Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

When IoT Meet LLMs: Applications and Challenges

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that LLMs, arranged as layered agents from sensors to cloud, can give industrial IoT predictive-maintenance reasoning.

desk verdict A useful survey with an unsupported and mislabeled ToT-based system model; referee it for the survey, not for the architecture. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17722 v1 pith:COV6OJT4 submitted 2024-11-20 cs.DC cs.AIcs.NI

Ibrahim Kok , Orhan Demirci , Suat Ozdemir This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.DCcs.AIcs.NI
keywords LargeLanguageModelsInternetofThingsGenerativeIoTIndustrialTreeThoughtMulti-AgentSystemspredictivemaintenanceedge-fog-cloudarchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that large language models and IoT systems are mutually beneficial: IoT supplies LLMs with real-time sensory grounding, and LLMs supply IoT with advanced reasoning, natural-language interaction, and decision-making. It surveys the existing literature on LLM-IoT integration, organized by deployment level (on-device, edge/fog, cloud) and by problem area such as network management, task scheduling, security, and resource allocation. On top of this survey, it proposes a three-tier system model for industrial IoT in which small LLM agents at the physical layer, contextual agents at the edge/fog layer, and a coordinating virtual chairman in the cloud work together, guided by the Tree of Thought reasoning framework, to predict maintenance needs and monitor machine condition. A reader would care because the architecture offers a concrete way to get reasoning-based predictive maintenance without sending all raw sensor data to a large cloud model.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the Tree of Thought (ToT) reasoning framework, a prompting method in which the model explores multiple candidate reasoning paths at each step and selects the best one, applied to a three-tier multi-agent system. Operative agents (small models such as TinyBERT or DistilBERT) sit above individual sensors and produce initial thoughts about anomalies; contextual agents (e.g., Gemini Nano, LLaMA 2 Chat, CodeGen, Mistral) fuse pairs of sensor streams and produce contextual thoughts such as high temperature plus high power suggesting overheating; a virtual chairman in the cloud consolidates all thoughts with maintenance records and makes a final classification. The ToT structure is what lets the architecture branch and evaluate multiple failure hypotheses before committing to a maintenance decision.

What would settle it

Run the proposed three-tier architecture on an industrial testbed using the named small models (for example, TinyBERT, DistilBERT, Gemini Nano, and LLaMA 2 Chat) with real vibration, temperature, sound, and power-consumption data, and compare its detection accuracy and end-to-end latency against a single cloud LLM baseline; if the hierarchy cannot match or beat the baseline within the latency budget, the architecture's central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is twofold. First, the paper positions itself as the first study covering LLM-IoT integration across all three of edge, fog, and cloud paradigms, and it maps the field into a taxonomy of deployment and application categories. Second, building on that map, the paper proposes that a collective of smaller LLM agents, each handling a narrow sensing or fusion task and organized in a Tree-of-Thought hierarchy, can perform industrial predictive maintenance and condition monitoring. The physical layer's operative agents process individual sensor streams; the edge/fog layer's contextual agents fuse those streams and draw contextual inferences; the cloud layer's virtual chairman aggregates everything and issues the final maintenance decision, drawing on maintenance records. The claim is that this division of reasoning labor makes LLM-based maintenance feasible in resource-constrained IoT settings, where a single large model would be too heavy.

