Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Electric Field-Induced Formation of a 2D Adatom Gas on Cryogenic Li Surfaces

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Electric fields turn crystalline lithium surfaces into a 2D adatom gas.

desk verdict Plausible and novel mechanism for field-driven kink dissolution on Li, but the quantitative critical field rests on a reference correction that needs a direct calculation before I'd trust the 1 V/Å number. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06518 v1 pith:CPL6ETXK submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Shyam Katnagallu , Huan Zhao , Se-Ho Kim , Baptiste Gault , Christoph Freysoldt , Jörg Neugebauer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords 2Dadatomgaselectricfieldsurfacephasediagramlithium(110)kink-sitereservoirdesorptionatomprobetomographydensityfunctionaltheorydiffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using density functional theory that includes the electrostatic field explicitly, the paper predicts that a lithium (110) surface under a field of about 1 V/Å stops being a normal stepped crystal: kink atoms become thermodynamically unstable in favor of terrace adsorption sites, producing a dense two-dimensional adatom gas even at cryogenic temperature. The same field reverses the preferred adsorption site from on-top to bridge above about 1.1 V/Å and flattens the energy surface between them, meaning lithium adatoms can diffuse almost without a barrier while still being bound against field desorption. This gives a unified explanation for the Taylor-cone-like plumes observed in atom probe experiments on pure Li and identifies electric field as a tunable parameter that can switch a solid surface into a mobile, gas-like state before evaporation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the field-dependent adsorption surface phase diagram, where electric field replaces chemical potential or temperature as the state variable. Adsorption energies are computed relative to a kink-site reservoir: $E^{Li}_{ad}(\mathcal{E}) = E^{slab+Liad}_{tot}(\mathcal{E}) - E^{slab}_{tot}(\mathcal{E}) - E^{Li}_{ref}(\mathcal{E})$, with $E^{Li}_{ref}$ the binding energy of a kink atom on a (952) surface plus the field correction $\Delta E = \tfrac{1}{2}\epsilon_0 \mathcal{E}^2 \Delta\Omega$. The diagram locates the field where the adsorption energy becomes negative, which is the thermodynamic signal for kink dissolution, and the bridge-to-on-top energy profile quantifies the diffusion barrier.

What would settle it

Repeat the reference calculation with a different kink geometry or a bulk Li reservoir under the same field and compare the field at which adsorption energies cross zero; if that critical field moves by more than about 0.1 V/Å, the predicted 2D gas at 1 V/Å is an artifact of the chosen reference.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that the plume-like ion-hit patterns seen in atom probe tomography of cryogenic Li are not merely a reconstruction artifact but a physical surface phase: above about 1 V/Å the crystalline kink/step surface is unstable against a 2D adatom gas. DFT shows kink atoms spontaneously leave the step for on-top terrace sites, and above about 1.1 V/Å the bridge site becomes preferred and the bridge-to-on-top energy profile flattens, so adatoms diffuse almost without a barrier. Field desorption remains blocked until about 1.43 V/Å, so the mobile adatom layer is stable before evaporation. The mechanism is driven by field-induced charge localization, which stabilizes the more exposed adsorption sites relative to the kink reservoir.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rests on using the energy to remove one kink atom from a (952) stepped surface, plus a classical volume correction, as the reservoir that supplies lithium adatoms; if that reference does not represent the real surface, the critical field shifts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Kink atoms dissolve into terrace adatoms above about 1 V/Å, creating a dense 2D adatom gas on Li surfaces under atom-probe-like fields.
  • Above about 1.1 V/Å the bridge site becomes preferred and the diffusion barrier nearly vanishes, so the Li surface is highly mobile before field evaporation begins.
  • Field desorption is still blocked up to about 1.43 V/Å, but kink dissolution and roll-over occur first, which changes which atoms are available for evaporation.
  • Coverage-dependent calculations show that repulsive adatom interactions raise the critical field, so the adatom gas has a finite density and at high coverage the critical field approaches the desorption strength.
  • The approach of constructing surface phase diagrams with electric field as a state variable is general and can be applied to other materials and surface structures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism transfers to other low-melting metals, plume-like atom probe reconstructions may be a general signature of field-induced surface mobility that precedes evaporation, not a specimen-specific artifact.
  • The same phase-diagram logic could guide battery anode and liquid metal ion source design: electric fields may act as a low-temperature switch that turns a crystalline surface into a mobile, gas-like state.
  • A testable scaling prediction is that the critical field for kink dissolution should depend on adatom polarizability and kink coordination, so elements with weaker kink binding should form the 2D gas at lower fields.
  • The flattening of the diffusion barrier suggests a field-tunable diffusion switch that could be exploited to manipulate surface morphology in nanoscale devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript combines atom probe tomography (APT) observations of pure Li at 60 K with density functional theory (DFT) calculations that explicitly include electrostatic fields. The central claim is that above roughly 1 V/Å, Li atoms at kink sites become thermodynamically unstable with respect to adsorption on the (110) terrace, leading to spontaneous dissolution of kinks into a dense 2D adatom gas. At fields above about 1.1 V/Å the preferred adsorption site switches from on-top to bridge, and the computed energy profile along the bridge-to-on-top path becomes nearly flat, which the authors interpret as nearly barrierless surface diffusion. The paper also reports field-desorption and field-evaporation barriers and argues that these remain finite up to ~1.3 V/Å, so the adatom gas is kinetically stable. The DFT setup is described with unusually careful convergence criteria, and the field is incorporated through a generalized dipole correction.

