Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Dimer Models and Hochschild Cohomology

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a zigzag consistent dimer in a torus, the Hochschild cohomology of its Jacobi algebra and its BV structure are determined by the dimer's fan and perfect matchings.

desk verdict A serious, detailed computation of Hochschild cohomology and BV structure for toric dimer models; the main theorems are new and mostly well-proven, with one load-bearing imported uniqueness result that a referee should verify. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03005 v1 pith:CQE5JOQU submitted 2019-08-08 math.RA math.AGmath.RT

Michael Wong This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RAmath.AGmath.RT MSC 16E4016G2014J33
keywords dimermodelsJacobialgebrasHochschildcohomologyBatalin-Vilkoviskystructurematrixfactorizationstoricgeometrynoncommutativecrepantresolutionsmirrorsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that for a zigzag consistent dimer drawn on a torus, the Hochschild cohomology of the associated Jacobi algebra—the algebra built from quiver paths modulo the dimer's face relations—is completely described by dimer combinatorics: the antizigzag fan, the corner matchings, and the powers of zigzag cycles. It gives explicit additive bases for $HH^0$ through $HH^3$ and shows that the Batalin-Vilkovisky operator, the Gerstenhaber bracket, and the cup products are determined by the same data. From this it computes the compactly supported Hochschild cohomology of the matrix-factorization category of the dimer's Landau-Ginzburg model and identifies it additively with the cohomology of the punctured mirror surface together with even and odd polynomial copies attached to each zigzag cycle. If correct, the computation turns deformation-theoretic invariants of noncommutative toric resolutions and their mirrors into finite combinatorial data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is comparison with central localization. For a Calabi-Yau algebra $A$, the paper proves that Hochschild cohomology commutes with localization away from a central element: $HH^*(\hat A)$ is the localization of $HH^*(A)$, and the BV operators are related by $\hat{\Delta}(f \otimes s^{-1}) = \Delta(f) \otimes s^{-1} - \{s, f\} \otimes s^{-2}$. For a dimer, $J(Q)[\ell^{-1}]$ is Morita equivalent to the group algebra of the torus fundamental group, i.e. Laurent polynomials in three variables, whose Hochschild cohomology is the algebra of polyvector fields with a divergence operator as BV differential. The hard lifting step—deciding which classes on the localization come from $J(Q)$—is carried out with perfect-matching gradings (integral gradings from selecting one arrow in each face) and the antizigzag fan, whose cones $\sigma_i$ and semigroup algebras $S_i$ index the non-local summands; minimal-path uniqueness then makes the basis well defined.

What would settle it

Find a zigzag consistent dimer in a torus with two minimal paths between the same vertices that have the same homotopy class and the same degrees in every corner matching but are not equal in $J(Q)$ up to a power of $\ell$; the claimed bases for $HH^1$, $HH^2$, and $HH^3$ would then contain spurious classes. Concretely, checking the suspended pinch point by a direct bar-complex computation of $HH^1$ would either confirm or contradict the dimension formula.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, under zigzag consistency, the entire Hochschild cohomology of the Jacobi algebra $J(Q)$ of a toric dimer is additively built from the center $Z$, the lattice $N^{out}$ of one-parameter subgroups of outer automorphisms, and powers of zigzag cycles. In the paper's notation, $HH^0(J(Q)) \cong Z$, $HH^1(J(Q)) \cong Z \otimes N^{out}_{\mathbb{C}} \oplus \bigoplus_i S_i$, while $HH^2(J(Q))$ and $HH^3(J(Q))$ are direct sums of the corresponding wedge powers of $N^{out}_{\mathbb{C}}$, the semigroup algebras $S_i = \mathbb{C}[\mathrm{Int}\,\sigma_i \cap \mathbb{Z}^2]$, powers of zigzag cycles, and, in the top degree, vertex generators. The paper further shows that the BV operator is unique up to scaling, is computed by a divergence operator on the localization $J(Q)[\ell^{-1}]$, and satisfies explicit formulas on all basis elements; together with the cup products and Gerstenhaber bracket, this determines the full BV algebra structure.