Load-bearing premise

The design assumes that the small language models assigned to sensors and edge nodes can actually perform the anomaly detection, data fusion, and contextual reasoning they are given, with acceptable accuracy and latency, but the paper provides no implementation or measurements to support this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Predictive maintenance can be performed by a hierarchy of small LLMs rather than a single large cloud model, reducing bandwidth use and enabling on-device privacy preservation.
  • Edge and fog agents can cut network traffic by forwarding only fused, contextual insights instead of raw sensor streams.
  • The Tree-of-Thought step lets the system weigh multiple machine-failure hypotheses before deciding on maintenance, which should make diagnoses more robust than single-pass classification.
  • The survey's deployment taxonomy gives designers a structured way to choose on-device, edge/fog, or cloud placement for LLM-powered IoT tasks.
  • If the model works, it gives industrial operators early warnings and automatic safety actions, such as slowing or halting a machine, rather than reactive repairs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same three-tier pattern should transfer to other industrial IoT monitoring tasks, such as energy management or quality control, because the fusion-and-context reasoning steps do not depend on the specific sensor types.
  • The paper's strongest untested prediction is that small models on weak devices can match a large cloud LLM's anomaly-detection accuracy; a head-to-head comparison on the same sensor dataset would settle this and is the natural next step.
  • A practical extension would add a confidence threshold at the contextual-agent layer, sending only uncertain cases to the cloud chairman; this would directly test the latency-versus-accuracy trade-off the architecture claims to improve.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper surveys the integration of large language models (LLMs) with Internet of Things (IoT) systems. It reviews LLM reasoning frameworks, deployment options (on-device, edge/fog, cloud), application areas (network management, task planning, security, resource allocation), and open challenges. The paper also proposes a three-tier multi-agent architecture for industrial IoT that assigns operative agents to sensors, contextual agents to edge/fog fusion, and a virtual chairman at the cloud layer, intended for predictive maintenance and condition monitoring. The abstract claims that this is the first comprehensive study covering IoT-LLM integration across edge, fog, and cloud systems, and that the proposed ToT-based system enables predictive maintenance.

