Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Gravitational memory effects in Tachyon gravity

T0 review · 6 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a massless Tachyon field, when non-minimally coupled to gravity, gives gravitational radiation a scalar breathing polarization, modifies the Bondi mass-loss formula, and leaves a permanent displacement memory, with…

desk verdict Competent but incomplete: a model-specific tachyon extension of scalar-tensor memory and soft theorems with correctable algebra errors and a deferred central proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.01879 v1 pith:CKTSHNUR submitted 2025-07-02 gr-qc

Pouneh Safarzadeh Ilkhchi , Amin Rezaei Akbarieh , Ali Seraj This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C3583C4083D05 PACS 04.30.-w04.50.Kd
keywords gravitationalmemorytachyongravitybreathingmodeBondi-Sachsgaugesofttheoremsscalar-tensortheoriesnullinfinitywaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a massless Tachyon scalar, non-minimally coupled to Einstein gravity, changes the infrared structure of gravitational radiation in three linked ways: it adds a scalar "breathing" polarization to the wave, it modifies the Bondi mass-loss formula that governs how much energy the system radiates, and it leaves a permanent displacement memory on test masses. These effects are derived in the Bondi–Sachs asymptotic framework, where the leading scalar perturbation $\varphi_1$ enters both the metric shear and the scalar news. The paper further derives the soft graviton and soft scalar emission factors and shows that the non-minimal coupling function $f(\varphi)$ rescales the standard graviton soft factors, while a nonvanishing soft scalar factor arises only through couplings to massive matter or gravitons. A sympathetic reader would care because the breathing memory is a distinctive observable signature that could distinguish this Tachyon model from general relativity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Bondi–Sachs asymptotic expansion with a nonstandard determinant condition $\det(h_{AB})=\varphi^{-2}\gamma$, imposed in the Einstein frame. This condition makes the trace of the metric shear carry the scalar mode, so the leading metric perturbation $C^{(1)}_{AB}=C_{AB}-\gamma_{AB}\varphi_1/\varphi_0$ packages the graviton and the breathing scalar in one object. The argument runs through the flux-balance equations at null infinity: the $uu$-component yields the modified Bondi mass-loss formula, whose integral gives the electric tensor memory; the scalar equation relates the breathing memory $\Delta\varphi_1$ to the time integral of $\dot{\varphi}_2$; and the geodesic deviation equation converts these into the permanent displacement formula. In the soft-theorem part, the machinery is the perturbative expansion $\varphi=\varphi_0+\delta\varphi$ and the cubic vertices for $\delta\varphi$, the massive scalar $\Phi$, and the graviton $h_{\mu\nu}$, whose soft limits produce the factors displayed in Eqs. (4.5), (4.6), (4.17), and (4.23).

What would settle it

Evolve the Tachyon field equations for a concrete source, such as a compact binary, out to early and late retarded times and extract $\varphi_2(u,x^A)$ on the sphere; if $\varphi_2$ saturates, oscillates, or grows nonlinearly, Eq. (3.7) forces $\Delta\varphi_1=0$ and the breathing memory is absent. A detector search for an isotropic permanent displacement in gravitational-wave events with no corresponding quadrupole shearing would test the observable prediction directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that in a non-minimally coupled massless Tachyon theory the asymptotic shear of outgoing null geodesics splits into a traceless spin-2 part $C_{AB}$ and a trace part fixed by the scalar: $C^{(1)}_{AB}=C_{AB}-\gamma_{AB}\varphi_1/\varphi_0$. The trace part is the breathing mode; its time variation, the scalar news $N=\dot{\varphi}_1$, enters the modified Bondi mass-loss equation $\partial_u M=\frac{1}{4} D_A D_B \dot{C}^{AB}-\frac{1}{8}\dot{C}_{AB}\dot{C}^{AB}-(1+f_0/4)N^2$. Integrating the balance equations gives the electric tensor memory and the breathing memory $\Delta\varphi_1$, whose permanent displacement on a ring of test masses is $\Delta X^{\hat A}=\frac{1}{2r}(\Delta C_{\hat A\hat B}-\delta_{\hat A\hat B}\Delta\varphi_1/\varphi_0)X^{\hat B}_0$. In the soft sector, the paper derives that the leading and subleading soft graviton factors are the usual Weinberg expressions multiplied by $(3/(2\varphi_0)-f_0/(2\varphi_0))$, and that the total leading soft scalar factor combines a massive-matter pole $-m_\Phi^2(\varphi_0+2)/(4\varphi_0^2)\sum_i 1/(p_i\cdot q)$ with a graviton-emission term, while the pure three-Tachyon vertex contributes zero. These results are presented as the extension of the infrared triangle to Tachyon gravity, with the soft factors consistent with the memory effects.

