Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Nonlocal Hamiltonian structures of the kinetic equation for soliton gas under polychromatic reductions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The polychromatic reductions of the soliton-gas kinetic equation admit nonlocal Hamiltonian structures when their metric has constant curvature, and the paper gives necessary conditions on the interaction kernel for this to happen.

desk verdict Useful proof and examples for constant-curvature nonlocal structures, but the main calculation is quoted rather than derived and has sign typos. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16493 v2 pith:CNVYRTED submitted 2025-01-27 math-ph math.MP

Pierandrea Vergallo This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 37K1035Q5153B20
keywords solitongaskineticequationpolychromaticreductionnonlocalHamiltonianoperatorsconstant-curvaturemetricsbi-HamiltonianstructuresDubrovin-NovikovKorteweg-deVries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the polychromatic (delta-functional) reductions of the kinetic equation for a soliton gas, which are quasilinear first-order systems, carry nonlocal Hamiltonian operators of constant-curvature type, and it derives necessary conditions on the interaction kernel for such operators to exist. The key geometric requirement is that the metric naturally associated with the reduction have constant curvature; Theorem 10 translates this into the two algebraic conditions (34a) and (34b) on the kernel and the free functions. If these conditions hold, the reduced system gains a second Hamiltonian structure alongside the local one, and for reductions with more than two spectral components this is what restores bi-Hamiltonian integrability. The paper shows the conditions are met by the KdV and additive-separable kernels and are violated for the Lieb-Liniger kernel except in the flat case, and it also constructs nonlocal operators of conformally-flat type for KdV and Lieb-Liniger.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nonlocal first-order Hamiltonian operator (22), $g^{ij}\partial_x + b^{ij}_k u^k_x + c\,u^i_x \partial_x^{-1} u^j_x$, whose Hamiltonianity is equivalent to the leading coefficient $g^{ij}$ being a semi-Riemannian metric of constant curvature $c$ with $b^{ij}_k$ tied to its Christoffel symbols. The metric is the one determined in (20) by the compatibility conditions for hydrodynamic-type systems applied to the reduced Jordan-block system, so the Hamiltonian question becomes a curvature question. Theorem 10 answers it by evaluating the constant-curvature identity (25) on the component $R^{r_i}_{r_i r_i \eta_i}$ and reading off the coefficients of monomials in the fields $r_i$, producing (34a)-(34b). For the conformally flat branch, the machinery is the Ferapontov operator (26) and its two-tail specialisation (31), whose Hamiltonianity is equivalent to conformal flatness of the metric, with the affinor $w^i_j$ required to be a hydrodynamic-type symmetry of the system.

