mechanics and device non-leakage for QKD), on the accuracy of vendor-reported use case descriptions, and on the feasibility of physical key distribution for fixed endpoints. These are explicitly stated in Sections 2.4 to 2.6 and Section 4.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption QKD security rests on correctness and completeness of quantum theory, device non-leakage, and an authenticated classical channel.
    Stated in Section 2.6.1 as fundamental assumptions; the paper's comparative analysis accepts these assumptions when assessing QKD's guarantees.
  • domain assumption Vendor and project reports used in Section 4 accurately describe the deployed systems and their security goals.
    The use case analysis in Section 6 depends on these descriptions; missing details are noted when known to be unknown.
  • domain assumption Standard computational hardness assumptions for AES and for PQC schemes (module-LWE, hash-based, code-based) hold.
    Used throughout Section 2.5 and in the comparison table (Table 3); if these fail, the comparison between QKD+AES and PQC would shift.
  • domain assumption For fixed, physically close endpoints, pre-shared keys can be distributed in person at acceptable cost.
    Section 2.4 argues this with a 1 TB SD card example; this assumption underlies many of the alternative recommendations in Section 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Critical Analysis of Deployed Use Cases for Quantum Key Distribution and Comparison with Post-Quantum Cryptography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CJ4GSWM5

@misc{pith2026250204009,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Critical Analysis of Deployed Use Cases for Quantum Key Distribution and Comparison with Post-Quantum Cryptography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CJ4GSWM5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04009}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is currently being discussed as a technology to safeguard communication in a future where quantum computers compromise traditional public-key cryptosystems. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive security evaluation of QKD-based solutions, focusing on real-world use cases sourced from academic literature and industry reports. We analyze these use cases, assess their security and identify the possible advantages of deploying QKD-based solutions. We further compare QKD-based solutions with Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), the alternative approach to achieving security when quantum computers compromise traditional public-key cryptosystems, evaluating their respective suitability for each scenario. Based on this comparative analysis, we critically discuss and comment on which use cases QKD is suited for, considering factors such as implementation complexity, scalability, and long-term security. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the role QKD could play in future cryptographic infrastructures and offer guidance to decision-makers considering the deployment of QKD.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Current numbers of qubits and their uses

    Tsubasa Ichikawa et al. “Current numbers of qubits and their uses”. In: Nature Reviews Physics 6.6 (May 2024), pp. 345–347.issn: 2522-5820. doi: 10.1038/s42254-024-00725-0. 33

    doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00725-0 2024

  2. [2]

    Scholten et al

    Travis L. Scholten et al. Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Quantum Computers. 2024. eprint: arXiv:2401.16317

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring

    P.W. Shor. “Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring”. In: Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 1994, pp. 124–

    1994

  4. [4]

    Prepare for the threat of quantum computers

    General Intelligence and Security Service. Prepare for the threat of quantum computers. Feb. 17, 2022. url: https://english.aivd.nl/binaries/aivd-en/documenten/publications/ 2022/01/18/prepare-for-the-threat-of-quantumcomputers/Prepare+for+the+threat+of+ quantumcomputers.pdf

    2022

  5. [5]

    Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribu- tion and Coin Tossing

    Charles H. Bennett and Gilles Brassard. “Quantum Cryptography: Public Key Distribu- tion and Coin Tossing”. In:Theoretical Computer Science560 (Dec. 2014), pp. 7–11.issn: 03043975. doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025

    doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025 2014

  6. [6]

    Experimental Integration of Quantum Key Distribution and Post- Quantum Cryptography in a Hybrid Quantum-Safe Cryptosystem

    Lydia Garms et al. “Experimental Integration of Quantum Key Distribution and Post- Quantum Cryptography in a Hybrid Quantum-Safe Cryptosystem”. In:Advanced Quantum Technologies 7.4 (Apr. 2024), p. 2300304. issn: 2511-9044, 2511-9044. doi: 10.1002/qute. 202300304

    doi:10.1002/qute 2024

  7. [7]

    Version Number: 3

    Pei Zeng et al.Practical hybrid PQC-QKD protocols with enhanced security and performance. Version Number: 3. 2024.doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2411.01086

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.01086 2024

  8. [8]

    Announcing Approval of Three Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) for Post-Quantum Cryptography

    National Institute of Standards and Technology. Announcing Approval of Three Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) for Post-Quantum Cryptography. ID Quantique. 13th Aug. 2024. url: https://csrc.nist.gov/News/2024/postquantum-cryptography-fips- approved (visited on 20/11/2024)

    2024

Show all 144 references
  1. [9]

    French Cybersecurity Agency (ANSSI) et al.Position Paper on Quantum Key Distribution. Jan. 26, 2024. url: https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/797c7e8e-9c70-4a98-bfb4- 11cb5f19515f/file

    2024

  2. [10]

    Standardization Roadmap on Quantum Technologies

    CEN-CENELEC FGQT. Standardization Roadmap on Quantum Technologies. Jan. 3, 2023. url: https://www.cencenelec.eu/media/CEN-CENELEC/AreasOfWork/CEN-CENELEC_ Topics / Quantum % 20technologies / Documentation % 20and % 20Materials / fgqt _ q04 _ standardizationroadmapquantumtechno...

