Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Excitron-Induced Pair Fluctuations Reveal Superconductivity in the Electron Gas

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read First-principles self-energy calculations place a superconducting transition in the dilute 3D electron gas at r_s ≈ 8, with T_c ≈ 1 K, driven by one-dimensional excitron-mediated pair fluctuations.

desk verdict Serious FGWGamma computation points to a Tc ~1K superconducting instability in the dilute 3D electron gas, but the key 1D fluctuation premise is imported from earlier work and carries the whole identification. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08498 v1 pith:CNUEPGGL submitted 2026-08-09 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Yasutami Takada This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
keywords superconductivityelectrongasplasmonmechanismexcitronsuperconductingfluctuationsself-energypseudogapnon-Fermiliquid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the clean three-dimensional electron gas becomes superconducting at low density, with a transition temperature of about 1 K at the density parameter $r_s \approx 8$, and that the transition appears as a sharp divergence in the electron self-energy computed from first principles. That divergence occurs in the renormalization function $Z(K) \equiv 1 - \mathrm{Im}\,\Sigma(K)/\omega_n$ at $T \approx 10^{-4}\varepsilon_F$ and is read as the normal-state signature of a second-order superconducting transition. The proposed physical channel is the excitron, a quasi-one-dimensional composite of an electron and longitudinal electron-hole pairs, whose virtual excitations make the superconducting fluctuations effectively one-dimensional. The paper matches the computed fluctuation self-energy to an analytic form with a characteristic $\omega^{-6}$ high-frequency tail. If correct, the result settles a longstanding controversy over phonon-free superconductivity in the uniform electron gas and ties the dilute-gas problem to pseudogap and strange-metal-like anomalies.

What carries the argument

The central object is the excitron, a quasi-one-dimensional electronic composite formed by an electron and longitudinal electron-hole pairs, introduced in the author's earlier work and used here as the carrier of the superconducting-fluctuation channel. The numerical engine is the functional $GW\Gamma$ method: a fully self-consistent loop for $\Sigma(K)$ built from the Hedin equation with a vertex that satisfies the Ward identity and conservation laws, so all fluctuation effects are encoded in the normal-state self-energy without modeling them explicitly. The analytic machinery is the excitron-induced fluctuation self-energy $\Sigma_{\mathrm{sc}}^{(b)}(K)$, Eq. (C1), in which phase-space restrictions fix the pair-fluctuation momentum to a small longitudinal $\delta Q$, reducing the integral to one dimension and producing the high-frequency tail proportional to $\xi(T)\,\omega^{-6}$ of Eq. (C6). A decomposition of $Z(K)$ into normal quasiparticle, excitron, and superconducting-fluctuation parts isolates $Z_{\mathrm{sc}}(k_F,i\omega_n)$, whose fit to Eq. (4) yields the coherence length, quasiparticle lifetime, and $T_c$.

What would settle it

An independent, conserving calculation of the normal-state self-energy of the 3D electron gas at $r_s = 8.0$ and $T/\varepsilon_F = 2 \times 10^{-4}$ that does not impose one-dimensional excitron kinematics would settle the claim: if the high-frequency fluctuation tail decays as $\omega_n^{-3/2}$ rather than $\omega_n^{-6}$, or if no divergence in $Z(k_F,i\omega_n)$ develops as $r_s$ approaches 8.07, the paper's central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the fully self-consistent, conserving first-principles self-energy of the low-density three-dimensional electron gas contains a divergence in the renormalization function $Z(K) \equiv 1 - \mathrm{Im}\,\Sigma(K)/\omega_n$ at $r_s \approx 8$ and $T \approx 10^{-4}\varepsilon_F$, signaling a second-order phase transition to a superconducting state with $T_c \approx 1\,\mathrm{K}$. The transition is attributed to superconducting fluctuations that become one-dimensional because they propagate through the excitron, a quasi-1D composite of an electron bound to a longitudinal electron-hole polarization field. The numerical fluctuation component $Z_{\mathrm{sc}}(k_F,i\omega_n)$ decays as $\omega_n^{-6}$ at high frequency and approaches $\omega_n^{-1}$ toward $\omega_n \to 0$; the paper shows a 3D Cooper-pair fluctuation channel would give $\omega_n^{-3/2}$ and is therefore ruled out, while the excitron-induced 1D channel reproduces both the measured tail and its growth as the transition is approached. Near the transition, the calculation yields a pseudogap in the density of states and an inverse quasiparticle lifetime linear in $T$, read as further evidence of superconducting fluctuations in a non-Fermi-liquid normal state.

