Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SafeLife 1.0: Exploring Side Effects in Complex Environments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.01217 v2 pith:CLRCJLR6 submitted 2019-12-03 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords agentseffectssideabilitycomplexenvironmentslearninglevels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present SafeLife, a publicly available reinforcement learning environment that tests the safety of reinforcement learning agents. It contains complex, dynamic, tunable, procedurally generated levels with many opportunities for unsafe behavior. Agents are graded both on their ability to maximize their explicit reward and on their ability to operate safely without unnecessary side effects. We train agents to maximize rewards using proximal policy optimization and score them on a suite of benchmark levels. The resulting agents are performant but not safe -- they tend to cause large side effects in their environments -- but they form a baseline against which future safety research can be measured.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Autonomous Alignment with Human Value on Altruism through Considerate Self-imagination and Theory of Mind

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An RL agent trained with self-imagination and Theory-of-Mind intrinsic rewards balances its own task, rescuing others, and avoiding side effects in a small grid world.

Pith tools