    2023

  3. [11]

    Standardization Op- portunities for Quantum Communication Technologies, Standardization Gaps and demands, Challenges and Opportunities to arise in the future

    Telecommunications Standards Development Society India (TSDSI). “Standardization Op- portunities for Quantum Communication Technologies, Standardization Gaps and demands, Challenges and Opportunities to arise in the future”. In:White paper(Dec. 2024).url: https: //tsdsi.in/wp-...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet

    Koji Azuma et al. “Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet”. In: Rev. Mod. Phys.95 (4 Dec. 2023), p. 045006.doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045006

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Towards metropolitan free-space quantum networks

    Andrej Kržič et al. “Towards metropolitan free-space quantum networks”. In:npj Quantum Information 9.1 (Sept. 2023).issn: 2056-6387. doi: 10.1038/s41534-023-00754-0

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    url: https://www.nsa.gov/Cybersecurity/Quantum-Key-Distribution-QKD- and-Quantum-Cryptography-QC/ (visited on 09/11/2024)

    National Security Agency (NSA).Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Quantum Cryptog- raphy (QC). url: https://www.nsa.gov/Cybersecurity/Quantum-Key-Distribution-QKD- and-Quantum-Cryptography-QC/ (visited on 09/11/2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Renato Renner and Ramona Wolf.The debate over QKD: A rebuttal to the NSA’s objections

  8. [16]

    Quantum security technologies

    National Cyber Security Center. Quantum security technologies. Mar. 24, 2020.url: https: //www.ncsc.gov.uk/whitepaper/quantum-security-technologies

    2020

  9. [17]

    Quantum Initiatives Worldwide 2024 - Qureca — qureca.com

    Isabelle Desouches. Quantum Initiatives Worldwide 2024 - Qureca — qureca.com. https:// www.qureca.com/quantum-initiatives-worldwide/

    2024

  10. [18]

    https://www.quantum.gov/

  11. [19]

    https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-quantum- communication-infrastructure-euroqci

    The European Quantum Communication Infrastructure (EuroQCI) Initiative — digital- strategy.ec.europa.eu. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-quantum- communication-infrastructure-euroqci

  12. [20]

    https://qt.eu/

    The future is Quantum — qt.eu. https://qt.eu/

  13. [21]

    https://uknqt.ukri.org/

    UK National Quantum Technologies Programme — uknqt.ukri.org. https://uknqt.ukri.org/

  14. [22]

    Quantum Communications Hub — quantumcommshub.net.https://www.quantumcommshub. net/

  15. [23]

    https://quantumdelta.nl/catalyst- programs/ quantum-network

    Quantum Networks — quantumdelta.nl. https://quantumdelta.nl/catalyst- programs/ quantum-network

  16. [24]

    https://dst

    Cabinet approves National Quantum Mission to scale-up scientific & industrial R&D for quantum technologies | Department Of Science & Technology — dst.gov.in. https://dst. 34 gov.in/cabinet-approves-national-quantum-mission-scale-scientific-industrial-rd-quantum- technologies

  17. [25]

    https://www.idquantique.com/quantum- safe- security/ products/

    Products — idquantique.com. https://www.idquantique.com/quantum- safe- security/ products/. (Visited on 12/04/2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    https://www.toshiba

    Toshiba Quantum: QKD & Quantum Security Solutions — toshiba.eu. https://www.toshiba. eu/quantum/

  19. [27]

    Top 25 Quantum Cryptography & Encryption Companies [2024] — thequan- tuminsider.com

    James Dargan. Top 25 Quantum Cryptography & Encryption Companies [2024] — thequan- tuminsider.com. https://thequantuminsider.com/2021/01/11/25-companies-building-the- quantum-cryptography-communications-markets/

    2024

  20. [28]

    https:// www.ventureradar.com/keyword/Quantum%20Key%20Distribution

    Top Quantum Key Distribution companies | VentureRadar — ventureradar.com. https:// www.ventureradar.com/keyword/Quantum%20Key%20Distribution

  21. [29]

    Business Research Insights. Quantum Communication Market Size, Share, Growth, and In- dustry Analysis, (Hardware, Software and Services), By Application (Government, Military And Defense, Telecommunication, BFSI, Enterprise And Industrial), Regional Insights, and Forecast To 2...

    2023

  22. [30]

    GS QKD 002-V1. 1.1-Quantum Key Distribution; Use Cases

    QK Distribution. “GS QKD 002-V1. 1.1-Quantum Key Distribution; Use Cases”. In:Inno- vation 1 (2010), pp. 1–32.url: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/qkd/001_099/002/01. 01.01_60/gs_qkd002v010101p.pdf

    2010

  23. [31]

    FGQT Q05 Quantum Technologies Use Cases [writ- ten by the CEN-CENELEC Focus Group on Quantum Technologies (FGQT)]

    Marco Gramegna, Paolo Traina, et al. “FGQT Q05 Quantum Technologies Use Cases [writ- ten by the CEN-CENELEC Focus Group on Quantum Technologies (FGQT)]”. In: (2023). url: https://www.cencenelec.eu/media/CEN-CENELEC/AreasOfWork/CEN-CENELEC_ Topics / Quantum % 20technologies / D...

