REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 92 references
New axion contribution to the two-photon decays of neutral pions
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Axion-pion mixing adds a missing one-loop term to the neutral pion's two-photon decay.
desk verdict A plausible and likely correct new axion-pion mixing correction to pi0 to gamma gamma, negligible for standard QCD axions; the MeV-scale optimism rests on an unverified mass relation and the abstract overstates the heavy-axion case. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central object is the axion-pion mass-mixing angle $\varepsilon$ that appears when the $(\pi_3, a)$ mass matrix generated by the $l_7$ low-energy constant is diagonalized. In the authors' basis, leading-order mixing is absent by construction, but the $l_7$ term of the $O(p^4)$ chiral Lagrangian reintroduces it; inserting the physical $\pi^0$ and axion states into the Wess-Zumino-Witten and axion-photon vertices then yields $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ in closed form. The same $l_7$ coupling, together with the NLO relation $m_a^2 f_a^2 = \frac{z}{(z+1)^2} m_\pi^2 f_\pi^2 (1+\beta_m)$, converts the correction from a function of the axion decay constant into a function of the axion mass.
What would settle it
Calculate the QCD contribution to the axion mass as a function of $f_a$ at masses around 1-100 MeV from first principles, for example with lattice QCD or a controlled instanton computation; if $m_a^2 f_a^2$ deviates from the standard relation by more than the input errors, the plotted magnitude of $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ in the heavy-mass region is not reliable. A second check would be a more precise measurement of the $\pi^0\to\gamma\gamma$ width: agreement with the standard NLO chiral prediction within a smaller experimental error would confirm that the correction is negligible for light axions.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The authors show that, in SU(2) chiral perturbation theory with the Wess-Zumino-Witten term, axion-pion mixing produces a new $O(p^6)$ correction to the $\pi^0\to\gamma\gamma$ amplitude, $$\delta_{\mathrm{mix}} = \frac{2 l_7 $m_a^{2}$}{f_\$pi^{2}$ (1+\beta_m)} \frac{1-z}{1+z}\left(\frac{E}{C} - \frac{2}{3}\frac{4+z}{1+z}\right),$$ which is Eq. (18) of the paper. This term is nonzero only through isospin breaking, since it carries the factor $(1-z)/(1+z)$ with $z=m_u/m_d$, and it vanishes when the axion-photon coupling tends to zero. For the standard QCD axion the term is extremely small, so the paper rules it out as an explanation of the tension between the chiral-theory prediction and the measured width. For heavy QCD axions with masses around or above the MeV scale, the same term can be comparable to the other one-loop contributions.
Load-bearing premise
The quantitative size of $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ at MeV-scale axion masses assumes that the standard relation between the axion mass and its decay constant, $m_a^2 f_a^2 = \frac{z}{(z+1)^2} m_\pi^2 f_\pi^2 (1+\beta_m)$, continues to hold in the heavy-mass regime, even though the paper itself notes that an extra non-QCD mass source would modify that relation.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If Eq. (18) is correct, any chiral perturbation theory calculation of the neutral pion lifetime that includes an axion background must retain $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$; it is an unavoidable analytic contribution rather than a negligible higher-order artifact.
- For the standard QCD axion with mass below about an MeV, $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ is far too small to affect the decay width, so the measured pion lifetime cannot be explained by the standard QCD axion.
- For heavy QCD axions in the MeV range, $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ can be comparable to other one-loop corrections and should be included when comparing predictions with experimental pion-decay data or when deriving axion constraints from such data.
- The same mixing mechanism extends to axion-like particles with MeV-scale masses, where the formula can be applied with model-dependent choices of the anomaly coefficients and the mass-decay-constant relation.
Reading between the lines
- Extension: because $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ is proportional to the same anomaly combination that enters the axion-photon coupling, mechanisms that enhance $g_{a\gamma\gamma}$ would also enhance the pion-decay correction, so $\pi^0\to\gamma\gamma$ could serve as an indirect probe of axion-photon interactions even in regions where direct axion searches are insensitive.
- Extension: the factor $(1-z)/(1+z)$ ties the correction to the up-down quark mass difference; an independent high-precision determination of $z$ combined with a measured pion width could in principle isolate this mixing contribution from other isospin-breaking effects, a separation the paper does not attempt.
