Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:55.966146Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity
As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 79 of 79 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2507.14741.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-05-08T03:46:43.221811Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-11T21:56:17.082360Z
Reference resolution
79 of 79 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy46
- unresolved33
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation 3edb15bc-1ca7-4e4f-a828-bf0275936101 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 1
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:10.952924Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 2a53cf5c-69f0-44a3-9ac8-1be6fb49b675 · outbound
This paper cites J., Sugimoto, C.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity J., Sugimoto, C
Reference 2
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:10.822463Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation a33f4d47-c028-4af9-93b7-7a5750315f95 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 3
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:10.622621Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation af510ca1-eafc-4145-a11e-7d944ab4cdf9 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 4
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:10.467125Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 2979060a-e379-418b-97f2-cf9e3a3e44cc · outbound
This paper cites Who’s afraid of peer review? (2013).
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Who’s afraid of peer review? (2013)
Reference 5
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:10.268586Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 01dc32e3-ed0d-400f-97c1-78b6db53570f · outbound
This paper cites & Heavlin, W.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Heavlin, W
Reference 6
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:10.033881Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation f6bcad52-caea-42ed-9949-7ebe3df7b035 · outbound
This paper cites Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
Reference 7
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:09.842450Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation b1fa6f9f-13b9-49a4-820a-6d61fe1440af · outbound
This paper cites & Raphael, E.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Raphael, E
Reference 8
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:09.604125Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation f43f21ed-8f95-4ebd-98c4-df54c5e3c53a · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 9
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:09.382792Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation e260d6d8-620e-4fc1-82f0-9313c4025b92 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 10
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:09.116402Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation dacd667c-b283-4deb-803c-615bc53c214b · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 11
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:08.928592Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation cce686ff-7b3e-41e3-ba65-0316e35f73d2 · outbound
This paper cites this work is antithetical to the spirit of research.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity this work is antithetical to the spirit of research
Reference 12
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:08.699455Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation fd33b5ef-e625-4d1e-817b-83e003eef0a4 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 13
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:08.488867Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation be80a147-81fa-4836-936f-797180675ee6 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 14
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:08.207910Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation a7cb8b77-0dcc-4ab0-9062-c91f8ea1a950 · outbound
This paper cites & Maruˇsi´c, A.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Maruˇsi´c, A
Reference 15
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:07.878927Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation f2af6909-48bb-40d4-b0a1-f5399ea4daca · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 16
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:07.631643Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 76826903-e388-4110-ab73-273044e8f1f9 · outbound
This paper cites J., Kahn, S.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity J., Kahn, S
Reference 17
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:07.385599Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation b997b496-5185-435d-a5dc-bf7543e29fb2 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 18
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:07.154290Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 1c42655b-6273-4d36-98f0-5b4580438ddd · outbound
This paper cites & Fang, F.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Fang, F
Reference 19
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:06.803877Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation cf93e1e0-d499-49f8-9270-8f105c1fd036 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 20
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:06.498830Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 67ffdf12-aa31-413a-8a8c-186d16c71b14 · outbound
This paper cites & ˙Zela´zniewicz, A.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & ˙Zela´zniewicz, A
Reference 21
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:06.297423Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 9530352e-2ebc-40ea-84cf-968710f09552 · outbound
This paper cites G., Politzer-Ahles, S.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity G., Politzer-Ahles, S
Reference 22
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:06.104195Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 9dccc325-c5e3-4817-9c1c-629b816c227a · outbound
This paper cites & Teplitskiy, M.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Teplitskiy, M
Reference 23
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:05.859860Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 27c3b7dd-b4b9-4c7c-99c5-db9fada9abb2 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 24
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:05.594872Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 8d44041a-099d-49b9-81c4-b10b78d3dd84 · outbound
This paper cites & Dinesh, S.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Dinesh, S
Reference 25
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:05.439437Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 936c59de-0a27-4d8e-badb-826fd81a5c0e · outbound
This paper cites Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach
Reference 26
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:50.186489Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 635b7062-a728-4c37-9f92-b4bb027a9797 · outbound
This paper cites SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text
Reference 27
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:50.300656Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 0abae862-3a4e-4921-8ffc-9a7c2e33798e · outbound
This paper cites K., Navlakha, M., Agarwal, M.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity K., Navlakha, M., Agarwal, M
Reference 28
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:05.314561Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 9c4b5c7b-2ebd-425a-b25e-ef6cee74d020 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 29
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:05.139600Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 3fc6e7ed-33c3-4d4e-be2b-b6e2fe4f4d07 · outbound
This paper cites & Falk Delgado, A.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Falk Delgado, A
Reference 30
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:04.933172Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation aea1ac84-1ad5-44de-80ac-59011d68e482 · outbound
This paper cites Analysis of the language used in the reports of peer-review journals.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Analysis of the language used in the reports of peer-review journals
Reference 31
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:04.639937Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 5d9ec5ea-d963-4031-8af2-84f0239696ac · outbound
This paper cites Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective
Reference 32
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:04.378377Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 04e97d74-94e3-4d94-b54c-a29368f53d98 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 33
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:04.105193Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation b7865137-dfbc-4f94-b38d-4d15da8a9af5 · outbound
This paper cites W.,(1997).