    2023

  24. [32]

    https://www.global.toshiba/ww/products-solutions/security- ict/qkd/cases.html

    Use Cases | Quantum Key Distribution | TOSHIBA DIGITAL SOLUTIONS CORPORA- TION — global.toshiba. https://www.global.toshiba/ww/products-solutions/security- ict/qkd/cases.html. [Accessed 28-01-2025]

    2025

  25. [33]

    https://www.idquantique.com/quantum-safe-security/ applications/

    Applications — idquantique.com. https://www.idquantique.com/quantum-safe-security/ applications/. [Accessed 28-01-2025]

    2025

  26. [34]

    https://www.qnulabs.com/case-studies

    Quantum Cryptography Case Studies | QNu Labs - Real-World Security Solutions — qnulabs.com. https://www.qnulabs.com/case-studies. [Accessed 28-01-2025]

    2025

  27. [35]

    http: //www.quantum-info.com/English/case/

    Typical Cases_QuantumCTek 2013; Quantum Secures Every Bit — quantum-info.com. http: //www.quantum-info.com/English/case/. (Visited on 06/28/2024)

    2013

  28. [36]

    https : / / quantumxc

    Quantum Communications in Real World Applications | Quantum Xchange — quan- tumxc.com. https : / / quantumxc . com / blog / quantum - communications - real - world - applications/. [Accessed 28-01-2025]

    2025

  29. [37]

    On Post-compromise Security

    Katriel Cohn-Gordon, Cas Cremers, and Luke Garratt. “On Post-compromise Security”. In: 2016 IEEE 29th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF). 2016 IEEE 29th Com- puter Security Foundations Symposium (CSF). Lisbon: IEEE, June 2016, pp. 164–178.doi: 10.1109/csf.2016.19

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    Universal classes of hash functions (Extended Abstract)

    J. Lawrence Carter and Mark N. Wegman. “Universal classes of hash functions (Extended Abstract)”. In: Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC ’77. the ninth annual ACM symposium. Boulder, Colorado, United States: ACM Press, 1977, pp. 106–112...

    1977

  31. [39]

    New Hash Functions and Their Use in Authenti- cation and Set Equality

    Mark N. Wegman and J. Lawrence Carter. “New Hash Functions and Their Use in Authenti- cation and Set Equality”. In:Journal of Computer and System Sciences22.3 (June 1, 1981), pp. 265–279. issn: 0022-0000. doi: 10.1016/0022-0000(81)90033-7

    1981 doi

  32. [40]

    A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems

    R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adleman. “A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems”. In:Communications of the ACM21.2 (Feb. 1978), pp. 120–126. issn: 0001-0782, 1557-7317.doi: 10.1145/359340.359342

    1978

  33. [41]

    New directions in cryptography

    W. Diffie and M. Hellman. “New directions in cryptography”. In: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory22.6 (Nov. 1976), pp. 644–654.issn: 0018-9448, 1557-9654.doi: 10.1109/ TIT.1976.1055638

    1976

  34. [42]

    Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard

    Federal Information Processing Standards Publication. Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard. doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203. 35

    doi

  35. [43]

    CRYSTALS - Kyber: A CCA-Secure Module-Lattice-Based KEM

    Joppe Bos et al. “CRYSTALS - Kyber: A CCA-Secure Module-Lattice-Based KEM”. In:2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P). 2018, pp. 353–367. doi: 10.1109/EuroSP.2018.00032

    2018

  36. [44]

    Carlos Aguilar-Melchor et al. HQC. Tech. rep. available at https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/ post-quantum-cryptography/round-4-submissions. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signa- ture Standard

    Federal Information Processing Standards Publication. Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signa- ture Standard. doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204

    doi

  38. [46]

    CRYSTALS-Dilithium: A Lattice-Based Digital Signature Scheme

    Leo Ducas et al. “CRYSTALS-Dilithium: A Lattice-Based Digital Signature Scheme”. In: IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems2018.1 (Feb. 2018), pp. 238–268. doi: 10.13154/tches.v2018.i1.238-268

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard

    FederalInformationProcessingStandardsPublication. Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard. doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.205

    doi

  40. [48]

    The SPHINCS+ Signature Framework

    Daniel J. Bernstein et al. “The SPHINCS+ Signature Framework”. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. CCS ’19. Lon- don, United Kingdom: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, pp. 2129–2146. isbn: 9781450367479. doi: 10.1...

    2019

  41. [49]

    Falcon: Fast-Fourier Lattice-based Compact Signatures over NTRU, Specification v1.2

    Pierre-AlainFouqueetal. Falcon: Fast-Fourier Lattice-based Compact Signatures over NTRU, Specification v1.2. https://falcon-sign.info/falcon.pdf

  42. [50]

    Albrecht et al

    Martin R. Albrecht et al. Classic McEliece. Tech. rep. available at https://csrc.nist.gov/ projects/post-quantum-cryptography/round-4-submissions. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2022

    2022

  43. [51]

    Michael Naehrig et al.FrodoKEM. Tech. rep. available at https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post- quantum-cryptography/post-quantum-cryptography-standardization/round-3-submissions. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    XMSS: eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme

    Andreas Hülsing et al. XMSS: eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme. RFC 8391. RFC Editor, May 2018. url: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8391.txt

    2018

  45. [53]

    McGrew, Michael Curcio, and Scott R

    David A. McGrew, Michael Curcio, and Scott R. Fluhrer.Hash-Based Signatures. RFC 8554. RFC Editor, 2019.url: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8554.txt

