Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 72 references

Boosting State Discrimination in Quantum Brownian Motion Channel via Memory-Induced Coherence Preservation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Adding heat to a squeezed probe preserves its coherence and improves state discrimination.

desk verdict Plausible and genuinely new continuous-variable result, but the quantitative claims rest on an unbounded short-time truncation and a partly circular coherence witness. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15405 v1 pith:CPCRWDRS submitted 2026-07-16 quant-ph

João C. P. Porto , Pedro R. Dieguez , Carlos H. S. Vieira , Irismar G. da Paz , Giandomenico Palumbo , Lucas S. Marinho This is my paper
classification quant-ph MSC 81P4581S22
keywords QuantumBrownianmotionstatediscriminationcoherencepreservationthermal-squeezedstatesnon-MarkoviandynamicshomodynedetectionHelstromboundGaussianchannels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that in a Quantum Brownian Motion channel, raising the initial thermal noise of a squeezed probe can preserve quantum coherence rather than destroy it, and this preservation sharply reduces the error in discriminating between orthogonal squeezing directions. The effect is driven by a transient non-thermalization of the probe with the bath: the probe keeps an excess non-thermal excitation component even at high temperature, which sustains coherence. As a result, homodyne detection reaches near-optimal performance, approaching the Helstrom bound with error probabilities around 4% at carefully chosen measurement times. A sympathetic reader would care because the result turns a supposedly harmful resource (heat) into a protective one, offering a concrete way to do quantum communication in hot, dissipative environments without suppressing the environmental coupling.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by the exact non-Markovian QBM master equation and its short-time weak-coupling solution, where the environmental diffusion matrix N(t) is approximated to first order in the damping, dropping O(g⁴) terms. On top of this dynamical map, the paper uses the relative entropy of coherence for Gaussian states, the non-thermal excitation witness Θ, and the Bures distance to bound the Helstrom error; a homodyne receiver with critical threshold q_c is designed to estimate the achievable error probability. The central mathematical object is the non-thermal excitation witness Θ, which tracks the excess excitation beyond the thermal value set by the symplectic eigenvalue and opera

What would settle it

Compute the exact environmental noise matrix N(t) without the short-time truncation (or by numerically integrating the exact master equation) and verify whether the ~4% homodyne error and the coherence revivals survive at the longest evaluated times and in the Markovian (x=5) case; if the error rises toward the classical 50% limit or the revival disappears, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a QBM channel, increasing the initial thermal noise of a squeezed probe preserves the relative entropy of coherence and boosts the distinguishability of two states squeezed along orthogonal quadratures, thereby lowering the state-discrimination error probability. The mechanism is a transient non-thermalization: the probe's excess excitation beyond its thermal value, quantified by the non-thermal excitation witness Θ = n̄ − (ν−1)/2, remains large during short-time non-Markovian dynamics, keeping the Wigner distributions of the two encoded states oriented apart. The paper further shows that quadrature homodyne detection, using a variance-based threshold, achieves n

