Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 84 references

Clay Edges Are Dynamic Proton-conducting Networks Modulated by Structure and pH

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Montmorillonite edges are dynamic proton-conducting networks whose acid-base reactivity is set by local structure, pH, and Mg-for-Al substitution.

desk verdict Nanosecond MLP-MD of a clay nanoparticle shows dynamic, pH-dependent edge proton transfer; the qualitative story is solid, but the unbenchmarked MLP makes the computed 2–4 kBT barriers more suggestive than quantitative. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15401 v1 pith:CNG7R3D3 submitted 2025-08-21 physics.chem-ph

Yixuan Feng , Xavier R. Advincula , Hongwei Fang , Christoph Schran This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords montmorilloniteclayedgesurfacesprotontransfermachinelearningpotentialamphotericsurfacereactivityisomorphicsubstitutionGrotthussmechanismclay-waterinterface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the edges of montmorillonite—sheets of aluminosilicate clay—are not static arrays of hydroxyl groups but dynamic, proton-conducting networks whose acid-base behavior depends on local structure, pH, and magnesium-for-aluminum substitution. Using a machine-learned potential trained on density-functional data, the authors ran nanosecond simulations of a hydrated clay nanoparticle in acidic, neutral, and basic water. They find clear amphoteric behavior—proton uptake in acid, release in base—and, even at neutral pH, frequent spontaneous proton transfers between silanol and aluminol edge groups, via both direct hops and water-bridged chains. If the picture holds, conventional static surface-complexation views of clay edges miss nanosecond charge fluctuations that affect ion exchange, catalysis, and contaminant binding.

What carries the argument

The central object is a machine-learned interatomic potential trained on density-functional reference data, which supplies enough accuracy to run nanosecond simulations of a fully solvated hexagonal montmorillonite nanoparticle with explicit water. The argument is carried by proton-transfer free-energy landscapes computed along collective coordinates (differences of O–H distances, or a signed reaction coordinate for chain transfers), resolved for two distinct B-edge aluminol environments: one that exchanges protons through a bridging water molecule and one that participates in direct chain-like hops with neighboring silanol and aluminol groups. These site-resolved free-energy surfaces are wh

What would settle it

Perform ab initio umbrella sampling for the two B-edge proton-transfer reactions in Fig. 3 (solvent-assisted, using the averaged coordinate xi, and direct chain) and compare the forward/reverse barriers (4.2/3.3 and 3.2/3.8 kBT) with the MLP-computed free-energy surfaces; a difference larger than about 1 kBT would falsify the transferability claim. An independent check would be pH-jump or isotopic-exchange kinetics on edge-enriched montmorillonite showing exchange on the predicted nanosecond scale.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that proton transfer at montmorillonite edges is a routine, directional event rather than a rare reaction. In neutral water, the simulations record hundreds of proton-transfer events per nanosecond at the B edge: an aluminol group (AlOH−) repeatedly acquires a proton from a neighboring AlOH2 or, through a bridging water molecule, from another surface hydroxyl; the free-energy barriers are a few kBT (for example, 4.2 kBT forward versus 3.3 kBT reverse for the solvent-assisted pathway), so the surface constantly fluctuates between protonation states. Acidic conditions protonate and stabilize the basic sites, suppressing further exchange; basic

