Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 65 references

Reflection Time Difference as a probe of S-matrix Zeroes in Chaotic Resonance Scattering

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper introduces the reflection time difference, a measurable quantity that plays for S-matrix zeroes the role the Wigner time delay plays for poles, and shows how to extract complex zero positions from weak absorption data.

desk verdict The reflection-time-difference identity is correct and new, but the loss-based extraction formula (15) fails for near-real zeros, which is exactly the CPA-motivated regime. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06920 v1 pith:CK2Q2PVV submitted 2019-08-19 cond-mat.dis-nn math-phmath.MPnlin.CD

Yan V Fyodorov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.dis-nnmath-phmath.MPnlin.CD MSC 81Q5082B44
keywords S-matrixzeroesreflectiontimedifferenceWignerdelaychaoticscatteringHeidelbergmodelcoherentperfectabsorptionmicrowavebilliardsrandommatrixtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces the reflection time difference δT(λ), half the energy derivative of the phase difference between the two reflection coefficients of a two-channel scattering system, and shows it is a sum of sign-weighted Lorentzians centered at the complex zeroes of the reflection amplitude. This makes δT the zero analogue of the Wigner time delay, which is a sum over resonance poles. The paper further shows that in the presence of weak uniform losses, the ratio of reflection moduli satisfies |R1/R2| ≈ exp(−2εδT), so δT can be extracted directly from measured unitary deficit. A numerical test with a 400-resonance Heidelberg model recovers zero positions from this relation.

What carries the argument

The key object is the ratio of reflection amplitudes R1/R2 expressed via the Heidelberg model as a ratio of characteristic polynomials, det(λ1N − H_N − iΓ1 + iΓ2)/det(λ1N − H_N + iΓ1 − iΓ2). The log-derivative of this ratio is the reflection time difference δT, and the weak-absorption identity |R1/R2|_{λ+iε} ≈ $e^{{−2εδT}}$ converts δT into an experimentally measurable quantity. The spectral representation of δT as Σ_n Im Z_n/((λ−Re Z_n)^2 + (Im Z_n)^2) is the mechanism that makes zero positions directly visible as Lorentzian peaks.

What would settle it

Measure the two reflection coefficients of a real two-channel microwave billiard with a small tunable absorber; extract δT independently from the phase derivative via Eq. (13) and from the modulus ratio via Eq. (15), and compare recovered zero positions with direct numerical diagonalization of the effective Hamiltonian for the same geometry. Agreement would confirm the relations; a systematic mismatch between the two extractions at absorber strengths below the CPA threshold would falsify them.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a two-channel flux-conserving system, the ratio R1/R2 is unimodular on the real axis and equal to a ratio of two spectral determinants; its complex-energy dependence is governed by the complex zeroes of R1. The reflection time difference δT(λ) := (1/2) ∂(φ1−φ2)/∂λ is the log-derivative of that ratio and therefore decomposes into a sum of sign-weighted Lorentzians, one for each zero, with positive or negative weights depending on whether the zero lies above or below the real axis. Because a small uniform absorption shifts λ to λ+iε and makes the modulus ratio |R1(λ+iε)/R2(λ+iε)| ≈ $e^{{−2εδT(λ)}}$, the same quantity can be read from reflection amplitudes in realistic lossy cavities. The paper demonstrates numerically that harmonic inversion of δT yields the true zero positions.

Load-bearing premise

The experimental extraction assumes losses are weak and uniform, so that the spectral parameter shift λ→λ+iε with ε ≪ Δ is valid and |R1/R2| is well approximated by exp(−2εδT); if losses are strong or nonuniform the simple exponential relation fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Positions of S-matrix zeroes can be extracted from scattering measurements in weakly absorbing two-channel cavities, without tuning to the CPA condition.
  • Harmonic inversion of δT(λ) recovers the complex zero set; the paper's numerical simulation with N = 400 confirms the two complementary routes agree.
  • The energy integral of δT over a wide interval equals π(N+−N−), giving a direct count difference between zeroes above and below the real axis.
  • For more than two channels, the construction generalizes by replacing R1,R2 with determinants of reflection sub-blocks.
  • The identity gives a practical way to test random-matrix predictions for zero distributions in the complex plane.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the relation survives nonuniform losses, δT could become a general tool for imaging complex spectral points of non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonians in any two-port wave experiment.
  • The same construction may apply to transmission or other off-diagonal S-matrix entries, providing new spectral functions sensitive to zeros rather than poles.
  • One could test the prediction by comparing measured δT against direct numerical solution of the wave equation in a microwave billiard with known geometry, without any random-matrix assumption.
  • Since coherent perfect absorption occurs when a zero crosses the real axis, δT could serve as a pre-threshold diagnostic for anti-lasing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. Fyodorov considers the two-channel Heidelberg model of chaotic resonance scattering and defines the Reflection Time Difference δT(λ) = (1/2)∂(φ1−φ2)/∂λ, where φ1, φ2 are the phases of the two diagonal reflection amplitudes. Using the determinant identity Eq. (12), he shows that δT equals a sum over the complex zeroes Z_n of R1 of Im Z_n / |λ−Z_n|^2, making δT the zero-analogue of the Wigner time delay. He further proposes that under weak uniform absorption the ratio |R1/R2| at λ+iε obeys |R1/R2| ≈ exp(−2ε δT(λ)), enabling extraction of the zeroes from the unitary deficit via harmonic inversion, and he presents a numerical simulation with N=400 zeroes.