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument rests on the claim, taken from the author's earlier work and not re-derived here, that the excitron is effectively one-dimensional, so the superconducting-fluctuation momentum has only a small longitudinal component. If that phase-space restriction is not exact, the $\omega^{-6}$ tail that labels the transition has no foundation and the identification of the divergence with superconductivity does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The dilute 3D electron gas is superconducting at $r_s\approx 8$ with $T_c\approx 1$ K, so phonon-free superconductivity in the uniform electron gas is realized, not forbidden.
  • Because paramagnetic impurities would suppress p-wave but not s-wave pairing, the implied superconducting state is s-wave.
  • Just above $T_c$, the normal state is not a Fermi liquid: the inverse quasiparticle lifetime is linear in $T$ and a pseudogap opens near the Fermi level.
  • The new $T_c$ values agree with earlier plasmon-mechanism gap-equation results from the KO ansatz, but the slope mismatch near $r_s\approx 8$ indicates the KO effective interaction needs refinement.
  • The critical behavior is governed by a one-dimensional fluctuation channel, with coherence-length exponent $\nu=0.5$ at $r_s=7.8$–$7.9$ and $\nu=0.65\pm0.05$ at $r_s=8.0$, rather than by standard 3D fluctuation theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: an independent calculation of the one-particle Green's function at $r_s \approx 8$ that does not assume one-dimensional excitron kinematics should be checked for the $\omega^{-6}$ tail; observing $\omega^{-3/2}$ would indicate the excitron premise, not superconductivity, is doing the work.
  • If the quasi-1D premise holds, the same $\omega^{-6}$ fluctuation signature could serve as a diagnostic for superconducting fluctuations in other dilute electronic systems, including a 2D electron gas near its Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition.
  • The paper does not compute transport; if the linear-in-$T$ inverse lifetime carries over to conductivity, the calculation predicts linear-in-$T$ resistivity in the dilute gas, a direct experimental test.
  • Because $r_s \approx 8$ sits near the Wigner-crystal boundary, a natural next question not addressed here is how the one-dimensional superconducting fluctuations compete with charge ordering as density is lowered further.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims to identify, from first-principles FGWΓ self-energy calculations of the three-dimensional homogeneous electron gas, a sharp divergence in the renormalization function Z(K) at r_s ≈ 8 and T ≈ 10^{-4} ε_F, which it interprets as a second-order superconducting transition driven by one-dimensional superconducting fluctuations mediated by a quasi-1D composite called the excitron. The evidence includes a bump-to-peak crossover in Z(K), a pseudogap in the density of states, a linear-in-T inverse quasiparticle lifetime, and an ω^{-6} high-frequency tail in the extracted superconducting-fluctuation component Z_sc(k_F, iω_n). By fitting this component to a dirty-superconductor formula, the author extracts T_c values around 0.58–1.79 K and critical exponents, and compares them with earlier plasmon-mechanism gap-equation results.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this would be a substantial result: first-principles evidence for superconductivity in the clean dilute 3D electron gas, with a new quasi-1D fluctuation channel and quantitative T_c estimates consistent with earlier plasmon-mediated calculations. The paper has real strengths: it uses a self-consistent conserving scheme with a Ward-identity-respecting vertex, and it reports agreement with quantum Monte Carlo and experimental quasiparticle data at metallic densities. The predicted ω^{-6} tail is in principle falsifiable, and the pseudogap and linear-in-T lifetime provide additional, potentially testable signatures. However, the interpretation rests on load-bearing assumptions that are not established in this manuscript, especially the quasi-1D reduction of the superconducting fluctuation channel and the controlled extraction of Z_sc from the numerical self-energy.