Load-bearing premise

The whole picture depends on the machine-learned potential reproducing the true free-energy cost of moving protons at the clay edge; it is checked against lattice, interface, and water-structure properties, but its proton-transfer barriers are not directly benchmarked against ab initio or experimental values.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If clay edges conduct protons at neutral pH, edge surface charge is time-dependent, so models that assign each hydroxyl a fixed protonation state will misrepresent Coulomb interactions at clay-water interfaces.
  • Water at the edge is part of the reactive network: solvent-bridged pathways mean the hydration structure, not just the hydroxyl chemistry, sets proton-transfer rates.
  • Mg-for-Al substitution tunes edge reactivity by raising deprotonation barriers, so natural compositional heterogeneity should produce patches of clay edges with different proton-exchange activity.
  • Acidic solutions self-quench edge proton exchange after early protonation, while basic solutions open multiple transfer cascades; pH therefore changes not just equilibrium protonation but the kinetics of surface proton mobility.
  • Nanoparticle-scale simulation resolves events that static pKa models miss, giving a molecular basis for interpreting titration curves at the group level.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is that clay nanoparticles in soils and sediments act as transient proton reservoirs that buffer pH at the nanoscale; the asymmetry in kinetics (fast deprotonation in base, slow protonation in acid) could be measured directly with pH-jump experiments on edge-enriched clays.
  • The Grotthuss-like double-water cascades hint that long-range proton transport along connected edge networks could occur if edges are in contact; scanning electrochemical or surface-conductivity measurements on oriented clay films would test this.
  • Because substitution pattern changes barrier heights, synthetic clays with controlled Mg content might be designed to tune proton-hopping rates, a possible lever for catalytic or ion-exchange applications.
  • The paper's site-specific assignments could be tested by comparing predicted group-level protonation changes with spectroscopic titration, such as IR or NMR, of isotopically labeled edge-enriched montmorillonite.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses a MACE machine-learned potential (trained on revPBE-D3 reference data) to perform nanosecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations of a solvated hexagonal montmorillonite nanoparticle in solutions nominally at pH 0.44, 7, and 13.56, with three Mg-for-Al substitution patterns. The authors report pH-dependent protonation/deprotonation of edge hydroxyl groups, spontaneous and directional proton transfer at neutral pH via both direct and water-mediated pathways, and free-energy barriers for representative proton-transfer events in the range of roughly 2.2 to 4.2 kBT. They conclude that montmorillonite edges behave as dynamic, proton-conducting networks rather than static arrays of hydroxyl groups, and that isomorphic substitution modulates the local reactive landscape.