Significance. The central algebraic content is correct and valuable: Eq. (12) is a parameter-free identity within the model, and Eq. (13) provides an exact, sign-weighted Lorentzian representation of δT analogous to the Wigner delay, with no fitted constants. The integral identity Eq. (14) is a clean topological consequence. These identifications are the paper's main strength and justify publication of the theoretical construction. The proposed experimental extraction via Eq. (15), however, is not uniformly valid and needs substantial qualification; the conceptual advance survives, but the practical protocol as stated is not reliable for the near-real zeroes that motivate the coherent-perfect-absorption discussion.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (15)] The weak-loss relation (15) is not uniformly valid, and the stated condition ε ≪ Δ is insufficient. For a zero Z_n = x + ib with 0 < b ≪ ε, the exact product representation gives, at λ = x + iε, |R1/R2| = (ε−b)/(ε+b) ≈ 1 − 2b/ε, so the quantity D(λ) = −(2ε)^{-1} ln|R1/R2| equals ≈ b/ε^2, whereas the first-order formula (15) would give δT(x) ≈ 1/b; the true signal is smaller by a factor (b/ε)^2. Equivalently, D(λ) near such a zero is a Lorentzian of width ε and amplitude 2b/ε^2 rather than the true Lorentzian b/(a^2+b^2), so harmonic inversion will return Im Z ≈ ε instead of the true b. For b = 0, which is exactly the CPA case motivating the paper, D vanishes identically at the real-axis point and the method is blind. The condition needed for (15) is ε ≪ min_n |Im Z_n|, not ε ≪ Δ; since Im Z_n can be arbitrarily small, no single ε works for all zeroes. This point is load-bearing for the proposed extraction protocol and must be corrected or qualified.
  2. [Fig. 1 and numerical test] The numerical demonstration does not test the regime where the approximation fails. With ε = 10^{-5} and the stated couplings γ1 = 0.1, γ2 = 0.05, the imaginary parts of the zeroes are likely of order 10^{-2}–10^{-1}, so the figure only verifies the first-order regime |Im Z_n| ≫ ε. Since Eq. (15) fails precisely when |Im Z_n| ≲ ε, the figure cannot support the general claim that harmonic inversion extracts zeroes from the unitary deficit. The simulation should be repeated with zeroes deliberately close to the real axis (for example, by choosing γ1 ≈ γ2 or by post-selecting realizations), and the recovered imaginary parts compared with the true values; the b = 0 case should be discussed explicitly. The paper should also state that the test is a self-consistency check within the same model, not an independent test of the extraction procedure.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The term 'S-matrix zeroes' is used for zeroes of the reflection amplitude R1; in the two-channel unitary case R1 = 0 does not make the full S-matrix singular. Please define the terminology precisely at the start.
  2. [Eq. (14)] The integral identity assumes that no zero of R1 lies exactly on the real axis within [λ1, λ2]; at a CPA crossing the numbers N± are not well-defined. This should be stated.
  3. [Fig. 1] The axes are unlabeled, and the caption does not specify the random-matrix ensemble (GUE or GOE), the distribution of the coupling vectors, or the mean level spacing Δ used to set ε. Please add these details so the numerical test is reproducible.
  4. [Numerical section] The sentence reporting that 'poles were extracted' should say 'zeroes were extracted', since the objects being recovered are the zeroes of R1.
  5. [References] Ref. [50] contains a typo in the author name ('M. K´’uhmayer1' should be 'M. K¨uhmayer'); please correct.
  6. [Eq. (12)] The central determinant identity is only justified as 'straightforward algebraic manipulations'; a short derivation in an appendix would make the paper self-contained, as this identity underlies the entire construction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Eq. (13) and Eq. (15) are algebraic consequences of the stated model, with no fitted parameters.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The ratio R1/R2 is written as a determinant ratio in Eq. (12) from the Heidelberg-model expressions (11); zeroes of R1 are then the eigenvalues of H_eff^- = H_N + i(Γ1−Γ2), defined independently of δT. Equation (13) follows by differentiating log(R1/R2), giving the exact sum of sign-weighted Lorentzians; no parameter is adjusted to make this identity hold. Equation (15) is presented as an explicit approximation for weak uniform loss, with the condition ε≪Δ stated before the equation; whether that condition is sufficient is a validity question, not a circularity, because the relation is derived from the same product form rather than imposed to match the target zeroes. The numerical test uses the Heidelberg model to generate both the δT signal and the 'true' zeroes by direct diagonalization, which is a self-consistency check, not circular reasoning. Self-citations such as [49] and [51] provide context and prior derivations but are not load-bearing: the key step Eq. (12) is asserted to follow by straightforward algebra and is not outsourced to a cited uniqueness theorem. No fitted-input-called-prediction pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The central derivation is parameter-free within the Heidelberg model; the numerical simulation uses arbitrary coupling values but they are not fitted. The main imported assumptions are the standard Heidelberg random-matrix model and the weak-loss approximation.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The scattering matrix is described by the Heidelberg model: S = (1 - iK)(1 + iK)^{-1} with K = W†(λ - H)^{-1}W, H a random N×N Hamiltonian from GUE or GOE with N >> M, and energy-independent couplings W.
    Stated in the Introduction, Eqs. (1)-(3); this is the standard model adopted, not derived.
  • domain assumption For the two-channel guiding example, the system is flux-conserving and time-reversal invariant, so S = ((R1,t),(t,R2)) is unitary and satisfies the phase relation e^{2iθ} = -e^{i(φ1+φ2)}.
    Stated around Eq. (10); needed for the ratio R1/R2 to be unimodular on the real axis.
  • domain assumption Uniform absorption is represented by shifting λ to λ+iε with ε << Δ, and Eq. (15) keeps only the leading exponential approximation.
    Stated before Eq. (9) and Eq. (15); load-bearing for the measurement proposal.
  • standard math The zeroes of R1 are simple and their complex conjugates are zeroes of R2, as follows from the determinant identity Eq. (12) and from H being Hermitian.
    Used implicitly in deriving the signed Lorentzian sum in Eq. (13).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reflection Time Difference as a probe of S-matrix Zeroes in Chaotic Resonance Scattering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CK2Q2PVV

