Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Zero-Crossing Statistics for Non-Markovian Time Series

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.02926 v1 pith:CRVZR5BF submitted 2017-11-08 cond-mat.stat-mech

classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords intervalnon-markovianresultsricetimezero-crossingagreesanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In applications spaning from image analysis and speech recognition, to energy dissipation in turbulence and time-to failure of fatigued materials, researchers and engineers want to calculate how often a stochastic observable crosses a specific level, such as zero. At first glance this problem looks simple, but it is in fact theoretically very challenging. And therefore, few exact results exist. One exception is the celebrated Rice formula that gives the mean number of zero-crossings in a fixed time interval of a zero-mean Gaussian stationary processes. In this study we use the so-called Independent Interval Approximation to go beyond Rice's result and derive analytic expressions for all higher-order zero-crossing cumulants and moments. Our results agrees well with simulations for the non-Markovian autoregressive model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Number of Sign Changes: Segment of AR(1)

    math.HO 2019-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For stationary AR(1) segments of length 2, 3 and 4, the variance of the number of sign changes is computed exactly; the independent interval approximation matches exactly for n=2,3 but deviates slightly for n=4, espec...

Pith tools