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative results rest on a weak-coupling, short-time truncation of the environmental noise kernel that drops higher-order terms, with an order-of-magnitude but not rigorous justification that the neglected terms stay small over the full evaluated time window.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thermal-squeezed states become viable information carriers in hot non-Markovian channels, with squeezing phase encoding logical bits.
  • Homodyne detection, a standard and readily implementable measurement, can approach the Helstrom limit under these conditions.
  • Initial purity is not required for quantum advantage: highly mixed, hot probes can outperform cold ones in state discrimination.
  • Squeezing remains more robust than displacement as a resource when preparation noise is added at fixed energy cost.
  • Protocols must operate within specific short-time windows to exploit the oscillatory regime where error rates drop to about 4%.
  • The non-thermal excitation witness Θ offers a practical figure of merit for selecting probe parameters in noisy environments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism—transient non-thermalization driven by memory effects—might occur in other non-Markovian Gaussian channels, suggesting a general design principle: engineer the probe's excess excitation to outpace thermalization.
  • Because coherence preservation equates to increased channel capacity for pure states, the reported effect likely translates directly into improved transmission rates for continuous-variable quantum communication in high-temperature settings.
  • A direct experimental test is feasible with an optical parametric oscillator and homodyne detection: vary the probe's initial thermal occupation while keeping squeezing fixed and look for the predicted reduction in error probability at the optimal measurement time.
  • The time-dependent oscillatory error suggests a synchronization advantage: if the receiver can actively wait for the optimal window, the protocol effectively turns decoherence into a controlled resource.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies single-mode Gaussian thermal-squeezed (and, in an appendix, displaced) probes evolving through a QBM channel with Ohmic spectral density. Using the weak-coupling short-time approximation of the exact master equation, it evolves the covariance matrix and computes the relative entropy of coherence, a 'non-thermal excitation witness' Θ, the von Neumann entropy production rate, the Bures distance, Fuchs–van de Graaf bounds on the Helstrom error probability, and the error probability of a quadrature-homodyne receiver for binary states squeezed in orthogonal directions. The central claim is that increasing the initial probe temperature T_P, in combination with squeezing, preserves coherence and improves state discrimination, with homodyne error probabilities reaching ~4% at optimal times and approaching the Helstrom window.

Significance. If the central effect is real, the paper offers a counterintuitive and potentially useful resource: high-temperature thermal-squeezed states can outperform pure squeezed probes in a dissipative QBM channel, and the effect is connected to transient non-thermal behavior rather than to initial purity. The analytic treatment is generally careful and uses standard continuous-variable tools; the closed coefficients in Appendix B, the fidelity and homodyne formulas, and the bounds are nontrivial and are applied consistently. The paper makes falsifiable predictions (coherence preservation and specific error curves as functions of T_P, T_B, x, r, and φ) without fitting to data. However, the quantitative results currently rest on an uncontrolled truncation, and the 'near-optimal' claim needs a quantitative tightness statement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (A8)] The central quantitative results (Figs. 2–6) are all obtained from the truncated noise kernel in Eq. (A8), in which the exponential factors in the integral are set to unity and O(g^4) terms are dropped. The justification 'Γ∼10^-4' is not established for the parameter range used. For x=0.15 the prefactor in Eq. (B1) is g^2/(4x)≈1.7×10^-2, and the bracket contains oscillatory exponential-integral terms with argument τ/x up to 200; the accumulated integral Γ~(t)=2∫Γ dt could therefore reach values where the exponentials are non-negligible, and the 'exact' N(t) may differ materially from the truncated version. The ν≥1 physicality check is performed on the truncated map and cannot detect errors that preserve positivity. Please provide a numerical bound on Γ~(t) over τ∈[0,30] for the plotted parameters, or benchmark Figs. 2–6 against the untruncated integral in Eq. (A6).
  2. [Sec. III B, Eq. (8) and Fig. 6] The claim that homodyne detection 'approaches the Helstrom limit' is based on Fuchs–van de Graaf bounds p±, not on the exact Helstrom bound, and the width of the uncertainty window is not quantified. If at the operating times the interval [p−,p+] spans a large fraction of a decade, the statement 'near-optimal' is not supported. Please report numerical values of p−, pH_error, and p+ at the 4% operating points, or compute the exact trace distance for Gaussian states numerically, and state the maximum gap over the times shown. This is load-bearing because the communication-performance claim depends on near-saturation of the Helstrom bound.
  3. [Sec. III A, Eq. (11)] The non-thermal excitation witness Θ is defined as n̄−(ν−1)/2. Since the coherence functional (10) depends only on (ν,n̄), and Θ is a linear combination of those same two parameters, the statement that coherence preservation is 'driven by' a pronounced non-thermal component (Fig. 3 and surrounding text) is largely a restatement of the coherence dynamics rather than an independent mechanistic explanation. To make the mechanism load-bearing, show that Θ behaves differently from a generic monotone of (ν,n̄), for example by comparing with a thermal-state benchmark at fixed n̄, or by identifying which master-equation term (damping vs. diffusion) controls the trajectory in the (ν,n̄) plane.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II A, Eq. (4) and all figures] The squeezing phase is denoted χ in Sec. II A and Eq. (4), but φ in Sec. II B and in the figure captions and results. Please make the notation consistent and explicitly set φ=χ (or vice versa).
  2. [Sec. IV and Fig. 4] Fig. 4 and the discussion refer to the 'entropy production rate', but Eq. (12) defines the von Neumann entropy production rate of the probe, not of the thermal bath. Clarify whose entropy production is plotted and avoid conflating the two in the interpretation.
  3. [Title, abstract, Sec. III A] The term 'memory-induced' is stronger than the evidence shown: coherence preservation is reported also for x=5 (near-Markovian), e.g., Figs. 2(g,h) and 5(d). Either temper the title/abstract language or provide a quantitative comparison that isolates the non-Markovian contribution.
  4. [Sec. III A and Appendix A] The phrase 'short non-Markovian timescales' may mislead: for x=0.15 and τ=30, one has t=200/ω_0, i.e., 200 oscillator periods. The approximation is 'short' relative to the damping time, not the oscillator period; please clarify to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Error probabilities are computed directly from the covariance map (no fitting, no load-bearing self-citation); the only circular element is the Θ 'non-thermal excitation' witness, a definitional restatement of the coherence-carrying combination (n̄, ν).

