Pith. sign in

REVIEW

CFNS Ad-Hoc meeting on Radiative Corrections Whitepaper

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.09970 v3 pith:COXESXQX submitted 2020-12-17 nucl-th

Andrei Afanasev , Jaseer Ahmed , Igor Akushevich , Jan C. Bernauer , Peter G. Blunden , Andrea Bressan , Duane Byer , Ethan Cline
show 20 more authors
Markus Diefenthaler Jan M. Friedrich Haiyan Gao Alexandr Ilyichev Ulrich D. Jentschura Vladimir Khachatryan Lin Li Wally Melnitchouk Richard Milner Fred Myhrer Chao Peng Jianwei Qiu Udit Raha Axel Schmidt Vanamali C. Shastry Hubert Spiesberger Stan Srednyak Steffen Strauch Pulak Talukdar Weizhi Xiong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-th
keywords ad-hoccurrentexperimentsnuclearradiativewhitepaperworkshopbrook
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current precision scattering experiments and even more so many experiments planed for the Electron Ion Collider will be limited by systematics. From the theory side, a fundamental source of systematic uncertainty is the correct treatment of radiative effects. To gauge the current state of technique and knowledge, help the cross-pollination between different direction of nuclear physics, and to give input to the yellow report process, the community met in an ad-hoc workshop hosted by the Center for Frontiers in Nuclear Science, Stony Brook University. This whitepaper is a collection of contributions to this workshop.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools