Pith

open record

sign in

arxiv: 2607.00835 · v2 · pith:CRWQ25UU · submitted 2026-07-01 · quant-ph

Simulating generic single-qubit open-dynamics via polarization-frequency coupling in a photonic interferometer

Kalle Raikisto , Alberto Ferrara , Tom Kuusela , Rosario Lo Franco , Jyrki Piilo , Astronomy , University of Turku , Finland
show 3 more authors
(2) Dipartimento di Ingegneria Universita degli Studi di Palermo Italy)
This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-03 20:47 UTCgrok-4.3pith:CRWQ25UUrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification quant-ph
keywords photonic quantum simulationopen quantum systemssingle-qubit dynamicspolarization-frequency couplingMach-Zehnder interferometernon-Markovian evolutiondepolarization channel
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single-photon Mach-Zehnder interferometer with birefringent coupling can reproduce arbitrary single-qubit open dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors show that an open Mach-Zehnder setup containing one birefringent plate produces a tunable map on photon polarization by letting frequency act as an effective environment. Adjusting the input frequency spectrum and the interferometer arm parameters changes the balance between population transfer and coherence loss. This yields a protocol that matches target open evolutions such as depolarization or non-Markovian relaxation. The method is presented as experimentally accessible because it uses only standard linear optics and a single photon.

Core claim

By inducing a controllable coupling between polarization and frequency degrees of freedom in a photonic Mach-Zehnder interferometer, the reduced dynamics on the polarization qubit can be engineered to reproduce arbitrary single-qubit open-system maps through adjustments to the frequency distribution and path parameters.

What carries the argument

Polarization-frequency coupling induced by a birefringent quartz plate inside an open Mach-Zehnder interferometer, which converts frequency into a tunable effective environment for the polarization qubit.

If this is right

  • Target single-qubit states can be reproduced by tuning only the frequency spectrum and interferometer parameters.
  • The resulting evolution exhibits a controllable mix of population transfer and coherence decay rather than pure dephasing.
  • The same platform reproduces standard benchmarks including depolarization channels and non-Markovian dynamics with high accuracy.
  • The protocol is expected to operate under standard laboratory conditions without additional isolation requirements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be extended to simulate open dynamics on two or more qubits by adding further frequency or spatial modes.
  • Because the control relies on classical spectral shaping, the simulator might be integrated into larger photonic circuits for hybrid tasks.
  • The same coupling mechanism might allow experimental tests of open-system theorems that are currently hard to access with other platforms.

Load-bearing premise

The frequency degree of freedom can be treated as a fully controllable effective environment that produces the desired maps without extra uncontrolled decoherence.

What would settle it

Measure the output polarization state for a chosen target map and frequency distribution; if the observed populations and coherences deviate substantially from the analytic prediction, the claimed controllability does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00835 by (2) Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Alberto Ferrara, Astronomy, Finland, Italy), Jyrki Piilo, Kalle Raikisto, Rosario Lo Franco, Tom Kuusela, Universita degli Studi di Palermo, University of Turku.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Diagram of the setup. The system is a Mach-Zehnder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The diagonal and off-diagonal values of the polarization state for one of the output branch of the interferometer, as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Results of the single qubit simulation for the depo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Results of the single qubit simulation for a non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Probability of finding the photon in the output branch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Results of the single qubit simulation for a amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a photonic platform for simulating arbitrary single-qubit open-system dynamics using a single photon in an open Mach-Zehnder interferometer. A birefringent quartz plate induces a coupling between the polarization and frequency degrees of freedom. By treating the latter as an effective environment, we analytically derive the reduced polarization dynamics. We show that the resulting evolution is characterized by a controllable interplay between populations and coherence, instead of the usual dephasing caused by quartz plates. By adjusting the photon frequency distribution and interferometric parameters, we demonstrate that target single-qubit states can be efficiently reproduced through a tunable optical protocol expected to work under accessible experimental conditions. The simulator is benchmarked against paradigmatic open-system evolutions, including depolarization and non-Markovian dynamics, achieving high accuracy. Our results establish polarization-frequency engineered photonic interferometers as a versatile protocol for simulation of open quantum systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a photonic platform using a single photon in an open Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a birefringent quartz plate to induce polarization-frequency coupling. Treating frequency as an effective environment, the authors analytically derive the reduced polarization dynamics and claim that tuning the photon frequency distribution and interferometric parameters allows efficient reproduction of target single-qubit open-system evolutions. The protocol is benchmarked against depolarization and non-Markovian dynamics with high accuracy, under accessible experimental conditions.