Significance. If the quantitative results are trustworthy, this is a significant contribution: it provides a molecular-scale, multi-nanosecond view of clay edge acid-base reactivity, goes beyond isolated AIMD snapshots, and offers a plausible resolution of apparently contradictory prior observations of transient versus directional proton transfer at clay edges. The paper is commendably explicit about the structural models, uses three substitution patterns, and cross-checks its qualitative amphoteric behavior against prior AIMD studies and experimental titration/pKa data. The direct observation of hundreds of proton-transfer events over 1.2 ns is a strength. The central caveats are that the MLP's accuracy for the specific quantity at issue—proton-transfer barriers and acid-base free energies—is not benchmarked, and that the pH label refers to initial ion concentrations rather than a maintained thermodynamic pH. These issues are load-bearing for the quantitative claims, but the qualitative phenomenology is likely robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.B, Fig. 3b-d; Supplementary S1-S2] The central quantitative claims rest on free-energy barriers of +2.2 to +4.2 kBT (about 1.3–2.5 kcal/mol). These are extracted from MACE-MLP trajectories and PTFELs, yet the MLP is validated only against lattice constants, interfacial energetics, and water structure (Supplementary S1-S2), not against reference AIMD or experimentally derived acid-base free energies for proton transfer at edge sites. Because MLP force errors are often in the 1–2 kcal/mol range and PT barriers are especially sensitive to the exchange-correlation functional and transition-state sampling, an unvalidated shift of even 1 kcal/mol could alter the directionality, the characterization of events as 'spontaneous,' and the thermodynamic bias inferred from the PTFELs. The authors should benchmark the MLP against DFT/AIMD for representative PT pathways (e.g., recompute the PTFELs for the site-1 and site-2 mechanisms at
  2. [Section II.A, Fig. 2a] The labels 'pH 0.44,' 'pH 7,' and 'pH 13.56' are initial solution compositions, not maintained equilibrium pH values. Figure 2a shows the net proton excess in the aqueous phase drifting from about +5 and -5 toward zero over 1.2 ns, indicating that the solution chemical potential changes during the simulation and that the systems equilibrate toward different effective pH values. Many analyses, including the final-200 ps population distributions and the protonation timescales, are therefore tied to a transient, time-dependent solution state rather than a well-defined pH. The authors should either implement a proton reservoir/constant-pH scheme, or explicitly track and report the time-dependent H3O+ and OH- activities and frame pH-dependent conclusions as initial-condition-dependent observations. This is particularly important for the quantitative claims about protonation kinetics (e.g., 'n
  3. [Section II.C, solvent-assisted PT between two SiOH groups] The paper itself notes that some pathways were observed only 'once or twice over the full 1.2 ns simulations, making it challenging to resolve a well-sampled free energy pathway,' yet a two-dimensional PTFEL is presented for this process and used to argue that the transition 'lacks continuous low-energy pathways.' With two observed events, the free-energy surface cannot be statistically converged, and the placement of minima and barriers is not reliable. The same concern applies to the hydroxide-like configurations in Fig. 3 that are described but not shown. The authors should mark such PTFELs as illustrative, provide sampling statistics and error estimates, or omit them from the quantitative conclusions. The qualitatively observed event is still informative, but the free-energy barriers derived from it are not.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II.A] Typographical errors: 'ampotheric nature of montmorrilonite' should be 'amphoteric nature of montmorillonite'; 'no earlier tha 634 ps' is missing an 'n'.
  2. [Figure 3] The notation for the averaged reaction coordinate uses ξ = (ξ1 + ξ2)/2 in the text but the figure caption mixes ξ and 'x' or other symbols. Please unify the notation so the reader can directly identify the collective variables used in the PTFEL.
  3. [Section II.C, Fig. 4] The double-water-mediated pathway is described as a 'delocalized proton hole migrating across the hydrogen-bond network' characteristic of Grotthuss-like dynamics. This is an important mechanistic statement, but no structural order parameters (e.g., coordination numbers or hydrogen-bond populations) are provided to support the 'delocalized' characterization. Adding such analysis would strengthen the claim.
  4. [Methods / Supplementary S1] The training set description is vague: 'encompassed bulk aqueous solutions and clay-water interface structures under a range of pH conditions.' The authors should specify how many configurations were generated, whether transition-state or proton-transfer configurations were explicitly sampled, and what the force/energy errors are for proton-transfer coordinates specifically. This would directly address the central validation concern.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central claims emerge from MLP-MD simulations and are benchmarked against independent AIMD and experimental data.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—amphoteric edge behavior and dynamic proton-conducting networks—are emergent results of nanosecond-scale MLP-MD simulations, not fitted outputs. The MACE MLP is trained on revPBE-D3 energies and forces, and the observed protonation/deprotonation statistics, PT event frequencies, and PTFEL barriers are computed from the learned potential, not taken from the training targets. The paper validates the MLP against lattice properties, interfacial energetics, and aqueous structure (Supplementary S1–S2), and cross-checks its reactivity findings against previous AIMD studies (e.g., refs. 26–31) and experimental titration data. No equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to an input by construction; the PTFELs are derived from collective variables and free-energy sampling, independent of the training labels. While the MLP's PT barriers are not directly benchmarked against AIMD, that is a validation gap (a correctness risk) rather than circularity. Self-citations to prior MLP method papers are contextual and do not carry the load of the present conclusions. Therefore, no circular step can be identified by the paper's own derivations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or free parameters. The key assumptions are the accuracy of the revPBE-D3-based MLP for reactive proton transfer, the representativeness of the single hexagonal nanoparticle with three substitution patterns, and the correspondence between initial ion counts and effective solution pH.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption revPBE-D3 DFT provides sufficient accuracy for acid-base chemistry and proton transfer at clay edges.
    The MLP is trained on revPBE-D3 reference data; the paper claims first-principles accuracy but does not benchmark PT barriers against higher-level theory or experiment.
  • domain assumption The hexagonal nanoparticle with four AC edges, two B edges, and three Mg-for-Al substitutions represents natural montmorillonite edge reactivity.
    Edge prevalence is based on AFM/MD references, but the ideal hexagonal symmetry is acknowledged as rare in nature; a single 2-3 nm particle may not capture the full heterogeneity of real clay edges.
  • domain assumption The nominal pH values (0.44, 7, 13.56) correspond to the effective solution pH during the simulation.
    pH is set by adding excess hydronium or hydroxide ions with counterions; as the particle takes up or releases protons, the aqueous proton excess changes, so the effective pH drifts over the trajectory.
  • domain assumption The MACE machine learning potential generalizes to the simulated range of pH and chemical environments.
    The training set includes bulk solutions and clay-water interfaces under varying pH, but the reliability for proton transfer barriers is not independently validated in the text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Clay Edges Are Dynamic Proton-conducting Networks Modulated by Structure and pH." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CNG7R3D3

