Excitonic description of singlet fission beyond dimer model : a matrix product state approach

Amartya Bose; Debashree Ghosh; Supriyo Santra

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Excitonic description of singlet fission beyond dimer model : a matrix product state approach

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A nine-state-per-molecule excitonic model, solved with tensor networks, predicts aggregate singlet-fission spectra and state bands for pentacene.

desk verdict A useful tensor-network exciton method for singlet fission aggregates, with genuinely new decamer spectra, but the truncated monomer basis and lack of aggregate-level validation mean the quantitative claims need careful scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03966 v1 pith:CPO7EBG3 submitted 2025-09-04 physics.chem-ph

Supriyo Santra , Amartya Bose , Debashree Ghosh This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.chem-ph

keywords singletfissionpentaceneexcitonicHamiltoniantight-bindingmodeldensitymatrixrenormalizationgroupproductoperatorchargetransferstatestripletpair

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Singlet fission—one absorbed photon creating two triplet excitons—can boost solar-cell efficiency, but the states that matter live in large molecular aggregates, where direct quantum-chemistry calculations become too expensive and most models stop at a dimer. This paper argues that a coarse-grained, spin-resolved excitonic Hamiltonian, parameterized by monomer and dimer ab initio calculations, can be written as a matrix product operator and solved with the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) for ten-molecule pentacene chains. The result is the full low-lying singlet spectrum, absorption spectrum, and density of states for both the parallel and herringbone directions, including the spontaneous emergence of state bands. The authors validate the model against dimer CASSCF results, reproduce the state characters, and use entanglement entropy to separate delocalized multireference states from localized charge-transfer states. If right, this gives a route from few-molecule models to the bulk-like electronic structure that controls singlet fission, and a platform for adding vibrations and dynamics.

What carries the argument

The central object is a spin-resolved, nine-state monomeric basis (|G>, |S>, |T+>, |T0>, |T−>, |C↑>, |C↓>, |A↑>, |A↓>) together with a tight-binding Hamiltonian whose terms—site energies, distance-dependent correlations, excitation hopping, S↔CT, S↔TT, and CT↔TT couplings—are all expressed as a matrix product operator. The work it does is to reduce the exponential d^N Hilbert space to a polynomially growing (Q=0, Sz=0) subspace, to make the Hamiltonian machine-constructible for arbitrary aggregate size, and to allow DMRG with orthogonality penalties to yield spin-pure singlet eigenstates plus transition dipole spectra, state characters, and entanglement diagnostics.

What would settle it

Add the multiexcitonic and di-ionic monomer states that the paper identifies as contributing to dimer adiabats, recompute the decamer spectrum with the same DMRG workflow, and check whether the low-lying band order or the LE/CT gaps change by more than about 0.2 eV; a qualitative change would falsify the truncated-basis claim. Alternatively, polarization-resolved two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy on oriented pentacene films could look for the predicted dense mixed LE/CT bright manifold near 3490 meV in the herringbone direction and its absence along the parallel direction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that singlet fission can be cast as a spin-resolved tight-binding model on a nine-dimensional monomer basis—ground, singlet excited, three triplet, and two spin-resolved cation and anion states—whose parameters come from localized CASSCF calculations on monomers and dimers, and whose eigenstates can then be obtained with DMRG in the charge-neutral, Sz=0 subspace. For pentacene, the model reproduces the qualitative ordering and character of dimer excitations (triplet-pair, local excitation, charge transfer) from CASSCF, with vertical excitation energies shifted by 0.2–0.4 eV because some configurations are omitted. Applied to a ten-monomer chain, it predicts that