Load-bearing premise

The nonzero breathing memory rests on the assumption that $\varphi_2$ grows linearly in retarded time at early and late infinity, an asymptotic property the paper asserts and defers; the soft-theorem results additionally assume the scalar fluctuation behaves as a standard massless quantum field with a $1/(2p\cdot q)$ propagator in the soft limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A passing gravitational wave in this theory would produce an isotropic "breathing" expansion of a ring of test masses in addition to the usual $+$ and $\times$ shearing, and the permanent part of that expansion is the scalar memory $\Delta\varphi_1/\varphi_0$.
  • The Bondi mass aspect is no longer monotone in the same combination; the quantity $M=m-\frac{1}{8}(f'_0/f_0)\partial_u\varphi_1^2$ is strictly decreasing when either tensor or scalar news is present, generalizing the Bondi mass-loss formula.
  • The leading and subleading soft graviton factors are the general-relativity ones multiplied by a coupling-dependent coefficient, so the non-minimal Tachyon coupling changes the infrared weight of graviton emission but not its kinematic structure.
  • The soft scalar factor has a $1/(p_i\cdot q)$ pole only when the scalar couples to massive matter or to gravitons; a theory of only massless Tachyons would have a vanishing leading soft-scalar factor from the three-scalar vertex.
  • The permanent displacement of test masses combines tensor memory and breathing memory with different angular profiles: tensor modes start at $\ell=2$, while scalar radiation can contribute at dipole order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the deferred timelike-infinity analysis confirms the linear growth of $\varphi_2$, the breathing memory becomes a sharp observable prediction of this model; a numerical-relativity simulation of the Tachyon equations could settle it before any detector does.
  • The same infrared-triangle logic used here suggests that the breathing memory should be dual to an asymptotic symmetry of the scalar sector, in analogy with scalar-tensor theories; the paper does not construct that duality.
  • Because the breathing mode enters at dipole order whereas tensor memory is quadrupole, the model predicts a more isotropic angular pattern in the permanent displacement than in general relativity, a discriminant for future detector networks even at moderate signal-to-noise.
  • The coupling-dependent rescaling of the soft graviton factor implies that bounds on the breathing-mode amplitude can be translated into constraints on the coupling parameters $f_0$ and $f'_0$, connecting gravitational-wave observations directly to the model's action.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a massless Tachyon scalar field non-minimally coupled to gravity, using both Jordan and Einstein frames and a Bondi-Sachs asymptotic expansion. It derives asymptotic field equations, a modified Bondi mass-loss formula, gravitational memory effects (a tensor memory plus a scalar 'breathing' memory), the induced displacement memory on test masses, and soft graviton and soft scalar theorems. The central new claim is that the scalar mode produces a nonzero breathing memory Δφ1 whose existence is tied to the asymptotic growth of the coefficient φ2 at timelike infinity, and that the soft factors are modified by the non-minimal coupling.

Significance. If the derivations are corrected, the paper would provide a useful extension of scalar-tensor memory results to the non-minimally coupled Tachyon model. Its strengths are the explicit two-frame setup, the Bondi-Sachs expansion, the flux-balance equations (2.14) and (2.16), the displacement-memory observable (3.13), and the attempt to compute soft factors. The paper does not contain machine-checked proofs or data. At present, however, the headline scalar breathing memory is deferred to a future asymptotic analysis, and several displayed formulas contain algebraic errors, so the paper is not yet self-contained.

major comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.7)] Subtracting Eq. (2.11) at u→±∞ and using ∂uφ1→0 gives 2Δ(∂uφ2)+D²Δφ1=0, i.e. D²Δφ1=-2Δ(∂uφ2), not +Δ(∂uφ2) as printed in Eq. (3.7). The missing factor of -2 affects the quantitative breathing-memory relation and must be corrected; with the corrected sign the criterion for nonvanishing Δφ1 is unchanged, but Eq. (3.7) as displayed is wrong.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, text after Eq. (3.7)] The central claim of a nonzero scalar (breathing) memory is not derived in this paper. The text asserts that an asymptotic analysis at timelike infinity 'similar to [38]' reveals the linear growth of φ2 and defers the analysis to later work. Without reproducing that analysis, the statement that Δφ1 is generically nonzero is an assumption, not a result. The abstract, introduction, and conclusions should be amended to present this as conditional, or the analysis should be included.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.2, Eqs. (4.16), (4.17), (4.23)] The leading soft factor in Eq. (4.17) has the wrong power of φ0. Simplifying Eq. (4.16) gives a 1/(p_i·q) coefficient of -m_Φ²(φ0+2)/(4φ0³), not -m_Φ²(φ0+2)/(4φ0²). The finite term φ0^{-2}/4 in the simplification is dropped without stating that it is subleading. Equation (4.23) inherits the same error in its first term.
  4. [Sec. 4.2.1, Eq. (4.10)] Equation (4.10) does not follow from Eq. (4.8). In the emission diagram the second scalar has momentum p_i+q, so the vertex is proportional to p_i·(p_i+q)=p_i·q, not to p_i²; using p_i²=0 to conclude the amplitude vanishes is incorrect. The absence of a 1/ω pole from this vertex may be true, but the derivation is invalid, and the finite O(1) contribution is not accounted for in the total soft factor.
  5. [Sec. 4.2.3, Eqs. (4.19)-(4.21)] The soft scalar-graviton contribution is not defined as a complete emission amplitude: the momentum k of the graviton is not specified, and Eq. (4.20) multiplies the vertex by the scalar propagator 1/(2p_i·q) as if the soft scalar were emitted from an external scalar line, while the graviton is treated as an external field. The momentum routing and the role of the graviton in the hard amplitude must be clarified before Eq. (4.21) can be used in the total soft factor.
  6. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.4)-(4.23)] The field δφ is not canonically normalized in the Einstein frame: the quadratic kinetic term has coefficient Z=(3-f0)/(2φ0) at leading order. The propagator 1/(2p_i·q) used throughout Section 4 is therefore not the propagator of δφ as defined, and the soft factors in Eqs. (4.5), (4.6), (4.21), and (4.23) are expressed in a non-standard normalization. The authors should either work with the canonically normalized scalar or include the field-renormalization factor explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (2.11), (2.13), (2.16)] The notation ∂uφ2 1 is ambiguous; it should be written with parentheses, e.g. ∂_u(φ1²), to distinguish it from a derivative of φ2 or of φ1².
  2. [Throughout] Please correct the typographical errors: 'T achyon' in the Section 2 heading, 'obervable' in the Introduction, 'meomry' after Eq. (3.7), 'monople' after Eq. (3.13), and 'Quamtum' in the author affiliations.
  3. [Sec. 2.1-2.2] The determinant condition (2.8) is motivated in the Einstein frame, but the field equations in Section 2.2 are solved in the Jordan frame; please clarify which frame the Bondi-Sachs metric (2.7) and the condition (2.8) refer to.
  4. [Sec. 5] The conclusion states that the soft scalar theorem is 'consistent with the results on the memory effect found in section 3', but the connection is not demonstrated. Please either add the derivation or soften the claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central scalar breathing-memory claim rests on a deferred, self-cited asymptotic analysis; otherwise the derivation chain is self-contained.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3.1, immediately after Eq. (3.7)]
    "This equation states that the breathing meomry ∆ φ1 is nonvanishing iff φ2 grows linearly as u →∞or u →−∞. An asymptotic analysis at timelike infinity similar to [38] reveals that this is the case. We leave a careful analysis of the Tachyon model at timelike/spatial infinity to a later work."