Significance. If the central claim survives scrutiny, this is a conceptually important result: it extends surface phase diagrams to include the electric field as a state variable and offers a plausible mechanism for the plume-like APT patterns and for field-induced surface mobility in Li. The use of explicit-field DFT with high-index kink slabs is appropriate, and the stated convergence to 10^-3 eV is a genuine strength. The paper also provides a physically transparent picture connecting the on-top adsorption preference of Li to dimer-like bonding. However, the quantitative threshold for kink dissolution and the barrierless-diffusion claim rest on a small number of assumptions that need to be tested before the conclusions can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (3) and adsorption-energy definition, Eq. (1)] The kink-reservoir reference is corrected by the classical field-volume term ΔE = ½ε0E²ΔΩ, but the manuscript does not state whether an analogous term is removed from E_tot^{slab+Li_ad} − E_tot^{slab} in Eq. (1). Adding an adatom reduces the vacuum volume and therefore lowers the raw DFT energy by approximately ½ε0E²Ω_ad relative to the true material binding energy. With Ω_Li ≈ 21.6 ų this amounts to roughly 60 meV at 1 V/Å, which is the same order as the energy differences that set the critical field and the on-top/bridge switch. As written, the reported adsorption energies may be systematically too negative by tens of meV, shifting the predicted kink dissolution to lower fields. The authors should either apply the same correction to the adatom term or, preferably, compute the kink-to-adatom transfer directly within one supercell so that no classical volume correction is needed.
  2. [Eq. (2), kink-site reservoir] The chemical-potential reference rests on a single (952) kink geometry. The paper does not demonstrate that this geometry is representative of kinks on the hemispherical APT tip, nor does it compare with a bulk-reservoir calculation under field. Since the entire spontaneous-dissolution claim is a difference between two relatively large energies, a second kink geometry or an explicit bulk reference is needed to establish that the threshold is indeed near 1 V/Å rather than shifted by several tenths of a V/Å.
  3. [Fig. 4(c) and diffusion discussion] The 'almost flat' profile at 1.1 V/Å is computed along a single bridge-to-on-top path. A barrierless diffusion claim requires that all relevant paths on the 2D potential-energy surface have negligible barriers; a single linear path cannot rule out a saddle point elsewhere. The residual corrugation along the plotted path is also not quantified. As stated, the conclusion should be weakened to 'low barrier along this path' or supported by a full potential-energy surface or nudged-elastic-band search.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 2] The critical fields at which the adsorption energies cross zero and at which the on-top/bridge preference switches are not marked numerically on the figure; adding these values would help the reader connect the text to the plot.
  2. [Figure 4 and text] The text refers to 'Hirschfeld charge', but the correct name is Hirshfeld; the same typo appears in the Figure 4 caption.
  3. [Notation throughout] The electric field is denoted by both ℇ and E in different places, and Eq. (3) inherits this inconsistency; a single symbol should be used.
  4. [Abstract and introduction] The phrase 'the here identified mechanisms' is ungrammatical and should be rephrased, e.g. as 'the mechanisms identified here'.
  5. [APT interpretation] The connection between the observed plumes and Taylor cones is presented as an explanation, but the APT data cannot directly resolve surface structure; this should be framed as a hypothesis consistent with the simulations rather than a demonstrated observation.
  6. [Figure 3 and desorption barriers] The linear extrapolation of the desorption barrier to zero at ~1.43 V/Å is based on a small number of points and should include an uncertainty estimate or a nonlinear fit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: critical fields and barriers are direct DFT energy differences; self-citations are methodological tools, not load-bearing inputs.

full rationale

The central claim is obtained from first-principles DFT total-energy differences, not from fitting to the experimental data. Equation (1) defines the adsorption energy against an explicit kink-site reservoir, and Eq. (2) computes that reservoir from a (952) slab; the field dependence enters via explicit dipole-corrected DFT. The APT observations serve only as qualitative motivation and are not used to set any parameter, so there is no fitted input being renamed as a prediction. The self-citations [23,24,36] refer to the generalized dipole correction, the field-desorption methodology, and a slab-generation tool; these are independent computational tools and do not themselves imply the 2D adatom-gas result. The classical field correction ΔE = 1/2 ε0 E² ΔΩ is a derived electrostatic expression, not a fitted or imported uniqueness condition. Whether this correction is applied consistently to the kink reference and to the adatom slab is a legitimate correctness and validation concern, but it is not a circularity: the conclusion does not reduce to that correction by construction, and the DFT energy differences would still define the phase diagram if the correction were omitted or revised. No step in the derivation chain is equivalent to its own input, and no load-bearing argument depends on an unverified self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on DFT energies computed with a specific functional, a specific field-application method, and a single kink-reservoir model. No experimental fitting parameters are used. The main unverified inputs are the accuracy of PBE under high fields, the fidelity of the (952) kink model, and the classical field-correction formula.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA exchange-correlation functional accurately describes Li surface energetics and charge redistribution under fields up to 1.5 V/Å.
    All DFT results use PBE; functional errors on adsorption-energy differences (meV scale) directly affect the predicted critical field.
  • domain assumption The generalized dipole correction for charged slabs (Freysoldt et al. 2020) is valid at high fields.
    The method is used to apply the field; the paper notes sensitivity to smearing and widths, indicating the method's validity at these fields is not trivial.
  • ad hoc to paper The (952) high-index surface faithfully represents the kink-site reservoir on an atom-probe tip.
    Only one kink geometry is used; kink density, step interactions, and local field enhancement may differ on real tips.
  • ad hoc to paper The classical field correction ΔE = 1/2 ε0 E² ΔΩ = 1/2 Q E Δz relates the kink binding energy to the bulk chemical potential under field.
    This assumes the removed atom retains its bulk volume and that the surface charge-field relation is linear; both may break down at very high fields.
  • domain assumption On Li(110), the only possible adatom adsorption sites are on-top and bridge.
    The paper states this without an exhaustive site search; other high-symmetry sites could alter the phase diagram.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electric Field-Induced Formation of a 2D Adatom Gas on Cryogenic Li Surfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CPL6ETXK

@misc{pith2026250206518,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electric Field-Induced Formation of a 2D Adatom Gas on Cryogenic Li Surfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CPL6ETXK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06518}
}
read the original abstract