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the nine-state-per-molecule basis—ground, singlet, three triplets, two positive and two negative charge states—is sufficient to describe the low-lying states of the aggregate, even though the dimer test shows that states outside this basis contribute to the exact dimer wavefunctions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The dimer-to-decamer transfer shows how aggregate electronic structure can be obtained without direct large-scale multireference calculations, making bulk-like spectra accessible for singlet-fission materials.
In herringbone pentacene, the model predicts LE-CT mixing across the low-lying manifold, implying CT-mediated singlet fission rather than direct S-to-TT coupling, consistent with the near-zero direct S-TT couplings in the parameter table.
In the parallel direction, CT states form distinct bands separated by the distance between the charged monomers; this band structure is absent along the herringbone direction because of the CA/AC asymmetry.
Entanglement entropy in the excitonic basis provides a practical classification: high entropy marks delocalized multireference LE states, while low entropy marks localized single-reference CT states, which can guide approximate treatments.
Because the Hamiltonian is a matrix product operator, vibrational and spin-dephasing terms can be incorporated without rebuilding the formalism, opening a path to dynamics of triplet-pair separation beyond the static spectrum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same spin-resolved matrix-product-operator construction should transfer to other acene crystals and carotenoid aggregates with different parameter tables; nothing in the method is pentacene-specific except the parameter values.
If the omitted multiexcitonic and di-ionic monomer states contribute to the aggregate as they do to the dimer adiabats, the absolute positions of the predicted CT bands could shift by the same 0.2–0.4 eV scale, which would test the predicted gap and bright-state ordering in transient-absorption or two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy.
The low entanglement entropy of CT states suggests dynamics simulations might safely treat the CT manifold with a cheaper single-reference representation while keeping a multireference treatment for the LE manifold—a testable computational shortcut.
The predicted decamer spectra along the two crystallographic directions could be compared directly with polarization-resolved absorption or photoemission measurements on oriented pentacene thin films, providing an experimental check on the band structure predictions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This paper is a useful contribution to the singlet fission modeling toolbox: it delivers a spin-resolved tight-binding exciton Hamiltonian that can be mapped onto an MPO and solved with DMRG for aggregates of ten monomers, and it produces decamer absorption spectra, state densities, and entanglement entropies that are new. The method goes beyond the manual decamer construction of Li et al. by automating the basis and including non-singlet states, and the dimer validation against CASSCF is honest and shows the right state ordering and character. The spin-purity handling via projection is a neat technical step.

The main soft spot is the truncation of the monomer basis to nine states (G, S, T_s, C_s, A_s). The dimer VEE errors are already 0.2–0.4 eV (Tables I and II), which the authors attribute to omitted multiexcitonic/di-ionic configurations. The same d=9 basis is then used for the decamer, so the predicted bands, the ~1 eV CT band gap, and the S/T/CT character assignments inherit this incompleteness. The paper openly acknowledges this in the Conclusion, where it says including spin-resolved multiexcitonic states 'would bring higher accuracy'—so the authors are not hiding it, but the central claim about aggregate spectra as reliable predictions is weakened. There is no external check at the aggregate level (experiment or a higher-level calculation), and the claimed convergence of spectra at hexamer/heptamer is stated without presenting the data. Also, a decamer along a single crystallographic direction is not really 'bulk,' even if it is a step in that direction.

The parameterization/validation loop is partly circular: the Hamiltonian is fit to dimer CASSCF curves, and the dimer validation compares against the same underlying calculations, so the agreement is not an independent test. That is a common situation in model building, but it means the aggregate results are predictions of a model with no independent check. The entanglement entropy analysis is interesting and the interpretation (CT states are local, LE states are delocalized) is plausible, but it's heuristic.

The paper is clear and well-written; the thinking is serious and the literature is engaged. It deserves a serious referee: the method is new, the results are new, and the limitations are acknowledged. A referee should ask for the convergence data, a more careful statement about the basis truncation, and ideally some comparison to experiment or to a larger-basis calculation for a small aggregate. I would recommend acceptance after major revisions, not desk rejection.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a spin-resolved tight-binding excitonic Hamiltonian for singlet fission, expressed as a matrix product operator, and solves it with DMRG for aggregate chains of pentacene. The monomeric basis contains nine states per site: ground, singlet excited, three triplet states, and two cation/anion doublets. Parameters are obtained from (4e,4o)-CASSCF dimer calculations along the a and herringbone directions. The dimer vertical excitation energies are compared with SA-CASSCF, showing roughly 0.2–0.4 eV deviations that the authors attribute to omitted multiexcitonic/di-ionic configurations. The method is then used to compute absorption spectra, state densities, state characters, and entanglement entropies for decamers, with claims of emergent bands, a large CT-band gap along a, and low entanglement entropy for CT states. The paper bills itself as a step beyond dimer models toward bulk/crystal singlet fission.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the work is significant: it provides a scalable, automated MPS/MPO framework for singlet-fission aggregates with spin-resolved local states, including non-singlet states needed for future spin-dephasing and dynamics studies. The DMRG machinery, Q=0/Sz=0 quantum-number restriction, and spin-purity enforcement are useful methodological contributions. The dimer results reproduce state ordering and character, and the entanglement-entropy analysis offers a physically interpretable classification. However, the aggregate-level predictions rest on a truncated monomer basis whose dimer-level errors are acknowledged but not benchmarked at the aggregate scale, and the 'bulk' interpretation goes beyond the actual 1D chain calculations. The paper is therefore a promising contribution whose main quantitative claims require additional validation.