    The nonzero scalar/breathing memory is the central new observable of the paper. Equation (3.7) only relates the memory ∆φ1 to the change in ∂uφ2; the conclusion that this is nonzero requires the premise that φ2 grows linearly as u → ±∞. That premise is not derived in this paper. It is asserted to follow "similar to [38]", which is a paper coauthored by current author A. Seraj, and the actual Tachyon analysis is explicitly postponed to later work. Thus a load-bearing step in the central memory claim is supported only by a self-citation rather than by a derivation presented here. This is a circularity of the 'self-citation load-bearing' type: the paper's key premise is justified only by an overlapping-author citation whose content is not reproduced or independently verified.

full rationale

Apart from the scalar memory endpoint, the paper's derivation chain is largely self-contained. The Bondi-Sachs expansions, the equations of motion, the modified mass-loss formula (2.14), the displacement formula (3.13), and the soft factors in Section 4 are all derived from the stated action and field equations; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no external benchmark is used as an input. I do not count the apparent algebraic mismatch between Eq. (2.11) and Eq. (3.7) (Eq. 2.11 contains 2∂uφ2, so subtraction suggests D^2∆φ1 = -2∆(∂uφ2), not +∆(∂uφ2)) as circularity; that is a correctness concern, not an input-equals-output reduction. The only load-bearing circular element is the assertion that φ2 grows linearly at timelike infinity, which is needed for the generic nonzero breathing memory and is deferred to a later work with reference [38] by a coauthor. This gives a partial self-citation dependency, but the rest of the paper's results retain independent content, so the overall circularity score is moderate rather than severe.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results depend on the arbitrary coupling function f(φ) and its Taylor coefficients, the background value φ0, the modified Bondi gauge condition, and the deferred timelike-infinity behavior of φ2. No genuinely new particles or forces are introduced; the tachyon field and breathing polarization are taken from earlier literature.

free parameters (4)
  • φ0
    Background value of the tachyon field; sets the effective gravitational constant and appears in all memory and soft formulas.
  • f0 = f(φ0)
    Value of the arbitrary non-minimal coupling function at φ0; enters the flux and mass loss (Eq. 2.14) and the soft graviton factor (Eq. 4.5).
  • f'_0 = f'(φ0)
    First Taylor coefficient of f(φ); enters the scalar equation (2.11), modified mass aspect (2.13), and three-scalar interaction (4.7).
  • mΦ
    Mass of the auxiliary matter scalar introduced in Sec. 4.2.2; produces the nonzero leading soft scalar factor (4.17).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Spacetime is asymptotically flat and admits a Bondi-Sachs coordinate system with the given 1/r expansions (Eq. 2.9).
    The entire asymptotic analysis is performed in this gauge; no proof of existence of such coordinates for the tachyon system is given.
  • domain assumption Fields are analytic at future null infinity, so the 1/r expansion and the Taylor expansion of f(φ) are valid.
    Invoked in Sec. 2.1 before Eq. (2.9).
  • ad hoc to paper The background scalar φ0 is constant on the celestial sphere.
    Imposed as a boundary condition in Sec. 2.2 because φ0 represents the effective gravitational constant; only ∂u φ0 = 0 follows from the equations.
  • ad hoc to paper The Bondi-Sachs determinant condition is modified to det(hAB) = φ^{-2}γ (Eq. 2.8).
    A gauge choice that collects the scalar mode in the trace of C^(1)_AB; it differs from the standard Bondi condition and is central to identifying the breathing mode.
  • ad hoc to paper At timelike infinity the coefficient φ2 grows linearly in u, so the breathing memory Δφ1 is nonzero.
    Required by Eq. (3.7); the proof is deferred to future work and only referenced to [38].
  • ad hoc to paper Soft amplitudes can be computed treating the perturbed scalar δφ with ordinary Feynman propagators and no field renormalization.
    Used throughout Sec. 4; the tachyon kinetic term is non-canonical, so this treatment is not justified in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational memory effects in Tachyon gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CKTSHNUR

@misc{pith2026250701879,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational memory effects in Tachyon gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CKTSHNUR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.01879}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we explore how a massless Tachyon field, when non-minimally coupled to gravity, affects gravitational memory, soft theorems, and symmetries near null infinity. We set up the model using both the Jordan and Einstein frames, work out the equations of motion and study the behavior of fields at large distances with the Bondi-Sachs gauge. The Tachyon adds a ``breathing'' polarization mode to the gravitational radiation, which modifies the Bondi mass loss formula and leaves a trace in the displacement memory effect. We also derived the leading and subleading soft factors, involving the radiation of a soft graviton or a soft scalar.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    P´ erez, S