What would settle it

Compute the full Riemann tensor of the metric (20) for the $n=3$ KdV solution of Example 14, with the stated $s_i,\chi_i,\psi_i$, and verify directly whether every component satisfies $R^i_{jkl}=c(\delta^i_k g_{jl}-\delta^i_l g_{jk})$ for the same $c$; if any independent component fails, the single-component argument in Theorem 10 is insufficient or the example is inconsistent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 10: for the metric (20) obtained from the polychromatic reduction of the soliton-gas kinetic equation, conditions (34a) and (34b) are necessary for the metric to have constant curvature $c$. The proof extracts this from the single Riemann-curvature component $R^{r_i}_{r_i r_i \eta_i}$, using an explicit Christoffel-symbol formula for the metric (20). The theorem splits the admissible kernels into two families: multiplicatively separable kernels, which Corollary 12 sharpens to kernels depending essentially on one spectral variable, and kernels with $\phi_i=0$ and $\psi_i=-c$. For the KdV kernel and additive-separable kernels, the paper exhibits explicit functions $s_i,\chi_i,\psi_i$ that satisfy these conditions, so the nonlocal operator (22) furnishes a second compatible Hamiltonian structure even when the number of components exceeds two; for the Lieb-Liniger kernel the conditions force $c=0$, leaving only the local Dubrovin-Novikov structure. The paper also constructs operators of form (31) tied to conformally flat metrics and commuting flows for the KdV and Lieb-Liniger cases, which reduce to the flat case when the affinor vanishes.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's necessary conditions are extracted from a single component of the curvature tensor, using a Christoffel-symbol formula quoted from an earlier paper without being re-derived; if that quoted formula or the computed component is wrong, conditions (34) do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For reductions with $n>2$, the constant-curvature operator restores a second compatible Hamiltonian structure for the KdV and additive-separable kernels, a role the local Dubrovin-Novikov structure alone cannot play.
  • The necessary conditions (34) partition the interaction kernels into two classes—multiplicatively separable kernels, which then reduce to essentially one-variable kernels by Corollary 12, and kernels with $\phi_i=0$, $\psi_i=-c$—so any kernel outside these classes admits no constant-curvature nonlocal operator of form (22).
  • The Lieb-Liniger kernel admits only the flat, purely local structure, since the nonlocal condition forces $c=0$.
  • For conformally flat metrics, nonlocal operators of form (31) exist for the KdV and Lieb-Liniger kernels with the affinor built from commuting flows; setting the affinor to zero recovers the local flat structures.
  • The explicit Hamiltonian densities (58) and (62) complete the nonlocal structures with their full data, not just the operators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because Theorem 10 states only necessity, a symbolic check of the remaining curvature components for the KdV $n=3$ solution would test whether these conditions are sufficient; the paper does not perform that check.
  • The same constant-curvature ansatz can be applied to the other kernels in the paper's Table 1, such as the sinh-Gordon, DNLS, and hard-rod kernels, which are not computed and therefore remain open candidates for nonlocal Hamiltonian structures.
  • Taking the number of spectral components to infinity would convert the polychromatic nonlocal operators into nonlocal Hamiltonian structures for the full integro-differential soliton-gas kinetic equation, the direction the paper flags as future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies polychromatic reductions of the kinetic equation for soliton gas and investigates nonlocal Hamiltonian structures for the resulting quasilinear systems. After reviewing the delta-functional reduction, the local Dubrovin-Novikov formalism, and the Ferapontov-Mokhov nonlocal operators, the paper states Theorem 10, which gives necessary conditions (34a)-(34b) for the block metric (20) to have constant curvature c. Corollaries 11-12 classify the corresponding interaction kernels into separable and non-separable cases. Examples 14-16 apply the conditions to the KdV, additive-separable, and Lieb-Liniger kernels, and Examples 17-18 construct operators with two nonlocal tails related to conformally flat metrics. The stated goal is to provide a second, compatible Hamiltonian structure in the nonlocal case, thereby restoring bi-Hamiltonianity for n>2.

Significance. If the central theorem is correct, the paper would give a meaningful extension of the local Hamiltonian results in [43] and [44]: constant-curvature metrics produce nonlocal operators of the form (22), and the KdV and additive-separable reductions would admit a second compatible structure for n>2, while the Lieb-Liniger case would not for nonzero curvature. The paper also makes a useful connection to conformally flat metrics and Ferapontov operators. Its strengths are the explicitness of the examples and the clear use of the standard Ferapontov-Mokhov criterion. I do not see a circularity problem: the reliance on [43, Theorem 1] is a checkability issue rather than a logical circularity. However, the proof of Theorem 10 is not independently verifiable from the printed text: the key curvature component (37) is quoted from a self-cited source without derivation, and Eq. (35) is sign-inconsistent with the stated convention (25). These issues are load-bearing because the examples rest on conditions (34a)-(34b).

