Torsion in Tiling Homology and Cohomology
pith:CLUWTRVC Add to your LaTeX paper
What is a Pith Number?\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{CLUWTRVC}
Prints a linked pith:CLUWTRVC badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more
read the original abstract
The first author's recent unexpected discovery of torsion in the integral cohomology of the T\"ubingen Triangle Tiling has led to a re-evaluation of current descriptions of and calculational methods for the topological invariants associated with aperiodic tilings. The existence of torsion calls into question the previously assumed equivalence of cohomological and K-theoretic invariants as well as the supposed lack of torsion in the latter. In this paper we examine in detail the topological invariants of canonical projection tilings; we extend results of Forrest, Hunton and Kellendonk to give a full treatment of the torsion in the cohomology of such tilings in codimension at most 3, and present the additions and amendments needed to previous results and calculations in the literature. It is straightforward to give a complete treatment of the torsion components for tilings of codimension 1 and 2, but the case of codimension 3 is a good deal more complicated, and we illustrate our methods with the calculations of all four icosahedral tilings previously considered. Turning to the K-theoretic invariants, we show that cohomology and K-theory agree for all canonical projection tilings in (physical) dimension at most 3, thus proving the existence of torsion in, for example, the K-theory of the T\"ubingen Triangle Tiling. The question of the equivalence of cohomology and K-theory for tilings of higher dimensional euclidean space remains open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.