major comments (3)

[Sec. IV A, Tables I–II; Sec. IV B, Fig. 5; Conclusion] The dimer benchmark shows VEE errors of 0.2–0.4 eV, which the text attributes to omitted multiexcitonic/di-ionic states, and the Conclusion states that including such states 'would bring higher accuracy to the tensor network results for the aggregates.' Yet the decamer spectra, state densities, and band assignments in Fig. 5 use exactly the same nine-state monomer basis. No aggregate-level check is provided: no comparison with experimental absorption, no enlarged-basis DMRG, and no estimate of how the monomer-basis truncation error propagates to N=10. The predicted CT band gap, band positions, and S/T/CT characters therefore all inherit the acknowledged dimer-level incompleteness. This is load-bearing for the central claim of reliable aggregate spectra.
[Sec. IV B, Fig. 5; Abstract] The text describes the results as 'bulk' spectra and state densities for the 'pentacene crystal,' but the calculations are independent one-dimensional decamers along the a and herringbone directions, with nearest-neighbor couplings and no interchain or full 3D packing effects. The stated convergence with hexamer/heptamer size only tests chain length in one direction. The claim of 'effective aggregate spectra' in the bulk limit is therefore an overstatement. Please qualify the results as a 1D chain model, or include a 2D ladder/slab calculation and discuss how omitted directions could shift the CT bands and gaps.
[Sec. II, spin-purity enforcement after Eq. (13)] The procedure claims 'absolute spin-purity' by generating non-singlet states from configurations in which 'all but two monomers are in the ground state' and requiring orthogonality to those states. This set is complete only if the DMRG is restricted to the single-excitation-pair sector reachable from one |S> state (one S, one CT pair, or one TT pair). The DMRG is instead described as running in the full Q=0, Sz=0 subspace, which also contains multi-pair sectors such as two TT pairs or S+TT states; the non-singlet combinations of those states are not included in the orthogonality basis. The paper should either explicitly impose and describe the single-excitation-pair constraint in the tensor network, or expand the non-singlet orthogonality set. As written, the claim that all resulting eigenstates are singlets is not justified.

minor comments (6)

[Eqs. (8)–(12)] Several displayed equations contain garbled symbols (e.g., '\u2423' appears in place of bras/kets), making the operator forms hard to read. Please typeset all Hamiltonian terms cleanly.
[Sec. IV B, Fig. 5] The convergence statement ('spectra converges within the system size of 6-monomers') is not supported by any figure or table in the main text or SI. Please show hexamer/heptamer spectra or provide numerical convergence data.
[Sec. IV A and Table I] The text says the dimer VEEs are in 'good agreement' while also noting 0.2–0.4 eV deviations; for clarity, distinguish 'qualitative agreement' from quantitative accuracy, especially since the subsequent aggregate analysis relies on state ordering rather than absolute energies.
[Sec. II, Eq. (5)] The notation for the site energy of |S> appears inconsistent (ϵ(S) versus ϵ(S)_j); define whether site energies can vary by monomer or are translationally invariant.
[SI Sec. S3] DMRG convergence is described in terms of sweeps, bond dimensions, and noise, but no final truncation errors or energy differences between successive sweeps are reported. At least one representative truncation-error value would help assess numerical convergence of the reported excited states.
[General] The paper does not include a data/code availability statement. Given the model is presented for reuse, providing the MPO construction and parameter tables in machine-readable form would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Dimer 'validation' reuses the same CASSCF data used to parameterize the model; aggregate bands are genuine model predictions but inherit the unvalidated truncation.

fitted input called prediction [Section III (parameterization, Eqs. 5-12) and Section IV A (Tables I-II)]
"While the diabatic energies can of course be obtained from the monomeric calculations, they can also be derived from the dimeric calculation. This is the route we take to ensure greater consistency. ... The correlation terms ... are now obtained by subtracting the long-distance value ... ϵ(SG)_r = E_SG(r) − ϵ(S) − ϵ(G). ... We have computed the low-lying adiabatic singlet excited states of the dimer ... and compared our results with ab initio calculation (6SA-(4e,4o)-CASSCF/6-31G(d)). This provides a test-bed for our method."