  1. self definitional [Sec. II C, Eq. (11) and Sec. III A (Fig. 3 discussion)]
    "Therefore, it is natural to define the non-thermal excitation witness as Θ = n̄−(ν−1)/2, (11) where for purely thermal states, this quantity vanishes (Θ = 0). Conversely, this parameter quantifies the excess excitation number beyond the thermal contribution fixed by the symplectic eigenvalue. It therefore witnesses the non-thermal, coherence-carrying component of a single-mode Gaussian state. ... As illustrated in Figure 3, this enhancement is driven by a pronounced non-thermal component in the transient dynamics."

    Θ is defined as the excess of n̄ over the thermal value (ν−1)/2 fixed by the symplectic eigenvalue, which is exactly the combination of the two invariants (n̄, ν) that determines the coherence measure C in Eq. (10). By construction C=0 iff n̄=(ν−1)/2, so Θ is the 'coherence-carrying' part of the state. Attributing the coherence preservation to 'a pronounced non-thermal component [Θ]' therefore restates the coherence dynamics under a new name rather than providing an independent mechanism. The quantitative state-discrimination results are, however, computed directly from the evolved covariance matrix and do not depend on this interpretive step.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular in its quantitative core. The state-discrimination error probabilities (homodyne p_H_error, Bures distance, Helstrom window) are computed directly from the time-evolved covariance matrix via the QBM map (Eq. 3), using established external results for the master equation [33,69], the weak-coupling short-time approximation [38], and the Gaussian coherence formula [19,20]. There is no fitting of parameters to target data, no 'predicted' quantity that is set by construction, and no invocation of a uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work. The paper's self-citations ([12,40,41,43,44] etc.) concern position-momentum correlations and earlier metrology applications and are not load-bearing for the present claims. The one genuinely circular-adjacent element is the 'non-thermal excitation witness' Θ (Eq. 11), defined from the same pair of state invariants (n̄, ν) that determines the coherence measure in Eq. (10), with Θ=0 engineered to coincide with C=0. Using this witness to explain why coherence is preserved ('this enhancement is driven by a pronounced non-thermal component') is partly a restatement rather than an independent mechanism; however, this affects only the interpretive narrative, not the computed error probabilities or the comparison with the Helstrom window. The O(g^4) truncation of Eq. (A8) and the Γ∼10^-4 estimate are approximation-validity concerns, not circularity. Overall the central claim retains independent computational content, so the score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central calculation uses standard Gaussian-state tools and a specific QBM truncation. The key inputs not derived in the paper are the Xu coherence theorem, the high-temperature bath expansion, and the O(g^2) truncation of N(t). No independent calibration or experimental data are provided.