- Extension: for axion-like particles, whose mass is not related to $f_a$ by Eq. (19), the numerical size of $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ at a given mass is no longer fixed by the QCD relation; applying Eq. (18) to such particles would require treating $m_a$ and $f_a$ as independent inputs, which the paper leaves for future work.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper studies the decay pi0 -> gamma gamma in SU(2) chiral perturbation theory with a background QCD axion field. The authors claim that axion-pion mixing at O(p^4) generates a new O(p^6) relative correction to the pi0 gamma gamma amplitude, given by Eq. (18), proportional to l7, (1-z)/(1+z), m_a^2/f_pi^2, and the axion-photon coupling combination E/C - (2/3)(4+z)/(1+z). Using the standard relation m_a^2 f_a^2 = z/(1+z)^2 m_pi^2 f_pi^2 (1+beta_m), Eq. (19), they plot |delta_mix| as a function of m_a up to the MeV scale for several E/C values, concluding that the correction is negligible for the classical QCD axion window but may become non-negligible for MeV-scale or heavier QCD axions. They further argue that, because delta_mix is tiny for the standard QCD axion, the standard axion cannot explain the possible discrepancy between the CHPT prediction and the PrimEx-II measurement of the pi0 lifetime.
Significance. If Eq. (18) is correct, the paper identifies a previously omitted contribution to the pi0 -> gamma gamma amplitude that is analytically unavoidable at O(p^6) in SU(2) CHPT. The derivation is not circular: the low-energy constants l7, z, f_pi, m_pi, and the mass relation are taken from external CHPT and lattice fits, and no parameter is adjusted to the PrimEx-II width. For the standard QCD axion the numerical smallness of delta_mix follows robustly, so the statement that the standard QCD axion cannot explain the PrimEx-II discrepancy is on solid ground. The quantitative extension to MeV-scale axions is weaker, however, because it relies on the mass-decay-constant relation in a regime where the paper itself shows that an extra mass source can invalidate that relation. The paper's explicit caveat in Sec. III that the MeV-scale estimate is a qualitative illustration is appropriate and should be made more prominent.
major comments (3)
- [Sec. III, Eq. (19), Fig. 2, Eq. (21)] The quantitative curves in Fig. 2 for MeV-scale masses are obtained by replacing the factor 1/f_a^2 in delta_mix with m_a^2 via Eq. (19). For the heavy QCD axion mechanisms cited in Sec. III, however, the axion mass receives an extra contribution M^2 from additional PQ-breaking sources, as the paper itself states in Eq. (21). Combining the original 1/f_a^2 form of delta_mix with Eq. (21) gives delta_mix proportional to (m_a^2 - M^2) up to constants, so when the extra mass source dominates, the true delta_mix is suppressed relative to the Fig. 2 curves by a factor (m_a^2 - M^2)/m_a^2. Since this suppression can be orders of magnitude in the heavy-QCD-axion scenarios invoked, the abstract's claim that the correction 'may not be negligible' for MeV or larger masses is not established by the plotted curves; at best they provide an upper bound. This is load-bearing for the secondary quantitative claim and should be addressed by either restricting the claim or explicitly presenting the curves as upper bounds with the caveat stated in the abstract.
- [Sec. III, Eq. (18)] The central new result, Eq. (18), is stated without showing the amplitude computation that produces it. The text says the correction can be derived from the merged effective Lagrangian, but neither the relevant Feynman rules for the axion-pion mixing vertex nor the algebraic steps leading to Eq. (18) are presented. Because Eq. (18) is the central claim of the paper, a derivation, or at least the key intermediate steps and the intermediate expression for the amplitude, should be included in the main text or Appendix A. This would also resolve possible normalization ambiguities and make the paper independently verifiable.
- [Abstract vs. Sec. III, last paragraph] The manuscript explicitly disclaims the MeV-scale estimate as 'just a qualitative illustration' and states that its plausibility at the MeV mass scale would require a convincingly precise formula for the QCD axion mass in that range. The abstract, however, presents the 'may not be negligible' conclusion for the MeV or larger mass range without this caveat. The abstract should be aligned with the body of the paper so that the heavy-mass statement is not overstated.
minor comments (4)
- [Fig. 1 caption] The caption lists two entries labeled (c): 'the tadpole diagram from WZW Lagrangian' and 'the diagram with one vertex from the WZW Lagrangian and the other from O(p^2) Lagrangian'; the second of these should be relabeled to avoid confusion with the subsequent (d) entry.
- [Sec. III, Eq. (15)] Before Eq. (15), the quantities delta_tree and delta_mix are introduced as relative corrections to the amplitude, but this is not stated explicitly; adding one sentence defining them as amplitude-level relative corrections would improve clarity.
- [Sec. III, discussion after Eq. (18)] The sentence 'the correction delta_mix tends to vanish as the axion-photon coupling constant approaches zero' is imprecise: the bracket in Eq. (18) vanishes at the specific point E/C = (2/3)(4+z)/(1+z), not as an asymptotic limit of the coupling going to zero, and this wording could be clarified.