The model parameters are read directly from the dimer CASSCF data used for the comparison: ϵ(S) comes from the asymptotic E_SG(r), ϵ(SG)_r = E_SG(r) − ϵ(S) − ϵ(G), CT parameters come from a 1/r fit to E_CA(r)/E_AC(r), and the h couplings are ⟨ψ_i|H|ψ_f⟩ matrix elements in that same dimer basis. The dimer eigenstates and VEEs in Tables I–II are therefore determined by the same E_SG(r), E_CA(r), and H-matrix elements used to assign the parameters. The agreement with SA-6-CASSCF is a consistency check of the diabatization and truncation, not an independent prediction; the conclusion 'Having established the validity ... we move towards modeling larger aggregates' transfers this non-independent validation to the decamer bands.

full rationale

The paper's central construction—a spin-resolved tight-binding Hamiltonian parameterized by monomer/dimer CASSCF and solved by DMRG—is not internally circular: the decamer spectra, state densities, band gaps, and entanglement entropies are computed from a Hamiltonian whose parameters come from dimer calculations, so they are genuine outputs of the model. The main circularity is the dimer validation in Sec. IV A. Because the site energies, correlation terms, and couplings are read off from the same dimer CASSCF diabat curves and matrix elements (Sec. III), the model's dimer VEEs are functions of the very data used to define the parameters; calling this a 'test-bed' and then using it to assert the validity of the aggregate calculation is a fitted-input-called-prediction step. This does not make the aggregate results definitionally equal to the inputs: bands and state characters are emergent properties of the many-site Hamiltonian. The acknowledged omission of multiexcitonic/di-ionic states (Conclusion) is a correctness risk, not a circularity, and the self-citations (Refs. 18-19) are not load-bearing because the coupling expressions are also attributed to Ref. 11. Overall score 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 16 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All Hamiltonian parameters derive from monomer/dimer CASSCF calculations on the pentacene thin-film geometry. The aggregate predictions therefore inherit these fitted values and the pairwise, nearest-neighbor structural assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (16)

site energy ε(G) = -840.9831 Ha
Obtained as E_GG(r→∞)/2 from dimer CASSCF curves; sets the absolute zero of the model.
site energy ε(T) = -840.9270 Ha
Obtained as E_TT(r→∞)/2 assuming triplet degeneracy at zero field.
site energy ε(S) = -840.8474 Ha
Obtained from asymptotic E_SG(r) minus ε(G).
site energy ε(C) = -840.7882 Ha
Taken from monomer CASSCF calculation.
site energy ε(A), a-axis = -840.9387 Ha
Derived from 1/r fit of CT diabat E_CT(∞) minus ε(C); fit is to dimer data.
site energy ε(A), herringbone = -840.9361 Ha
Same 1/r fit procedure for herringbone dimer.
hopping h(S) = -0.0042 (a), 0.0012 (herringbone) Ha
Coupling ⟨SG|H|GS⟩ from dimer localized CASSCF orbitals; nearest neighbor.
hopping h(T) = -0.0021 (a), 0.0006 (herringbone) Ha
Triplet hopping coupling fitted to dimer matrix elements.
coupling h(SG→CA) = -0.0024 (a), -0.0044 (herringbone) Ha
Coupling between singlet-local and charge-transfer CA diabat.
coupling h(SG→AC) = -0.0024 (a), -0.0039 (herringbone) Ha
Coupling between singlet-local and charge-transfer AC diabat.
coupling h(SG→TT) = -3.70e-7 (a), -9.05e-6 (herringbone) Ha
Direct singlet-local to triplet-pair coupling; near zero, consistent with CT-mediated mechanism.
coupling h(GS→TT) = 3.70e-7 (a), 7.63e-6 (herringbone) Ha
Direct GS-local to triplet-pair coupling; near zero.
coupling h(CA→TT) = -0.0037 (a), 0.0031 (herringbone) Ha
Coupling between charge-transfer CA and triplet-pair diabat.
coupling h(AC→TT) = 0.0028 (a), -0.0024 (herringbone) Ha
Coupling between charge-transfer AC and triplet-pair diabat.
pairwise correlation energies ε_GG, ε_TT, ε_SG, ε_GS = distance-dependent, from dimer ab initio curves
Extracted by subtracting one-body asymptotic energies from dimer diabat energies; assumed to vanish beyond next-nearest neighbor.
CT correlation 1/r parameters for ε(CA) and ε(AC) = E_CT(∞) and E_corr coefficient, fitted to dimer curves
Long-range charge-transfer correlations are fit to 1/r form; the asymptotic value enters the anion site energy.