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix C, Eqs. (C4)–(C6)] The ω^{-6} high-frequency tail, which is the main quantitative marker identifying superconductivity, is derived only after reducing the Cooper-pair propagator sum to a one-dimensional integral over q_∥ with an effective transverse area S_eff. This 1D reduction is asserted from Ref. [26] via the statement that phase-space restrictions render the excitron effectively one-dimensional, but it is not re-derived or independently verified here. If the transverse momentum integral is not actually frozen, the same diagram should be evaluated as a 3D fluctuation integral, and the leading tail would follow Eq. (B8) as ω^{-3/2}, not ω^{-6}; the claimed agreement with Fig. 1(e) would then collapse. The manuscript needs either a self-contained derivation of the 1D kinematics or a numerical/independent check that the q_⊥ integral is frozen.
  2. [§IV and Appendix D] There is a fitting loop in the parameter extraction: the anomaly in Z is first interpreted as superconducting fluctuation, then the dirty-superconductor formula Eq. (4) is fitted to the same Z_sc data to determine τ and A_1(k_F,0), and those fitted quantities are then used to infer T_c and to confirm the superconducting-fluctuation interpretation. Because the fit assumes the dirty-superconductor and 1D forms, the agreement with Fig. 1(e) is partly by construction. The manuscript should provide an out-of-sample consistency check or an independent determination of τ, D, and S_eff, and should report error bars on the extracted T_c, ν, and τ values.
  3. [§III, Fig. 1(d) and decomposition procedure] The extraction of Z_sc through the smoothing-based decomposition Z = Z_NQP + Z_ex + Z_sc is not demonstrated to be controlled or unique. No convergence analysis is given with respect to the smoothing parameters, grid size, or analytic-continuation scheme, and no convergent self-energy is obtained for r_s ≥ 8.07 after thousands of iterations. Without such tests, the bump-to-peak development and the ω^{-6} tail could in principle be numerical or analytic-continuation artifacts. The paper should present convergence checks and, ideally, an independent indicator of the phase transition (for example, direct evaluation of a superconducting susceptibility or pair propagator) that does not rely on the same extracted Z_sc.
  4. [§V, Fig. 3(d)] The quantitative T_c values inherit the unsupported 1D/dirty-limit premise because ν and T_c are fitting parameters in Eq. (4) and Appendix D, and the comparison with the KO gap-equation results in Fig. 3(d) is only a guide to the eye with no stated uncertainties. The claim of reasonable agreement with earlier plasmon-mediated T_c estimates is therefore weaker than presented; the author should state the precision of the extrapolation and discuss how the systematic slope difference near r_s ≈ 8 is affected by the fitting assumptions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and Section I] The title contains a spacing typo: 'Superconducti vity' should be 'Superconductivity'.
  2. [Appendix C, after Eq. (C5)] The text reads 'D is the QP diffusion contant'; this should be 'diffusion constant'.
  3. [Appendix C, first paragraph] The phrase 'Under the same approximations used in Appendix A' appears to refer to Appendix B, not Appendix A; please correct the cross-reference.
  4. [§IV, Eq. (4) and surrounding text] The notation D is used both for the density of states and for the quasiparticle diffusion constant; this is potentially confusing and should be disambiguated.
  5. [References] Reference [36] appears to be missing a comma after the author list, and several non-ASCII characters are rendered inconsistently; a final proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The ω^-6 superconducting-fluctuation signature and the T_c values are not independent: the 1D excitron premise is imported from the author's prior work, and A1, τ, and T_c are extracted by inverting the same Z_sc data with the formula they are meant to confirm.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Appendix C, Eqs. (C4)-(C6); Section IV]
    "As detailed in Ref. [26], phase-space restrictions render the excitron in the 3DHEG effectively one-dimensional. ... When K ≈ KF and |q| ≈ 2kF, the states K + Q, K′, and K′ + Q are all forced to lie near the Fermi surface, aligning their momenta longitudinally. This constraint fixes the kinematics to Q = −2K, K′ = K + δQ, and K′ + Q = −K + δQ, with δQ a small longitudinal deviation. ... This observation shows that the fluctuation wave vector Q in Σ(b)sc(K) is in fact the one-dimensional δQ, as it is directly tied to the internal kinematics of excitron formation."