    2019

  46. [54]

    https://security.googleblog.com/2024/ 09/a-new-path-for-kyber-on-web.html

    David Adrian et al.A new path for Kyber on the web. https://security.googleblog.com/2024/ 09/a-new-path-for-kyber-on-web.html

    2024

  47. [55]

    https://docs.aws.amazon.com/kms/latest/ developerguide/pqtls.html

    Using hybrid post-quantum TLS with AWS KMS. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/kms/latest/ developerguide/pqtls.html

  48. [56]

    https: //security.apple.com/blog/imessage-pq3/

    iMessage with PQ3: The new state of the art in quantum-secure messaging at scale. https: //security.apple.com/blog/imessage-pq3/

  49. [57]

    The PQXDH Key Agreement Protocol

    Ehren Kret and Rolfe Schmidt. The PQXDH Key Agreement Protocol. https://signal.org/ docs/specifications/pqxdh/

  50. [58]

    Worst-case to average-case reductions for module lat- tices

    Adeline Langlois and Damien Stehlé. “Worst-case to average-case reductions for module lat- tices”. In:Designs, Codes and Cryptography75.3 (June 2015), pp. 565–599.issn: 0925-1022, 1573-7586. doi: 10.1007/s10623-014-9938-4

    2015 doi

  51. [59]

    NTRUSign: Digital Signatures Using the NTRU Lattice

    Jeffrey Hoffstein et al. “NTRUSign: Digital Signatures Using the NTRU Lattice”. In:Topics in Cryptology — CT-RSA 2003. Ed. by Marc Joye. Red. by Gerhard Goos, Juris Hartmanis, and Jan Van Leeuwen. Vol. 2612. Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: ...

  52. [60]

    On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography

    Oded Regev. “On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography”. In: J. ACM 56.6 (Sept. 8, 2009), 34:1–34:40.issn: 0004-5411. doi: 10.1145/1568318.1568324

    2009

  53. [61]

    On the inherent intractability of certain coding problems (Corresp.)

    E. Berlekamp, R. McEliece, and H. Van Tilborg. “On the inherent intractability of certain coding problems (Corresp.)” In:IEEE Transactions on Information Theory24.3 (May 1978), pp. 384–386. issn: 0018-9448. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1978.1055873

    1978

  54. [62]

    Quantum Advantage in Cryptography

    Renato Renner and Ramona Wolf. “Quantum Advantage in Cryptography”. In: (2022). Publisher: arXiv Version Number: 2.doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2206.04078

    2022 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power

    Roger Colbeck and Renato Renner. “No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power”. In: (2010). Publisher: arXiv Version Number: 3.doi: 10.48550/ARXIV. 1005.5173

    2010 doi arXiv

  56. [64]

    Is the security of quantum cryptography guaranteed by the laws of physics?

    DanielJ.Bernstein. Is the security of quantum cryptography guaranteed by the laws of physics?

  57. [65]

    Renes and Renato Renner

    Joseph M. Renes and Renato Renner. Are quantum cryptographic security claims vacuous? Version Number: 1. 2020.doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2010.11961

    2020 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    A security framework for quantum key distribution implementations

    Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo et al. “A security framework for quantum key distribution implementations”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05930(2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Quantum key distribution with correlated sources

    Margarida Pereira et al. “Quantum key distribution with correlated sources”. In: Science Advances 6.37 (2020), eaaz4487

    2020

  60. [68]

    Loss-tolerant quantum cryptography with imperfect sources

    Kiyoshi Tamaki et al. “Loss-tolerant quantum cryptography with imperfect sources”. In: Physical Review A90.5 (2014), p. 052314

    2014

  61. [69]

    Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices

    Daniel Gottesman et al. “Security of quantum key distribution with imperfect devices”. In: International Symposium onInformation Theory, 2004. ISIT 2004. Proceedings.IEEE. 2004, p. 136

    2004

  62. [70]

    Quantum cryptography: a practical information security perspective

    Kenneth G. Paterson, Fred Piper, and Ruediger Schack. “Quantum cryptography: a practical information security perspective”. In: (2004). Publisher: arXiv Version Number: 2.doi: 10. 48550/ARXIV.QUANT-PH/0406147

    2004 doi

  63. [71]

    Quantum key distribution network interworking -Framework - Recommendation ITU- T Y.3810

    ITU-T. Quantum key distribution network interworking -Framework - Recommendation ITU- T Y.3810. Standard. Geneva, CH: Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, Sept. 2022

    2022

  64. [72]

    Tokyo QKD Network and the evolution to Secure Photonic Network

    M. Sasaki et al. “Tokyo QKD Network and the evolution to Secure Photonic Network”. In: CLEO: 2011 - Laser Science to Photonic Applications. 2011. doi: 10.1364/CLEO_AT.2011. JTuC1

    2011 doi

  65. [73]

    Secure and Agile 6G Networking – Quantum and AI Enabling Technologies

    Carlos Rubio García et al. “Secure and Agile 6G Networking – Quantum and AI Enabling Technologies”. In: 2023 23rd International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON). 2023, pp. 1–4.doi: 10.1109/ICTON59386.2023.10207418

    2023

  66. [74]