assumptions (9)

standard math DMRG variational principle and MPS/SVD entanglement entropy produce correct eigenstates in the Q=0, Sz=0 subspace with penalty orthogonality.
The method relies on established DMRG machinery (Refs 32-38) and the penalty projector approach in Eq. 6 of the SI.
standard math Clebsch-Gordan decomposition of two-site triplet and quintet states is complete for projecting out non-singlet states in the acene monomer basis.
Used in Section II to ensure spin purity of the eigenstates.
domain assumption The aggregate Hamiltonian is pairwise additive: only one- and two-body terms describe the physics; three-body or higher interactions are negligible.
H_corr in Eq. 6 includes only pair interactions j<k; no three-body terms are introduced.
domain assumption The nine-state monomeric diabatic basis is sufficient to describe low-lying aggregate eigenstates relevant for singlet fission.
The paper acknowledges in Section IV A that multiexcitonic configurations contribute to the dimer S1 state and are omitted; the same truncated basis is used for aggregates.
domain assumption Dimer-derived parameters transfer to aggregate sites without environmental renormalization.
Section IV B constructs the decamer Hamiltonian using dimer parameters; no correction for crystal environment beyond the thin-film geometry is applied.
domain assumption All coupling/hopping terms are nearest-neighbor; longer-range couplings are zero except CT correlations.
Section III: 'the coupling coefficients turn out to be nearest neighbor along all the directions.' This is an observed result of the dimer fits, but it is assumed to hold in larger aggregates.
domain assumption The true aggregate ground state is the direct product |GG...G> and is not coupled to other diabats.
Section II: 'Our definition of the Hamiltonian has currently ignored such possibilities for simplicity.'
domain assumption The crystal geometry from Ref 41 (thin-film pentacene polymorph) is the correct structure for both dimer and aggregate calculations.
All parameters and aggregate structures are derived from this experimental thin-film crystal structure.
domain assumption Hexamer and heptamer spectra are converged with respect to chain length, justifying the decamer as representative of the bulk.
Section IV B asserts convergence 'within the system size of 6-monomers' without presenting the convergence data.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Excitonic description of singlet fission beyond dimer model : a matrix product state approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CPO7EBG3

@misc{pith2026250903966,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Excitonic description of singlet fission beyond dimer model : a matrix product state approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CPO7EBG3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03966}
}

read the original abstract

The importance of singlet fission as a fundamental process with a variety of implications in energy harvesting cannot be overstated. The challenge is in characterizing the energy states of these large singlet fission molecular aggregates that participate in the process. Large dimensionality and essential multi-configuration nature of the electronic states of interest combine to make accurate ab initio calculations prohibitively difficult. We present a spin-resolved tight-binding excitonic model for singlet fission that can be parameterized based on ab initio calculations on monomers and dimers of molecules, and is highly suitable for the study of aggregates using tensor network methods such as the density matrix renormalization group. This tensor network coarse-grained model is demonstrated specifically on the pentacene crystal, where we evaluate the spectra and density of states. We show the natural emergence of bands of states in some cases, and characterize them. Through an analysis of entanglement entropy of the eigenstates, we gain crucial insight into the extent of their multireference character. This method is useful in understanding not just the structure of these extended aggregates, but also being the cornerstone for incorporation of vibronic features and simulation of the singlet fission dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03966 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Schematic representation of an important subspace of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (a)The crystal structure from the Ref. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energies of the dimeric diabatic states as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spectra of bulk (a) and state densities (b) for parallel a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Average entanglement entropy (calculated across the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

[1]

author author M. B. \ Smith \ and\ author J. Michl ,\ title title Singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Chemical reviews \ volume 110 ,\ pages 6891--6936 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page 2010
[2]

author author M. B. \ Smith \ and\ author J. Michl ,\ title title Recent advances in singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Annual review of physical chemistry \ volume 64 ,\ pages 361--386 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013
[3]

Breen , author R

author author I. Breen , author R. Tempelaar , author L. A. \ Bizimana , author B. Kloss , author D. R. \ Reichman ,\ and\ author D. B. \ Turner ,\ title title Triplet separation drives singlet fission after femtosecond correlated triplet pair production in rubrene , \ @noop journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 139 ,\ pages 11...

work page 2017
[4]

Rao \ and\ author R

author author A. Rao \ and\ author R. H. \ Friend ,\ title title Harnessing singlet exciton fission to break the shockley--queisser limit , \ @noop journal journal Nature reviews materials \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1--12 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

work page 2017
[5]

author author M. W. \ Wilson , author A. Rao , author B. Ehrler ,\ and\ author R. H. \ Friend ,\ title title Singlet exciton fission in polycrystalline pentacene: from photophysics toward devices , \ @noop journal journal Accounts of chemical research \ volume 46 ,\ pages 1330--1338 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013
[6]