    The collapse of the momentum sum from 3D to 1D is what changes the high-frequency tail from ω^-3/2 (Eq. B8) to ω^-6 (Eq. C6), and that collapse is the load-bearing step. The paper's only justification for the 1D kinematics is the sentence 'As detailed in Ref. [26]', i.e., the author's own prior paper; no independent calculation, simulation, or experiment is provided, and the 'aligning their momenta longitudinally' argument itself assumes the very δQ kinematics that is to be proved. Since the claimed agreement with Fig. 1(e) rests entirely on this unverified 1D reduction, the central 'first-principles' identification reduces to a self-cited ansatz.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section III, paragraph after Fig. 1(a)]
    "Aside from superconductivity [20, 21], no second-order phase transition has been proposed in the 3DHEG in this density and temperature range. We therefore interpret this anomaly in Σ(K) as arising from superconducting fluctuations (SCF)."

    The label 'superconducting fluctuations' is assigned to the Z(K) anomaly not because the FGWΓ calculation itself contains a pairing instability, but because the only previously proposed transition in this regime is the author's own plasmon-mediated superconductivity (Refs. [20,21]). That self-citation is load-bearing: it selects the dirty-superconductor form Eq. (B2) and the excitron diagram of Fig. 2(b), which are then used to 'confirm' the label. The paper also concedes that no convergent Σ is obtained for rs ≥ 8.07, so uncontrolled non-convergence is not excluded by an independent computation. The identification of the divergence as superconducting is therefore imported from the author's prior work rather than derived in this paper.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Appendix D, Eq. (D1); Section IV, Fig. 3(a),(c)]
    "We therefore assume that Eq. (4) remains applicable to Zsc(kF, iωn), with the understanding that such higher-order effects are absorbed into A1(kF, iωn). We further assume that the numerical data for Zsc(kF, iωn) over the entire ωn range in Fig. 1(e) contain the full information needed to extract these contributions. ... To determine τ and A1(kF, 0), we apply the following extrapolation procedure. ... Once ω0 is obtained, τ follows from τ −1 = 2ω0, and A1(kF, 0) is subsequently determined via A1(kF, 0) = 2F(0)/ω0."

    Eq. (4) is the superconducting-fluctuation formula whose validity the paper claims to demonstrate, yet it is the same equation used to define the derived quantities A1(kF,0) and τ from the already-labeled Z_sc data. There is no independent constraint: the 'full information' in Fig. 1(e) is inverted under the assumed dirty-1D form, so the ω^-6 tail, the A1∝ξ(T) scaling, and the resulting T_c values in Fig. 3 are transformations of the input, not out-of-sample predictions. The T_c in ξ(T) is needed to construct the abscissa before the critical exponent can be read off, making the reported T_c a fitted parameter presented as a first-principles result.

full rationale

The paper contains genuine independent content: the FGWΓ self-energy uses QMC-based polarization inputs and is benchmarked against QMC quasiparticle factors at metallic densities, and the computed DOS pseudogap and inverse-lifetime trends are nontrivial outputs. However, the central claim that the Z(K) divergence at rs ≈ 8 is a superconducting transition, and that T_c ≈ 1 K, is not self-contained. The discriminating ω^-6 tail is obtained only after the excitron is declared effectively one-dimensional by citation to the author's own Ref. [26]; the paper itself shows the corresponding 3D fluctuation diagram would give ω^-3/2 and would not fit. The superconducting interpretation is also selected largely because the author's earlier papers [20,21] proposed superconductivity in this regime. Finally, A1(kF,0), τ, and the T_c values used to demonstrate critical scaling are extracted from the same Z_sc data using the very dirty-1D formula that they are supposed to validate. These reductions are partial rather than total: the numerical FGWΓ computation is a real calculation, and the exponents/pseudogap are not strictly predetermined by the input interaction. But the load-bearing identification and the quantitative T_c values reduce, in substantial part, to a self-cited 1D ansatz and a same-data inversion. Score 6 reflects this partial but significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central result depends on several quantities that are not derived from the first-principles calculation alone: Tc and nu are obtained by fitting the self-energy anomaly, S_eff and the excitron vertex are left unspecified, and the one-dimensional character of the excitron is imported from the author's earlier work. The paper also assumes that the clean HEG can be described by dirty-superconductor formulas and that the numerical non-convergence at rs above about 8.07 is a physical phase transition rather than a scheme failure. These choices make the ledger heavier than a purely parameter-free derivation.