Significance. If the two-parameter family of reduced maps can be shown to cover a useful and non-trivial subset of single-qubit CPTP maps without uncontrolled decoherence, the work would provide a simple, tunable optical simulator for open quantum systems. The analytical derivation of the reduced dynamics and explicit benchmarking against standard channels constitute clear strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the setup simulates 'arbitrary single-qubit open-system dynamics' (and 'generic' dynamics in the title) rests on only two tunable quantities (photon frequency distribution and interferometric parameters). Single-qubit CPTP maps form a 12-real-parameter manifold; the analytic reduction produces a specific functional form whose span is not shown to be dense in this space or to reproduce, e.g., an arbitrary amplitude-damping channel together with an independent depolarizing component.
  2. [Analytical derivation] Analytical derivation (main text): the explicit reduced map obtained after tracing over frequency must be stated, together with the dimension of the manifold it parametrizes. Without this, it is impossible to verify whether the frequency degree of freedom functions as a fully controllable environment that generates the claimed range of maps or whether additional uncontrolled channels are present.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and detailed report. The comments correctly identify areas where our claims and derivations require clarification to avoid overstatement. We will revise the manuscript to address both points, adjusting the language in the abstract and title while adding the requested explicit map and manifold dimension.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the setup simulates 'arbitrary single-qubit open-system dynamics' (and 'generic' dynamics in the title) rests on only two tunable quantities (photon frequency distribution and interferometric parameters). Single-qubit CPTP maps form a 12-real-parameter manifold; the analytic reduction produces a specific functional form whose span is not shown to be dense in this space or to reproduce, e.g., an arbitrary amplitude-damping channel together with an independent depolarizing component.

    Authors: We agree that the phrasing 'arbitrary' and 'generic' in the abstract and title overstates the coverage. The protocol is controlled by the frequency distribution (treated as a tunable function) together with interferometric parameters, yielding a specific functional family rather than a dense subset of the full 12-parameter CPTP manifold. We do not claim the ability to realize every combination, such as independent amplitude damping plus depolarization. In the revision we will change the abstract to describe simulation of 'a broad class of controllable single-qubit open dynamics' and will similarly qualify the title. We will also add a short paragraph discussing the parametrized family and its relation to standard channels, while retaining the benchmarks for depolarization and non-Markovian cases as concrete demonstrations of utility. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Analytical derivation] Analytical derivation (main text): the explicit reduced map obtained after tracing over frequency must be stated, together with the dimension of the manifold it parametrizes. Without this, it is impossible to verify whether the frequency degree of freedom functions as a fully controllable environment that generates the claimed range of maps or whether additional uncontrolled channels are present.

    Authors: We accept the request for an explicit statement. The revised manuscript will include the closed-form reduced map for the polarization state after tracing out frequency, expressed directly in terms of the tunable parameters (frequency-distribution moments and interferometer settings). We will also state the dimension of the resulting manifold (determined by the number of independent parameters retained in the frequency distribution and the two interferometric phases/amplitudes). The derivation assumes an ideal interferometer with no extraneous decoherence; we will note this assumption explicitly so readers can assess the absence of uncontrolled channels. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is analytical and independent