Zeng , author R

author author T. Zeng , author R. Hoffmann ,\ and\ author N. Ananth ,\ title title The low-lying electronic states of pentacene and their roles in singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 136 ,\ pages 5755--5764 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

work page 2014
[7]

author author J. C. \ Johnson , author A. J. \ Nozik ,\ and\ author J. Michl ,\ title title The role of chromophore coupling in singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Accounts of chemical research \ volume 46 ,\ pages 1290--1299 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013
[8]

author author S. R. \ Yost , author J. Lee , author M. W. \ Wilson , author T. Wu , author D. P. \ McMahon , author R. R. \ Parkhurst , author N. J. \ Thompson , author D. N. \ Congreve , author A. Rao , author K. Johnson ,\ and\ author et. al. ,\ title title A transferable model for singlet-fission kinetics , \ @noop journal journal Nature chemistry \ vo...

work page 2014

Show all 48 references

[9]

author author \"O . H. \ Omar , author D. Padula ,\ and\ author A. Troisi ,\ title title Elucidating the relationship between multiradical character and predicted singlet fission activity , \ @noop journal journal ChemPhotoChem \ volume 4 ,\ pages 5223--5229 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[10]

Casanova ,\ title title Theoretical modeling of singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Chemical reviews \ volume 118 ,\ pages 7164--7207 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

author author D. Casanova ,\ title title Theoretical modeling of singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Chemical reviews \ volume 118 ,\ pages 7164--7207 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018
[11]

author author T. C. \ Berkelbach , author M. S. \ Hybertsen ,\ and\ author D. R. \ Reichman ,\ title title Microscopic theory of singlet exciton fission. ii. application to pentacene dimers and the role of superexchange , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics...

2013
[12]

Monahan \ and\ author X.-Y

author author N. Monahan \ and\ author X.-Y. \ Zhu ,\ title title Charge transfer--mediated singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Annual review of physical chemistry \ volume 66 ,\ pages 601--618 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015
[13]

Andrzejak \ and\ author P

author author M. Andrzejak \ and\ author P. Petelenz ,\ title title Vibronic relaxation energies of acene-related molecules upon excitation or ionization , \ @noop journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 14061--14071 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018
[14]

Kim \ and\ author A

author author W. Kim \ and\ author A. J. \ Musser ,\ title title Tracking ultrafast reactions in organic materials through vibrational coherence: vibronic coupling mechanisms in singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Advances in Physics: X \ volume 6 ,\ pages 1918022 ( year...

2021
[15]

\ Duan , author A

author author H.-G. \ Duan , author A. Jha , author X. Li , author V. Tiwari , author H. Ye , author P. K. \ Nayak , author X.-L. \ Zhu , author Z. Li , author T. J. \ Martinez , author M. Thorwart ,\ and\ author et. al. ,\ title title Intermolecular vibrations mediate ultrafa...

2020
[16]

Kundu \ and\ author J

author author A. Kundu \ and\ author J. Dasgupta ,\ title title Photogeneration of long-lived triplet states through singlet fission in lycopene h-aggregates , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1468--1474 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021
[17]

Peng , author Z

author author B. Peng , author Z. Wang , author J. Jiang , author Y. Huang ,\ and\ author W. Liu ,\ title title Investigation of ultrafast intermediate states during singlet fission in lycopene h-aggregate using femtosecond stimulated raman spectroscopy , \ @noop journal journ...

2024
[18]

Santra , author J

author author S. Santra , author J. Ray ,\ and\ author D. Ghosh ,\ title title Mechanism of singlet fission in carotenoids from a polyene model system , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 13 ,\ pages 6800--6805 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022
[19]

Santra \ and\ author D

author author S. Santra \ and\ author D. Ghosh ,\ title title Unraveling the geometrical effects on singlet fission of carotenoids: A model perspective , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 129 ,\ pages 2738--2744 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025
[20]

Barford \ and\ author C

author author W. Barford \ and\ author C. A. \ Chambers ,\ title title Theory of singlet fission in carotenoid dimers , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 159 ,\ pages 084116 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[21]

Manawadu , author D

author author D. Manawadu , author D. J. \ Valentine ,\ and\ author W. Barford ,\ title title Dynamical simulations of carotenoid photoexcited states using density matrix renormalization group techniques , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A \ volume 12...

