pith. sign in

arxiv: 1705.05263 · v1 · pith:CLADPXSEnew · submitted 2017-05-15 · 💻 cs.LG

Comparison of Maximum Likelihood and GAN-based training of Real NVPs

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords generatorwassersteinapproximatecriticlearninglikelihoodmaximumtrain
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We train a generator by maximum likelihood and we also train the same generator architecture by Wasserstein GAN. We then compare the generated samples, exact log-probability densities and approximate Wasserstein distances. We show that an independent critic trained to approximate Wasserstein distance between the validation set and the generator distribution helps detect overfitting. Finally, we use ideas from the one-shot learning literature to develop a novel fast learning critic.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Guided Image Generation with Conditional Invertible Neural Networks

    cs.CV 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Proposes cINN architecture for conditional image generation that by construction yields diverse sharp samples, demonstrated on MNIST digit generation and image colorization with latent space manipulation.

  2. Demystifying MMD GANs

    stat.ML 2018-01 accept novelty 6.0

    MMD GANs have unbiased critic gradients but biased generator gradients from sample-based learning, and the Kernel Inception Distance provides a practical new measure for GAN convergence and dynamic learning rate adaptation.

  3. Justifying Diagnosis Decisions by Deep Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A multi-task deep learning model maps frontal X-rays to continuous text for producing diagnoses, textual justifications, and alternative images, with expert study showing better justification than saliency maps.