@misc{pith2026250815401,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Clay Edges Are Dynamic Proton-conducting Networks Modulated by Structure and pH},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CNG7R3D3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15401}
}
read the original abstract

Montmorillonite, a ubiquitous clay mineral, plays a vital role in geochemical and environmental processes due to its chemically complex edge surfaces. However, the molecular-scale acid-base reactivity of these interfaces remains poorly understood due to the limitations of both experimental resolution and conventional simulations. Here, we employ machine learning potentials with first-principles accuracy to perform nanosecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations of montmorillonite nanoparticles across a range of pH. Our results reveal clear amphoteric behavior: edge sites undergo protonation in acidic environments and deprotonation in basic conditions. Even at neutral pH, spontaneous and directional proton transfer events are common, proceeding via both direct and solvent-mediated pathways. These findings demonstrate that montmorillonite edges are not static arrays of hydroxyl groups but dynamic, proton-conducting networks whose reactivity is modulated by local structure and solution conditions. This work offers a molecular-level framework for understanding proton transport and buffering in clay-water systems, with broad implications for catalysis, ion exchange, and environmental remediation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author D. M. \ Rempe \ and\ author W. E. \ Dietrich ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800141115 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 115 ,\ pages 2664 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1800141115 2018

  2. [2]

    author author J. D. \ Hemingway , author D. H. \ Rothman , author K. E. \ Grant , author S. Z. \ Rosengard , author T. I. \ Eglinton , author L. A. \ Derry ,\ and\ author V. V. \ Galy ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1280-6 journal journal Nature \ volume 570 ,\ pages 228 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1280-6 2019

  3. [3]

    author author M. L. \ Whittaker , author D. Ren , author C. Ophus , author Y. Zhang , author L. Waller , author B. Gilbert ,\ and\ author J. F. \ Banfield ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31004-0 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 13 ,\ pages 3382 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31004-0 2022

  4. [4]

    author author G. C. \ Sosso , author T. Li , author D. Donadio , author G. A. \ Tribello ,\ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01013 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 7 ,\ pages 2350 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01013 2016

  5. [5]

    Liu , author C

    author author X. Liu , author C. Tournassat , author S. Grangeon , author A. G. \ Kalinichev , author Y. Takahashi ,\ and\ author M. Marques Fernandes ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00301-z journal journal Nature Reviews Earth & Environment \ volume 3 ,\ pages 461 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00301-z 2022

  6. [6]

    Sellin \ and\ author O

    author author P. Sellin \ and\ author O. X. \ Leupin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2013.0610601 journal journal Clays and Clay Minerals \ volume 61 ,\ pages 477–498 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    author author M. K. \ Uddin ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.029 journal journal Chemical Engineering Journal \ volume 308 ,\ pages 438 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.029 2016

  8. [8]

    Borisover \ and\ author J

    author author M. Borisover \ and\ author J. A. \ Davis ,\ in\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100027-4.00002-4 booktitle Natural and Engineered Clay Barriers ,\ series Developments in Clay Science , Vol. volume 6 ,\ editor edited by\ editor C. Tournassat , editor C. I. \ Steefel , editor I. C. \ Bourg ,\ and\ editor F. Bergaya \ ( publis...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100027-4.00002-4 2015

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    author author K. I. \ Garc , author G. R. \ Quezada , author L. Arum , author R. Urrutia ,\ and\ author P. G. \ Toledo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05995 journal journal Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 125 ,\ pages 21179 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    author author B. R. \ Bickmore , author D. Bosbach , author M. F. O. J. H. \ JR. , author L. Charlet ,\ and\ author E. Rufe ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2001-0404 journal journal American min \ volume 86 ,\ pages 411 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  3. [11]

    Li , author J

    author author D. Li , author J. Chun , author D. Xiao , author W. Zhou , author H. Cai , author L. Zhang , author K. M. \ Rosso , author C. J. \ Mundy , author G. K. \ Schenter ,\ and\ author J. J. D. \ Yoreo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1621186114 journal journal Proceedin...

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    author author A. M. \ Borst , author M. P. \ Smith , author A. A. \ Finch , author G. Estrade , author C. Villanova-de Benavent , author P. Nason , author E. Marquis , author N. J. \ Horsburgh , author K. M. \ Goodenough , author C. Xu , author J. Kynick \'y ,\ and\ author K. ...

