REVIEW 1 cited by
How Decentralization Affects User Agency on Social Platforms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Mainstream social media platforms function as "walled garden" ecosystems that restrict user agency, control, and data portability. They have demonstrated a lack of transparency that contributes to a multitude of online harms. Our research investigates how decentralization might present promise as an alternative model to walled garden platforms. Specifically, we describe the user-driven content moderation through blocks as an expression of agency on Bluesky, a decentralized social platform. We examine the impact of providing users with more granular control over their online experiences, including what they post, who can see it, and whose content they are exposed to. We describe the patterns identified in user-driven content moderation and suggest directions for further research.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Understanding Decentralized Social Feed Curation on Mastodon
Mastodon users in this interview study prefer chronological feeds but accept transparent, adjustable rule-based feed curation; a slider-based prototype called braids.social helped them balance home, local, and trendin...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.