Significance. The survey portion collects a broad set of recent works and organizes them by deployment level and application focus, which is useful as an entry point for researchers. The proposed architecture is clearly structured and the concrete example in Figure 2 helps communicate the intended data flow. However, the paper's central forward-looking claims are not supported by evidence: the proposed system is not implemented or evaluated, and the 'ToT-based' characterization is not matched by the described process. The novelty claim of being the first comprehensive study is also not credible in view of existing surveys. If the authors revise the claims, add a feasibility analysis or prototype evaluation, and correct the survey table errors, the paper could be a useful conceptual and survey contribution.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section VI-A and Fig. 2] The architecture is called a 'ToT-based collective intelligent system,' but the process and data flow described in Section VI-A.1 is a linear pipeline: each operative agent emits initial thoughts, contextual agents perform fusion, and the virtual chairman makes a final decision. Tree of Thought as defined in Section II-A requires generating multiple reasoning branches at each decision point, evaluating them, and selecting or backtracking among them; none of these operations appears in the system description. The term 'ToT-based' is therefore unsupported, and Figure 2 only shows sample thoughts rather than a branch-search procedure. The authors should either specify how ToT is instantiated (branch generation, evaluation, and selection) or relabel the model as a layered multi-agent pipeline.
  2. [Abstract and Section VI] The central claim that the proposed system 'enables predictive maintenance and condition monitoring' is not backed by any implementation, dataset, or evaluation. The paper does not explain how raw vibration, temperature, sound, and power-consumption time series are tokenized or serialized for the selected models (TinyBERT, DistilBERT, Gemini Nano, LLaMA 2 Chat), does not state latency or accuracy budgets, and provides no comparison with conventional anomaly-detection or predictive-maintenance baselines. At present this is a conceptual block diagram, not a demonstrated capability; the claim should be softened or the section should include a feasibility study or prototype evaluation.
  3. [Abstract and Section I] The statement that this is 'the first comprehensive study covering IoT-LLM integration between edge, fog, and cloud systems' is not credible in view of the paper's own reference [9] (Friha et al., 'LLM-based edge intelligence: A comprehensive survey'), as well as other recent surveys on LLM-IoT. The novelty claim should be revised to position the paper as a focused survey and conceptual architecture rather than the first comprehensive study.
  4. [Table I] Several entries in Table I are inconsistent with the text and with the cited works, which is load-bearing for a survey. The row 'Hassanin et al. [7] IOT-LLM' contradicts the text, where [7] is PLLM-CS; the row 'An et al. [3]' lists ChatGPT-4/PaLM 2 and MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, whereas Section V-D describes [3] as IoT-LLM evaluated on five IoT tasks with multiple LLMs; and 'Yu et al. [25]' appears twice as 'EDGE-LLM' and 'Edge-LLM' with different model entries. These errors need to be corrected before the survey can be used as a reliable reference.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV] The first paragraph says 'as shown in Figure 2' when discussing on-device, edge/fog, and cloud deployment; this should refer to Figure 1, since Figure 2 is the proposed architecture.
  2. [Section VI-A and Fig. 2] The text uses 'Conceptual Agents' while Figure 2 labels the same layer 'Contextual Agents'; the terminology should be unified.
  3. [Table I] There are typos in Table I: 'Adaptive Prunning' should be 'Adaptive Pruning', and 'LoRa' should be 'LoRA' in several places.
  4. [Table I] The SecurityBERT row lists 'BERT-11B', but the cited work [38] does not indicate an 11B parameter model; please clarify the model size or remove the unsupported value.
  5. [Section V-D] The text and Table I should be cross-checked for the attribution of IoT-LLM: the text attributes it to An et al. [3], while Table I assigns the name IoT-LLM to Hassanin et al. [7], which is confusing for readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a survey plus an unevaluated conceptual architecture; there are no fitted parameters, derivations, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce a prediction to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper does not present a derivation chain in the sense required for circularity. Section VI proposes a ToT-based multi-agent system model for IIoT predictive maintenance, but it is explicitly a conceptual model with a process/data-flow description, not a mathematical derivation. The claim that the system 'enables' predictive maintenance is an unsupported design proposal, not a result obtained from equations whose inputs already contain the output. The 'first comprehensive study' claim in the abstract is a novelty assertion, not a circular step. The paper's self-citations ([22] and [41]) are background references to earlier surveys by the authors and are not load-bearing for the proposed architecture or for any surveyed result. The possible discrepancy between the ToT label and the linear pipeline described in Section VI-A.1 is a question of fidelity or unspecified mechanism, not circularity. The strongest issues here are lack of evaluation, unstated tokenization of sensor data, and the absence of a real ToT search procedure; these are correctness or evidence concerns and are outside the definition of circular reasoning used in this analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted numerical parameters. Its central assumptions are about the reliability and deployability of LLM agents in the proposed IIoT architecture, none of which are tested. The invented entities are conceptual software roles rather than physical objects, and they lack independent evidence of effectiveness.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption LLM agents can reliably interpret sensor data and produce correct maintenance decisions from prompted text.
    Section VI assumes operative, contextual, and chairman agents perform anomaly detection and fusion correctly, but no experiments validate this.
  • domain assumption The named small and medium models can run on edge and fog devices within latency and resource constraints.
    Section IV and Fig. 2 assign TinyBERT, DistilBERT, Gemini Nano, LLaMA 2 Chat, and other models to the layers without any resource evaluation.
  • ad hoc to paper Tree of Thought reasoning improves accuracy over baseline prompting in this maintenance setting.
    Section VI uses ToT as the basis for the collective intelligence model but provides no comparative study or benchmark.
invented entities (3)
  • Operative Agent
    purpose: Processes raw sensor data at the physical layer to detect anomalies.
    Introduced in Section VI-A as a new role; no implementation or benchmark verifies its behavior.
  • Contextual Agent
    purpose: Fuses multi-sensor data at the edge/fog layer and performs contextual analysis.
    Section VI-A; conceptual only, with no measured performance.
  • Virtual Chairman
    purpose: Coordinates agents, fuses results, and makes final maintenance decisions in the cloud layer.
    Section VI-A and Fig. 2; no evaluation of decision accuracy or reliability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of When IoT Meet LLMs: Applications and Challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/COV6OJT4