    A. P´ erez, S. Prohazka and A. Seraj, Fracton Infrared Triangle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 021603 [2310.16683]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Zel’dovich and A.G

    Y.B. Zel’dovich and A.G. Polnarev, Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars, Sov. Astron. 18 (1974) 17

    work page 1974

  3. [2]

    Braginsky and L.P

    V.B. Braginsky and L.P. Grishchuk, Kinematic Resonance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas, Sov. Phys. JETP 62 (1985) 427

    work page 1985

  4. [3]

    Braginsky and K.S

    V.B. Braginsky and K.S. Thorne, Gravitational-wave bursts with memory and experimental prospects, Nature 327 (1987) 123

    work page 1987

  5. [4]

    Christodoulou, Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments , Phys

    D. Christodoulou, Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments , Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 1486

    work page 1991

  6. [5]

    Thorne, Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect , Phys

    K.S. Thorne, Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 520

    work page 1992

  7. [6]

    Zhang, C

    P.M. Zhang, C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, Soft gravitons and the memory effect for plane gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 064013 [ 1705.01378]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [7]

    Zhang, C

    P.M. Zhang, C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, The Memory Effect for Plane Gravitational Waves, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 743 [ 1704.05997]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 44 references
  1. [8]

    Flanagan, A.M

    E.E. Flanagan, A.M. Grant, A.I. Harte and D.A. Nichols, Persistent gravitational wave observables: general framework , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 084044 [ 1901.00021]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Seraj and B

    A. Seraj and B. Oblak, Gyroscopic Gravitational Memory, 2112.04535

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Seraj and B

    A. Seraj and B. Oblak, The Precession Caused by Gravitational Waves , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 061101 [ 2203.16216]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Pasterski, Asymptotic Symmetries and Electromagnetic Memory , JHEP 09 (2017) 154 [1505.00716]

    S. Pasterski, Asymptotic Symmetries and Electromagnetic Memory , JHEP 09 (2017) 154 [1505.00716]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Seraj and T

    A. Seraj and T. Neogi, Memory effects from holonomies , 2206.14110

    arXiv

  6. [13]

    Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory , 1703.05448

    A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory , 1703.05448

    arXiv

  7. [14]

    De Luca, J

    V. De Luca, J. Khoury and S.S.C. Wong, Gravitational memory and soft theorems: the local perspective, 2412.01910

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Barack et al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap , Class

    L. Barack et al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 143001 [ 1806.05195]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    S. Hou, T. Zhu and Z.-H. Zhu, Asymptotic analysis of Chern-Simons modified gravity and its memory effects, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 024025 [ 2109.04238]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet and D. Trestini, Gravitational waves in scalar-tensor theory to one-and-a-half post-Newtonian order , JCAP 08 (2022) 008 [ 2201.10924]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Gorji, T

    M.A. Gorji, T. Matsuda and S. Mukohyama, Cosmological memory effect in scalar-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 024013 [ 2204.09182]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Heisenberg, N

    L. Heisenberg, N. Yunes and J. Zosso, Gravitational wave memory beyond general relativity , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 024010 [ 2303.02021]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Trestini, Gravitational radiation of compact binary systems in general relativity and in scalar-tensor theories, Ph.D

    D. Trestini, Gravitational radiation of compact binary systems in general relativity and in scalar-tensor theories, Ph.D. thesis, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, France, Sorbonne Universit´ e, 2023. – 13 –

    2023

  14. [21]

    Ben Achour, M.A

    J. Ben Achour, M.A. Gorji and H. Roussille, Nonlinear gravitational waves in Horndeski gravity: scalar pulse and memories , JCAP 05 (2024) 026 [ 2401.05099]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Hou and Z.-H

    S. Hou and Z.-H. Zhu, Gravitational memory effects and Bondi-Metzner-Sachs symmetries in scalar-tensor theories, JHEP 01 (2021) 083 [ 2005.01310]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Tahura, D.A

    S. Tahura, D.A. Nichols, A. Saffer, L.C. Stein and K. Yagi, Brans-Dicke theory in Bondi-Sachs form: Asymptotically flat solutions, asymptotic symmetries and gravitational-wave memory effects , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 104026 [ 2007.13799]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Seraj, Gravitational breathing memory and dual symmetries , JHEP 05 (2021) 283 [2103.12185]

    A. Seraj, Gravitational breathing memory and dual symmetries , JHEP 05 (2021) 283 [2103.12185]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Tahura, D.A

    S. Tahura, D.A. Nichols and K. Yagi, Gravitational-wave memory effects in the Damour-Esposito-Far` ese extension of Brans-Dicke theory, 2501.07488

  19. [26]

    Koyama, Testing Brans-Dicke Gravity with Screening by Scalar Gravitational Wave Memory, Phys

    K. Koyama, Testing Brans-Dicke Gravity with Screening by Scalar Gravitational Wave Memory, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 021502 [ 2006.15914]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Bose, Aspects of tachyon theory , J

    S.K. Bose, Aspects of tachyon theory , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 196 (2009) 012022

    2009

  21. [28]

    Calcagni and A.R

    G. Calcagni and A.R. Liddle, Tachyon dark energy models: dynamics and constraints , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 043528 [ astro-ph/0606003]

    2006 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Sen, Rolling tachyon , JHEP 04 (2002) 048 [ hep-th/0203211]

    A. Sen, Rolling tachyon , JHEP 04 (2002) 048 [ hep-th/0203211]

    2002 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Fairbairn and M.H.G

    M. Fairbairn and M.H.G. Tytgat, Inflation from a tachyon fluid? , Phys. Lett. B 546 (2002) 1 [hep-th/0204070]

    2002 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Sen, Tachyon condensation on the brane anti-brane system , JHEP 08 (1998) 012 [hep-th/9805170]

    A. Sen, Tachyon condensation on the brane anti-brane system , JHEP 08 (1998) 012 [hep-th/9805170]

    1998 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Arutyunov, S

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, S. Theisen and A.A. Tseytlin, Tachyon condensation and universality of DBI action , JHEP 02 (2001) 002 [ hep-th/0012080]

    2001 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Rezaei Akbarieh and Y

    A. Rezaei Akbarieh and Y. Izadi, Tachyon Inflation in Teleparallel Gravity , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 366 [ 1812.06649]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Nozari and N

    K. Nozari and N. Rashidi, Some Aspects of Tachyon Field Cosmology , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 023519 [ 1306.5853]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Piao, Q.-G

    Y.-S. Piao, Q.-G. Huang, X.-m. Zhang and Y.-Z. Zhang, Nonminimally coupled tachyon and inflation, Phys. Lett. B 570 (2003) 1 [ hep-ph/0212219]

    2003 arXiv

  29. [36]

    M¨ adler and J

    T. M¨ adler and J. Winicour,Bondi-Sachs Formalism, Scholarpedia 11 (2016) 33528 [1609.01731]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Faye and A

    G. Faye and A. Seraj, Gyroscopic gravitational memory from quasi-circular binary systems , Class. Quant. Grav. 42 (2025) 035005 [ 2409.02624]

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    A.P. Saha, B. Sahoo and A. Sen, Proof of the classical soft graviton theorem in D = 4, JHEP 06 (2020) 153 [ 1912.06413]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Sahoo and A

    B. Sahoo and A. Sen, Classical soft graviton theorem rewritten , JHEP 01 (2022) 077 [2105.08739]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Comp` ere, S.E

    G. Comp` ere, S.E. Gralla and H. Wei,An asymptotic framework for gravitational scattering , Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023) 205018 [ 2303.17124]. – 14 –

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Favata, Gravitational-wave memory revisited: memory from the merger and recoil of binary black holes , J

    M. Favata, Gravitational-wave memory revisited: memory from the merger and recoil of binary black holes , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 154 (2009) 012043 [ 0811.3451]

    2009 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys

    S. Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) B516

    1965

  36. [44]

    Weinberg, Photons and Gravitons in S-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass , Phys

    S. Weinberg, Photons and Gravitons in S-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass , Phys. Rev. 135 (1964) B1049. – 15 –

    1964

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.