REVIEW 1 cited by
SafeLife 1.0: Exploring Side Effects in Complex Environments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We present SafeLife, a publicly available reinforcement learning environment that tests the safety of reinforcement learning agents. It contains complex, dynamic, tunable, procedurally generated levels with many opportunities for unsafe behavior. Agents are graded both on their ability to maximize their explicit reward and on their ability to operate safely without unnecessary side effects. We train agents to maximize rewards using proximal policy optimization and score them on a suite of benchmark levels. The resulting agents are performant but not safe -- they tend to cause large side effects in their environments -- but they form a baseline against which future safety research can be measured.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Autonomous Alignment with Human Value on Altruism through Considerate Self-imagination and Theory of Mind
An RL agent trained with self-imagination and Theory-of-Mind intrinsic rewards balances its own task, rescuing others, and avoiding side effects in a small grid world.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.