Intense electrostatic fields, such as those able to break bonds and cause field-ion emission, can fundamentally alter the behaviour of atoms at and on the surface. Using density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the Li (110) surface under high electrostatic fields, we identify a critical field strength at which surface atoms occupying a kink site become thermodynamically unstable against adatom formation. This mechanism leads to the formation of a highly concentrated two-dimensional (2D) adatom gas on the surface. Moreover, the applied field reverses the stability of preferred adsorption sites, enabling barrierless diffusion of lithium atoms even well below the threshold required for field evaporation. The here identified mechanisms offer a unified explanation for experimental observations in atom probe tomography and for understanding high electric field phenomena in systems such as battery interfaces and electrochemical environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Degradation and SEI Evolution in Alloy Anodes Revealed by Correlative Liquid-Cell Electrochemistry and Cryogenic Microscopy

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cryo-APT directly maps lithium retained inside a cycled platinum anode, plausibly at grain boundaries, together with a Li2CO3-rich inner SEI and dead lithium accumulation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Neugebauer and M

    J. Neugebauer and M. Scheffler, Theory of adsorption and desorption in high electric fields, Surf Sci 287–288, 572 (1993)

    work page 1993

  2. [2]

    E. W. Müller and K. Bahadur, Field Ionization Of Gases At A Metal Surface And The Resolution Of The Field Ion Microscope, Physical Review 102, 624 (1956)

    work page 1956

  3. [3]

    Vurpillot, F

    F. Vurpillot, F. Danoix, M. Gilbert, S. Koelling, M. Dagan, and D. N. Seidman, True Atomic- Scale Imaging in Three Dimensions: A Review of the Rebirth of Field-Ion Microscopy, Microscopy and Microanalysis 23, 210 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Danoix and F

    F. Danoix and F. Vurpillot, Basics of Field Ion Microscopy, Atom Probe Tomography: Put Theory Into Practice 73 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    E. W. Müller, J. A. Panitz, and S. B. McLane, The {Atom-Probe} Field Ion Microscope, Review of Scientific Instruments 39, 83 (1968)

    work page 1968

  6. [6]

    Gault, A

    B. Gault, A. Chiaramonti, O. Cojocaru-Mirédin, P. Stender, R. Dubosq, C. Freysoldt, S. K. Makineni, T. Li, M. Moody, and J. M. Cairney, Atom probe tomography, Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2021 1:1 1, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Pluis, A

    B. Pluis, A. W. D. Van Der Gon, J. W. M. Frenken, and J. F. Van Der Veen, Crystal-Face Dependence of Surface Melting, Phys Rev Lett 59, 2678 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [8]

    De Knoop, M

    L. De Knoop, M. Juhani Kuisma, J. Löfgren, K. Lodewijks, M. Thuvander, P. Erhart, A. Dmitriev, and E. Olsson, Electric-field-controlled reversible order-disorder switching of a metal tip surface, Phys Rev Mater 2, 85006 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    A. Y. Lozovoi and A. Alavi, Reconstruction of charged surfaces: General trends and a case study of Pt(110) and Au(110), Phys Rev B 68, 245416 (2003)

    2003

  2. [10]

    T. Kim, W. Song, D. Y. Son, L. K. Ono, and Y. Qi, Lithium-ion batteries: outlook on present, future, and hybridized technologies, J Mater Chem A Mater 7, 2942 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Westhead, R

    O. Westhead, R. Jervis, and I. E. L. Stephens, Is lithium the key for nitrogen electroreducti on?, Science (1979) 372, 1149 (2021)

    1979

  4. [12]

    A. J. Sanchez, E. Kazyak, Y. Chen, K. H. Chen, E. R. Pattison, and N. P. Dasgupta, Plan- View Operando Video Microscopy of Li Metal Anodes: Identifying the Coupled Relationships among Nucleation, Morphology, and Reversibility, ACS Energy Lett 5, 994 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    C. Niu, H. Lee, S. Chen, Q. Li, J. Du, W. Xu, J. G. Zhang, M. S. Whittingham, J. Xiao, and J. Liu, High-energy lithium metal pouch cells with limited anode swelling and long stable cycles, Nature Energy 2019 4:7 4, 551 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Y. Lu, Z. Tu, and L. A. Archer, Stable lithium electrodeposition in liquid and nanoporous solid electrolytes, Nature Materials 2014 13:10 13, 961 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Santos and W