Load-bearing premise

The whole computation rests on the imported lemma that, in the localized algebra, a path is determined by its homotopy class and its degrees in the perfect matchings, so minimal paths are unique up to powers of the potential; if two non-equivalent minimal paths shared those data, the derivation basis and everything built from it would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The additive formulas give explicit bases for $HH^0$ through $HH^3$: the ranks and generator degrees are read directly from the antizigzag fan, the corner matchings, and the number of parallel zigzag cycles.
  • The complete BV algebra structure means the Gerstenhaber bracket, the BV operator, and the cup product on $HH^*(J(Q))$ are computable for any toric dimer, so deformation-theoretic invariants of the associated noncommutative crepant resolution are explicit.
  • All first-order Calabi-Yau deformations of $J(Q)$ are deformations of the superpotential, classified up to gauge equivalence by boundary cycles, minimal interior cycles, and powers of antizigzag cycles.
  • For the matrix-factorization category, the compactly supported Hochschild cohomology is additively $H^*(\Sigma^\vee \setminus Q_0^\vee, \mathbb{C})$ plus even and odd polynomial generators $Z_j^n$ attached to each zigzag; this reproduces the symplectic cohomology of the punctured mirror surface as a BV complex.
  • In the four-punctured-sphere example the computed BV algebra is isomorphic to the symplectic cohomology algebra, while in the five-punctured-sphere example the additive and BV-operator structures agree but the ring structures differ, pinpointing where the B-side remembers more than the punctures do.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The formulas suggest that $HH^*(J(Q))$ depends only on the antizigzag fan together with the corner-matching data, so dimers with the same fan and matching polygon should have isomorphic Hochschild cohomology; the paper does not explicitly state this invariance.
  • If the natural map from compactly supported to ordinary Hochschild cohomology of the matrix-factorization category is an isomorphism, Theorem 1.3 would upgrade to a full computation of $HH^*(MF(J(Q),\ell))$, matching the A-side wrapped category on the cochain level rather than only additively.
  • A testable extension is to replace the torus by a higher-genus surface: the localization comparison would express $HH^*(J(Q))$ in terms of the string-topology BV structure on the free loop space of the surface, provided an analog of the minimal-path-uniqueness lemma holds.
  • The multiplicative discrepancy in the five-punctured-sphere example predicts that the filtration on symplectic cohomology recording parallel zigzags is the B-side shadow of the BV algebra's noncommutativity; this could be checked by comparing the filtered ring structure on the A-side.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the Hochschild cohomology of the Jacobi algebra J(Q) of a zigzag-consistent dimer Q embedded in a torus, in purely combinatorial terms: additive bases for HH^0 through HH^3 are given in Theorem 1.2, the BV algebra structure is described in Section 4.5, and the compactly supported Hochschild cohomology of the matrix factorization category MF(J(Q),ℓ) is computed in Theorem 1.3 and shown to agree additively with the symplectic cohomology of the dual punctured surface. The main technical tools are a central localization theorem for Hochschild cohomology and BV structures (Section 3), a derivation classification for J(Q) (Section 4), and a spectral sequence for the matrix factorization category (Section 5).