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1, Eqs. (25), (35), (36)] Under the convention stated in Eq. (25), the component with i=j=r_i, k=r_i, l=η_i equals +c g_{r_i η_i}, not -c g_{r_i η_i}. The negative sign in Eq. (35) corresponds to the index order i=j=r_i, k=η_i, l=r_i, which is not the component expanded in Eq. (36). Since Eq. (35) is the starting point of the proof of Theorem 10, this sign error must be corrected and the derivation of Eqs. (34a)-(34b) rechecked; if the sign is absorbed by redefining c, the c-terms in (34a)-(34b) change sign accordingly.
  2. [Section 3.1, Eq. (37)] The displayed expression for the curvature component is un-derived and typographically malformed: the numerator and denominator are not clearly separated, and the cofactor notation A_{i,k} alone does not make the expression unambiguous. The following sentence invokes [43, Theorem 1] to conclude that this expression is independent of r_i, and then extracts (34a)-(34b) by coefficient comparison. Since [43, Theorem 1] is not reproduced, the central computation of the paper is not checkable from the text. A complete derivation of Eq. (37), or a computer-algebra verification, together with an explicit statement of the r_i-dependence that justifies the coefficient comparison, should be supplied.
  3. [Section 4, Examples 14 and 15] Theorem 10 proves only necessity of conditions (34a)-(34b). In Example 14 the n=2 case is checked against the full constant-curvature condition (25), but the claimed generalization to arbitrary n, and the whole of Example 15, use only the necessary conditions. Unless sufficiency is proved for these families, the displayed s_i, ψ_i, and χ_i do not establish that the metric (20) has constant curvature c, and hence do not establish the existence of the nonlocal Hamiltonian operator (22) for n>2. The paper should either prove sufficiency in these cases or verify the full condition (25) directly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.1, Corollary 11] The derivation from Eq. (34b) to Eq. (40) is not reproducible as stated: differentiating twice with respect to η_k and then once with respect to η_i does not produce the displayed identity; the computation works, modulo factors, with one derivative in η_k and one in η_i. In addition, Eq. (39) rewrites (34b) with the opposite sign on the right-hand side; this is harmless because c is arbitrary but should be corrected.
  2. [Section 4, Example 14, Eq. (57b)] The formula for χ_i contains a typo: the last term should be c(η_i)^2, not c(η_1)^2.
  3. [Section 4, Example 14, Eq. (58)] The display for h_i is typographically broken; the cases and the integration variable should be typeset unambiguously so that the formula can be checked.
  4. [Table 1 and Example 14] The KdV interaction kernel is written with an absolute value in Table 1 but without one in Eq. (55); please make the notation consistent.
  5. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and OCR artifacts, including 'fo r', 'ensamble', 'S chroedinger', and 'Gauss-Peterson-Codazzi'; a careful proofread is needed.
  6. [Section 3.1, Eqs. (35)-(37)] The notation 'Rri ririηi' is visually overloaded; explicitly marking upper and lower indices, for example R^{r_i}_{r_i r_i η_i}, would prevent index-order ambiguities.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Theorem 10's necessity proof imports its decisive curvature-component formula from the same authors' earlier paper, and the theorem was previously announced there without proof; this is load-bearing self-citation rather than a definitional tautology.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3.1, proof of Theorem 10 (before Eq. (34), and Eqs. (35)-(37))]
    "We remark that the following statement first appeared in [43] without a proof. In this paper, we show the proof in details ... One can now substitute the expression of the Christoffel symbols ( see [43, Theorem 1]) to make (36) explicit, as [Eq. (37)] ... Finally, one can easily see as [43, Theorem 1] that (35) does not depend on r_i."

    The proof of Theorem 10 — the paper's main new necessity result — relies at its decisive step on formula (37) for the curvature component, which is quoted from [43, Theorem 1], a paper by the same authors, and the theorem itself is acknowledged to have first appeared in that same reference 'without a proof'. The subsequent conclusion that (35) does not depend on r_i, hence g_i is quadratic, and the coefficient comparison giving (34a)-(34b), are also justified only by 'as [43, Theorem 1]'. Thus the necessary conditions are not established self-containedly here; their content is inherited from the authors' own prior announcement and a self-cited Christoffel-symbol formula. No derivation or computer-algebra check of (37) is given.

full rationale

No quantity is defined into existence by the target statement, and the examples (KdV, additive-separable, Lieb-Liniger) are genuine applications rather than renamed fits. The derivation chain for the local flat case and the nonlocal operator form follows standard external theorems (Dubrovin-Novikov, Mokhov-Ferapontov). The only substantive circularity risk is the proof of Theorem 10: the decisive expression (37) and the r_i-independence assertion are taken from the same authors' [43], the reference in which Theorem 10 was previously announced without proof. That is load-bearing self-citation, so the paper is not fully self-contained at its central step. Separately, Eq. (35) has the opposite sign from the index convention in (25) for the component R^{r_i}_{r_i r_i η_i}, and Eq. (37) is printed with an ambiguous numerator/denominator structure; these are correctness risks that do not themselves constitute circularity but reinforce the need for an independent symbolic check. Because the theorem still has independent content (its proof outline, corollaries, and examples are new relative to the quoted lemma), the score is 4 rather than higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a theorem in differential geometry of Hamiltonian operators, not an empirical claim. It relies on standard theorems on Dubrovin-Novikov and Ferapontov operators, plus a metric ansatz (20) with free functions s_i and g_i, and the self-cited Christoffel formula from [43]. No new physical entities are introduced. The examples introduce arbitrary constants that parametrize families of solutions; no values are fixed by data.