    E. Santos and W. Schmickler, The Crucial Role of Local Excess Charges in Dendrite Growth on Lithium Electrodes, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60, 5876 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Barai, K

    P. Barai, K. Higa, Y. Dai, al -, J. Wang, H. Lin, and S. Passerini -, Spatially Resolved Growth Mechanisms of a Lithium Dendrite Population, J Electrochem Soc 170, 030533 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    P. M. Read, J. T. Maskrey, and G. D. Alton, A lithium liquid metal ion source suitable for high voltage terminal applications, Review of Scientific Instruments 61, 502 (1998)

    1998

  10. [18]

    Hesse, F

    E. Hesse, F. K. Naehring, and J. Teichert, A lithium liquid metal ion source with a narrow angle emission for writing beam lithography, Microelectron Eng 23, 111 (1994)

    1994

  11. [19]

    Bischoff, P

    L. Bischoff, P. Mazarov, L. Bruchhaus, and J. Gierak, Liquid metal alloy ion sources—An alternative for focussed ion beam technology, Appl Phys Rev 3, 021101 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Sivaprakash, S

    S. Sivaprakash, S. B. Majumder -, P. Liu, J. Wang, J. Hicks-Garner, al -, F. Holtstiege, A. Wilken, L. Bischoff, and C. Akhmadaliev, An alloy liquid metal ion source for lithium, J Phys D Appl Phys 41, 052001 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    Hesse, L

    E. Hesse, L. Bischoff, and J. Teichert, Angular distribution and energy spread of a lithium liquid metal ion source, J Phys D Appl Phys 28, 1707 (1995)

    1995

  14. [22]

    Hesse and F

    E. Hesse and F. K. Naehring, Narrow angle emission from a lithium liquid metal ion source, J Phys D Appl Phys 26, 717 (1993)

    1993

  15. [23]

    Freysoldt, A

    C. Freysoldt, A. Mishra, M. Ashton, and J. Neugebauer, Generalized dipole correction for charged surfaces in the repeated-slab approach, Phys Rev B 102, 45403 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Ashton, A

    M. Ashton, A. Mishra, J. Neugebauer, and C. Freysoldt, Ab initio Description of Bond Breaking in Large Electric Fields, Phys Rev Lett 124, (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Geoffrey Ingram, Disintegration of water drops in an electric field, Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 280, 383 (1964)

    T. Geoffrey Ingram, Disintegration of water drops in an electric field, Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 280, 383 (1964)

    1964

  18. [26]

    Thompson, D

    K. Thompson, D. Lawrence, D. J. Larson, J. D. Olson, T. F. Kelly, and B. Gorman, In situ site-specific specimen preparation for atom probe tomography., Ultramicroscopy 107, 131 (2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    L. T. Stephenson et al., The Laplace Project: An integrated suite for preparing and transferring atom probe samples under cryogenic and UHV conditions, PLoS One 13, e0209211 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Pfeiffer, J

    B. Pfeiffer, J. Maier, J. Arlt, and C. Nowak, In Situ Atom Probe Deintercalation of Lithium- Manganese-Oxide, Microscopy and Microanalysis 23, 314 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    S. H. Kim, S. Antonov, X. Zhou, L. T. Stephenson, C. Jung, A. A. El-Zoka, D. K. Schreiber, M. Conroy, and B. Gault, Atom probe analysis of electrode materials for Li-ion batteries: challenges and ways forward, J Mater Chem A Mater 10, 4926 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    M. P. Singh, E. V. Woods, S. H. Kim, C. Jung, L. S. Aota, and B. Gault, Facilitating the Systematic Nanoscale Study of Battery Materials by Atom Probe Tomography through in- situ Metal Coating, Batter Supercaps 7, e202300403 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Vurpillot and C