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, the paper provides explicit, parameter-free, combinatorially defined bases and BV products for nontrivial noncommutative invariants of dimer models, and it gives concrete evidence for the expected agreement with symplectic cohomology on the mirror side. The manuscript is careful in many places: the localization compatibility with BV structure in Section 3 is written out in detail, the grading arguments in Section 4 are systematic, and the spectral sequence in Section 5 is set up with attention to inverse limits. The central claim is of clear interest to the dimer-model and homological-mirror-symmetry communities, and the results would be a useful reference if the identified gaps are filled.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Lemma 4.5] The classification of derivations of J(Q) is the load-bearing step for Theorems 4.6, 4.17, 4.19, and hence for Theorem 1.2. Its proof relies on two imported facts: that minimal path representatives in J(Q)[ℓ^{-1}] are unique up to powers of ℓ, and that nonnegative perfect-matching degrees characterize membership in J(Q). These are cited to [6, Lemma 7.4] and [8, Lemmas 3.18–3.19] but are not proved or even stated as explicit hypotheses. Because the basis {∂_i, ∂_α} of HH^1 and everything built from it depend on this classification, the paper should either prove these facts or formulate them as explicit assumptions with a precise verification. In the ray case n = -1, the step asserting that a nontrivial γ supported on P_i must equal E_{P_i} also needs proof: the face equations (19) alone show only that γ is supported on P_i, and it is not immediate that the only grading in N supported on P_i is proportional, modulo N^in, to E_{P_i}.
  2. [§5, Proposition 5.2] The spectral sequence argument leading to the isomorphisms (31) is too compressed. The text states that the only possible nonzero components of d^2 are d^2_{i,i}, but in a first-quadrant spectral sequence d^2 has bidegree (-1,2); a bidegree-by-bidegree check is needed before concluding that d^2 vanishes. More importantly, after showing d^2 = 0, the paper asserts that the spectral sequence degenerates at the second page. Since the matching-degree argument shows that d^r has degree at least r in all perfect matchings, the vanishing of all higher differentials should be stated uniformly for all r, and the convergence of the inverse-limit exact sequence (29) should be tied explicitly to this degeneration. As written, Theorem 1.3 depends on an unproved degeneration claim.
  3. [§3.1, Theorem 3.5(2)] The proof of the localization isomorphism for Hochschild cohomology checks the key quasi-isomorphism only for the free bimodule M = A^e and then asserts it for general perfect M. The statement is used for M = A, so the argument should either be written for that case or justified by a finite-cell argument. This is a small but load-bearing gap in the localization theorem on which the later computations rely.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.2, Lemma 4.5] In the ray case, the sentence invoking Theorem 2.10 refers to zigzag cycles of homology -η_i, but the relevant corner matchings are P_i and P_{i+1}; presumably the intended homology class is -η_{i+1}. Please correct the index.
  2. [Throughout] The symbol Z is overloaded: it denotes the center of J(Q), the integer lattice, and the Laurent variable z in the localization. In formulas such as Z·N_C in §4.2 this is confusing; a distinct notation for the center would help.
  3. [Abstract and §2.9] There are several typographical slips: 'noncommutati ve' in the abstract, 'compactly suppported' in §2.9, and 'Van den Berg' on page 21 for 'Van den Bergh'.
  4. [§4.5, Proposition 4.21] The formula in item (4) writes {∂_α, f} = deg_{P_i}(f)x_αℓ^{-1}f, but for a homogeneous f of arbitrary degree the right-hand side should be x_αℓ^{-1} times a scalar depending on the degree of f; please state the degree convention for f explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central derivation is self-contained given standard external dimer-model results.

full rationale

The paper derives additive bases and BV structure for HH^*(J(Q)) and HH^*_c(MF(J(Q),ell)) under the stated hypothesis that Q is a zigzag consistent dimer in a torus. The derivation chain is not circular. The potentially load-bearing facts are imported from prior work by other authors: the existence and uniqueness of minimal paths up to powers of ell is taken from Bocklandt ([6, Lemma 7.4] and [8, Lemma 3.18]), and the matching-polytope facts come from Gulotta ([23]) and Broomhead ([10]). These are external, parameter-free theorems about dimer combinatorics and path classes; they do not assume or encode the Hochschild cohomology groups being computed. Lemma 4.5 uses these facts to classify derivations, Theorem 4.6 converts that classification into an HH^1 basis, and Theorems 4.17 and 4.19 compute HH^3 and HH^2 by grading-and-dimension arguments from that basis, not by assuming the answer. The BV operator is pinned down by the unique volume of J(Q) (Lemma 3.9), itself proved inside the paper from the self-dual Ginzburg resolution, together with grading constraints in Theorem 3.10. The matrix-factorization result in Theorem 1.3 is obtained by feeding Theorem 1.2 into the Caldăraru–Tu spectral sequence, whose degeneration is proved by degree arguments. There are no author self-citations, no fitted parameters, and no renaming of a known result as a new prediction. The acknowledged external dependence on minimal-path uniqueness is real but is independent support, not circularity, because it concerns path representatives rather than cohomological conclusions. Overall the central claims have genuine content beyond their inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or ad hoc physical entities are introduced. The antizigzag paths, strips E_{i,j}, and BV operators are all defined directly from the dimer data and existing mathematical structures. The listed axioms are the standard and domain-specific assumptions the proof rests on.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Q is zigzag consistent and admits a perfect matching.
    Used throughout Sections 3 to 5. Zigzag consistency gives cancellation, the Calabi-Yau property, and injectivity of localization maps (Definition 2.6, Theorem 2.19, Lemma 4.5).
  • standard math J(Q)[ell^-1] is Morita equivalent to Mat_{#Q0}(C[pi_1(Sigma)] tensor C[z^{+-1}]).
    Theorem 2.13, cited from [7]. This is load-bearing for the localized Hochschild cohomology and for the BV structure in Theorem 3.10 and Section 4.5.
  • standard math For zigzag consistent Q in a torus, minimal paths are unique up to multiplication by powers of the potential ell.
    Imported from [6] Lemma 7.4 and [8] Lemma 3.18. The HH^1 basis, the containment arguments in Lemma 4.10, and the HH^0 quotient in Theorem 4.15 all assume this uniqueness.
  • standard math J(Q) is Calabi-Yau of dimension 3 for zigzag consistent dimers in positive genus, and its volume is unique up to scalar.
    Theorem 2.19 is cited from [14], and Lemma 3.9 proves uniqueness of the volume. Van den Bergh duality and the BV operator depend on this fact.
  • standard math The compactly supported Hochschild cohomology of MF(A,W) equals that of the curved algebra (A,W), and the Caldararu-Tu spectral sequence applies.
    Theorem 2.17 from [29] and the spectral sequence method from [13] transfer the Jacobi algebra computation to the matrix factorization category in Section 5.
  • standard math Homotopy class and perfect matching degrees determine path classes in J(Q)[ell^-1].
    Imported from [7] Lemma 7.2 and used in the H_1(Sigma) times Z^{PM} grading arguments in Theorem 3.10 and Proposition 4.21.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dimer Models and Hochschild Cohomology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CQE5JOQU