    Quantum-Classical Coexistence in Multi-Band Optical Networks: A Noise Analysis of QKD

    Pouya Mehdizadeh et al. “Quantum-Classical Coexistence in Multi-Band Optical Networks: A Noise Analysis of QKD”. In:IEEE Communications Letters28.3 (2024), pp. 488–492.doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2024.3356165

    2024

  67. [75]

    Current Status, Gaps, and Future Directions in Quantum Key Distribution Standards: Implications for Industry

    Juan Morales Sáez et al. “Current Status, Gaps, and Future Directions in Quantum Key Distribution Standards: Implications for Industry”. In: 2024 International Conference on Quantum Communications, Networking, and Computing (QCNC). 2024, pp. 341–345. doi: 10.1109/QCNC62729.2024.00059

    2024

  68. [76]

    Long-Distance QKD System LD

    Toshiba. Long-Distance QKD System LD. QKD Systems. Mar. 22, 2023.url: https://www. toshiba.eu/quantum/products/quantum-key-distribution/long-distance-qkd-system-ld/ (visited on 01/30/2025)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Quantum-Safe Security Products

    IDQ. Quantum-Safe Security Products. ID Quantique. Jan. 30, 2025. url: https://www. idquantique.com/quantum-safe-security/products/#quantum_key_distribution (visited on 01/30/2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    Experimental demonstration of five-intensity measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution over 442 km

    Jing-Yang Liu et al. “Experimental demonstration of five-intensity measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution over 442 km”. In:Physical Review A108.2 (Aug. 9, 2023). Publisher: American Physical Society, p. 022605.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.022605

    2023 doi

  71. [79]

    Twin-field quantum key distribution over a 511 km optical fibre linking two distant metropolitan areas

    Jiu-Peng Chen et al. “Twin-field quantum key distribution over a 511 km optical fibre linking two distant metropolitan areas”. In:Nature Photonics15 (Aug. 2021).doi: 10.1038/s41566- 021-00828-5

    2021 doi

  72. [80]

    Field demonstration of a continuous-variable quantum key distribution network

    Duan Huang et al. “Field demonstration of a continuous-variable quantum key distribution network”. In:Opt. Lett.41.15 (Aug. 2016), pp. 3511–3514.doi: 10.1364/OL.41.003511

    2016 doi

  73. [81]

    Field test of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a true local oscillator

    Brian P. Williams et al. “Field test of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a true local oscillator”. In: Phys. Rev. Applied 21.1 (2024), p. 014056. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.21.014056. arXiv: 2309.03959[quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Field Trial of 7 × 89λ × 256 Gb/s C-Band Classical / CVQKD Co- Existence Transmission over 7-Core Fiber

    Xin Wang et al. “Field Trial of 7 × 89λ × 256 Gb/s C-Band Classical / CVQKD Co- Existence Transmission over 7-Core Fiber”. In:2023 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference/2023 International Photonics and Optoelectronics Meetings (ACP/POEM). 2023, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/ACP...

    2023

  75. [83]

    Discretely modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution with an untrusted entanglement source

    Qin Liao et al. “Discretely modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution with an untrusted entanglement source”. In:Phys. Rev. A 102 (3 Sept. 2020), p. 032604. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.032604

    2020 doi

  76. [84]

    A New Proposal for QKD Relaying Models

    Cuong Le Quoc and Patrick Bellot. “A New Proposal for QKD Relaying Models”. In:2008 Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks. 2008, pp. 1–6.doi: 10.1109/ICCCN.2008.ECP.92. 37

    2008 doi

  77. [85]

    Co-propagation of 6 Tb/s (60*100Gb/s) DWDM & QKD channels with ~17 dBm aggregated WDM power over 50 km standard single mode fiber

    P. Gavignet et al. “Co-propagation of 6 Tb/s (60*100Gb/s) DWDM & QKD channels with ~17 dBm aggregated WDM power over 50 km standard single mode fiber”. In: (2023). Publisher: arXiv Version Number: 1.doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2305.13742

    2023 doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters

    Marco Lucamarini et al. “Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters”. In:Nature 557 (May 2018).doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0066-6

    2018 doi

  79. [87]

    Potential Impact of CV-QKD Integration on Classical WDM Network Capacity

    Cédric Ware et al. “Potential Impact of CV-QKD Integration on Classical WDM Network Capacity”. In:IEEE Photonics Technology Letters34.18 (2022), pp. 957–960.doi: 10.1109/ LPT.2022.3195433

    2022

  80. [88]

    Adnan A. E. Hajomer et al.Coexistence of continuous-variable quantum key distribution and classical data over 120-km fiber. Version Number: 1. 2025.doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2502.17388

    2025 doi arXiv

  81. [89]

    Optimized-Eight-State CV-QKD Protocol Outperforming Gaussian Modulation Based Protocols

    Ivan B. Djordjevic. “Optimized-Eight-State CV-QKD Protocol Outperforming Gaussian Modulation Based Protocols”. In:IEEE Photonics Journal 11.4 (2019), pp. 1–10. doi: 10. 1109/JPHOT.2019.2921521

    2019

  82. [90]

    Toward the Integration of CV Quantum Key Distribution in Deployed Optical Networks

    Fotini Karinou et al. “Toward the Integration of CV Quantum Key Distribution in Deployed Optical Networks”. In: IEEE Photonics Technology Letters30.7 (2018), pp. 650–653. doi: 10.1109/LPT.2018.2810334

    2018

  83. [91]

    Continuous-variable quantum key distribution system: Past, present, and future

    Yichen Zhang et al. “Continuous-variable quantum key distribution system: Past, present, and future”. In:Applied Physics Reviews11.1 (Mar. 2024), p. 011318.issn: 1931-9401. doi: 10.1063/5.0179566. eprint: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0179566/ 19855574...

