REVIEW 2 cited by
Improving Masked Autoencoders by Learning Where to Mask
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Masked image modeling is a promising self-supervised learning method for visual data. It is typically built upon image patches with random masks, which largely ignores the variation of information density between them. The question is: Is there a better masking strategy than random sampling and how can we learn it? We empirically study this problem and initially find that introducing object-centric priors in mask sampling can significantly improve the learned representations. Inspired by this observation, we present AutoMAE, a fully differentiable framework that uses Gumbel-Softmax to interlink an adversarially-trained mask generator and a mask-guided image modeling process. In this way, our approach can adaptively find patches with higher information density for different images, and further strike a balance between the information gain obtained from image reconstruction and its practical training difficulty. In our experiments, AutoMAE is shown to provide effective pretraining models on standard self-supervised benchmarks and downstream tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Self-Guided Masked Autoencoder
A Masked Autoencoder that masks the object cluster found by its own early patch-clustering signal learns better representations than random masking, with no external labels or models.
-
MINR: Implicit Neural Representations with Masked Image Modelling
A hybrid of implicit neural representations and masked image modeling, called MINR, reconstructs masked image patches better than MAE in the reported in-domain and out-of-distribution tests with fewer parameters.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.