- [Sec. III, input values, Eq. (22)] The input value l7 = (7 +/- 4) x 10^-3 has a very large relative uncertainty, and the combination h1^r - h3 - l4^r also has a sizable error; the resulting wide bands in Fig. 2 are acknowledged but a brief quantitative discussion of how these uncertainties propagate into the conclusions would be useful.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the new axion-pion mixing correction is derived from external CHPT inputs and is not fitted to the target width.
full rationale
The central result, Eq. (18), is a derived quantity: the mixing angle in Eq. (A4) follows from diagonalizing the axion-pion mass matrix (Eqs. (A1)-(A4)), and the axion-photon vertex is the standard O(p^4) coupling in Eq. (12). None of the numerical inputs in Eq. (22) (l7, z, f_pi, m_pi, h1-h3-l4) are fitted to delta_mix or to the experimental pi0 width; they come from external CHPT and lattice determinations. The paper even refuses to use the two-photon-fitted combinations of the cW_i couplings to evaluate the full width, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction loop. The PrimEx-II measurement is used only as a comparison value, not as an input. Ref. [25] is a same-author citation for the axion-photon coupling, but Eq. (12) is a standard, parameter-free formula and is not the novel claim, so the citation is independent support rather than load-bearing circularity. The only substantive weakness is the heavy-axion extrapolation: Eq. (21) introduces an extra mass source M^2 that invalidates Eq. (19), and the text itself concedes that 'the estimate of delta_mix up to the MeV mass range is just a qualitative illustration.' That is a robustness/correctness caveat, not a circular reduction of Eq. (18) to its own inputs. Therefore no circularity is found.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (5)
- l7 (NLO chiral low-energy constant) =
7 x 10^-3 central, with range +/- 4 x 10^-3
- z = m_u / m_d =
0.48 +/- 0.03
- h1^r - h3 - l4^r =
(4.8 +/- 1.4) x 10^-3
- E/C (axion electromagnetic-color anomaly ratio) =
8/3, 0, 10 (illustrative values in Fig. 2)
- M^2 (extra PQ-symmetry-breaking mass contribution) =
not fixed; discussed for heavy QCD axion scenarios
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption The QCD axion is a Goldstone boson of a global U(1)_PQ symmetry and is described by the SU(2) chiral Lagrangian with the WZW anomaly term.
- domain assumption At NLO, the only tree-level axion-pion mass mixing is the isospin-violating term proportional to l7 in the chosen Xa basis.
- standard math The one-loop diagrams (c) and (d) in Fig. 1 cancel exactly, as stated in Ref. [55].
- ad hoc to paper The relation m_a^2 f_a^2 = z/(z+1)^2 m_pi^2 f_pi^2 (1+beta_m), Eq. (19), remains valid for the axion masses considered, including the heavy-MeV region.
- domain assumption The discrepancy between the LO chiral prediction and PrimEx-II is a real effect that could in principle be explained by an axion contribution.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of New axion contribution to the two-photon decays of neutral pions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CJLMJ2HK
@misc{pith2026250204060,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: New axion contribution to the two-photon decays of neutral pions},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CJLMJ2HK}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04060}
}
abstract
The presence of axions introduces new diagrams at one-loop order to the two-photon decays of the neutral pion through axion-pion mixing. In this work, we calculate this correction, missing in all current calculations, in the framework of SU(2) chiral perturbation theory. We show that the correction is proportional to the axion-photon coupling and the square of axion mass, which in turn is strongly suppressed by the axion decay constant for the classical space window but may not be negligible for the QCD axion in the MeV or even larger mass range. On the other hand, in combination with the experimental measurement of the decay width of $\pi^0\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ process, this result rules out the standard QCD axion as an explanation for the possible discrepancy between the chiral perturbation theory prediction and the experimental data.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Neutral Pion Lifetime Measurements and the QCD Chiral Anomaly,
A. M. Bernstein and Barry R. Holstein, “Neutral Pion Lifetime Measurements and the QCD Chiral Anomaly,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 49 (2013), arXiv:1112.4809 [hep-ph]
arXiv 2013
-
[2]
Pions: the original Nambu–Goldstone bosons: An introduction and precision pion physics,
B. Ananthanarayan, “Pions: the original Nambu–Goldstone bosons: An introduction and precision pion physics,” Eur. Phys. J. ST 231, 91–102 (2022)
2022
-
[3]
50 Years of Quantum Chromodynam- ics,
Franz Gross et al., “50 Years of Quantum Chromodynam- ics,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023), arXiv:2212.11107 [hep-ph]
arXiv 2023
-
[4]
Re- view of Particle Physics,
R. L. Workman and Others (Particle Data Group), “Re- view of Particle Physics,” PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)
2022
-
[5]
A New Light Boson?