    2024 doi

  84. [92]

    High-Rate Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution Based on Probabilistically Shaped 64 and 256-QAM

    François Roumestan et al. “High-Rate Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution Based on Probabilistically Shaped 64 and 256-QAM”. In: 2021 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC). 2021, pp. 1–4.doi: 10.1109/ECOC52684.2021.9606013

    2021

  85. [93]

    Experimental Demonstration of Real-time Bob Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution over 25.7-km fiber

    João Frazão et al. “Experimental Demonstration of Real-time Bob Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution over 25.7-km fiber”. English. In: 24th Asian Quantum Infor- mation Science Conference, AQIS 2024, AQIS 2024 ; Conference date: 26-08-2024 Through 30-08-2024. Aug. 2024

    2024

  86. [94]

    Security Analysis of Gaussian and Discrete Modulations in FSO/CV- QKD Systems Employing LLO Under Phase and Amplitude Attacks

    Sara Ahmed et al. “Security Analysis of Gaussian and Discrete Modulations in FSO/CV- QKD Systems Employing LLO Under Phase and Amplitude Attacks”. In:IEEE Access10 (2022), pp. 100041–100053.doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3208132

    2022

  87. [95]

    https://www.idquantique.com/quantum-safe-security/ quantum-key-distribution/

    QKD Technology — idquantique.com. https://www.idquantique.com/quantum-safe-security/ quantum-key-distribution/

  88. [96]

    https://www.global.toshiba/ww/products-solutions/security- ict/qkd/cases.html

    Tosiba QKD Use Cases. https://www.global.toshiba/ww/products-solutions/security- ict/qkd/cases.html

  89. [97]

    https://www.thinkquantum.com/quky/

    QKD — thinkquantum.com. https://www.thinkquantum.com/quky/

  90. [98]

    https://openqkd.eu/

    openqkd.eu. https://openqkd.eu/

  91. [99]

    https://qt.eu/ projects/archive/communication/openqkd

    OPENQKD - Open European Quantum Key Distribution Testbed — qt.eu. https://qt.eu/ projects/archive/communication/openqkd

  92. [100]

    IDQ Celebrates 10-Year Anniversary of the World’s First Real-Life Quantum Cryptography Installation

    ID Quantique. IDQ Celebrates 10-Year Anniversary of the World’s First Real-Life Quantum Cryptography Installation. ID Quantique. 23rd Nov. 2017.url: https://www.idquantique. com/idq-celebrates-10-year-anniversary-of-the-worlds-first-real-life-quantum-cryptography- installation...

    2017

  93. [101]

    Use Case: Government

    ID Quantique. Use Case: Government. Aug. 31, 2023.url: https://marketing.idquantique. com/acton/attachment/11868/f-020f/1/-/-/-/-/Geneva%20Govt_%20DCI%20QKD% 20Use%20Case.pdf (visited on 03/13/2024)

    2023

  94. [102]

    Secure Ballots Using Quantum Cryptography

    Lester Houston III. Secure Ballots Using Quantum Cryptography. Dec. 2, 2007.url: https: //www.cse.wustl.edu/%7Ejain/cse571-07/ftp/ballots/index.html (visited on 06/19/2024)

    2007

  95. [103]

    Specsheet Cerberis V1

    ID Quantique. Specsheet Cerberis V1. Apr. 5, 2007. url: https://web.archive.org/web/ 20070728200426/http://www.idquantique.com/products/files/Cerberis-specs.pdf (visited on 03/13/2024)

    2007

  96. [104]

    Spec Vectis V2

    ID Quantique. Spec Vectis V2. Apr. 14, 2005. url: https : / / web . archive . org / web / 20071015070059/http://idquantique.com/products/files/vectis-specs.pdf (visited on 03/13/2024)

    2005

  97. [105]

    Nicolas Gisin. Oct. 31, 2007. url: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/10/ switzerland_pro.html/#comment-73567 (visited on 01/30/2025)

    2007

  98. [106]

    Use Case: Financial Services

    ID Quantique. Use Case: Financial Services. Aug. 31, 2023. url: https://marketing. idquantique.com/acton/attachment/11868/f-0211/1/-/-/-/-/Financial%20Services_DRC% 20QKD%20Use%20Case.pdf. 38

    2023

  99. [107]

    Cerberis Specs

    ID Quantique. Cerberis Specs. Jan. 20, 2012. url: https : / / web . archive . org / web / 20170129080704/http://www.idquantique.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Cerberis- Datasheet.pdf

    2012

  100. [108]

    Securing the critical link between front office and back office operations of major financial institutions

    Toshiba. Securing the critical link between front office and back office operations of major financial institutions. url: https://www.global.toshiba/ww/products-solutions/security- ict/qkd/cases/case2.html (visited on 06/04/2024)