free parameters (5)
  • system-bath coupling strength g = 0.1
    Fixed in all plots; the weak-coupling approximation and the Γ∼10^-4 estimate rely on this value.
  • non-Markovianity ratio x = ω_c/ω_0 = 0.15 and 5.0
    Chosen to contrast strongly non-Markovian and near-Markovian regimes; quantitative conclusions may depend on these choices.
  • bath temperature T_B = 1000 (natural units)
    The high-temperature bath regime is used for the analytic diffusion coefficients in Appendix B.
  • initial probe temperature T_P = 0 or 1000
    The central control parameter; T_P=1000 corresponds to n̄≈1000 thermal photons.
  • squeezing amplitude r and phase χ/φ = r=0.5, 1.0, 1.5; χ=0, π/2
    Scanned to demonstrate the effect; no optimization over r is performed.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Probe and bath remain Gaussian; the full dynamics are captured by first and second moments via Eq. (3).
    All results use Gaussian states and the QBM covariance map; non-Gaussian effects are excluded by construction.
  • domain assumption Weak-coupling, short-time truncation: exponentials in N(t) are set to unity and O(g^4) terms are dropped (Eq. A8).
    Every numerical result depends on this truncation; validity is checked only by an order-of-magnitude estimate.
  • domain assumption High-temperature bath expansion coth(ℏω/2k_BT) ≈ 2k_BT/ℏω.
    The analytic Δ and Π coefficients in Appendix B use this expansion; it restricts the regime of validity.
  • standard math Xu et al.'s theorem that thermal states are optimal incoherent references for single-mode Gaussian states.
    Basis for the relative entropy of coherence measure in Eq. (10), cited as Ref. [19].
  • standard math Fuchs-van de Graaf inequalities are valid and used to bound the Helstrom error probability.
    Used in Eq. (8) to define the Helstrom window; no exact Helstrom bound for the two Gaussian states is computed.
invented entities (1)
  • Non-thermal excitation witness Θ = n̄ − (ν−1)/2
    purpose: Diagnostic to attribute coherence preservation to excess non-thermal excitations during the dynamics.
    Defined in Eq. (11); it is an algebraic function of existing state parameters (n̄ and ν), so it has no independent experimental handle and covaries with the coherence measure itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Boosting State Discrimination in Quantum Brownian Motion Channel via Memory-Induced Coherence Preservation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CPCRWDRS

@misc{pith2026260715405,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Boosting State Discrimination in Quantum Brownian Motion Channel via Memory-Induced Coherence Preservation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CPCRWDRS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15405}
}
read the original abstract

Preserving quantum resources in dissipative environments is a fundamental challenge in quantum information processing. While environmental interactions usually degrade quantum resources, we theoretically show that in a Quantum Brownian Motion (QBM) channel, continuous-variable state discrimination can be improved by increasing, rather than minimizing, the initial thermal noise. Specifically, without suppressing the inherent environmental dissipation, when combined with squeezing, this initial noise induces a coherence preservation mechanism driven by the transient non-thermalization of the probe with the bath. This preservation translates into a pronounced reduction in error probabilities for state discrimination between orthogonal squeezing directions. Furthermore, we also show that quadrature homodyne detection achieves near-optimal performance, approaching the Helstrom limit. These results highlight the advantage of exploiting thermal-squeezed states, offering a robust physical architecture for quantum communication in high-temperature environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15405 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sketch of a quantum state discrimination protocol. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dynamics of the relative entropy of coherence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Dynamics of the entropy production rate across non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Error probabilities for discriminating between orthog [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dynamics of the Bures distance for variance-encoded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Phase-space evolution of the Wigner function for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dynamics of relative entropy of coherence subject to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Consequently, these phase-encoded thermal-squeezed states prove to be highly robust carriers of information across inherently noisy environments. Although recent work has shown that displacement can outperform squeezing as a resource in the presence of loss [35], our system exhibits a distinct behavior during short- time non-Markovian dynamics. Specifical...