Steven Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223–226 (1978)
1978
-
[6]
Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,
Frank Wilczek, “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279– 282 (1978)
1978
-
[7]
Opening the Axion Window,
David B. Kaplan, “Opening the Axion Window,” Nucl. Phys. B 260, 215–226 (1985)
1985
-
[8]
Axion couplings to electroweak gauge bosons,
G. Alonso- ´Alvarez, M. B. Gavela, and P. Quilez, “Axion couplings to electroweak gauge bosons,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 223 (2019), arXiv:1811.05466 [hep-ph]
arXiv 2019
Show all 92 references
-
[9]
Cp conservation in the presence of instantons,
R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn, “Cp conservation in the presence of instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440–1443 (1977)
1977
-
[10]
Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,
R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn, “Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791–1797 (1977)
1977
-
[11]
A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harm- less Axion,
Michael Dine, Willy Fischler, and Mark Srednicki, “A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harm- less Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 104, 199–202 (1981)
1981
-
[12]
On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),
A. R. Zhitnitsky, “On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian),” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980)
1980
-
[13]
Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,
Jihn E. Kim, “Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979)
1979
-
[14]
Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invari- ance of Strong Interactions?
Mikhail A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and Valentin I. Zakharov, “Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invari- ance of Strong Interactions?” Nucl. Phys. B166, 493–506 (1980)
1980
-
[15]
Cos- mology of the Invisible Axion,
John Preskill, Mark B. Wise, and Frank Wilczek, “Cos- mology of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Lett. B 120, 127– 132 (1983)
1983
-
[16]
Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report,
C. Antel et al., “Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1122 (2023), arXiv:2305.01715 [hep-ph]. 7
2023 arXiv
-
[17]
Mi- crowave cavity searches for dark-matter axions,
R. Bradley, J. Clarke, D. Kinion, L. J. Rosenberg, K. van Bibber, S. Matsuki, M. Muck, and P. Sikivie, “Mi- crowave cavity searches for dark-matter axions,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 777–817 (2003)
2003
-
[18]
The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics,
Joerg Jaeckel and Andreas Ringwald, “The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 405–437 (2010), arXiv:1002.0329 [hep-ph]
2010 arXiv
-
[19]
Exploring the Role of Axions and Other WISPs in the Dark Universe,
Andreas Ringwald, “Exploring the Role of Axions and Other WISPs in the Dark Universe,” Phys. Dark Univ. 1, 116–135 (2012), arXiv:1210.5081 [hep-ph]
2012 arXiv
-
[20]
Ex- perimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-Like Par- ticles,
Peter W. Graham, Igor G. Irastorza, Steven K. Lam- oreaux, Axel Lindner, and Karl A. van Bibber, “Ex- perimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-Like Par- ticles,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65, 485–514 (2015), arXiv:1602.00039 [hep-ex]
2015 arXiv
-
[21]
Invisible Axion Search Methods,
Pierre Sikivie, “Invisible Axion Search Methods,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015004 (2021), arXiv:2003.02206 [hep- ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[22]
A Review of Axion Lasing in Astrophysics,
Liang Chen and Thomas W. Kephart, “A Review of Axion Lasing in Astrophysics,” Universe 10, 24 (2024), arXiv:2311.16453 [hep-ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[23]
Axion dark matter: How to see it?