    2024

  101. [109]

    Quantum Xchange Tests Toshiba’s Quantum Key Distribution System | Quantum Xchange

    Quantum Xchange. Quantum Xchange Tests Toshiba’s Quantum Key Distribution System | Quantum Xchange. Apr. 25, 2019. url: https://quantumxc.com/press-release/testing- toshibas-quantum-key-distribution-system/ (visited on 06/18/2024)

    2019

  102. [110]

    生体認証データの高秘匿・高可用性な伝送・保管を量子暗号を用いて実現. NEC. Oct. 29,

  103. [111]

    Use Case: Finance - Digital Assets Storage

    ID Quantique. Use Case: Finance - Digital Assets Storage. Aug. 31, 2023. url: https: //marketing.idquantique.com/acton/attachment/11868/f-b2d8657c-6132-434c-8f38- 09ee1ed5d9bd/1/-/-/-/-/IDQ-Mt%20Pelerin_Quantum%20Vault%20Use%20Case.pdf

    2023

  104. [112]

    ID Quantique and Mt Pelerin start testing their quantum-safe digital asset custody solution in Geneva

    ID Quantique. ID Quantique and Mt Pelerin start testing their quantum-safe digital asset custody solution in Geneva. ID Quantique. Mar. 26, 2020.url: https://www.idquantique. com/id-quantique-and-mt-pelerin-start-testing-their-quantum-safe-digital-asset-custody- solution-in-ge...

    2020

  105. [113]

    Second and Final Report on Field Trial Execution

    Jean-Sébastien Pegon. Second and Final Report on Field Trial Execution. Mar. 1, 2023.url: https://openqkd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/D8-7.pdf

    2023

  106. [114]

    How to share a secret

    Adi Shamir. “How to share a secret”. In:Communications of the ACM22.11 (Nov. 1, 1979), pp. 612–613. issn: 0001-0782. doi: 10.1145/359168.359176

    1979

  107. [115]

    The Quantum Vault

    Bruno Huttner. “The Quantum Vault”. Quantum Safe Security Live use cases in Geneva - with Equinix, Mt Pelerin and ID Quantique. Mar. 26, 2020.url: https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=CtMrCcTFMDk

    2020

  108. [116]

    OpenQKD Use-case for Securing Sensitive Medical Data at rest and in transit

    Bernhard Zatoukal et al. “OpenQKD Use-case for Securing Sensitive Medical Data at rest and in transit”. In:2021 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC). 2021 Conference on Lasers and Electro- Optics Europe & E...

    2021

  109. [117]

    Medical Data successfully protected by quantum- cryptography in Graz

    fragmentiX Storage Solutions GmbH. Medical Data successfully protected by quantum- cryptography in Graz. Oct. 12, 2020. url: https://marketing.idquantique.com/acton/ attachment/11868/f-2b39fb7a-37d5-436a-9b20-49f95100585a/1/-/-/-/-/IDQ-fragmentiX_ pressrelease_OpenQKD_2020-12-...

    2020

  110. [118]

    fragmentiX Secret Sharing

    Werner Strasser. “fragmentiX Secret Sharing”. Nov. 11, 2020.url: https://www.unibw.de/ code/events/code2020_content/code2020_ws2_fragmentix.pdf

    2020

  111. [119]

    NEC, NICT and ZenmuTech use quantum cryptography to encrypt, transmit and backup electronic medical records

    NEC. NEC, NICT and ZenmuTech use quantum cryptography to encrypt, transmit and backup electronic medical records. NEC. Oct. 22, 2020.url: https://www.nec.com/en/press/202010/ global_20201022_01.html (visited on 06/03/2024)

    2020

  112. [120]

    QKD applications in Japan: Healthcare and IoT

    Masahide Sasaki. “QKD applications in Japan: Healthcare and IoT”. Sept. 14, 2017.url: https://docbox.etsi.org/Workshop/2017/201709_ETSI_IQC_QUANTUMSAFE/ TECHNICAL _ TRACK / S01 _ WORLD _ TOUR / NICT _ SASAKI . pdf (visited on 11/27/2024)

    2017

  113. [121]

    All-or-nothing encryption and the package transform

    Ronald L. Rivest. “All-or-nothing encryption and the package transform”. In:Fast Software Encryption. Ed. by Eli Biham. Vol. 1267. Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997, pp. 210–218.isbn: 978-3-540-63247-4. doi: 1...

    1997 doi

  114. [122]

    Future-proof datacenter interconnection

    ID Quantique. Future-proof datacenter interconnection. Aug. 31, 2023. url: https : / / marketing . idquantique . com / acton / attachment / 11868 / f - deeaa59c - bec2 - 489a - afa7 - 5e5eefdd5b8a / 1/ - / - / - / - /IDQ - ADVA - SIG _ Future - Proof % 20Datacenter % 20Interco...

    2023

  115. [123]

    Securing the high speed transfer of large scale sensitive genome data between two remote sites

    Toshiba. Securing the high speed transfer of large scale sensitive genome data between two remote sites. url: https://www.global.toshiba/ww/products-solutions/security-ict/qkd/ cases/case1.html (visited on 06/03/2024)

    2024

  116. [124]

    First real-time quantum system for genomic medicine. url: https://www.toshiba.eu/ quantum/news/worlds-first-development-and-demonstration-of-a-quantum-cryptographic- communication-technology-applied-system-for-genomic-medicine/ (visited on 10/08/2024). 39

    2024

  117. [125]

    World-first Demonstration of Real-time Transmission of Whole-genome Sequence Data Using Quantum Cryptography:Quantum encryption technology capable of large-capacity data trans- mission allows practical applications to genomic research and genomic medicine | Corporate Research ...