free parameters (2)
  • arbitrary constants c, c1, c2, c3 = unspecified
    Appear in Examples 14, 15, 17 and 18 as free parameters of the Hamiltonian families; existence does not depend on a particular value, but nonzero c is needed for genuine nonlocality.
  • arbitrary functions s_i(η_i), φ_i(η_i), χ_i(η_i), ψ_i(η_i) = unspecified
    Enter through metric ansatz (20) and Theorem 10; their choices parametrize the space of solutions and are not fixed by external data.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Theorem 2: first-order homogeneous local operators are Hamiltonian iff the leading coefficient is a flat metric.
    Used in Section 2.1 as the Dubrovin-Novikov characterization of local Hamiltonian operators.
  • standard math Theorem 5: nonlocal operator (22) is Hamiltonian iff the leading coefficient has constant curvature c.
    The central geometric criterion used to formulate Theorem 10 in Section 3.
  • standard math Theorems 6 and 9: Ferapontov operator curvature conditions and conformally flat metric conditions.
    Background for the conformally flat examples and the general Ferapontov framework in Sections 3 and 3.2.
  • domain assumption Christoffel-symbol formula for metric (20) from [43, Theorem 1].
    Self-cited previous result by the same author and Ferapontov; not re-derived in this paper and directly used in the proof of Theorem 10.
  • domain assumption The kinetic equation is set up with symmetric kernel G(μ,η)=G(η,μ), with S and G independent of x and t, and with nondegenerate leading coefficient det(g) != 0.
    These are explicit assumptions in Section 2 and before Theorem 2; the nondegeneracy excludes the degenerate operators mentioned in the conclusions.
  • domain assumption The delta-functional (polychromatic) ansatz (2) reduces El's equation to the quasilinear system (3).
    The reduction is cited to [34] and is the starting point for all systems in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlocal Hamiltonian structures of the kinetic equation for soliton gas under polychromatic reductions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CNVYRTED

@misc{pith2026250116493,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlocal Hamiltonian structures of the kinetic equation for soliton gas under polychromatic reductions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CNVYRTED}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16493}
}
read the original abstract

We deepen the existence of a nonlocal Hamiltonian formalism for the El's kinetic equation for soliton gas under the polychromatic reduction for a class of interaction kernels. The nonlocality presented is related to semi-Riemannian metrics of constant curvature, conformally flat metrics and hypersurfaces in a pseudo-Euclidean space. These results generalise a previous one that Vergallo and Ferapontov obtained with local Hamiltonian operators. Some examples as the Korteweg-de Vries, the Lieb-Liniger and the separable cases are analysed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [43]

    Hamiltonian aspects of the kinetic equation for soliton gas

    Vergallo, P., Ferapontov, E.V. Hamiltonian Aspects of the Kinetic Equation for Soliton Gas. J Nonlinear Sci 35, 24 (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00332-024-10118-3, arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.20162v1, 2024. 18

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [44]

    Vergallo P and Ferapontov E V 2023 Hamiltonian systems of Jorda n block type: delta-functional reductions of the kinetic equation for soliton gas, J. Math. Phys. 64, 103505 (2023); doi: 10.1063/5.0142689

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0142689 2023

  3. [1]

    Boldrighini C, Dobrushin R L and Sukhov Yu M 1983 One-Dimension al Hard Rod Caricature of Hydrodynamics, Journal of Statistical Physics 31 no

    C. Boldrighini C, Dobrushin R L and Sukhov Yu M 1983 One-Dimension al Hard Rod Caricature of Hydrodynamics, Journal of Statistical Physics 31 no. 3

    work page 1983

  4. [2]

    Hamiltonian formulation and aspects of integrability of generalised hydrodynamics

    Bonnemain, T., Caudrelier, V., Doyon, B. Hamiltonian Formulation an d Aspects of Integrability of Generalised Hydrodynamics. Ann. Henri Poincar ´ e (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-025-01546-2, arXiv: https:// export.arxiv.org/abs/2406.04924v1. 16

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  5. [3]

    Bulchandani V B, On classical integrability of the hydrodynamics o f quantum integrable systems, 2017, J. Phys. A 50, no. 43, 435203, 30 pp

    work page 2017

  6. [4]