2023
[22]

\ Lim , author T

author author S.-H. \ Lim , author T. G. \ Bjorklund , author F. C. \ Spano ,\ and\ author C. J. \ Bardeen ,\ title title Exciton delocalization and superradiance in tetracene thin films and nanoaggregates , \ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 92 ,\ pages ...

2004
[23]

author author D. Casanova ,\ title title Bright fission: Singlet fission into a pair of emitting states , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 11 ,\ pages 2642--2650 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015
[24]

author author D. Casanova ,\ title title Electronic structure study of singlet fission in tetracene derivatives , \ @noop journal journal Journal of chemical theory and computation \ volume 10 ,\ pages 324--334 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

2014
[25]

author author P. M. \ Zimmerman , author F. Bell , author D. Casanova ,\ and\ author M. Head-Gordon ,\ title title Mechanism for singlet fission in pentacene and tetracene: From single exciton to two triplets , \ @noop journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \...

2011
[26]

author author L. E. A. \ Suarez , author C. de Graaf ,\ and\ author S. Faraji ,\ title title Influence of the crystal packing in singlet fission: one step beyond the gas phase approximation , \ @noop journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 23 ,\ pages 1416...

2021
[27]

Li , author R

author author X. Li , author R. M. \ Parrish ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Mart \' nez ,\ title title An ab initio exciton model for singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 153 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[28]

author author T. C. \ Berkelbach , author M. S. \ Hybertsen ,\ and\ author D. R. \ Reichman ,\ title title Microscopic theory of singlet exciton fission. i. general formulation , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 138 ,\ pages 114102 ( year 2013 b...

2013
[29]

author author T. C. \ Berkelbach , author M. S. \ Hybertsen ,\ and\ author D. R. \ Reichman ,\ title title Microscopic theory of singlet exciton fission. iii. crystalline pentacene , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 141 ,\ pages 074705 ( year 20...

2014
[30]

Nakano , author T

author author H. Nakano , author T. Shirai ,\ and\ author T. Mori ,\ title title Tensor network approach to thermalization in open quantum many-body systems , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 103 ,\ pages L040102 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021
[31]

Peng , author D

author author J. Peng , author D. Hu , author H. Liu , author Q. Shi , author P. Bao ,\ and\ author Z. Lan ,\ title title Studies of nonadiabatic dynamics in the singlet fission processes of pentacene dimer via tensor network method , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Che...

2023
[32]

author author S. R. \ White ,\ title title Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 69 ,\ pages 2863--2866 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

1992
[33]

Schollw \"o ck ,\ title title The density-matrix renormalization group , \ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 77 ,\ pages 259--315 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

author author U. Schollw \"o ck ,\ title title The density-matrix renormalization group , \ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 77 ,\ pages 259--315 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

2005
[34]

author author U. Schollw \"o ck ,\ title title The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , \ @noop journal journal Annals of Physics \ volume 326 ,\ pages 96--192 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

2011
[35]

Baiardi \ and\ author M

author author A. Baiardi \ and\ author M. Reiher ,\ title title The density matrix renormalization group in chemistry and molecular physics: Recent developments and new challenges , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 152 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[36]

author author G. K. \ Chan , author A. Keselman , author N. Nakatani , author Z. Li ,\ and\ author S. R. \ White ,\ title title Matrix product operators, matrix product states, and ab initio density matrix renormalization group algorithms , \ @noop journal journal The Journal ...

2016
[37]

Ghosh , author J

author author D. Ghosh , author J. Hachmann , author T. Yanai ,\ and\ author G. K. \ Chan ,\ title title Orbital optimization in the density matrix renormalization group, with applications to polyenes and -carotene , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ vo...

2008
[38]

author author G. K.-L. \ Chan \ and\ author S. Sharma ,\ title title The density matrix renormalization group in quantum chemistry , \ @noop journal journal Annual review of physical chemistry \ volume 62 ,\ pages 465--481 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

2011
[39]

Fishman , author S

author author M. Fishman , author S. R. \ White ,\ and\ author E. M. \ Stoudenmire ,\ title title The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations , \ @noop journal journal arXiv pre-print server \ ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[40]

Fishman , author S

author author M. Fishman , author S. White ,\ and\ author E. Stoudenmire ,\ title title The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations , \ @noop journal journal SciPost Physics Codebases \ volume 4 ,\ pages 1--53 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022
[41]

Schiefer , author M

author author S. Schiefer , author M. Huth , author A. Dobrinevski ,\ and\ author B. Nickel ,\ title title Determination of the crystal structure of substrate-induced pentacene polymorphs in fiber structured thin films , \ @noop journal journal Journal of the American Chemical...