    2020

  118. [126]

    First Quantum Key Distribution Trial for Manufacturing Passes Test

    CFMS. First Quantum Key Distribution Trial for Manufacturing Passes Test. CFMS. url: https://cfms.org.uk/article/first-quantum-key-distribution-trial-for-manufacturing-passes- test/ (visited on 04/06/2024)

    2024

  119. [127]

    QKD for secure Inter-Site Connectivity

    CFMS. QKD for secure Inter-Site Connectivity. CFMS. url: https://cfms.org.uk/article/ qkd-for-secure-inter-site-connectivity/ (visited on 04/06/2024)

    2024

  120. [128]

    Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) for Secure Inter-Site Connectivity Suc- cessful Trial of Remote Monitoring for Manufacturing

    DETI and cfms. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) for Secure Inter-Site Connectivity Suc- cessful Trial of Remote Monitoring for Manufacturing. Apr. 19, 2021.url: https://cfms.org. uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Quantum-Key-Distribution-QKD-for-Secure-Inter-Site- Connectivity-Succe...

    2021

  121. [129]

    Университет Иннопо- лис внедрил в беспилотники систему квантового распределения ключей для защиты их от взлома — Центр технологий компонентов робототехники и мехатроники

    Center for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Components. Университет Иннопо- лис внедрил в беспилотники систему квантового распределения ключей для защиты их от взлома — Центр технологий компонентов робототехники и мехатроники. 14 мая

  122. [130]

    Authentication of smart grid communications using quantum key distribution

    Muneer Alshowkan et al. “Authentication of smart grid communications using quantum key distribution”. In: Scientific Reports 12.1 (July 26, 2022), p. 12731. issn: 2045-2322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16090-w

    2022 doi

  123. [131]

    Quantum Enabled Private Recognition of Composite Signals in Genome

    Lina Moscoso. Quantum Enabled Private Recognition of Composite Signals in Genome. Apr

  124. [132]

    Private Computation of Phylogenetic Trees Based on Quantum Technologies

    Manuel B. Santos et al. “Private Computation of Phylogenetic Trees Based on Quantum Technologies”. In:IEEE Access10 (2022), pp. 38065–38088.issn: 2169-3536. doi: 10.1109/ ACCESS.2022.3158416

    2022

  125. [133]

    About our core technology: secret sharing | ZenmuTech, Inc.ZenmuTech, Inc

    ZenmuTech. About our core technology: secret sharing | ZenmuTech, Inc.ZenmuTech, Inc. Oct. 10, 2024.url: https://en.zenmutech.com/sss/ (visited on 01/30/2025)

    2024

  126. [134]

    doi: 10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700

    1994

  127. [135]

    Безопасность, гарантированная законами физики — goqrate.com

    QRate: Квантовое шифрование. Безопасность, гарантированная законами физики — goqrate.com. https://goqrate.com/

  128. [136]

    private-phylogenetic-analysis/smc_engine/src/qHamParties.cpp at 4c8348c857bca0cfc74493067f3af7d15e8cd0b6 · manel1874/private-phylogenetic-analysis

    Manuel Santos. private-phylogenetic-analysis/smc_engine/src/qHamParties.cpp at 4c8348c857bca0cfc74493067f3af7d15e8cd0b6 · manel1874/private-phylogenetic-analysis. Nov. 23, 2022. url: https://github.com/manel1874/private-phylogenetic-analysis/blob/ 4c8348c857bca0cfc74493067f3af...

    2022

  129. [137]

    url: https://qugenome.av.it.pt/Outputs.html (visited on 10/21/2024)

    2024

  130. [138]

    [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit-08

    Christian Huitema. [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit-08. IETF Mail List Archives. Sept. 20, 2021. url: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ oatRrqmn1SSSqpwxBmTtu9DDYqc/ (visited on 10/08/2024). 40

    2021

  131. [140]

    Federico Giacon, Felix Heuer, and Bertram Poettering.KEM Combiners. 2018. url: https: //eprint.iacr.org/2018/024 (visited on 03/20/2024)

    2018

  132. [143]

    MadQCI: a heterogeneous and scalable SDN QKD network deployed in production facilities

    V Martin et al. “MadQCI: a heterogeneous and scalable SDN QKD network deployed in production facilities”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12791(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  133. [2018]

    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04520

    arXiv: 1803.04520[quant-ph]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04520. 36

    arXiv

  134. [2019]

    url: https://jpn.nec.com/press/201910/20191029_02.html (visited on 06/03/2024)

    2024

  135. [2021]

    21.05.2024)

    URL: https://robotics.innopolis.university/news/universitet-innopolis-vnedril-v- bespilotniki-sistemu-kvantovogo-raspredeleniya-klyuchej-dlya-zashhity-ih-ot-vzloma/ (дата обр. 21.05.2024)

    2024

  136. [2023]

    eprint: arXiv:2307.15116

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.