    Congy T, El G and Roberti G 2021 Soliton gas in bidirectional disper sive hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. E 103 042201

    work page 2021

  7. [5]

    Dell’Atti M and Vergallo M 2023 Classification of degenerate non-ho mogeneous Hamiltonian operators, J. Math. Phys. 64, 033505

    work page 2023

  8. [6]

    Doyon B, Yoshimura T and Caux J-S 2018 Soliton gases and genera lized hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 045301

    work page 2018

Show all 48 references
  1. [7]

    Doyon B 2020 Lecture notes on Generalised Hydrodynamics, SciP ost Phys. Lect. Notes 18

    2020

  2. [8]

    Castro-Alvaredo O A, Doyon B, and Yoshimura T 2016 Emergent H ydrodynamics in Integrable Quantum Systems Out of Equilibrium, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041065

    2016

  3. [9]

    Dubrovin B A and Novikov S P 1983 Hamiltonian formalism of one-dimen sional systems of hydrodynamic type and the Bogolyubov–Whitham averaging method , Soviet Math. Dokl. , 27 (3): 665-669

    1983

  4. [10]

    Dubrovin B A, Zykov S A and Pavlov M V 2011 Weakly nonlinear Hamilto nian partial differential equations and a new class of solutions to the WDVV associativity equa tions, Funct. Anal. Appl. 45, no. 4 278-290

    2011

  5. [11]

    Nonlinear Sci

    El G A, Kamchatnov A M, Pavlov M V and Zykov S A 2011 Kinetic equa tion for a soliton gas and its hydrodynamic reductions, J. Nonlinear Sci. 21, no. 2 151-191

    2011

  6. [12]

    El G A 2003 The thermodynamic limit of the Whitham equations, Phys. Lett. A 311, no. 4-5 374-383

    2003

  7. [13]

    El G A and Kamchatnov A M 2005, Kinetic equation for a dense solit on gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 204101

    2005

  8. [14]

    Ferapontov E V 1995 Nonlocal Hamiltonian operators of hydrod ynamic type: differential ge- ometry and applications, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 170 Adv. Math. Sci., 27 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 33-58

    1995

  9. [15]

    Ferapontov E V and Pavlov M V 2003 Reciprocal transformation s of Hamiltonian operators of hydrodynamic type: non-local Hamiltonian formalism for linearly dege nerate systems, J. Math. Phys. 44, no. 3 1150-1172

    2003

  10. [16]

    Nonlinear Sci

    Ferapontov E V and Pavlov M V 2022 Kinetic equation for soliton ga s: integrable reductions, J. Nonlinear Sci. 32 no. 2, Paper No. 26, 22 pp

    2022

  11. [17]

    Ferapontov E V 1991 Integration of weakly nonlinear hydrodyn amic systems in Riemann invari- ants, Phys. Lett. A 158 112-118

    1991

  12. [18]

    Ferapontov E V and Marshall G M 2007 Differential-geometric app roach to the integrability of hydrodynamic chains: the Haantjes tensor, Math. Ann. 339, no. 1 61-99

    2007

  13. [19]

    Ferapontov E V 2002 Decomposition of higher order equations o f Monge-Amp` ere type, Lett. Math. Phys. 62 193-198

    2002

  14. [20]

    Ferapontov E V 1995 Conformally plane metrics, systems of hyd rodynamic type, and non-local Hamiltonian operators, Russ. Math. Surv. , 50, 4, 811-813, DOI: 10.1070/RM1995v050n04ABEH002582

    1995 doi

  15. [21]

    Gibbons J 1981 Collisionless Boltzmann equations and integrable mo ment equations, Phys. D 3, no. 3 503-511

    1981

  16. [22]

    Gibbons J and Raimondo A 2007 Differential geometry of hydrody namic Vlasov equations, J. Geom. Phys. 57, no. 9 1815-1828. 17

    2007

  17. [23]

    Gibbons J and Tsarev S P 1996 Reductions of the Benney equa tions, Phys

    J. Gibbons J and Tsarev S P 1996 Reductions of the Benney equa tions, Phys. Lett. A 211 19-24

    1996

  18. [24]

    Kupershmidt B A and Manin Yu I 1978 Long wave equations with a fr ee surface. II. The Hamil- tonian structure and the higher equations, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 12, no.1, 25-37

    1978

  19. [25]

    Kupershmidt B A 1983 Deformations of integrable systems, Proc. R. Ir. Acad. Sect. A 83 45-74

