Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Systematic Evaluation of GPT-3 for Zero-Shot Personality Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.01183 v1 pith:CLCSYDVK submitted 2023-06-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords gpt-3zero-shotperformancepersonalitysystematicclassificationclosehowever
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Very large language models (LLMs) perform extremely well on a spectrum of NLP tasks in a zero-shot setting. However, little is known about their performance on human-level NLP problems which rely on understanding psychological concepts, such as assessing personality traits. In this work, we investigate the zero-shot ability of GPT-3 to estimate the Big 5 personality traits from users' social media posts. Through a set of systematic experiments, we find that zero-shot GPT-3 performance is somewhat close to an existing pre-trained SotA for broad classification upon injecting knowledge about the trait in the prompts. However, when prompted to provide fine-grained classification, its performance drops to close to a simple most frequent class (MFC) baseline. We further analyze where GPT-3 performs better, as well as worse, than a pretrained lexical model, illustrating systematic errors that suggest ways to improve LLMs on human-level NLP tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Prompts Go Wrong: Evaluating Code Model Robustness to Ambiguous, Contradictory, and Incomplete Task Descriptions

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Code-generating LLMs lose 20 to 40 percentage points in pass rate when task descriptions are ambiguous, incomplete, or contradictory.

  2. Personality Prediction from Life Stories using Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A two-step model, sliding-window fine-tuned RoBERTa plus an attention GRU, predicts Big Five scores from life-narrative interviews with higher R2 than several transformer baselines.

Pith tools