    F. Vurpillot and C. Oberdorfer, Modeling Atom Probe Tomography: A review, Ultramicroscopy 159, 202 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    D. J. Larson, B. Gault, B. P. Geiser, F. De Geuser, and F. Vurpillot, Atom probe tomography spatial reconstruction: Status and directions, Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 17, 236 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Gault, S

    B. Gault, S. T. Loi, V. J. Araullo-Peters, L. T. Stephenson, M. P. Moody, S. L. Shrestha, R. K. W. Marceau, L. Yao, J. M. Cairney, and S. P. Ringer, Dynamic reconstruction for atom probe tomography, Ultramicroscopy 111, 1619 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Vurpillot, M

    F. Vurpillot, M. Gruber, G. Da Costa, I. Martin, L. Renaud, and a. Bostel, Pragmatic reconstruction methods in atom probe tomography, Ultramicroscopy 111, 1286 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    Geiser, D

    B. Geiser, D. Larson, E. Oltman, S. Gerstl, D. Reinhard, T. Kelly, and T. Prosa, Wide-Field- of-View Atom Probe Reconstruction, Microscopy and Microanalysis 15, 292 (2009)

    2009

  28. [36]

    Katnagallu, C

    S. Katnagallu, C. Freysoldt, B. Gault, and J. Neugebauer, Ab initio vacancy formation energies and kinetics at metal surfaces under high electric field, Phys Rev B 107, 41406 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    M. A. Van Hove and G. A. Somorjai, A new microfacet notation for high-Miller-index surfaces of cubic materials with terrace, step and kink structures, Surf Sci 92, 489 (1980)

    1980

  30. [38]

    Janssen, S

    J. Janssen, S. Surendralal, Y. Lysogorskiy, M. Todorova, T. Hickel, R. Drautz, and J. Neugebauer, pyiron: An integrated development environment for computational materials science, Comput Mater Sci 163, 24 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Boeck, C

    S. Boeck, C. Freysoldt, A. Dick, L. Ismer, and J. Neugebauer, The object-oriented DFT program library S/PHI/nX, Comput Phys Commun 182, 543 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys Rev Lett 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  33. [41]

    Gaissmaier, D

    D. Gaissmaier, D. Fantauzzi, and T. Jacob, First principles studies of self-diffusion processes on metallic lithium surfaces, J Chem Phys 150, 041723 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    K. Doll, N. M. Harrison, and V. R. Saunders, A density functional study of lithium bulk and surfaces, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 11, 5007 (1999)

    1999

  35. [43]

    Suchorski, N

    Yu. Suchorski, N. Ernst, W. a. Schmidt, V. K. Medvedev, H. J. Kreuzer, and R. L. C. Wang, Field desorption and field evaporation of metals, Prog Surf Sci 53, 135 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    I. M. Mikhailovskij, G. D. W. Smith, N. Wanderka, and T. I. Mazilova, Non-kinkwise field evaporation and kink relaxation on stepped W(1 1 2) surface, Ultramicroscopy 95, 157 (2003)

    2003

  37. [45]

    T. T. Tsong, Atom-Probe Field Ion Microscopy: Field Ion Emission, and Surfaces and Interfaces at Atomic Resolution (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    2005

  38. [46]

    C. G. Sánchez, A. Y. Lozovoi, & A. Alavi, C. G. Sa´nchez, S. Sa´nchez, and A. Alavi, Field- evaporation from first-principles, Mol Phys 102, 1045 (2004)

    2004

  39. [47]

    Gomer and L

    R. Gomer and L. W. Swanson, Theory of Field Desorption, J Chem Phys 38, 1613 (1963)

    1963

  40. [48]

    F. L. Hirshfeld, Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities, Theor Chim Acta 44, 129 (1977). Supplementary Information for Electric Field-Induced Cryogenic Formation of a 2D Adatom Gas on Li Surfaces Shyam Katnagallu 1,*, Huan Zhao 1,2, Se -Ho Kim1,3, Bapt...

    1977

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.