@misc{pith2026190803005,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dimer Models and Hochschild Cohomology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CQE5JOQU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03005}
}
read the original abstract

Dimer models provide a method of constructing noncommutative crepant resolutions of affine toric Gorenstein threefolds. In homological mirror symmetry, they can also be used to describe noncommutative Landau--Ginzburg models dual to punctured Riemann surfaces. For a zigzag consistent dimer embedded in a torus, we explicitly compute the Hochschild cohomology of its Jacobi algebra in terms of dimer combinatorics. This includes a full characterization of the Batalin--Vilkovisky structure induced by the Calabi--Yau structure of the Jacobi algebra. We then compute the compactly supported Hochschild cohomology of the category of matrix factorizations for the Jacobi algebra with its canonical potential.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03005 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The dimer Q, with one vertex v1 and arrows x, y, z, is embedded in a torus. The dual dimer Q ∨ , which has the same arrow set but has three vertices, is embedded in a sphere. Theorem 1.1 ([9] Corollary 8.4). Suppose Q is a zigzag consistent dimer (see §2.5) in a compact Riemann surface of positive genus. Then there exists an A∞-quasi-isomorphism mf(Q) ∼= fuk(Q ∨ ). Dimer models thus offer an algebraic, combinatorial… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples of dimers from [9]. The first two are embedded in a torus, while the third is embedded in a genus 2 surface. 2.3. Jacobi algebras. A superpotential of a quiver Q is any element Φ ∈ HH0(CQ) ∼= CQ/[CQ, CQ], the vector space spanned by closed paths up to cyclic permutation of the arrows. Ginzburg [22] defines a linear map ∂a : CQ/[CQ, CQ] → CQ called the cyclic derivative with respect to a ∈ Q1: if a1, . . . ,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An example of the inductive step at i = 2. We claim that b1b2 · · · bi is a subpath of p ′ j . To see this, observe that any positive partial cycle that ends in bk, 1 ≤ k ≤ i, must contain a: R + bk+1 = bk+2 . . . bmab1 . . . bk. Because f is minimal and R+ a ⊂ Q1(f), the arrow a must be in a perfect matching in which f has degree 0. Therefore, none of the paths p ′ 0 , . . . , p′ n contain a, implying the downward … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The subspace Ei,j . i.e., r ⊂ Q1(x m ηi ). But Q1(x m ηi ) = Q1(xηi ) by Corollary 4.11, so we conclude that v is xηi -connected to the vertices of O+(Zi,j ) and O−(Zi,j+1). For the other direction, note that any path connecting vertices in different strips must cross …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mirror dual to the four punctured sphere. Then according to Theorem 4.19, HH2 (J(Q)) = Z ∪ N out C ∪ N out C ⊕ M i∈Z/4Z m,n>0 C · ∂mηi+nηi+1 ∪ N out C ⊕ C{x n ηi ψi |i ∈ Z/4Z, n ≥ 0}. Finally, in the presentation of Theorem 4.17, the third cohomology is HH3 (J(Q)) ∼= Z…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: There are four zigzag cycles, no two of which are parallel. F [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mirror dual to the five punctured sphere References [1] Mohammed Abouzaid, Denis Auroux, Alexander I. Efimov, Ludmil Katzarkov, and Dmitri Orlov. Homological mirror symmetry for punctured spheres. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 26(4):1051–1083, 2013. [2] Andr´es Angel and Diego …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Efimov, Lu dmil Katzarkov, and Dmitri Orlov