free parameters (6)
  • Tc at each rs = 0.58 K, 1.03 K, 1.55 K, 1.79 K
    Tc values are chosen or obtained so that A1(kF,0) scales as xi(T) with nu = 0.5, or 0.65 at rs = 8.0, and are then compared with the author's prior KO gap-equation values.
  • critical exponent nu = 0.5 for rs = 7.8 and 7.9; 0.65 +/- 0.05 for rs = 8.0
    The exponent is selected by best fit to the A1(kF,0) data in Fig. 3(a); the classical value 0.5 is assumed where the fit is adequate.
  • effective polarization area per excitron S_eff = not specified
    This quantity enters Eq. (C5) in A1(kF,0), but no derivation, numerical value, or independent estimate is given in the paper.
  • excitron-forming interaction vertex Gamma_ex(KF,KF:-2KF) = not specified
    This vertex appears squared in Eqs. (C4) and (C5); it is said to come from a Bethe-Salpeter equation, but its value is not quoted or tabulated.
  • quasiparticle lifetime tau = not stated in text
    Extracted from the first zero of the Pade continuation of F(omega_n) = omega_n Z_sc in Appendix D, then used inside the dirty-superconductor formulas; it is fitted to the same anomaly it is meant to explain.
  • diffusion constant D = not stated
    Defines the coherence length xi(T) = sqrt(pi D / (8(T - Tc))) in the dirty-superconductor formulas, but no value or derivation is given for a clean HEG.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The electron gas at rs about 8 and T about 10^-4 epsilon_F has no competing order, such as Wigner crystallization or magnetic order, in this density-temperature window.
    Used to exclude other explanations for the divergence in Z(K); stated in Sec. III as 'no second-order phase transition has been proposed in the 3D HEG in this density and temperature range. We therefore interpret this anomaly as superconducting fluctuations.'
  • ad hoc to paper The functional vertex from Ref. [26] satisfies the Ward identity and yields a self-consistent self-energy accurate enough for the dilute regime.
    The FGWGamma loop closes through this vertex, but no independent implementation or error bound is provided in this manuscript or its Supplemental Material reference.
  • domain assumption Dirty-superconductor fluctuation propagator Eq. (B2) and impurity-renormalized Green's function Eq. (B3) apply to a clean 3D HEG.
    The HEG contains no impurities, yet the analytic evaluation uses the dirty-superconductor limit with a diffusion constant D; the justification for this substitution is not given.
  • ad hoc to paper Phase-space restrictions make the excitron effectively one-dimensional, so only q_parallel appears in the fluctuation self-energy Eq. (C4).
    This is the load-bearing premise for the 1D fluctuation channel and the omega^-6 tail, sourced to the author's prior Ref. [26] and not independently re-derived or confirmed.
  • domain assumption Pade and Nevanlinna analytic continuations are reliable at the very low Matsubara frequencies used here.
    The results depend on analytic continuation of numerical self-energy data at T near 10^-4 epsilon_F; the paper notes both schemes give consistent low-energy results, but no systematic error assessment is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The smoothing-based decomposition Z = Z_NQP + Z_ex + Z_sc uniquely separates the superconducting fluctuation component.
    The extraction of Z_sc rests on the smoothing procedure of Ref. [26] applied to Z and then to Z_QP; no uniqueness or sensitivity test is supplied.
invented entities (2)
  • excitron
    purpose: Quasi-1D composite of an electron and longitudinal electron-hole pairs; it mediates 1D superconducting fluctuations and acts as a thermally excited scattering center.
    The excitron is developed in the author's Ref. [26], and the only evidence here is the low-energy peak in the same self-consistent spectral function. It has no falsifiable handle outside this method in the present paper.
  • 1D superconducting fluctuation channel along the excitron polarization field
    purpose: Produces the omega^-6 high-frequency tail in Z_sc, the linear-in-T lifetime, and the critical divergence near rs about 8.
    The channel is inferred from the same Z_sc data to which the dirty-superconductor 1D formula is fitted, so it is not independently verified by a separate measurement or simulation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Excitron-Induced Pair Fluctuations Reveal Superconductivity in the Electron Gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CNUEPGGL

@misc{pith2026260808498,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Excitron-Induced Pair Fluctuations Reveal Superconductivity in the Electron Gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CNUEPGGL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08498}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding how superconductivity can emerge in dilute electronic systems remains a central challenge in condensed matter physics. By performing first-principles calculations of the electron self-energy \Sigma(k,iw_n) in the low-density three-dimensional electron gas, we identify a sharp divergence at r_s ~ 8 and T ~ 10^{-4}E_ F, signaling a second-order phase transition. This critical behavior originates from one-dimensional superconducting fluctuations mediated by virtual excitations of an excitron---a quasi-1D electronic composite formed by an electron and longitudinal electron-hole pairs. Although the superconducting mechanism itself is plasmon-mediated, the excitron channel provides a unique window into its fluctuation dynamics. Near the transition, we observe a pseudogap and a linear-in-T inverse electron lifetime, reminiscent of phenomena in high-T_c materials. These results reveal an unexpected route by which plasmon-driven superconductivity manifests in the dilute 3D electron gas through quasi-1D excitron dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08498 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Renormalization function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Self-energy diagrams for up-spin electrons arising [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Strength of the 1D superconducting-fluctuation c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    Takada, Low-energy peak in the one-particle spectra l function of the electron gas at metallic densities, Phys