@misc{pith2026190806920,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reflection Time Difference as a probe of S-matrix Zeroes in Chaotic Resonance Scattering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CK2Q2PVV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06920}
}
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent interest in the zeroes of S-matrix entries in the complex energy plane, I use the Heidelberg model of resonance scattering to introduce the notion of Reflection Time Difference which is shown to play the same role for the {\it zeroes} as the Wigner time delay plays for the S- matrix {\it poles}.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06920 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fig.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Special issue on ‘Trends in Quantum Chaotic Scattering’, ed. by Y.V. Fyodorov, T. Kottos, and H.J. St¨ ockmann.J. Phys. A: Math.Gen. 38, No. 49 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    U. Kuhl, O. Legrand, and F. Mortessagne. Microwave experiments using open chaotic cavities in the realm of the effective Hamiltonian formalism. Fortschr. Phys., 61, 414–419 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Gradoni, J.-H

    G. Gradoni, J.-H. Yeh, B. Xiao, T.-M. Antonsen , S.-M. Anlage, and E. Ott. Predicting the statistics of wave transport through chaotic cavities 8 by the Random Coupling Model: a review and recent progress. Wave Motion, 51, 606–621 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Dietz and A

    B. Dietz and A. Richter. Quantum and wave dynamical chaos in super- conducting microwave billiards. Chaos, 25, 097601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Cao and J

    H. Cao and J. Wiersig. Dielectric microcavities: Model systems for wave chaos and non-Hermitian physics.” Rev. Mod. Phys., 87, 61–111 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    J. J. M. Verbaarschot, H.A. Weidenm¨ uller and M.R. Zirnbauer. Grass- mann integration in stochastic quantum physics: the case of compound- nucleus scattering. Phys. Rep., 129, 367–438 (1985)

    work page 1985

  7. [7]