Yannis K. Semertzidis and SungWoo Youn, “Axion dark matter: How to see it?” Sci. Adv. 8, abm9928 (2022), arXiv:2104.14831 [hep-ph]
2022 arXiv
-
[24]
The QCD ax- ion, precisely,
Giovanni Grilli di Cortona, Edward Hardy, Javier Pardo Vega, and Giovanni Villadoro, “The QCD ax- ion, precisely,” JHEP 01, 034 (2016), arXiv:1511.02867 [hep-ph]
2016 arXiv
-
[25]
QCD θ-vacuum en- ergy and axion properties,
Zhen-Yan Lu, Meng-Lin Du, Feng-Kun Guo, Ulf-G. Meißner, and Thomas Vonk, “QCD θ-vacuum en- ergy and axion properties,” JHEP 05, 001 (2020), arXiv:2003.01625 [hep-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[26]
Axions and the Strong CP Problem,
Jihn E. Kim and Gianpaolo Carosi, “Axions and the Strong CP Problem,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 557–602 (2010), arXiv:0807.3125 [hep-ph]
2010 arXiv
-
[27]
Axion Cosmology,
David J. E. Marsh, “Axion Cosmology,” Phys. Rept.643, 1–79 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]
2016 arXiv
-
[28]
The landscape of QCD axion models,
Luca Di Luzio, Maurizio Giannotti, Enrico Nardi, and Luca Visinelli, “The landscape of QCD axion models,” Phys. Rept. 870, 1–117 (2020), arXiv:2003.01100 [hep- ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[29]
Precision measurement of the neutral pion lifetime,
I. Larin et al. (PrimEx-II), “Precision measurement of the neutral pion lifetime,” Science 368, 506–509 (2020)
2020
-
[30]
Two-photon decay of the neutral pion in lattice QCD,
Xu Feng, Sinya Aoki, Hidenori Fukaya, Shoji Hashimoto, Takashi Kaneko, Jun-ichi Noaki, and Eigo Shintani, “Two-photon decay of the neutral pion in lattice QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 182001 (2012), arXiv:1206.1375 [hep-lat]
2012 arXiv
-
[31]
Pseudoscalar decays into photon-photon in chiral per- turbation theory,
Johan Bijnens, Albert Bramon, and Fernando Cornet, “Pseudoscalar decays into photon-photon in chiral per- turbation theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1453 (1988)
1988
-
[32]
Chiral sum rules for parameters of the order six Lagrangian in the W-Z sector and application to pi0, eta, eta-prime decays,
B. Moussallam, “Chiral sum rules for parameters of the order six Lagrangian in the W-Z sector and application to pi0, eta, eta-prime decays,” Phys. Rev. D 51, 4939–4949 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9407402
1995 arXiv
-
[33]
De- cay π0 → γγ to next to leading order in chiral perturba- tion theory,
J. L. Goity, A. M. Bernstein, and B. R. Holstein, “De- cay π0 → γγ to next to leading order in chiral perturba- tion theory,” Phys. Rev. D 66, 076014 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0206007
2002
-
[34]
Two photon decays of pi0, eta and eta-prime,
B. Borasoy and R. Nissler, “Two photon decays of pi0, eta and eta-prime,” Eur. Phys. J. A 19, 367–382 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0309011
2004 arXiv
-
[35]
Two photon decay of the pseudoscalars, the chiral symmetry breaking corrections,
N. F. Nasrallah, “Two photon decay of the pseudoscalars, the chiral symmetry breaking corrections,” Phys. Rev. D 66, 076012 (2002)
2002
-
[36]
Neutral pseudoscalar meson decays: π0 → γγ and η → γγ in su(3) limit,
Johan Bijnens and Karol Kampf, “Neutral pseudoscalar meson decays: π0 → γγ and η → γγ in su(3) limit,” Nucl. Phys. B-Proc. Suppl. 207-208, 220–223 (2010), proceed- ings of the QCD 10: 15th High-Energy Physics Interna- tional Conference on Quantum Chromodynamics
2010
-
[37]
Chiral expan- sions of the π0 lifetime,
Karol Kampf and Bachir Moussallam, “Chiral expan- sions of the π0 lifetime,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 076005 (2009), arXiv:0901.4688 [hep-ph]
2009 arXiv
-
[38]
Axial anomaly and the precise value of the π0 → 2γ decay width,
B. L. Ioffe and A. G. Oganesian, “Axial anomaly and the precise value of the π0 → 2γ decay width,” Phys. Lett. B 647, 389–393 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0701077
2007 arXiv
-
[39]
Search for a Dark-Matter- Induced Cosmic Axion Background with ADMX,
T. Nitta et al. (ADMX), “Search for a Dark-Matter- Induced Cosmic Axion Background with ADMX,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 101002 (2023), arXiv:2303.06282 [hep- ex]
2023 arXiv
-
[40]
Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics,
Sz. Borsanyi et al., “Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics,” Nature 539, 69–71 (2016), arXiv:1606.07494 [hep-lat]
2016 arXiv
-
[41]
QCD at fi- nite isospin density: chiral perturbation theory con- fronts lattice data,