    Mohammed Abouzaid, Denis Auroux, Alexander I. Efimov, Lu dmil Katzarkov, and Dmitri Orlov. Homological mirror symmetry for punctured spheres. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 26(4):1051–1083, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    The BV-algebra structur e of the Hochschild cohomology of the group ring of cyclic gro ups of prime order

    Andr´ es Angel and Diego Duarte. The BV-algebra structur e of the Hochschild cohomology of the group ring of cyclic gro ups of prime order. In Geometric, algebraic and topological methods for quantum fi eld theory, pages 353–372. W orld Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Derived invariance of the cap product in Hochschild theory

    Marco Armenta and Bernhard Keller. Derived invariance o f the cap product in Hochschild theory. arXiv:1711.02947

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [4]

    A c ategory of kernels for equivariant factorizations and its i mpli- cations for Hodge theory

    Matthew Ballard, David Favero, and Ludmil Katzarkov. A c ategory of kernels for equivariant factorizations and its i mpli- cations for Hodge theory. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. , 120:1–111, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Toby Stafford, and Michael W emyss

    Gwyn Bellamy, Daniel Rogalski, Travis Schedler, J. Toby Stafford, and Michael W emyss. Noncommutative algebraic geom- etry, volume 64 of Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications . Cambridge University Press, New York, 2016. Lecture notes based on courses given at the Summer Graduate S chool at the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI...

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Consistency conditions for dimer models

    Raf Bocklandt. Consistency conditions for dimer models . Glasg. Math. J. , 54(2):429–447, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Calabi-Yau algebras and weighted quiver polyhedra

    Raf Bocklandt. Calabi-Yau algebras and weighted quiver polyhedra. Math. Z. , 273(1-2):311–329, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    A dimer ABC

    Raf Bocklandt. A dimer ABC. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , 48(3):387–451, 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Noncommutative mirror symmetry for punc tured surfaces

    Raf Bocklandt. Noncommutative mirror symmetry for punc tured surfaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 368(1):429–469, 2016. With an appendix by Mohammed Abouzaid

    2016

  2. [10]

    Dimer models and Calabi-Yau algebra s

    Nathan Broomhead. Dimer models and Calabi-Yau algebra s. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 215(1011):viii+86, 2012

    2012

  3. [11]

    Central localization in Hochschi ld homology

    Jean-Luc Brylinski. Central localization in Hochschi ld homology. J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 57(1):1–4, 1989

    1989

  4. [12]

    String topology

    Moira Chas and Dennis Sullivan. String topology. arXiv :math/9911159. 46 MICHAEL WONG

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Curved A∞ algebras and Landau-Ginzburg models

    Andrei C˘ ald˘ araru and Junwu Tu. Curved A∞ algebras and Landau-Ginzburg models. New York J. Math. , 19:305–342, 2013

    2013

  6. [14]

    Consistency conditions for brane tilings

    Ben Davison. Consistency conditions for brane tilings . J. Algebra, 338:1–23, 2011

    2011

  7. [15]

    C alabi-Yau deformations and negative cyclic homology

    Louis de Thanhoffer de Volcesy and Michel Van den Bergh. C alabi-Yau deformations and negative cyclic homology. arXiv:1201.1520. To appear in Journal of Noncommutative Ge ometry

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Compact generators in categories of matrix factorizations

    Tobias Dyckerhoff. Compact generators in categories of matrix factorizations. Duke Math. J. , 159(2):223–274, 2011

    2011

  9. [17]

    Noncommutative com plete intersections and matrix integrals

    Pavel Etingof and Victor Ginzburg. Noncommutative com plete intersections and matrix integrals. Pure Appl. Math. Q. , 3(1, Special Issue: In honor of Robert D. MacPherson. Part 3) :107–151, 2007