    Y. Takada, Low-energy peak in the one-particle spectra l function of the electron gas at metallic densities, Phys. R ev. B 110, 085132 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Takada, Theory of Superconductivity in Polar Semicon ductors and Its Application to N-Type Semiconducting SrTi0 3, J

    Y. Takada, Theory of Superconductivity in Polar Semicon ductors and Its Application to N-Type Semiconducting SrTi0 3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49, 1267 (1980)

    work page 1980

  3. [2]

    C. F. Richardson and N. W. Ashcroft, Effective electron-e lectron interactions and the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15130 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [3]

    Kurth, M

    S. Kurth, M. Marques, M. L¨ uders, and E. K. U. Gross, Local Density Approximation for Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2628 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [4]

    Monthoux, D

    P. Monthoux, D. Pines, and G. G. Lonzarich, Superconduct ivity without phonons, Nature 450, 1177 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [5]

    Akashi and R

    R. Akashi and R. Arita, Development of Density-Function al Theory for a Plasmon-Assisted Superconducting State: Ap - plication to Lithium under High Pressures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 057006 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [6]

    Akashi and R

    R. Akashi and R. Arita, Density Functional Theory for Pla smon-Assisted Superconductivity, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 061016 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [7]

    Takada, Theory for Reliable First-Principles Predic tion of the Superconducting Transition Temperature, Chap

    Y. Takada, Theory for Reliable First-Principles Predic tion of the Superconducting Transition Temperature, Chap. 8, pp. 193-230, in Carbon-Based Superconductors: Toward High- Tc Superconductivity, edited by J. Haruyama (Pan Stanford, Singapore, 2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 57 references
  1. [8]

    Ruhman and P

    J. Ruhman and P. A. Lee, Superconductivity at very low den sity: The case of strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. B 94, 224515 (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    Wei and Z

    T. Wei and Z. Zhang, High-temperature superconductivit y in monolayer FeSe on SrTiO 3 and related systems mediated by low energy plasmons, Phys. Rev. B 104, 184503 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    Akashi, Revisiting homogeneous electron gas in purs uit of properly normed ab initio Eliashberg theory, Phys

    R. Akashi, Revisiting homogeneous electron gas in purs uit of properly normed ab initio Eliashberg theory, Phys. Rev. B 105, 104510 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    T. Wang, X. Cai, K. Chen, B. V. Svistunov, and N. V. Prokof ’ev, Origin of the Coulomb pseudopotential, Phys. Rev. B 107, L140507 (2023)

    2023

  5. [12]

    Pellegrini, C

    C. Pellegrini, C. Kukkonen, and A. Sanna, Ab initio calculations of superconducting transition temperatures : When going beyond RPA is essential, Phys. Rev. B 108, 064511 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    X. Cai, T. Wang, S. Zhang, T. Zhang, A. Millis, B. V. Svist unov, N. V. Prokof’ev, and K. Chen, Superconductivity in electron liquids: Precision many-body treatment of Coulom b Interaction, arXiv: 2512.19382 (2025)

    2025

  7. [14]

    Kohn and J

    W. Kohn and J. M. Luttinger, New Mechanism for Supercond uctivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 524 (1965)

    1965

  8. [15]

    Takada, Plasmon mechanism of superconductivity in t wo- and three-dimensional electron systems, J

    Y. Takada, Plasmon mechanism of superconductivity in t wo- and three-dimensional electron systems, J. Phys. Soc. J pn. 45, 786 (1978)

    1978

  9. [16]

    Rietschel and L

    H. Rietschel and L. J. Sham, Role of electron Coulomb int eraction in superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5100 (1983)

    1983

  10. [17]

    Grabowski and L

    M. Grabowski and L. J. Sham, Superconductivity from non phonon interactions, Phys. Rev. B 29, 6132 (1984); ibid., 37, 3726(E) (1988)