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    author author K. J. \ Li , author A. Kurniawan , author G. E. \ Christidis , author J. Y. \ He ,\ and\ author C. H. \ Zhou ,\ https://doi.org/doi:10.2138/am-2022-8834 journal journal American Mineralogist \ volume 109 ,\ pages 633 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    Sposito , author N

    author author G. Sposito , author N. T. \ Skipper , author R. Sutton , author S. H. \ Park , author A. K. \ Soper ,\ and\ author J. A. \ Greathouse ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3358 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of...

    1999 doi

  7. [15]

    Tombácz \ and\ author M

    author author E. Tombácz \ and\ author M. Szekeres ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2004.01.001 journal journal Applied Clay Science \ volume 27 ,\ pages 75 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    Tombácz \ and\ author M

    author author E. Tombácz \ and\ author M. Szekeres ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2006.05.009 journal journal Applied Clay Science \ volume 34 ,\ pages 105 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  9. [17]

    Schultz \ and\ author T

    author author C. Schultz \ and\ author T. Grundl ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.023 journal journal Chemosphere \ volume 57 ,\ pages 1301 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  10. [18]

    Duc , author F

    author author M. Duc , author F. Gaboriaud ,\ and\ author F. Thomas ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.03.060 journal journal Journal of Colloid and Interface Science \ volume 289 ,\ pages 139 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  11. [19]

    Baeyens \ and\ author M

    author author B. Baeyens \ and\ author M. H. \ Bradbury ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(97)00008-9 journal journal Journal of Contaminant Hydrology \ volume 27 ,\ pages 199 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  12. [20]

    Duc , author F

    author author M. Duc , author F. Thomas ,\ and\ author F. Gaboriaud ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.04.081 journal journal Journal of Colloid and Interface Science \ volume 300 ,\ pages 616 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  13. [21]

    author author I. C. \ Bourg , author G. Sposito ,\ and\ author A. C. \ Bourg ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.03.062 journal journal Journal of Colloid and Interface Science \ volume 312 ,\ pages 297 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  14. [22]

    Tournassat , author S

    author author C. Tournassat , author S. Grangeon , author P. Leroy ,\ and\ author E. Giffaut ,\ https://doi.org/10.2475/05.2013.01 journal journal American Journal of Science \ volume 313 ,\ pages 395 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    Tournassat , author J

    author author C. Tournassat , author J. A. \ Davis , author C. Chiaberge , author S. Grangeon ,\ and\ author I. C. \ Bourg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04677 journal journal Environmental Science & Technology \ volume 50 ,\ pages 13436 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Schoonheydt \ and\ author C

    author author R. Schoonheydt \ and\ author C. Johnston ,\ in\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-4352(05)01003-2 booktitle Handbook of Clay Science ,\ series Developments in Clay Science , Vol. volume 1 ,\ editor edited by\ editor F. Bergaya , editor B. K. \ Theng ,...

    2006 doi

  17. [25]

    author author S. V. \ Churakov \ and\ author X. Liu ,\ in\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102432-4.00003-2 booktitle Surface and Interface Chemistry of Clay Minerals ,\ series Developments in Clay Science , Vol. volume 9 ,\ editor edited by\ editor R. Schoon...

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    Liu , author X

    author author X. Liu , author X. Lu , author M. Sprik , author J. Cheng , author E. J. \ Meijer ,\ and\ author R. Wang ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.04.008 journal journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta \ volume 117 ,\ pages 180 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    Liu , author J

    author author X. Liu , author J. Cheng , author M. Sprik , author X. Lu ,\ and\ author R. Wang ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.044 journal journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta \ volume 140 ,\ pages 410 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    Tazi , author B

    author author S. Tazi , author B. Rotenberg , author M. Salanne , author M. Sprik ,\ and\ author M. Sulpizi ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.07.010 journal journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta \ volume 94 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  21. [29]

    Liu , author J

    author author X. Liu , author J. Cheng , author M. Sprik , author X. Lu ,\ and\ author R. Wang ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.07.015 journal journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta \ volume 168 ,\ pages 293 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    author author J. L. \ Suter , author L. Kabalan , author M. Khader ,\ and\ author P. V. \ Coveney ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.07.013 journal journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta \ volume 169 ,\ pages 17 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  23. [31]

    author author S. V. \ Churakov ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.11.026 journal journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta \ volume 71 ,\ pages 1130 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  24. [32]

    Schran , author F

    author author C. Schran , author F. L. \ Thiemann , author P. Rowe , author E. A. \ Müller , author O. Marsalek ,\ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110077118 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 118 ,\ pages e21100...