Prabal Adhikari and Jens O. Andersen, “QCD at fi- nite isospin density: chiral perturbation theory con- fronts lattice data,” Phys. Lett. B 804, 135352 (2020), arXiv:1909.01131 [hep-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[42]
Condensates and pressure of two-flavor chi- ral perturbation theory at nonzero isospin and tempera- ture,
Prabal Adhikari, Jens O. Andersen, and Martin A. Mojahed, “Condensates and pressure of two-flavor chi- ral perturbation theory at nonzero isospin and tempera- ture,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 173 (2021), arXiv:2010.13655 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[43]
Equation of state of imbalanced cold mat- ter from chiral perturbation theory,
Stefano Carignano, Andrea Mammarella, and Massimo Mannarelli, “Equation of state of imbalanced cold mat- ter from chiral perturbation theory,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 051503 (2016), arXiv:1602.01317 [hep-ph]
2016 arXiv
-
[44]
Topological Susceptibility and QCD Axion Mass: QED and NNLO corrections,
Marco Gorghetto and Giovanni Villadoro, “Topological Susceptibility and QCD Axion Mass: QED and NNLO corrections,” JHEP 03, 033 (2019), arXiv:1812.01008 [hep-ph]
2019
-
[45]
The QCD Axion at Finite Density,
Reuven Balkin, Javi Serra, Konstantin Springmann, and Andreas Weiler, “The QCD Axion at Finite Density,” JHEP 07, 221 (2020), arXiv:2003.04903 [hep-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[46]
θ-dependence of the lightest meson resonances in QCD,
Neramballi Ripunjay Acharya, Feng-Kun Guo, Maxim Mai, and Ulf-G. Meißner, “ θ-dependence of the lightest meson resonances in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 054023 (2015), arXiv:1507.08570 [hep-ph]
2015 arXiv
-
[47]
Cumulants of the QCD topological charge distribution,
Feng-Kun Guo and Ulf-G. Meißner, “Cumulants of the QCD topological charge distribution,” Phys. Lett. B749, 278–282 (2015), arXiv:1506.05487 [hep-ph]
2015 arXiv
-
[48]
Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,
J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, “Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,” Annals Phys. 158, 142 (1984)
1984
-
[49]
Manifesting the Invisible Axion at Low-energies,
Howard Georgi, David B. Kaplan, and Lisa Randall, “Manifesting the Invisible Axion at Low-energies,” Phys. Lett. B 169, 73–78 (1986)
1986
-
[50]
Light Pseudoscalars, Particle Physics and Cosmology,
Jihn E. Kim, “Light Pseudoscalars, Particle Physics and Cosmology,” Phys. Rept. 150, 1–177 (1987)
1987
-
[51]
Non- abelian Anomaly and Vector Meson Decays,
O. Kaymakcalan, S. Rajeev, and J. Schechter, “Non- abelian Anomaly and Vector Meson Decays,” Phys. Rev. D 30, 594 (1984)
1984
-
[52]
Low-Energy Hadron Physics from Ef- fective Chiral Lagrangians with Vector Mesons,
Ulf G. Meissner, “Low-Energy Hadron Physics from Ef- fective Chiral Lagrangians with Vector Mesons,” Phys. Rept. 161, 213 (1988)
1988
-
[53]
Anomalies and WZW term of two fla- vor QCD,
Roland Kaiser, “Anomalies and WZW term of two fla- vor QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 63, 076010 (2001), arXiv:hep- ph/0011377 [hep-ph]
2001
-
[54]
The Anoma- lous chiral Lagrangian of order O(p6),
J. Bijnens, L. Girlanda, and P. Talavera, “The Anoma- lous chiral Lagrangian of order O(p6),” Eur. Phys. J. C 8 23, 539–544 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0110400 [hep-ph]
2002 arXiv
-
[55]
Chiral Loops in pi0, eta0 — > gamma gamma and eta eta-prime Mixing,
J. F. Donoghue, Barry R. Holstein, and Y. C. R. Lin, “Chiral Loops in pi0, eta0 — > gamma gamma and eta eta-prime Mixing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2766–2769 (1985), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 61, 1527–1527 (1988)]
1985
-
[56]
Electromag- netic corrections in the anomaly sector,
B. Ananthanarayan and B. Moussallam, “Electromag- netic corrections in the anomaly sector,” JHEP 05, 052 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0205232
2002 arXiv
-
[57]
Bose-Einstein Condensation of Dark Matter Axions,
P. Sikivie and Q. Yang, “Bose-Einstein Condensation of Dark Matter Axions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 111301 (2009), arXiv:0901.1106 [hep-ph]
2009 arXiv
-
[58]
Aiming for tops of ALPs with a muon collider,
So Chigusa, Sudhakantha Girmohanta, Yuichiro Nakai, and Yufei Zhang, “Aiming for tops of ALPs with a muon collider,” JHEP 01, 077 (2024), arXiv:2310.11018 [hep- ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[59]