    2024

  2. [2]

    Optimal threshold-based discrimination is achieved by establishing de- cision boundaries at the critical intersection points±q c

    presents a broadened, anti-squeezed widthσ as. Optimal threshold-based discrimination is achieved by establishing de- cision boundaries at the critical intersection points±q c. If the measurement resultqfalls within the inner region defined by the thresholds (|q| ≤qc), the receiver assigns the result to the position-squeezed state and declares bit

  3. [3]

    If the outcome falls in the outer tail regions (|q|> q c), the receiver declares bit 1. Assuming the encoded states are transmitted with equal prior probabilities (p0 =p 1 = 1/2), the error probability is computed by integrating over the distributions in their respective failure regions. The total error probability is given in terms of the error function:...

  4. [4]

    R. Brown, A brief account of microscopical observations on the particles contained in the pollen of plants and the general existence of active molecules in organic and inorganic bodies., Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal 1, 358–371 (1828)

  5. [5]

    A. Einstein, ¨Uber die von der molekularkinetischen the- orie der w¨ arme geforderte bewegung von in ruhenden fl¨ ussigkeiten suspendierten teilchen, Annalen der Physik 322, 549 (1905)

    1905

  6. [6]

    Breuer and F

    H. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quan- tum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2002)

    2002

  7. [7]

    Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, Series in mod- ern condensed matter physics (World Scientific, 2008)

    U. Weiss,Quantum Dissipative Systems, Series in mod- ern condensed matter physics (World Scientific, 2008)

    2008

  8. [8]

    R. M. Mazo,Brownian Motion: Fluctuations, Dynamics, and Applications(Oxford University Press, 2008)

    2008

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Lampo, M

    A. Lampo, M. March, and M. Lewenstein,Quantum Brownian Motion Revisited: Extensions and Applica- tions, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Quantum tunnelling in a dissipative system, Annals of physics149, 374 (1983)

    1983

  3. [11]

    Caldeira and A

    A. Caldeira and A. Leggett, Path integral approach to quantum brownian motion, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications121, 587 (1983)

    1983

  4. [12]

    Blume-Kohout and W

    R. Blume-Kohout and W. H. Zurek, Quantum darwin- ism in quantum brownian motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 240405 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    Galve, R

    F. Galve, R. Zambrini, and S. Maniscalco, Non- markovianity hinders quantum darwinism, Scientific Re- ports6, 19607 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Mirkhalaf, M

    S. Mirkhalaf, M. Mehboudi, Z. Nafari Qaleh, and S. Rahimi-Keshari, Operational significance of nonclassi- cality in nonequilibrium gaussian quantum thermometry, New Journal of Physics26, 023046 (2024)

    2024

  7. [16]

    Nakatsugawa, T

    K. Nakatsugawa, T. Fujii, and S. Tanda, Quantum time crystal by decoherence: Proposal with an incommensu- rate charge density wave ring, Phys. Rev. B96, 094308 (2017)

    2017

  8. [17]

    Nakatsugawa, S

    K. Nakatsugawa, S. Tanda, and T. Fujii, Caldeira-leggett quantum time crystal: Periodic revival of quantum co- herence by a sub-ohmic environment, Phys. Rev. A112, 022202 (2025)

    2025

  9. [18]

    Torre, W

    G. Torre, W. Roga, and F. Illuminati, Non-markovianity of gaussian channels, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 070401 (2015)

    2015

  10. [19]

    L. A. M. Souza, H. S. Dhar, M. N. Bera, P. Liuzzo- Scorpo, and G. Adesso, Gaussian interferometric power as a measure of continuous-variable non-markovianity, Phys. Rev. A92, 052122 (2015)