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    Kobayashi , author A

    author author K. Kobayashi , author A. Yamaguchi ,\ and\ author M. Okumura ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2022.106596 journal journal Applied Clay Science \ volume 228 ,\ pages 106596 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  26. [34]

    Shepherd , author G

    author author S. Shepherd , author G. A. \ Tribello ,\ and\ author D. M. \ Wilkins ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0152361 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 158 ,\ pages 204704 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Sanz , author A.-R

    author author C. Sanz , author A.-R. \ Allouche , author C. Bousige ,\ and\ author P. Mignon ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c00406 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 129 ,\ pages 3567 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    Dell’Angelo , author J

    author author D. Dell’Angelo , author J. Lain \'e , author H. Said , author Y. Foucaud ,\ and\ author M. Badawi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c03288 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 128 ,\ pages 11447 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    author author A. S. \ Raman \ and\ author A. Selloni ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0217720 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 160 ,\ pages 244708 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Gomez , author W

    author author A. Gomez , author W. H. \ Thompson ,\ and\ author D. Laage ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-024-01593-y journal journal Nature Chemistry \ ( year 2024 ),\ 10.1038/s41557-024-01593-y NoStop

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    Hellstr \"o m \ and\ author J

    author author M. Hellstr \"o m \ and\ author J. Behler ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01448 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 7 ,\ pages 3302 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    Nakanishi , author S

    author author A. Nakanishi , author S. Kasamatsu , author J. Haruyama ,\ and\ author O. Sugino ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c05857 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 129 ,\ pages 2403 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    author author X. R. \ Advincula , author K. D. \ Fong , author A. Michaelides ,\ and\ author C. Schran ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5c02053 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 19 ,\ pages 17728 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    author author G. N. \ White \ and\ author L. W. \ Zelazny ,\ https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1988.0360207 journal journal Clays and Clay Minerals \ volume 36 ,\ pages 141–146 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988

  35. [43]

    author author S. V. \ Kraevsky , author C. Tournassat , author M. Vayer , author F. Warmont , author S. Grangeon , author B. F. \ Ngouana Wakou ,\ and\ author A. G. \ Kalinichev ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2020.105442 journal journal Applied Clay Science ...

    2020

  36. [44]

    author author S. V. \ Churakov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp053874m journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry B \ volume 110 ,\ pages 4135 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  37. [45]

    Batatia , author D

    author author I. Batatia , author D. P. \ Kovács , author G. N. C. \ Simm , author C. Ortner ,\ and\ author G. Csányi ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07697 title Mace: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force f...

    2023 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    Liu , author X

    author author X. Liu , author X. Lu , author E. J. \ Meijer , author R. Wang ,\ and\ author H. Zhou ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.12.009 journal journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta \ volume 81 ,\ pages 56 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  39. [47]

    author author M. E. \ Tuckerman , author D. Marx ,\ and\ author M. Parrinello ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00797 journal journal Nature \ volume 417 ,\ pages 925 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  40. [48]

    Quaranta , author M

    author author V. Quaranta , author M. Hellstr \"o m ,\ and\ author J. Behler ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00358 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1476 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  41. [49]

    Barakan \ and\ author V

    author author S. Barakan \ and\ author V. Aghazadeh ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10985-9 journal journal Environmental Science and Pollution Research \ volume 28 ,\ pages 2572 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    author author R. A. \ Schoonheydt ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.12.005 journal journal Applied Clay Science \ volume 131 ,\ pages 107 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    Ochirkhuyag \ and\ author J

    author author A. Ochirkhuyag \ and\ author J. Temuujin ,\ https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060629 journal journal Minerals \ volume 14 ( year 2024 ),\ 10.3390/min14060629 NoStop