    1984

  11. [18]

    B¨ uche and H

    T. B¨ uche and H. Rietschel, Superconductivity in the ho mogeneous electron gas: Exchange and correlation effects, P hys. Rev. B 41, 8691 (1990)

    1990

  12. [19]

    Takada, Plasmon mechanism of superconductivity in t he multivalley electron gas, J

    Y. Takada, Plasmon mechanism of superconductivity in t he multivalley electron gas, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61, 238 (1992)

    1992

  13. [20]

    Takada, Insignificance of vertex corrections in the p lasmon mechanism of superconductivity at low electron conc entra- tion: Migdal’s theorem in the antiadiabatic region, J

    Y. Takada, Insignificance of vertex corrections in the p lasmon mechanism of superconductivity at low electron conc entra- tion: Migdal’s theorem in the antiadiabatic region, J. Phys . Soc. Jpn. 61, 3849 (1992)

    1992

  14. [21]

    Takada, s- and p-wave pairings in the dilute electron gas: Superconductivi ty mediated by the Coulomb hole in the vicinity of the Wigner-crystal phase, Phys

    Y. Takada, s- and p-wave pairings in the dilute electron gas: Superconductivi ty mediated by the Coulomb hole in the vicinity of the Wigner-crystal phase, Phys. Rev. B 47, 5202 (1993)

    1993

  15. [22]

    C. F. Richardson and N. W. Ashcroft, Superconductivity in electron liquids with and without intermediaries, Phys. Rev. B 54, R764 (1996)

    1996

  16. [23]

    C. A. Kukkonen and K. Chen, Quantitative electron-elec tron interaction using local field factors from quantum Mont e Carlo calculations, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195142 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    X. Cai, T. Wang, N. V. Prokof’ev, B. V. Svistunov, and K. C hen, Superconductivity in the uniform electron gas: Irrele vance of the Kohn-Luttinger mechanism, Phys. Rev. B 106, L220502 (2022). 10

    2022

  18. [25]

    C. A. Kukkonen and A. W. Overhauser, Electron-electron interaction in simple metals, Phys. Rev. B 20, 550 (1979)

    1979

  19. [27]

    Abrahams, M

    E. Abrahams, M. Redi, and J. W. F. Woo, Effect of fluctuatio ns on electronic properties above the superconducting transition, Phys. Rev. B 1, 208 (1970)

    1970

  20. [28]

    J. P. Hurault and K. Maki, Breakdown of the Mean Field The ory in the Superconducting Transition Region, Phys. Rev. B 2, 2560 (1970)

    1970

  21. [29]

    Takayama, Effect of Fluctuations in the Superconduct ing Order Parameter on the Electronic States, Prog

    H. Takayama, Effect of Fluctuations in the Superconduct ing Order Parameter on the Electronic States, Prog. Theor. Phys.43, 1445 (1970)

    1970

  22. [30]

    C. F. Richardson and N. W. Ashcroft, Dynamical local-fie ld factors and effective interactions in the three-dimensio nal electron liquid, Phys. Rev. B 50, 8170 (1994)

    1994

  23. [31]

    Takada, Emergence of an excitonic collective mode in the dilute electron gas, Phys

    Y. Takada, Emergence of an excitonic collective mode in the dilute electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 94, 245106 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Moroni, D

    S. Moroni, D. M. Ceperley, and G. Senatore, Static respo nse and local field factor of the electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett . 75, 689 (1995)

    1995

  25. [33]

    Dornheim, S

    T. Dornheim, S. Groth, J. Vorberger, and M. Bonitz, Ab initio path integral Monte Carlo results for the dynamic structure factor of correlated electrons: From the electron liquid to warm dense matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 255001 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Chen and K

    K. Chen and K. Haule, A combined variational and diagram matic quantum Monte Carlo approach to the many-electron problem, Nat. Commun. 10, 3725 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    J. P. F. LeBlanc, K. Chen, K. Haule, N. V. Prokof’ev, and I . S. Tupitsyn, Dynamic response of an electron gas: Towards the exact exchange-correlation kernel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 246401 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Chuna, N

    T. Chuna, N. Barnfield, J. Vorberger, M. P. Friedlander, T. Hoheisel, and T. Dornheim Estimates of the dynamic struct ure factor for the finite temperature electron liquid via analyt ic continuation of path integral Monte Carlo data, Phys. Rev . B 112, 125112 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle G reen’s function with application to the electron-gas probl em, Phys