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity W.,(1997)
Reference 34
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:03.873832Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 84d56c58-eed9-449c-9337-4db33b125989 · outbound
This paper cites N., Langerhuizen, D.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity N., Langerhuizen, D
Reference 35
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:03.595779Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 57298fa6-b533-4a56-b989-e0f3507a03fe · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 36
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:03.372770Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation a731fbcb-719b-406e-80ce-1ee4d3965823 · outbound
This paper cites A., Jawaid, M.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity A., Jawaid, M
Reference 37
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:03.148216Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 5fb1cc85-4b20-4c7c-b3a9-e83ef1e9ee83 · outbound
This paper cites Interactive functions of language in peer reviews of medical papers written by non- native users of english.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Interactive functions of language in peer reviews of medical papers written by non- native users of english
Reference 38
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:03.007138Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation e93894b0-11d8-46e7-8ee0-4a34a2f4a20b · outbound
This paper cites & Diani, G.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Diani, G
Reference 39
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:02.828478Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation c4011fff-d03c-4850-a102-f0a840a97758 · outbound
This paper cites & Mckeachie, W.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Mckeachie, W
Reference 40
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:02.661304Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation dd938c3c-eb3e-4aa5-8d6d-023d701354a5 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 41
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:02.469766Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 9d5284f4-489c-442e-968d-acca80c76d68 · outbound
This paper cites & Timperley, H.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Timperley, H
Reference 42
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:02.281865Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 830b43b6-f39f-4f95-84fc-bcecf4695cf5 · outbound
This paper cites & Molloy, E.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Molloy, E
Reference 43
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:02.119534Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation fae1f14f-93a2-4932-9561-2a84f4121f12 · outbound
This paper cites Differing perceptions in the feedback process.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Differing perceptions in the feedback process
Reference 44
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:01.934525Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 4aeff596-f3fb-4a16-8feb-5914471cedf4 · outbound
This paper cites R., James, R., Berghella, V.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity R., James, R., Berghella, V
Reference 45
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:01.808306Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 8f01fdb1-1a8f-45fe-a2f2-7d86f4501511 · outbound
This paper cites S., Knutsen, J.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity S., Knutsen, J
Reference 46
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:01.725067Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 93400d71-e2e1-4297-b6ac-653f72f823b6 · outbound
This paper cites The peer-review crisis (2022).
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity The peer-review crisis (2022)
Reference 47
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:01.594813Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation d3ce79ce-069e-41fd-b83d-6eec5b50dc8d · outbound
This paper cites & Smits, J.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Smits, J
Reference 48
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:01.491764Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 5d6e6829-721c-4550-ad68-1e1de8215037 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 49
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:01.341736Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 92850a48-407e-46ef-bf2f-d480a5ece9ba · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 50
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:01.113330Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 553a555b-9c05-42da-b000-e02fa06f61c8 · outbound
This paper cites Self-archiving and license to publish.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Self-archiving and license to publish
Reference 51
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:01.030241Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 2586d2ab-efde-4470-a257-59b796b323dd · outbound
This paper cites Plos text and data mining.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Plos text and data mining
Reference 52
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:00.909701Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 69162d24-8b46-4049-ae26-f785bef634fe · outbound
This paper cites Genderize.io (2024).
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Genderize.io (2024)
Reference 53
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:00.738610Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 3b20c98d-5855-4ce4-aaf3-634e654f505c · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 54
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:00.478122Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 70d06b13-2879-4f88-869d-d37e56fcc07e · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 55
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:54:00.247543Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 23bf6c31-df0e-4278-b556-3def5faae5fe · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 56
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:59.960366Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation cd4ce50e-1278-48cf-9f9c-941648b5623f · outbound
This paper cites Nature index (2024).