    2015

  11. [20]

    Liuzzo-Scorpo, W

    P. Liuzzo-Scorpo, W. Roga, L. A. M. Souza, N. K. Bernardes, and G. Adesso, Non-markovianity hierarchy of gaussian processes and quantum amplification, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 050401 (2017)

    2017

  12. [21]

    Pellitteri, V

    G. Pellitteri, V. Giovannetti, and V. Cavina, Control- ling the non-markovianity of quantum brownian motion (2026), arXiv:2606.30730 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Xu, Quantifying coherence of gaussian states, Phys

    J. Xu, Quantifying coherence of gaussian states, Phys. Rev. A93, 032111 (2016)

    2016

  14. [23]

    Baumgratz, M

    T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Quantify- ing coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 140401 (2014)

    2014

  15. [24]

    Streltsov, G

    A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 041003 (2017)

    2017

  16. [25]

    Designolle, R

    S. Designolle, R. Uola, K. Luoma, and N. Brunner, Set coherence: Basis-independent quantification of quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 220404 (2021)

    2021

  17. [26]

    O. A. D. Molitor, A. H. A. Malavazi, R. D. Baldij˜ ao, A. C. Orthey, I. L. Paiva, and P. R. Dieguez, Quantum switch instabilities with an open control, Communica- tions Physics7, 373 (2024)

    2024

  18. [27]

    P. A. Camati, J. F. G. Santos, and R. M. Serra, Coher- ence effects in the performance of the quantum otto heat engine, Phys. Rev. A99, 062103 (2019)

    2019

  19. [28]

    J. F. G. Santos, C. H. S. Vieira, and W. R. Cardoso, Im- proving parameter estimation in gaussian channels using quantum coherence, Phys. Rev. A111, 052404 (2025)

    2025

  20. [29]

    J. F. G. Santos, Enhanced frequency estimation by non- gaussianity of fock states, The European Physical Jour- nal Plus141, 184 (2026)

    2026

  21. [30]

    Lally, N

    S. Lally, N. Werren, J. Al-Khalili, and A. Rocco, Master equation for non-markovian quantum brownian motion: The emergence of lateral coherences, Phys. Rev. A105, 012209 (2022)

    2022

  22. [31]

    Chefles, Quantum state discrimination, Contempo- rary Physics41, 401 (2000)

    A. Chefles, Quantum state discrimination, Contempo- rary Physics41, 401 (2000)

    2000

  23. [32]

    Namkung and H.-T

    M. Namkung and H.-T. Lim, Contextuality-enhanced quantum state discrimination under fixed failure prob- ability, Phys. Rev. A113, 022216 (2026)

    2026

  24. [33]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum informa- tion with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 513 (2005)

    2005

  25. [34]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  26. [35]

    C. W. Helstrom,Quantum detection and estimation the- ory, Vol. 1 (Journal of Statistical Physics, 1969) pp. 231– 252

    1969

  27. [36]

    Torre and F

    G. Torre and F. Illuminati, Exact non-markovian dy- namics of gaussian quantum channels: Finite-time and asymptotic regimes, Phys. Rev. A98, 012124 (2018)

    2018

  28. [37]

    Chesi, S

    G. Chesi, S. Olivares, and M. G. A. Paris, Squeezing- enhanced phase-shift-keyed binary communication in noisy channels, Phys. Rev. A97, 032315 (2018)

    2018

  29. [38]

    Walsh, L

    A. Walsh, L. Conlon, B. Shajilal, O. Erkilic, J. Janousek, S. Assad, J. Zhao, and P. K. Lam, All-gaussian state dis- crimination beyond the coherent helstrom bound (2025), arXiv:2510.20096 [quant-ph]

    2025

  30. [39]

    M. G. Genoni, S. Olivares, and M. G. A. Paris, Optical phase estimation in the presence of phase diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 153603 (2011)