A viable QCD axion in the MeV mass range,
Daniele S. M. Alves and Neal Weiner, “A viable QCD axion in the MeV mass range,” JHEP 07, 092 (2018), arXiv:1710.03764 [hep-ph]
2018 arXiv
-
[60]
Grand unification and heavy axion,
V. A. Rubakov, “Grand unification and heavy axion,” JETP Lett. 65, 621–624 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9703409
1997 arXiv
-
[61]
Strong CP problem and mirror world: The Weinberg-Wilczek axion revisited,
Zurab Berezhiani, Leonida Gianfagna, and Maurizio Gi- annotti, “Strong CP problem and mirror world: The Weinberg-Wilczek axion revisited,” Phys. Lett. B 500, 286–296 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0009290
2001 arXiv
-
[62]
Anomalous solutions to the strong CP problem,
Anson Hook, “Anomalous solutions to the strong CP problem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 141801 (2015), arXiv:1411.3325 [hep-ph]
2015 arXiv
-
[63]
Model of visible QCD axion,
Hajime Fukuda, Keisuke Harigaya, Masahiro Ibe, and Tsutomu T. Yanagida, “Model of visible QCD axion,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 015021 (2015), arXiv:1504.06084 [hep- ph]
2015 arXiv
-
[64]
Strong CP and SUZ 2,
Abdelhamid Albaid, Michael Dine, and Patrick Draper, “Strong CP and SUZ 2,” JHEP 12, 046 (2015), arXiv:1510.03392 [hep-ph]
2015 arXiv
-
[65]
Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism,
Marc Kamionkowski and John March-Russell, “Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism,” Phys. Lett. B 282, 137–141 (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9202003
1992 arXiv
-
[66]
Planck scale corrections to axion models,
Stephen M. Barr and D. Seckel, “Planck scale corrections to axion models,” Phys. Rev. D 46, 539–549 (1992)
1992
-
[67]
In- stability of the invisible axion,
S. Ghigna, Maurizio Lusignoli, and M. Roncadelli, “In- stability of the invisible axion,” Phys. Lett. B 283, 278– 281 (1992)
1992
-
[68]
Solutions to the strong CP prob- lem in a world with gravity,
Richard Holman, Stephen D. H. Hsu, Thomas W. Kephart, Edward W. Kolb, Richard Watkins, and Lawrence M. Widrow, “Solutions to the strong CP prob- lem in a world with gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 282, 132–136 (1992), arXiv:hep-ph/9203206
1992 arXiv
-
[69]
High Quality QCD Axion and the LHC,
Anson Hook, Soubhik Kumar, Zhen Liu, and Raman Sundrum, “High Quality QCD Axion and the LHC,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 221801 (2020), arXiv:1911.12364 [hep-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[70]
A heavy QCD axion and the mirror world,
David I. Dunsky, Lawrence J. Hall, and Keisuke Hari- gaya, “A heavy QCD axion and the mirror world,” JHEP 02, 212 (2024), arXiv:2302.04274 [hep-ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[71]
A Computation of the Small Instanton Contribution to the Axion Poten- tial,
Jonathan M. Flynn and Lisa Randall, “A Computation of the Small Instanton Contribution to the Axion Poten- tial,” Nucl. Phys. B 293, 731–739 (1987)
1987
-
[72]
Mass Renor- malization by Instantons and the Strong CP Problem,
Kiwoon Choi, C. W. Kim, and W. K. Sze, “Mass Renor- malization by Instantons and the Strong CP Problem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 794 (1988)
1988
-
[73]
Small instanton contribution to the axion potential in supersymmetric models,
Kiwoon Choi and Hyung Do Kim, “Small instanton contribution to the axion potential in supersymmetric models,” Phys. Rev. D 59, 072001 (1999), arXiv:hep- ph/9809286
1999
-
[74]
Color unified dynamical axion,
M. K. Gaillard, M. B. Gavela, R. Houtz, P. Quilez, and R. Del Rey, “Color unified dynamical axion,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 972 (2018), arXiv:1805.06465 [hep-ph]
2018 arXiv
-
[75]
The Axion Mass from 5D Small Instan- tons,
Tony Gherghetta, Valentin V. Khoze, Alex Pomarol, and Yuri Shirman, “The Axion Mass from 5D Small Instan- tons,” JHEP 03, 063 (2020), arXiv:2001.05610 [hep-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[76]
Heavy axion opportunities at the DUNE near detector,
Kevin J. Kelly, Soubhik Kumar, and Zhen Liu, “Heavy axion opportunities at the DUNE near detector,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 095002 (2021), arXiv:2011.05995 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[77]
Heavy QCD axion in b → s transition: Enhanced limits and projections,
Sabyasachi Chakraborty, Manfred Kraus, Vazha Lo- ladze, Takemichi Okui, and Kohsaku Tobioka, “Heavy QCD axion in b → s transition: Enhanced limits and projections,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 055036 (2021), arXiv:2102.04474 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[78]
First Constraints on Heavy QCD Axions with a Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber Using the ArgoNeuT Experiment,
R. Acciarri et al. (ArgoNeuT), “First Constraints on Heavy QCD Axions with a Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber Using the ArgoNeuT Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 221802 (2023), arXiv:2207.08448 [hep-ex]
2023 arXiv
-
[79]
Searches for heavy QCD axions via dimuon final states,
Raymond T. Co, Soubhik Kumar, and Zhen Liu, “Searches for heavy QCD axions via dimuon final states,” JHEP 02, 111 (2023), arXiv:2210.02462 [hep-ph]
2023 arXiv
-
[80]
Heavy QCD axion at Belle II: Displaced and prompt signals,
Emilie Bertholet, Sabyasachi Chakraborty, Vazha Lo- ladze, Takemichi Okui, Abner Soffer, and Kohsaku To- bioka, “Heavy QCD axion at Belle II: Displaced and prompt signals,” Phys. Rev. D 105, L071701 (2022), arXiv:2108.10331 [hep-ph]
2022 arXiv
-
[81]
Consistent Treatment of Axions in the Weak Chiral Lagrangian,
Martin Bauer, Matthias Neubert, Sophie Renner, Marvin Schnubel, and Andrea Thamm, “Consistent Treatment of Axions in the Weak Chiral Lagrangian,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081803 (2021), arXiv:2102.13112 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[82]
Axion production in the η → ππa decay within SU(3) chiral perturbation theory,
Jin-Bao Wang, Zhi-Hui Guo, Zhun Lu, and Hai-Qing Zhou, “Axion production in the η → ππa decay within SU(3) chiral perturbation theory,” JHEP 11, 029 (2024), arXiv:2403.16064 [hep-ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[83]
Factoring the Strong CP Problem,
Prateek Agrawal and Kiel Howe, “Factoring the Strong CP Problem,” JHEP 12, 029 (2018), arXiv:1710.04213 [hep-ph]
2018 arXiv
-
[84]
A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group,
Tony Gherghetta, Natsumi Nagata, and Mikhail Shifman, “A Visible QCD Axion from an Enlarged Color Group,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 115010 (2016), arXiv:1604.01127 [hep-ph]
2016 arXiv
-
[85]
Selective enhancement of the QCD ax- ion couplings,
Luc Darm´ e, Luca Di Luzio, Maurizio Giannotti, and Enrico Nardi, “Selective enhancement of the QCD ax- ion couplings,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 015034 (2021), arXiv:2010.15846 [hep-ph]
2021 arXiv
-
[86]
Window for preferred axion models,
Luca Di Luzio, Federico Mescia, and Enrico Nardi, “Window for preferred axion models,” Phys. Rev. D 96, 075003 (2017), arXiv:1705.05370 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[87]
Exploring the axion potential and axion walls in dense quark matter,
Bonan Zhang, David E. A. Castillo, Ana G. Grunfeld, and Marco Ruggieri, “Exploring the axion potential and axion walls in dense quark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 054010 (2023), arXiv:2304.10240 [hep-ph]
2023 arXiv
-
[88]
QCD topology and axion properties in an isotropic hot and dense medium,
Hong-Fang Gong, Qi Lu, Zhen-Yan Lu, Lu-Meng Liu, Xun Chen, and Shu-Peng Wang, “QCD topology and axion properties in an isotropic hot and dense medium,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1222 (2024), arXiv:2404.15136 [hep- ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[89]
Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles,
Martin Bauer, Matthias Neubert, and Andrea Thamm, “Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles,” JHEP 12, 044 (2017), arXiv:1708.00443 [hep-ph]
2017 arXiv
-
[90]
The Low-Energy Effective Theory of Axions and ALPs,
Martin Bauer, Matthias Neubert, Sophie Renner, Mar- vin Schnubel, and Andrea Thamm, “The Low-Energy Effective Theory of Axions and ALPs,” JHEP 04, 063 (2021), arXiv:2012.12272 [hep-ph]. 9
2021 arXiv
-
[91]
a → πππ decay at next-to-leading order in chiral perturbation theory,
Luca Di Luzio and Gioacchino Piazza, “a → πππ decay at next-to-leading order in chiral perturbation theory,” JHEP 12, 041 (2022), arXiv:2206.04061 [hep-ph]
2022 arXiv
-
[92]
Axion-like particles in radiative quarkonia decays,
Luca Di Luzio, Alfredo Walter Mario Guerrera, Xavier Ponce D ´ ıaz, and Stefano Rigolin, “Axion-like particles in radiative quarkonia decays,” JHEP 06, 217 (2024), arXiv:2402.12454 [hep-ph]
2024 arXiv
Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.