    G. E. Mitchell, A. Richter, and H. A. Weidenm¨ uller. Random matrices and chaos in nuclear physics: Nuclear reactions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2845 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Fyodorov and D.V

    Y.V. Fyodorov and D.V. Savin. Resonance scattering of waves in chaotic systems. Akemann, Gernot (ed.) et al., The Oxford handbook of ran- dom matrix theory. (Oxford University Press, 2011) pp. 703–722 [ arXiv:1003.0702]

    arXiv 2011

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Schomerus

    H. Schomerus. Random matrix approaches to open quantum systems. Les Houches summer school on ”Stochastic Processes and Random Ma- trices”, 2015, Ed. G. Schehr et al. (Oxford University Press, 2017)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Sokolov and V.G

    V.V. Sokolov and V.G. Zelevinsky. Dynamics and statistics of unstable quantum states. Nucl. Phys. A 504, Issue 3, 562–588(1989)

    1989

  3. [11]

    Y. V. Fyodorov, D. V. Savin and H.-J. Sommers. Scattering, reflection and impedance of waves in chaotic and disordered systems with absorp- tion. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38, Issue 49, 10731–10760 (2005)

    2005

  4. [12]

    Kumar, A

    S. Kumar, A. Nock, H.-J. Sommers, T. Guhr, B. Dietz, M. Miski-Oglu, A. Richter, and F. Sch¨ afer. Distribution of Scattering Matrix Elements in Quantum Chaotic Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 030403 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    Fyodorov and A

    Y.V. Fyodorov and A. Nock. On Random Matrix Averages Involving Half-Integer Powers of GOE Characteristic Polynomials. J. Stat. Phys. 159, Issue 4, 731-751 (2015) 9

    2015

  6. [14]

    Kumar, B

    S. Kumar, B. Dietz, T. Guhr, and A. Richter. Distribution of Off- Diagonal Cross Sections in Quantum Chaotic Scattering: Exact Results and Data Comparison. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 244102 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    S. B. Fedeli and Y.V. Fyodorov. Statistics of off-diagonal entries of Wigner K−matrix for chaotic wave systems with absorption. arXiv:1905.04157

    1905 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Kottos and U

    T. Kottos and U. Smilansky. Chaotic Scattering on Graphs. Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 85, 968–971 (2000)

    2000

  9. [17]

    O. Hul, S. Bauch, P. Pakonski, N. Savytskyy, K. Zyczkowski, and L. Sirko. Experimental simulation of quantum graphs by microwave net- works. Phys. Rev. E 69, 056205 (2004)

    2004

  10. [18]

    O. Hul, O. Tymoshchuk, S. Bauch, P.M. Koch, and L. Sirko. Exper- imental investigation of Wigner’s reaction matrix for irregular graphs with absorption. J. Phys. A 38, 10489 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Lawniczak, O

    M. Lawniczak, O. Hul, S. Bauch, P. Seba, and L. Sirko. Experimental and numerical investigation of the reflection coefficient and the distribu- tions of Wigner’s reaction matrix for irregular graphs with absorption. Phys. Rev. E 77, 056210 (2008)

    2008

  12. [20]

    Lawniczak, S

    M. Lawniczak, S. Bauch, O. Hul, and L. Sirko. Experimental investiga- tion of the enhancement factor for microwave irregular networks with preserved and broken time reversal symmetry in the presence of absorp- tion. Phys. Rev. E 81, 046204 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    Haake, F

    F. Haake, F. Izrailev, N. Lehmann, D. Saher , and H.-J. Sommers. Statis- tics of complex levels of random matrices for decaying systems. Z. Phys. B, 88, 359–370 (1992)

    1992

  14. [22]

    Lehmann, D

    N. Lehmann, D. Saher, V.V. Sokolov, and H.-J. Sommers. Chaotic Scat- tering: the supersymmetry method for large number of channels. Nucl. Phys. A, 582, 223–256 (1995)

    1995

  15. [23]

    Y. V. Fyodorov and H.-J. Sommers. Statistics of S-matrix poles in few- channel chaotic scattering: Crossover from isolated to overlapping reso- nances. JETP Lett., 63 1026–1030 (1996). 10

    1996

  16. [24]

    Y. V. Fyodorov and H.-J. Sommers. Statistics of resonance poles, phase shifts and time delays in quantum chaotic scattering: Random matrix approach for systems with broken time-reversal invariance. J. Math. Phys. 38, Issue 4, 1918–1981 (1997)

    1997

  17. [25]

    Y. V. Fyodorov, B. A. Khoruzhenko. Systematic Analytical Approach to Correlation Functions of Resonances in Quantum Chaotic Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 65 –68 (1999)

    1999

  18. [26]

    Sommers, Y

    H.-J. Sommers, Y. V. Fyodorov, and M. Titov. S-matrix poles for chaotic quantum systems as eigenvalues of complex symmetric random matrices: from isolated to overlapping resonances.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 32, L77 (1999)

    1999

  19. [27]

    R. A. Janik, W. Noerenberg, M. A. Nowak, G. Papp, I. Zahed. Cor- relations of Eigenvectors for Non-Hermitian Random-Matrix Models. , Phys. Rev. E 60, 2699 (1999)

    1999

  20. [28]

    Schomerus, K.M

    H. Schomerus, K.M. Frahm, M. Patra, C.W.J. Beenakker. Quantum limit of the laser line width in chaotic cavities and statistics of residues of scattering matrix poles. Physica A, 278, 469–496 (2000)

    2000

  21. [29]

    Mehlig and M

    B. Mehlig and M. Santer. Universal eigenvector statistics in a quantum scattering ensemble. Phys. Rev. E , 63, 020105(R) (2001)

    2001

  22. [30]

    Fyodorov and B

    Y.V. Fyodorov and B. Mehlig. Statistics of resonances and nonorthogo- nal eigenfunctions in a model for single-channel chaotic scattering.Phys. Rev. E, 66, 045202(R) (2002)

    2002

  23. [31]

    T. Kottos. Statistics of resonances and delay times in random media: beyond random matrix theory. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 10761-10786 (2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    Poli, D.V

    C. Poli, D.V. Savin, O. Legrand, F. Mortessagne. Statistics of resonance states in open chaotic systems: A perturbative approach. Phys. Rev. E, 80, 046203 ( 2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    G. L. Celardo, N. Auerbach, F. M. Izrailev, and V. G. Zelevinsky. Dis- tribution of Resonance Widths and Dynamics of Continuum Coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 042501 (2011) 11

    2011

  26. [34]

    Shchedrin and V

    G. Shchedrin and V. Zelevinsky. Resonance width distribution for open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. C 86, 044602 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Fyodorov and D.V

    Y.V. Fyodorov and D.V. Savin. Statistics of resonance width shifts as a signature of eigenfunction nonorthogonality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 184101 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    Y. V. Fyodorov and D.V. Savin. Resonance width distribution in RMT: Weak-coupling regime beyond Porter-Thomas.EPL, 110, 40006, (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    L. Wang, D. Lippolis, Z.-Y. Li, X.-F. Jiang, Q. Gong, and Y.-F. Xiao. Statistics of Chaotic Resonances in an Optical Microcavity. Phys. Rev. E 93, 040201(R) (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    R. Kozhan. Rank one non-Hermitian perturbations of Hermitian beta- ensembles. J. Stat. Phys. 168, Issue 1, 92-108 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    U. Kuhl, R. H¨ ohmann, J. Main, and H.-J. St¨ ockmann. Resonance Widths in Open Microwave Cavities Studied by Harmonic Inversion. Phys. Rev. Lett.,100, 254101 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    P. E. Koehler, F. Beˇ cv´ aˇ r, M. Krtiˇ cka , J.-A. Harve, and K.-H. Gu- ber. Anomalous Fluctuations of s-Wave Reduced Neutron Widths of Pt192,194 Resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 072502 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    Di Falco, T.-F

    A. Di Falco, T.-F. Krauss, and A. Fratalocchi. Lifetime statistics of quantum chaos studied by a multiscale analysis. Appl. Phys. Lett., 100, 184101 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Barkhofen, T

    S. Barkhofen, T. Weich, A. Potzuweit, H.-J. St¨ ockmann, U. Kuhl , M. Zworski. Experimental observation of the spectral gap in microwave n- disk systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 164102 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    C. Liu, A. Di Falco, A. Fratalocchi. Dicke Phase Transition with Multiple Superradiant States in Quantum Chaotic Resonators. Phys. Rev. X , 4, 021048 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    J.-B. Gros, U. Kuhl, O. Legrand, F. Mortessagne, E. Richalot, and D. V. Savin. Experimental width shift distribution: a test of nonorthogonality for local and global perturbations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113 224101 (2014) 12