    2011

  31. [40]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc ´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 621 (2012)

    2012

  32. [41]

    Vasile, S

    R. Vasile, S. Olivares, M. G. A. Paris, and S. Man- iscalco, Continuous-variable-entanglement dynamics in structured reservoirs, Phys. Rev. A80, 062324 (2009)

    2009

  33. [42]

    O. R. de Araujo, L. S. Marinho, J. F. G. Santos, and C. H. S. Vieira, Towards gravimetry enhancement with 13 squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A113, L020401 (2026)

    2026

  34. [43]

    J. C. P. Porto, C. H. S. Vieira, P. R. Dieguez, I. G. da Paz, and L. S. Marinho, Multiparameter estimation with position-momentum correlated gaussian probes, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal Plus141, 194 (2026)

    2026

  35. [44]

    J. a. C. P. Porto, C. H. S. Vieira, I. G. da Paz, P. R. Dieguez, and L. S. Marinho, Temperature and non- markovian parameter estimation in quantum brownian motion, Phys. Rev. A112, 042424 (2025)

    2025

  36. [45]

    T. M. S. Oliveira, L. S. Marinho, F. C. V. de Brito, M. Sampaio, and I. G. da Paz, Matter-wave squeezing from gouy phase: toward a new tool for quantum tech- nology, New Journal of Physics27, 084505 (2025)

    2025

  37. [46]

    J. C. P. Porto, L. S. Marinho, P. R. Dieguez, I. G. da Paz, and C. H. S. Vieira, Enhancing gaussian quantum metrology with position-momentum correlations, Phys- ica Scripta100, 015111 (2024)

    2024

  38. [47]

    L. S. Marinho, P. R. Dieguez, C. H. S. Vieira, and I. G. da Paz, Gouy phase and quantum interference with cross- wigner functions for matter-waves, Scientific Reports14, 12223 (2024)

    2024

  39. [48]

    L. S. Marinho, I. G. da Paz, and M. Sampaio, Squeez- ing and slowed quantum decoherence in the double-slit experiment, Phys. Rev. A101, 062109 (2020)

    2020

  40. [49]

    F. R. Lustosa, P. R. Dieguez, and I. G. da Paz, Irrealism from fringe visibility in matter-wave double-slit interfer- ence with initial contractive states, Phys. Rev. A102, 052205 (2020)

    2020

  41. [50]

    O. R. de Araujo, L. S. Marinho, H. A. S. Costa, M. Sam- paio, and I. G. da Paz, Shannon entropy and interference in the double-slit experiment with matter waves, Modern Physics Letters A34, 1950017 (2019)

    2019

  42. [51]

    Marian and T

    P. Marian and T. A. Marian, Squeezed states with ther- mal noise. i. photon-number statistics, Phys. Rev. A47, 4474 (1993)

    1993

  43. [52]

    Olivares, Quantum optics in the phase space, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal Special Topics203, 3 (2012)

    S. Olivares, Quantum optics in the phase space, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal Special Topics203, 3 (2012)

    2012

  44. [53]

    S. M. Barnett and S. Croke, Quantum state discrimina- tion, Adv. Opt. Photon.1, 238 (2009)

    2009

  45. [54]

    Salazar and A

    R. Salazar and A. Delgado, Quantum tomography via un- ambiguous state discrimination, Phys. Rev. A86, 012118 (2012)

    2012

  46. [55]

    Dittmann, Explicit formulae for the bures metric, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and General32, 2663 (1999)

    J. Dittmann, Explicit formulae for the bures metric, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and General32, 2663 (1999)

    1999

  47. [56]

    Zanardi, L

    P. Zanardi, L. Campos Venuti, and P. Giorda, Bures met- ric over thermal state manifolds and quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. A76, 062318 (2007)

    2007

  48. [57]

    Palumbo, Momentum-space cigar geometry in topo- logical phases, The European Physical Journal Plus133, 23 (2018)