    1983

  20. [26]

    Magri F 1978 A simple model of the integrable Hamiltonian system, J. Math. Phys. 19 no. 5, 1156–1162

    1978

  21. [27]

    di Mat., 73, 233-245, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-023-00792-y

    Manganaro N and Rizzo A 2024 Double wave solutions for a hyperb olic model describing nerve fiber, Ric. di Mat., 73, 233-245, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11587-023-00792-y

    2024 doi

  22. [28]

    Nonlinear Sci

    Manganaro N and Rizzo A 2024 A reduction procedure for deter mining exact solutions of second order hyperbolic equations, Comm. Nonlinear Sci. Num. Sim ., 108240, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2024.108240, 138,

    2024

  23. [29]

    Mokhov O I 1998 Symplectic and Poisson geometry on loop spaces of smooth manifolds and integrable equations. In S.P. Novikov and I.M. Krichever, editors, Reviews in mathematics and mathematical physics, volume 11, pages 1–128. Harwood academic publishers, 1998

    1998

  24. [30]

    Surveys 45, no

    Mokhov O I and Ferapontov E V 1990 Nonlocal Hamiltonian operat ors of hydrodynamic type that are connected with metrics of constant curvature, Russian Math. Surveys 45, no. 3, 218-219

    1990

  25. [31]

    Steklov Inst

    Pavlov M V 2018 Integrability of exceptional hydrodynamic-typ e systems, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 302 325-35; Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 302 Topologiya i Fizika 343-53

    2018

  26. [32]

    Pavlov M V 2003 Integrable hydrodynamic chains, J. Math. Phys. 44, no. 9 4134-4156

    2003

  27. [33]

    and Math

    Pavlov M V 2004 Classification of integrable Egorov hydrodynamic chains, Theoret. and Math. Phys. 138, no. 1, 45-58

    2004

  28. [34]

    and Math

    Pavlov M V, Taranov V B and El G A 2012 Generalized hydrodynamic reductions of the kinetic equation for a soliton gas, Theoret. and Math. Phys. 171, no. 2 675-682

    2012

  29. [35]

    Pavlov M V, Vergallo P and Vitolo R 2021 Classification of bi-Hamiltonia n pairs ex- tended by isometries, Proc. A. 477 no. 2251, Paper No. 20210185, 14 pp., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.0185

    2021

  30. [36]

    Perkus J K 1969 Exact solution of kinetics of a model classical flu id, The Physics of Fluids 12, no. 8

    1969

  31. [37]

    Rizzo A and Vergallo P 2024 Quasilinear differential constraints for parabolic system s of Jordan- block type, arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10101

    2024 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Spohn H 2023 Hydrodynamic Scales of Integrable Many-Particle Systems, arXiv:2301.08504

    2023 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Tsarev S P 1985 Poisson brackets and one-dimensional Hamilton ian systems of hydrodynamic type, Soviet Math. Dokl. 31 488-491

    1985

  34. [40]

    The generalized hodograph method, Math

    Tsarev S P 1991 The geometry of Hamiltonian systems of hydrod ynamic type. The generalized hodograph method, Math. USSR Izvestiya 37 397-419

    1991

  35. [41]

    Vergallo, Quasilinear systems of first order PDEs with nonloca l Hamiltonian structures, Math- ematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry, 25(4), 2022

    P. Vergallo, Quasilinear systems of first order PDEs with nonloca l Hamiltonian structures, Math- ematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry, 25(4), 2022

    2022

  36. [42]

    Unione Mat

    Vergallo P 2024 Non-homogeneous Hamiltonian structures for q uasilinear systems, Boll. Unione Mat. Ital., pages 1–14, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Vergallo P and Vitolo R, Homogeneous Hamiltonian operators and t he theory of coverings Diff. Geom. Its Appl., 75, 101713, April 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    Vergallo P and Vitolo R 2023 Projective geometry of homogeneou s second order Hamiltonian operators , Nonlinearity 36, 5311–5333, DOI: 10.1088/1361-654 4/acf269

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    Xue Lingling and Ferapontov E V 2020 Quasilinear systems of Jord an block type and the mKP hierarchy, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53 205202 (14pp)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Zakharov V E 1971 Kinetic equation for solitons, Sov. Phys. JETP 33 538-541. 19

    1971

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.