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Nature index (2024)
Reference 57
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:59.704433Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 35ee33b7-eda6-4d22-bcbe-13e535736fbe · outbound
This paper cites & Piwowar, H.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity & Piwowar, H
Reference 58
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:59.490311Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 9bf64f56-88f4-4597-b245-5a9ace04b8e4 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 59
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:59.292716Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 5791b3d2-29f6-4b99-baf7-4e45d30ebbd2 · outbound
This paper cites A., Evans, J.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity A., Evans, J
Reference 60
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:59.119553Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 9de9041d-236c-4e06-aacc-a95181ceac4e · outbound
This paper cites BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Reference 61
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:53.993172Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5da7e027-9d91-45be-a32c-4722454b5ba6 · outbound
This paper cites Nature communications: Writing your report (2024).
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Nature communications: Writing your report (2024)
Reference 62
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:58.954390Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 3c899c92-2675-4023-925d-309f52edb5f4 · outbound
This paper cites manuscript appreciation.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity manuscript appreciation
Reference 63
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:58.820457Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 24989ace-3ef5-480d-b271-76efb2bd2ede · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 64
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:58.678536Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation d5bcbf13-80d5-4501-91dc-c9fcb7f00569 · outbound
This paper cites Contextual-Summarizing.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Contextual-Summarizing
Reference 65
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:58.541308Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation cb16df26-530e-4506-a11a-c3119d115357 · outbound
This paper cites Handle Sarcasm Carefully: If a sentence contains sarcasm, do not classify it based on its literal meaning.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Handle Sarcasm Carefully: If a sentence contains sarcasm, do not classify it based on its literal meaning
Reference 66
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:58.390556Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation c3903ddc-c908-40bd-b73c-83c7c2be6b67 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 67
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:58.273275Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 87b44018-84ae-4a26-b23a-8cfb406ade9e · outbound
This paper cites If two tones are equally present, list both, separated by a semicolon.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity If two tones are equally present, list both, separated by a semicolon
Reference 68
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:58.109297Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 067866a9-18c1-4a89-9774-715a35d01d4a · outbound
This paper cites Sincerely, Dr. Smith.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Sincerely, Dr. Smith
Reference 69
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:58.000727Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 6cad6488-af60-4dfa-a31b-8ed7a4becd80 · outbound
This paper cites Contextual-Summarizing.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Contextual-Summarizing
Reference 70
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:57.877410Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 3a3487a4-bce3-4e48-b5e6-7034af2e54b0 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 71
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:57.716405Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 2ad14b76-5f13-4d15-bbb3-3260b23645b8 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 72
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:57.576124Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 850a5951-9302-4a7d-93ea-dbae9a2e2062 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 73
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:57.372836Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation bf34c640-bcc8-4e11-8705-3afc43bc57c2 · outbound
This paper cites sentence 1.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity sentence 1
Reference 74
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:57.172954Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 6bc4c8dc-8471-4e38-9c0c-b93b87aba2c7 · outbound
This paper cites (1) and constant in eq.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity (1) and constant in eq
Reference 75
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:56.968639Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation af861dab-2e2b-498c-9196-d141e956342c · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 76
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:56.821005Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 405eaa38-87c9-40a4-bb1f-2933502bfc45 · outbound
This paper cites the question is, if the absorption of a certain tissue is not that small at 800nm, does the method still work? if not, how to solve this problem?.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity the question is, if the absorption of a certain tissue is not that small at 800nm, does the method still work? if not, how to solve this problem?
Reference 77
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:56.661754Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 02b86b26-61b1-4974-b7e6-0a6c63ed54f6 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 78
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:56.450697Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Observation 02191706-c0a1-4a57-8d86-eab9c3bf2f25 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity Unresolved cited work
Reference 79
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T15:53:56.276078Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.
Pith citing papers
Observation d3619ad9-ebc8-4bc6-8156-3e0ff0dbabb1 · inbound
PeeriScope: A Multi-Faceted Framework for Evaluating Peer Review Quality cites this paper.
PeeriScope: A Multi-Faceted Framework for Evaluating Peer Review Quality Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity
Reference 19
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T21:56:17.126265Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.