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    Lan , author Y

    author author Y. Lan , author Y. Liu , author J. Li , author D. Chen , author G. He ,\ and\ author I. P. \ Parkin ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202004036 journal journal Advanced Science \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2004036 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    author author D. P. \ Kovács , author I. Batatia , author E. S. \ Arany ,\ and\ author G. Csányi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0155322 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 159 ,\ pages 044118 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    author author T. D. \ Kühne , author M. Iannuzzi , author M. Del Ben , author V. V. \ Rybkin , author P. Seewald , author F. Stein , author T. Laino , author R. Z. \ Khaliullin , author O. Schütt , author F. Schiffmann , author D. Golze , author J. Wilhelm , author S. Chulkov ...

    2020

  47. [55]

    O’Neill , author B

    author author N. O’Neill , author B. X. \ Shi , author K. Fong , author A. Michaelides ,\ and\ author C. Schran ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01030 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 15 ,\ pages 6081 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  48. [56]

    author author J. P. \ Perdew , author K. Burke ,\ and\ author M. Ernzerhof ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 3865 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  49. [57]

    Zhang \ and\ author W

    author author Y. Zhang \ and\ author W. Yang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.890 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 890 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  50. [58]

    Grimme , author J

    author author S. Grimme , author J. Antony , author S. Ehrlich ,\ and\ author H. Krieg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 132 ,\ pages 154104 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  51. [59]

    Zen , author L

    author author A. Zen , author L. M. \ Roch , author S. J. \ Cox , author X. L. \ Hu , author S. Sorella , author D. Alfè ,\ and\ author A. Michaelides ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09559 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 120 ,\ pages 26402 ( ...

    2016 doi

  52. [60]

    Marsalek \ and\ author T

    author author O. Marsalek \ and\ author T. E. \ Markland ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00391 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1545 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  53. [61]

    Goedecker , author M

    author author S. Goedecker , author M. Teter ,\ and\ author J. Hutter ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 54 ,\ pages 1703 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  54. [62]

    author author A. P. \ Thompson , author H. M. \ Aktulga , author R. Berger , author D. S. \ Bolintineanu , author W. M. \ Brown , author P. S. \ Crozier , author P. J. \ in 't Veld , author A. Kohlmeyer , author S. G. \ Moore , author T. D. \ Nguyen , author R. Shan , author M...

    2021

  55. [63]

    Matsumoto ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2431168 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 126 ,\ pages 054503 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    author author M. Matsumoto ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2431168 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 126 ,\ pages 054503 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  56. [64]

    The crystal structures of 2 m 1 phengite and 2 m 1 muscovite

    Necip Güven. The crystal structures of 2 m 1 phengite and 2 m 1 muscovite. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials , 134:196--212, 1971

    1971

  57. [65]

    Norman White and L

    G. Norman White and L. W. Zelazny. Analysis and implications of the edge structure of dioctahedral phyllosilicates. Clays and Clay Minerals , 36(2):141–146, 1988

    1988

  58. [66]

    Kraevsky, Christophe Tournassat, Marylène Vayer, Fabienne Warmont, Sylvain Grangeon, Brice F

    Sergey V. Kraevsky, Christophe Tournassat, Marylène Vayer, Fabienne Warmont, Sylvain Grangeon, Brice F. Ngouana Wakou , and Andrey G. Kalinichev. Identification of montmorillonite particle edge orientations by atomic-force microscopy. Applied Clay Science , 186:105442, 2020

    2020

  59. [67]

    Newton and Garrison Sposito

    Aric G. Newton and Garrison Sposito. Molecular dynamics simulations of pyrophyllite edge surfaces: Structure, surface energies, and solvent accessibility. Clays and Clay Minerals , 63(4):277–289, 2015

    2015

  60. [68]

    Newton, Kideok D

    Aric G. Newton, Kideok D. Kwon, and Dae-Kyo Cheong. Edge structure of montmorillonite from atomistic simulations. Minerals , 6(2), 2016

    2016

  61. [69]

    Kwon and Aric G

    Kideok D. Kwon and Aric G. Newton. Structure and stability of pyrophyllite edge surfaces: Effect of temperature and water chemical potential. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta , 190:100--114, 2016

    2016

  62. [70]

    Thompson, H

    Aidan P. Thompson, H. Metin Aktulga, Richard Berger, Dan S. Bolintineanu, W. Michael Brown, Paul S. Crozier, Pieter J. in 't Veld , Axel Kohlmeyer, Stan G. Moore, Trung Dac Nguyen, Ray Shan, Mark J. Stevens, Julien Tranchida, Christian Trott, and Steven J. Plimpton. Lammps - a...