    2014

  37. [45]

    Davy and A

    M. Davy and A. Z. Genack. Selectively exciting quasi-normal modes in open disordered systems. Nature Commun. 9, Article number: 4714 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Davy and A

    M. Davy and A. Z. Genack. Impact of non-Hemiticity on modal strength and correlation in transmission through random open cavities. arXiv:1905.08301

    1905 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Chong, L

    Y.D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao and A. D. Stone. Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010)

    2010

  40. [48]

    H. Li, S. Suwunnarat, R. Fleischmann, H. Schanz, & T. Kottos. Random matrix theory approach to chaotic coherent perfect absorbers.Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 044101 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Fyodorov, S

    Y.V. Fyodorov, S. Suwunnarat, T. Kottos. Distribution of zeros of the S-matrix of chaotic cavities with localized losses and coherent perfect absorption: non-perturbative results. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, Issue 30, 30LT01 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Pichler, M

    K. Pichler, M. K ´’uhmayer1, J. B¨ ohm, A. Brandst¨ otter, P. Ambichl, U. Kuhl & S. Rotter. Random anti-lasing through coherent perfect absorp- tion in a disordered medium. Nature 567, 351-355 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Fyodorov

    Y.V. Fyodorov. Induced vs. Spontaneous breakdown of S-matrix unitar- ity: probability of no return in quantum chaotic and disordered systems. JETP Letters 78, 250–254 (2003)

    2003

  44. [52]

    Wigner, Lower limit for the energy derivative of the scattering phase shift

    E.P. Wigner, Lower limit for the energy derivative of the scattering phase shift. Phys. Rev. 98 (1) 145-147 (1955)

    1955

  45. [53]

    Lehmann, D.V

    N. Lehmann, D.V. Savin, V.V. Sokolov, H.-J. Sommers, Time delay correlations in chaotic scattering: random matrix approach. Physica D 86, 572-585 (1995)

    1995

  46. [54]

    Fyodorov, H.-J

    Y.V. Fyodorov, H.-J. Sommers, Parametric correlations of scattering phase shifts and fluctuations of delay times in few-channel chaotic scat- tering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (25), 4709 (1996)

    1996

  47. [55]

    Fyodorov, D.V

    Y.V. Fyodorov, D.V. Savin, H.-J. Sommers, Parametric correlations of phase shifts and statistics of time delays in quantum chaotic scattering: 13 crossover between unitary and orthogonal symmetries, Phys. Rev. E 55 R4857-R4860 (1997)

    1997

  48. [56]

    Brouwer, K.M

    P.W. Brouwer, K.M. Frahm, C.W. Beenakker. Distribution of the quan- tum mechanical time-delay matrix for a chaotic cavity Waves Random Media 9 91-104 (1999)

    1999

  49. [57]

    Savin, Y.V

    D.V. Savin, Y.V. Fyodorov, H.-J. Sommers. Reducing nonideal to ideal coupling in random matrix description of chaotic scattering: application to the timedelay problem. Phys. Rev. E 63 035202 (2001)

    2001

  50. [58]

    Ossipov, Y.V

    A. Ossipov, Y.V. Fyodorov. Statistics of delay times in mesoscopic sys- tems as a manifestation of eigenfunction fluctuations. Phys. Rev. B 71 125133 (2005)

    2005

  51. [59]

    Mezzadri, N.J

    F. Mezzadri, N.J. Simm. τ-Function theory of quantum chaotic trans- port with β = 1, 2, 4. Commun. Math. Phys. 324, 465-513 (2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    M. Novaes. Statistics of time delay and scattering correlation functions in chaotic systems. I. Random matrix theory. J. Math. Phys. 56 062110 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    F.D. Cunden. Statistical distribution of the WignerSmith time-delay matrix moments for chaotic cavities. Phys. Rev. E 91, 060102 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    C. Texier. Wigner time delay and related concepts: Application to trans- port in coherent conductors. Physica E 82, 16–33 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    Grabsch, D.V

    A. Grabsch, D.V. Savin and C. Texier. Wigner-Smith time-delay matrix in chaotic cavities with non-ideal contacts. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51, 404001 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    A. Ossipov. Scattering Approach to Anderson Localization Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 076601 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    Doron, U

    E. Doron, U. Smilansky and A. Frenkel. Experimental Demonstration of Chaotic Scattering of Microwaves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, no. 25. 3072– 3075 (1990) 14

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.