    G. Palumbo, Momentum-space cigar geometry in topo- logical phases, The European Physical Journal Plus133, 23 (2018)

    2018

  49. [58]

    Einsiedler, A

    S. Einsiedler, A. Ketterer, and H.-P. Breuer, Non- markovianity of quantum brownian motion, Phys. Rev. A102, 022228 (2020)

    2020

  50. [59]

    Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, Journal of Modern Optics41, 2315 (1994)

    R. Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, Journal of Modern Optics41, 2315 (1994)

    1994

  51. [60]

    Fuchs and J

    C. Fuchs and J. van de Graaf, Cryptographic distin- guishability measures for quantum-mechanical states, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory45, 1216 (1999)

    1999

  52. [61]

    Olivares, S

    S. Olivares, S. Cialdi, F. Castelli, and M. G. A. Paris, Ho- modyne detection as a near-optimum receiver for phase- shift-keyed binary communication in the presence of phase diffusion, Phys. Rev. A87, 050303(R) (2013)

    2013

  53. [62]

    P. P. da Silva, C. H. S. Vieira, L. S. Marinho, M. Sam- paio, and I. G. da Paz, The role of position-momentum correlations in coherence freezing and purity behavior of macromolecular gaussian states, The European Physical Journal Plus139, 1042 (2024)

    2024

  54. [63]

    H¨ orhammer and H

    C. H¨ orhammer and H. B¨ uttner, Information and en- tropy in quantum brownian motion, Journal of Statistical Physics133, 1161 (2008)

    2008

  55. [64]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Col- loquium: Non-markovian dynamics in open quantum sys- tems, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021002 (2016)

    2016

  56. [65]

    H. P. Yuen and M. Ozawa, Ultimate information carry- ing limit of quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 363 (1993)

    1993

  57. [66]

    J. A. Giordmaine and R. C. Miller, Tunable coherent parametric oscillation in linbo 3 at optical frequencies, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 973 (1965)

    1965

  58. [67]

    E. C. Lima, B. Marques, M. Martinelli, and L. S. Cruz, Role of seeding in the generation of polarization squeezed light by an atomic kerr medium, Phys. Rev. A110, 023704 (2024)

    2024

  59. [68]

    Monta˜ na Guerrero, R

    A. Monta˜ na Guerrero, R. L. Rinc´ on Celis, P. Nussen- zveig, M. Martinelli, A. M. Marino, and H. M. Florez, Continuous variable entanglement in an optical paramet- ric oscillator based on a nondegenerate four wave mixing process in hot alkali atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 1636...

    2022

  60. [69]

    G. C. Borba, R. S. N. Moreira, L. S. Cruz, M. Martinelli, D. Felinto, and J. W. R. Tabosa, Continuous variable en- tanglement in a cold-atom mirrorless optical parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. Res.8, L012006 (2026)

    2026

  61. [70]

    J. C. d. A. Carvalho, R. S. N. Moreira, and J. W. R. Tabosa, Self-interfering technique for observing intensity squeezing in four-wave mixing in a pure two-level system, Phys. Rev. A113, 033731 (2026)

    2026

  62. [71]

    F. A. S. Barbosa, A. S. Coelho, K. N. Cassemiro, P. Nussenzveig, C. Fabre, A. S. Villar, and M. Martinelli, Quantum state reconstruction of spectral field modes: Homodyne and resonator detection schemes, Phys. Rev. A88, 052113 (2013)

    2013

  63. [72]

    B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz, and Y. Zhang, Quantum brownian motion in a general environment: Exact master equation with nonlocal dissipation and colored noise, Phys. Rev. D45, 2843 (1992)

    1992

  64. [73]

    Intravaia, S

    F. Intravaia, S. Maniscalco, and A. Messina, Density- matrix operatorial solution of the non-markovian master equation for quantum brownian motion, Phys. Rev. A 67, 042108 (2003)

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.