@misc{pith2026241117722,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: When IoT Meet LLMs: Applications and Challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/COV6OJT4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17722}
}
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have positively and efficiently transformed workflows in many domains. One such domain with significant potential for LLM integration is the Internet of Things (IoT), where this integration brings new opportunities for improved decision making and system interaction. In this paper, we explore the various roles of LLMs in IoT, with a focus on their reasoning capabilities. We show how LLM-IoT integration can facilitate advanced decision making and contextual understanding in a variety of IoT scenarios. Furthermore, we explore the integration of LLMs with edge, fog, and cloud computing paradigms, and show how this synergy can optimize resource utilization, enhance real-time processing, and provide scalable solutions for complex IoT applications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study covering IoT-LLM integration between edge, fog, and cloud systems. Additionally, we propose a novel system model for industrial IoT applications that leverages LLM-based collective intelligence to enable predictive maintenance and condition monitoring. Finally, we highlight key challenges and open issues that provide insights for future research in the field of LLM-IoT integration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17722 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. LLM Deployment Strategies in IoT and reacting to tissue resistance during surgery, by integrating medical domain knowledge. This can ensure accuracy and enhances operation safety. B. Why LLMs need IoT? LLMs need real-time, multimodal, and rich data sources to best understand more advanced meaning and context-based decisions. There is great potential to meet this need due to the heterogeneous nature of IoT. IoT in pa… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proposed ToT-based Collective Intelligent System Model for IIoT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Talk with the Things: Integrating LLMs into IoT Networks

    cs.NI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A framework for placing small RAG-based LLMs at the edge of IoT networks is prototyped with a smart home setup, showing a trade-off between LLaMA 3 accuracy and slower inference versus Gemma 2B speed.

  2. A Unified Framework for Context-Aware IoT Management and State-of-the-Art IoT Traffic Anomaly Detection

    cs.NI 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A unified framework uses RAG-enhanced LLMs for IoT administration and a fine-tuned BERT model that reaches 99.87% accuracy on the Edge-IIoTset anomaly detection benchmark.

  3. AGI Enabled Solutions For IoX Layers Bottlenecks In Cyber-Physical-Social-Thinking Space

    cs.NI 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic review claims AGI can mitigate data overload, protocol heterogeneity, and identity explosion in IoX layers, but the supporting evidence consists mostly of narrower AI systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [9]

    Llm-based edge intelligence: A comprehensive survey on architectures, applications, security and trustworthiness,

    O. Friha, M. A. Ferrag, B. Kantarci, B. Cakmak, A. Ozgun, and N. Ghoualmi-Zine, “Llm-based edge intelligence: A comprehensive survey on architectures, applications, security and trustworthiness,”IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [7]

    Pllm- cs: Pre-trained large language model (llm) for cyber threat detection in satellite networks,

    M. Hassanin, M. Keshk, S. Salim, M. Alsubaie, and D. Sharma, “Pllm- cs: Pre-trained large language model (llm) for cyber threat detection in satellite networks,” Ad Hoc Networks , vol. 166, p. 103645, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Iot-llm: Enhancing real- world iot task reasoning with large language models,

    T. An, Y . Zhou, H. Zou, and J. Yang, “Iot-llm: Enhancing real- world iot task reasoning with large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02429, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  4. [25]

    Edge-llm: Enabling efficient large language model adaptation on edge devices via layerwise unified compression and adaptive layer tuning and voting,

    Z. Yu, Z. Wang, Y . Li, H. You, R. Gao, X. Zhou, S. R. Bommu, Y . K. Zhao, and Y . C. Lin, “Edge-llm: Enabling efficient large language model adaptation on edge devices via layerwise unified compression and adaptive layer tuning and voting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15758, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  5. [1]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,

    J. D. M.-W. C. Kenton and L. K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proceedings of naacL-HLT, vol. 1. Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2019, p. 2

    2019

  6. [2]

    Artificial hallucinations in chatgpt: implications in scientific writing,

    H. Alkaissi and S. I. McFarlane, “Artificial hallucinations in chatgpt: implications in scientific writing,” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 2, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [4]

    Penetrative ai: Making llms comprehend the physical world,

    H. Xu, L. Han, Q. Yang, M. Li, and M. Srivastava, “Penetrative ai: Making llms comprehend the physical world,” inProceedings of the 25th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 2024, pp. 1–7

    2024

  8. [5]

    A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions,

    L. Huang, W. Yu, W. Ma, W. Zhong, Z. Feng, H. Wang, Q. Chen, W. Peng, X. Feng, B. Qin et al. , “A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05232 , 2023

    arXiv 2023

Show all 41 references
  1. [6]

    Smart home reasoning systems: a systematic literature review,

    D. N. Mekuria, P. Sernani, N. Falcionelli, and A. F. Dragoni, “Smart home reasoning systems: a systematic literature review,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing , vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 4485–4502, 2021

    2021

  2. [8]

    Llmind: Orchestrating ai and iot with llm for complex task execution,

    H. Cui, Y . Du, Q. Yang, Y . Shao, and S. C. Liew, “Llmind: Orchestrating ai and iot with llm for complex task execution,” IEEE Communications Magazine, 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    Dlora: Distributed parameter-efficient fine-tuning solution for large language model,

    C. Gao and S. Q. Zhang, “Dlora: Distributed parameter-efficient fine-tuning solution for large language model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05182, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Perllm: Personalized inference scheduling with edge-cloud collaboration for diverse llm services,

    Z. Yang, Y . Yang, C. Zhao, Q. Guo, W. He, and W. Ji, “Perllm: Personalized inference scheduling with edge-cloud collaboration for diverse llm services,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14636 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Fedbiot: Llm local fine-tuning in federated learning without full model,

    F. Wu, Z. Li, Y . Li, B. Ding, and J. Gao, “Fedbiot: Llm local fine-tuning in federated learning without full model,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 2024, pp. 3345–3355

    2024

  6. [13]

    Attention is all you need in advances in neural information processing systems, 2017,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need in advances in neural information processing systems, 2017,” Search PubMed, pp. 5998–6008

    2017

  7. [14]

    Cutting down on prompts and parameters: Simple few-shot learning with language models,

    R. L. Logan IV , I. Bala ˇzevi´c, E. Wallace, F. Petroni, S. Singh, and S. Riedel, “Cutting down on prompts and parameters: Simple few-shot learning with language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13353, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,

    J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. V . Le, D. Zhou et al. , “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 35, pp. 24 824–24 837, 2022

    2022

  9. [16]

    Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models,

    S. Yao, D. Yu, J. Zhao, I. Shafran, T. Griffiths, Y . Cao, and K. Narasimhan, “Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 36, 2024

    2024

  10. [17]

    Program of thoughts prompting: Disentangling computation from reasoning for numerical reasoning tasks,

    W. Chen, X. Ma, X. Wang, and W. W. Cohen, “Program of thoughts prompting: Disentangling computation from reasoning for numerical reasoning tasks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.12588 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Retrieval- augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,

    P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V . Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. K ¨uttler, M. Lewis, W.-t. Yih, T. Rockt ¨aschel et al. , “Retrieval- augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 33, pp. 9459–9474, 2020

    2020

  12. [19]

    Efficient deep learning: A survey on making deep learning models smaller, faster, and better,

    G. Menghani, “Efficient deep learning: A survey on making deep learning models smaller, faster, and better,” ACM Computing Surveys , vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1–37, 2023

    2023

  13. [20]

    Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for large models: A comprehensive survey,

    Z. Han, C. Gao, J. Liu, J. Zhang, and S. Q. Zhang, “Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for large models: A comprehensive survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14608, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey,

    C. Perera, A. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos, “Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey,” IEEE Communi- cations Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 414–454, 2014

    2014

  15. [22]

    Internet of nano, bio- nano, biodegradable and ingestible things: a survey,

    S. Senturk, I. Kok, and F. Senturk, “Internet of nano, bio- nano, biodegradable and ingestible things: a survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12409, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Polca: Power oversubscription in llm cloud providers,

    P. Patel, E. Choukse, C. Zhang, ´I. Goiri, B. Warrier, N. Mahalingam, and R. Bianchini, “Polca: Power oversubscription in llm cloud providers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12908 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Edge-llm: A collaborative framework for large language model serving in edge computing,

    F. Cai, D. Yuan, Z. Yang, and L. Cui, “Edge-llm: A collaborative framework for large language model serving in edge computing,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 799–809

    2024

  18. [26]