    2007

  10. [18]

    Noncommutative del Pezzo surfaces and Calabi-Yau algebras

    Pavel Etingof and Victor Ginzburg. Noncommutative del Pezzo surfaces and Calabi-Yau algebras. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 12(6):1371–1416, 2010

    2010

  11. [19]

    Hochschild duality, localization, an d smash products

    Marco Farinati. Hochschild duality, localization, an d smash products. J. Algebra, 284(1):415–434, 2005

    2005

  12. [20]

    Symplectic cohomology and duality for the wrapped Fukaya ca tegory

    Sheel Ganatra. Symplectic cohomology and duality for the wrapped Fukaya ca tegory. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012

    2012

  13. [21]

    The cohomology structure of an as sociative ring

    Murray Gerstenhaber. The cohomology structure of an as sociative ring. Ann. of Math. (2) , 78:267–288, 1963

    1963

  14. [22]

    Calabi-Yau algebras

    Victor Ginzburg. Calabi-Yau algebras. arXiv:math/06 12139

  15. [23]

    Daniel R. Gulotta. Properly ordered dimers, R-charges, and an efficient inverse algorithm. J. High Energy Phys. , (10):014, 31, 2008

    2008

  16. [24]

    Hochschild, Bertram Kostant, and Alex Rosenberg

    G. Hochschild, Bertram Kostant, and Alex Rosenberg. Di fferential forms on regular affine algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 102:383–408, 1962

    1962

  17. [25]

    T. Y. Lam. Lectures on modules and rings , volume 189 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999

    1999

  18. [26]

    Floer cohomology of g-equivariant Lagrangian branes

    Yanki Lekili and James Pascaleff. Floer cohomology of g-equivariant Lagrangian branes. Compos. Math., 152(5):1071–1110, 2016

    2016

  19. [27]

    Lin and Daniel Pomerleano

    Kevin H. Lin and Daniel Pomerleano. Global matrix facto rizations. Math. Res. Lett. , 20(1):91–106, 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    Cyclic homology, volume 301 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamen tal Prin- ciples of Mathematical Sciences]

    Jean-Louis Loday. Cyclic homology, volume 301 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamen tal Prin- ciples of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 1998. Appendix E by Mar ´ ıa O. Ronco, Chapter 13 by the author in collaboration with ...

    1998

  21. [29]

    Hochsch ild (co)homology of the second kind I

    Alexander Polishchuk and Leonid Positselski. Hochsch ild (co)homology of the second kind I. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 364(10):5311–5368, 2012

    2012

  22. [30]

    Two kinds of derived categories, K oszul duality, and comodule-contramodule correspondence

    Leonid Positselski. Two kinds of derived categories, K oszul duality, and comodule-contramodule correspondence . Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 212(996):vi+133, 2011

    2011

  23. [31]

    The ring of differenti al operators on forms in noncommutative calculus

    Dmitri Tamarkin and Boris Tsygan. The ring of differenti al operators on forms in noncommutative calculus. In Graphs and patterns in mathematics and theoretical physics , volume 73 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , pages 105–131. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2005

    2005

  24. [32]

    The homotopy theory of dg-categories and derived Morita theory

    Bertrand Toen. The homotopy theory of dg-categories and derived Morita theory. Invent. Math. , 167(3):615–667, 2007

    2007

  25. [33]

    The string topology BV algebra, Hochs child cohomology and the Goldman bracket on surfaces

    Dmitry Vaintrob. The string topology BV algebra, Hochs child cohomology and the Goldman bracket on surfaces. arXiv:math/0702859

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    A relation between Hochschild hom ology and cohomology for Gorenstein rings

    Michel van den Bergh. A relation between Hochschild hom ology and cohomology for Gorenstein rings. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 126(5):1345–1348, 1998

    1998

  27. [35]

    Charles A. W eibel. An introduction to homological algebra , volume 38 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994

    1994

  28. [36]

    Derived categories and Calabi-Yau algeb ras

    Jieheng Zeng. Derived categories and Calabi-Yau algeb ras. arXiv:1711.08574. Department of Mathematics, University College London, Gowe r Street, London WC1E 6BT E-mail address : michael.wong@ucl.ac.uk

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.