    L. Hedin, New method for calculating the one-particle G reen’s function with application to the electron-gas probl em, Phys. Rev. 139, A796 (1965)

    1965

  30. [38]

    Onida, L

    G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Electronic excitati ons: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-functi on ap- proaches, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601 (2002)

    2002

  31. [39]

    J. C. Ward, An Identity in quantum electrodynamics, Phy s. Rev. 78, 182 (1950)

    1950

  32. [40]

    Takada, Exact self-energy of the many-body problem f rom conserving approximations, Phys

    Y. Takada, Exact self-energy of the many-body problem f rom conserving approximations, Phys. Rev. B 52, 12708 (1995)

    1995

  33. [41]

    Takada, Inclusion of vertex corrections in the self- consistent calculation of quasiparticles in metals, Phys

    Y. Takada, Inclusion of vertex corrections in the self- consistent calculation of quasiparticles in metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 226402 (2001)

    2001

  34. [42]

    Maebashi and Y

    H. Maebashi and Y. Takada, Analysis of exact vertex func tion for improving on the GWΓ scheme for first-principles calculation of electron self-energy, Phys. Rev. B 84, 245134 (2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    See Supplemental Material at [url] for the explicit for m of the vertex function and additional numerical data

  36. [44]

    H. J. Vidberg and J. W. Serene, Solving the Eliashberg eq uations by means of N-point Pad´ e approximants, J. Low Temp. Phys. 29, 179 (1977)

    1977

  37. [45]

    Fei , C.-N

    J. Fei , C.-N. Yeh , and E. Gull, Nevanlinna analytical co ntinuation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 056402 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Holzmann, B

    M. Holzmann, B. Bernu, C. Pierleoni, J. McMinis, D. M. Ce perley, V. Olevano, and L. Delle Site, Momentum distributio n of the homogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 110402 (2011)

    2011

  39. [47]

    Hiraoka, Y

    N. Hiraoka, Y. Yang, T. Hagiya, A. Niozu, K. Matsuda, S. H uotari, M. Holzmann, and D. M. Ceperley, Direct observation of the momentum distribution and renormalization factor in lithium, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165124 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Haule and K

    K. Haule and K. Chen, Single-particle excitations in th e uniform electron gas by diagrammatic Monte Carlo, Sci. Rep . 12, 2294 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Holzmann, F

    M. Holzmann, F. Calcavecchia, D. M. Ceperley, and V. Ole vano, Static self-energy and effective mass of the homogeneo us electron gas from Quantum Monte Carlo calculations, Phys. R ev. Lett. 131, 186501 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Suortti, T

    P. Suortti, T. Buslaps, V. Honkim¨ aki, C. Metz, A. Shukl a, Th. Tschentscher, J. Kwiatkowska, F. Maniawski, A. Bansi l, S. Kaprzyk, A. S. Kheifets, D. R. Lun, T. Sattler, J. R. Schnei der, and F. Bell, Fermi-surface and electron correlation in Al studied by Compton Scattering...

    2000

  43. [51]

    Huotari, J

    S. Huotari, J. A. Soininen,T. Pylkk¨ anen, K. H¨ am¨ al¨ ainen, A. Issolah, A. Titov, J. McMinis, J. Kim, K. Esler, D. M. Ceperley, M. Holzmann, and V. Olevano, Momentum distributi on and renormalization factor in sodium and the electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 086403 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    Kiometzis, H

    M. Kiometzis, H. Kleinert, and A. M. J. Schakel, Critica l exponents of the superconducting phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1975 (1994)

    1994

  45. [53]

    I. F. Herbut and Z. Teˇ sanovi´ c, Critical fluctuations i n superconductors and the magnetic field penetration depth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4588 (1996)

    1996

  46. [54]

    Takada, Electron correlations in the effective-pote ntial expansion method, Phys

    Y. Takada, Electron correlations in the effective-pote ntial expansion method, Phys. Rev. B 35, 6923 (1987)

    1987

  47. [55]

    P. W. Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors, J. Phy s. Chem. Solids 11, 26 (1959)

    1959

  48. [56]

    V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in o ne-dimensional and two-dimensional systems possessing a c ontinuous symmetry group. II. Quantum systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 610 (1972)

    1972

  49. [57]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metastab ility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C 6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.