    2022

  63. [71]

    Elena, Dávid P

    Ilyes Batatia, Philipp Benner, Yuan Chiang, Alin M. Elena, Dávid P. Kovács, Janosh Riebesell, Xavier R. Advincula, Mark Asta, Matthew Avaylon, William J. Baldwin, Fabian Berger, Noam Bernstein, Arghya Bhowmik, Samuel M. Blau, Vlad Cărare, James P. Darby, Sandip De, Flaviano De...

    2024

  64. [72]

    Kühne, Marcella Iannuzzi, Mauro Del Ben, Vladimir V

    Thomas D. Kühne, Marcella Iannuzzi, Mauro Del Ben, Vladimir V. Rybkin, Patrick Seewald, Frederick Stein, Teodoro Laino, Rustam Z. Khaliullin, Ole Schütt, Florian Schiffmann, Dorothea Golze, Jan Wilhelm, Sergey Chulkov, Mohammad Hossein Bani-Hashemian, Valéry Weber, Urban Boršt...

    2020

  65. [73]

    Shi, Kara Fong, Angelos Michaelides, and Christoph Schran

    Niamh O’Neill, Benjamin X. Shi, Kara Fong, Angelos Michaelides, and Christoph Schran. To pair or not to pair? machine-learned explicitly-correlated electronic structure for nacl in water. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , 15(23):6081--6091, 2024

    2024

  66. [74]

    Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 77:3865--3868, Oct 1996

    1996

  67. [75]

    Comment on ``generalized gradient approximation made simple''

    Yingkai Zhang and Weitao Yang. Comment on ``generalized gradient approximation made simple''. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 80:890--890, Jan 1998

    1998

  68. [76]

    A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu

    Stefan Grimme, Jens Antony, Stephan Ehrlich, and Helge Krieg. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 132(15):154104, 04 2010

    2010

  69. [77]

    Markland

    Ondrej Marsalek and Thomas E. Markland. Quantum dynamics and spectroscopy of ab initio liquid water: The interplay of nuclear and electronic quantum effects. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , 8(7):1545--1551, 2017

    2017

  70. [78]

    Tribello, and David M

    Sam Shepherd, Gareth A. Tribello, and David M. Wilkins. A fully quantum-mechanical treatment for kaolinite. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 158(20):204704, 05 2023

    2023

  71. [79]

    Goedecker, M

    S. Goedecker, M. Teter, and J. Hutter. Separable dual-space gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B , 54:1703--1710, Jul 1996

    1996

  72. [80]

    Ilyes Batatia, Dávid Péter Kovács, Gregor N. C. Simm, Christoph Ortner, and Gábor Csányi. Mace: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields, 2023

    2023

  73. [81]

    Evaluation of the mace force field architecture: From medicinal chemistry to materials science

    Dávid Péter Kovács, Ilyes Batatia, Eszter Sára Arany, and Gábor Csányi. Evaluation of the mace force field architecture: From medicinal chemistry to materials science. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 159(4):044118, 07 2023

    2023

  74. [82]

    Single crystal x-ray refinement of pyrophyllite-1tc

    Jung Hoo Lee and Stephen Guggenheim. Single crystal x-ray refinement of pyrophyllite-1tc. American Mineralogist , 66(3-4):350--357, 04 1981

    1981

  75. [83]

    Skinner, Congcong Huang, Daniel Schlesinger, Lars G

    Lawrie B. Skinner, Congcong Huang, Daniel Schlesinger, Lars G. M. Pettersson, Anders Nilsson, and Chris J. Benmore. Benchmark oxygen-oxygen pair-distribution function of ambient water from x-ray diffraction measurements with a wide q-range. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 13...

    2013

  76. [84]

    Relevance of hydrogen bond definitions in liquid water

    Masakazu Matsumoto. Relevance of hydrogen bond definitions in liquid water. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 126(5):054503, 02 2007

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.