2007
[42]

Pipek \ and\ author P

author author J. Pipek \ and\ author P. G. \ Mezey ,\ title title A fast intrinsic localization procedure applicable for ab initio and semiempirical linear combination of atomic orbital wave functions , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 90 ,\ pag...

1989
[43]

author author P. M. \ Zimmerman , author Z. Zhang ,\ and\ author C. B. \ Musgrave ,\ title title Singlet fission in pentacene through multi-exciton quantum states , \ @noop journal journal Nature chemistry \ volume 2 ,\ pages 648--652 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

2010
[44]

Pitesa , author S

author author T. Pitesa , author S. Polonius , author L. Gonz \'a lez ,\ and\ author S. Mai ,\ title title Excitonic configuration interaction: Going beyond the frenkel exciton model , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 20 ,\ pages 5609...

2024
[45]

Li , author R

author author X. Li , author R. M. \ Parrish , author F. Liu , author S. I. \ Kokkila Schumacher ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Mart \' nez ,\ title title An ab initio exciton model including charge-transfer excited states , \ @noop journal journal Journal of chemical theory and compu...

2017
[46]

u tz, P Celani, W Gy \

HJ Werner, PJ Knowles, G Knizia, FR Manby, M Sch \"u tz, P Celani, W Gy \"o rffy, D Kats, T Korona, R Lindh, and et al. Molpro, version 2015.1, a package of ab initio programs. 2015

2015
[47]

Microscopic theory of singlet exciton fission

Timothy C Berkelbach, Mark S Hybertsen, and David R Reichman. Microscopic theory of singlet exciton fission. ii. application to pentacene dimers and the role of superexchange. The Journal of chemical physics , 138(11):114103, 2013

2013
[48]

Mechanism of singlet fission in carotenoids from a polyene model system

Supriyo Santra, Jyotirmoy Ray, and Debashree Ghosh. Mechanism of singlet fission in carotenoids from a polyene model system. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , 13(29):6800--6805, 2022

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

author author M. B. \ Smith \ and\ author J. Michl ,\ title title Singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Chemical reviews \ volume 110 ,\ pages 6891--6936 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

work page 2010

[2] [2]

author author M. B. \ Smith \ and\ author J. Michl ,\ title title Recent advances in singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Annual review of physical chemistry \ volume 64 ,\ pages 361--386 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013

[3] [3]

Breen , author R

author author I. Breen , author R. Tempelaar , author L. A. \ Bizimana , author B. Kloss , author D. R. \ Reichman ,\ and\ author D. B. \ Turner ,\ title title Triplet separation drives singlet fission after femtosecond correlated triplet pair production in rubrene , \ @noop journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 139 ,\ pages 11...

work page 2017

[4] [4]

Rao \ and\ author R

author author A. Rao \ and\ author R. H. \ Friend ,\ title title Harnessing singlet exciton fission to break the shockley--queisser limit , \ @noop journal journal Nature reviews materials \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1--12 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

work page 2017

[5] [5]

author author M. W. \ Wilson , author A. Rao , author B. Ehrler ,\ and\ author R. H. \ Friend ,\ title title Singlet exciton fission in polycrystalline pentacene: from photophysics toward devices , \ @noop journal journal Accounts of chemical research \ volume 46 ,\ pages 1330--1338 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013

[6] [6]

Zeng , author R

author author T. Zeng , author R. Hoffmann ,\ and\ author N. Ananth ,\ title title The low-lying electronic states of pentacene and their roles in singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 136 ,\ pages 5755--5764 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

work page 2014

[7] [7]

author author J. C. \ Johnson , author A. J. \ Nozik ,\ and\ author J. Michl ,\ title title The role of chromophore coupling in singlet fission , \ @noop journal journal Accounts of chemical research \ volume 46 ,\ pages 1290--1299 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013

[8] [8]

author author S. R. \ Yost , author J. Lee , author M. W. \ Wilson , author T. Wu , author D. P. \ McMahon , author R. R. \ Parkhurst , author N. J. \ Thompson , author D. N. \ Congreve , author A. Rao , author K. Johnson ,\ and\ author et. al. ,\ title title A transferable model for singlet-fission kinetics , \ @noop journal journal Nature chemistry \ vo...

work page 2014