    Edge and terminal cooper- ation enabled llm deployment optimization in wireless network,

    W. Zhao, W. Jing, Z. Lu, and X. Wen, “Edge and terminal cooper- ation enabled llm deployment optimization in wireless network,” in 2024 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops). IEEE, 2024, pp. 220–225

    2024

  19. [27]

    Resource allocation for stable llm training in mobile edge computing,

    C. Liu and J. Zhao, “Resource allocation for stable llm training in mobile edge computing,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and Mobile Computing , 2024, pp. 81–90

    2024

  20. [28]

    Dynamic fog computing for enhanced llm execution in medical applications,

    P. Zagar, V . Ravi, L. Aalami, S. Krusche, O. Aalami, and P. Schmied- mayer, “Dynamic fog computing for enhanced llm execution in medical applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04680 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Edgeshard: Efficient llm inference via collaborative edge computing,

    M. Zhang, J. Cao, X. Shen, and Z. Cui, “Edgeshard: Efficient llm inference via collaborative edge computing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14371, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Iot-lm: Large multisensory language models for the internet of things,

    S. Mo, R. Salakhutdinov, L.-P. Morency, and P. P. Liang, “Iot-lm: Large multisensory language models for the internet of things,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09801, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Casit: Collective intelligent agent system for internet of things,

    N. Zhong, Y . Wang, R. Xiong, Y . Zheng, Y . Li, M. Ouyang, D. Shen, and X. Zhu, “Casit: Collective intelligent agent system for internet of things,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Fate- llm: A industrial grade federated learning framework for large language models,

    T. Fan, Y . Kang, G. Ma, W. Chen, W. Wei, L. Fan, and Q. Yang, “Fate- llm: A industrial grade federated learning framework for large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10049 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Multi-modal transformer and reinforcement learning-based beam man- agement,

    M. Ghassemi, H. Zhang, A. Afana, A. B. Sediq, and M. Erol-Kantarci, “Multi-modal transformer and reinforcement learning-based beam man- agement,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19859 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Efficient prompting for llm-based generative internet of things,

    B. Xiao, B. Kantarci, J. Kang, D. Niyato, and M. Guizani, “Efficient prompting for llm-based generative internet of things,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10382, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Safely learning with private data: A federated learning framework for large language model,

    J. Zheng, H. Zhang, L. Wang, W. Qiu, H. Zheng, and Z. Zheng, “Safely learning with private data: A federated learning framework for large language model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14898 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Cyber knowledge completion using large language models,

    B. K. Webb, S. Purohit, and R. Meyur, “Cyber knowledge completion using large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16176 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Detecting command injection vulnerabilities in linux-based embedded firmware with llm-based taint analysis of library functions,

    J. Ye, X. Fei, X. d. C. de Carnavalet, L. Zhao, L. Wu, and M. Zhang, “Detecting command injection vulnerabilities in linux-based embedded firmware with llm-based taint analysis of library functions,” Computers & Security, vol. 144, p. 103971, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Efficient federated intrusion detection in 5g ecosystem using optimized bert-based model,

    F. Adjewa, M. Esseghir, and L. Merghem-Boulahia, “Efficient federated intrusion detection in 5g ecosystem using optimized bert-based model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19390 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Let’s hide from llms: An adaptive contextual privacy preservation method for time series data,

    U. U. Rehman, M. Hussain, T. D. Nguyen, and S. Lee, “Let’s hide from llms: An adaptive contextual privacy preservation method for time series data,” in Proceedings of the 2023 6th Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference, 2023, pp. 196–203

    2023

  32. [40]

    Pac-gpt: A novel approach to generating synthetic network traffic with gpt-3,

    D. K. Kholgh and P. Kostakos, “Pac-gpt: A novel approach to generating synthetic network traffic with gpt-3,” IEEE Access, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Explainable artificial intelligence (xai) for internet of things: a survey,

    I. K ¨ok, F. Y . Okay, ¨O. Muyanlı, and S. ¨Ozdemir, “Explainable artificial intelligence (xai) for internet of things: a survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 14 764–14 779, 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.