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe an analytical derivation of reduced polarization dynamics from the interferometer parameters and frequency distribution, with explicit statements that the evolution is derived and then tuned to match targets. No equations or steps are shown that reduce a prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor any load-bearing self-citation chains. Benchmarking against known maps is presented as validation, not as the source of the functional form. This is the common case of a self-contained derivation against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal relies on treating frequency as an effective environment whose distribution can be chosen freely and on the assumption that interferometric parameters remain stable. No explicit free parameters are named in the abstract, but the frequency distribution and interferometer settings function as tunable inputs. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • photon frequency distribution
    Chosen to control the effective environment coupling; its specific form is adjusted to match target dynamics.
  • interferometric parameters
    Adjusted to tune the reduced polarization map; treated as experimental knobs.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The quartz plate induces a unitary coupling between polarization and frequency that can be reduced to a completely positive trace-preserving map on polarization alone.
    Invoked when the reduced dynamics are derived analytically.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5719 in / 1356 out tokens · 16273 ms · 2026-07-03T20:47:54.055785+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Rivas, S

    ´A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non- markovianity: characterization, quantification and detec- tion, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 094001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Col- loquium: Non-markovian dynamics in open quantum sys- tems, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 021002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems, Physical Review Letters103, 210401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Rivas, S

    ´A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and non-markovianity of quantum evolutions, Physical Review Letters105, 050403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    F. A. Pollock, C. Rodr´ ıguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, 8 M. Paternostro, and K. Modi, Non-markovian quantum processes: Complete framework and efficient characteri- zation, Physical Review A97, 012127 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Chru´ sci´ nski and P

    D. Chru´ sci´ nski and P. Nale˙ zyty, Non-markovian quantum evolution: Time-local generators and memory kernels, Reports on Mathematical Physics77, 399 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Cerrillo and J

    J. Cerrillo and J. Cao, Non-markovian dynamical maps: numerical processing of open quantum trajectories, Phys- ical Review Letters112, 110401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Quantum jump unravelings for non-Markovian open system dynamics: a review

    F. Settimo and J. Piilo, Quantum jump unravelings for non-markovian open system dynamics: a review, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.07797 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Suess, A

    D. Suess, A. Eisfeld, and W. T. Strunz, Hierarchy of stochastic pure states for open quantum system dynam- ics, Physical Review Letters113, 150403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Bylicka, D

    B. Bylicka, D. Chru´ sci´ nski, and S. Maniscalco, Non- markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum chan- nels: a quantum information theory perspective, Scien- tific reports4, 5720 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    G. D. Berk, A. J. Garner, B. Yadin, K. Modi, and F. A. Pollock, Resource theories of multi-time processes: A window into quantum non-markovianity, Quantum5, 435 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Taranto, F

    P. Taranto, F. A. Pollock, and K. Modi, Non-markovian memory strength bounds quantum process recoverability, npj Quantum Information7, 149 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Hakoshima, Y

    H. Hakoshima, Y. Matsuzaki, and S. Endo, Relationship between costs for quantum error mitigation and non- markovian measures, Physical Review A103, 012611 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Wang and X

    K. Wang and X. Li, Non-markovian noise mitigation: Practical implementation, error analysis, and the role of spectral properties of the environment, Physical Review A112, 012406 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    S. Endo, H. Hakoshima, and T. Shitara, Non- markovianity in quantum information processing: In- terplay with quantum error mitigation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20224 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    G. A. White, C. D. Hill, F. A. Pollock, L. C. Hollenberg, and K. Modi, Demonstration of non-markovian process characterisation and control on a quantum processor, Na- ture Communications11, 6301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    White, Characterization and control of non-markovian quantum noise, Nature Reviews Physics4, 287 (2022)

    G. White, Characterization and control of non-markovian quantum noise, Nature Reviews Physics4, 287 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Li, G.-C

    C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and J. Piilo, Non-markovian quan- tum dynamics: What is it good for?, Europhysics Letters 128, 30001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Bellomo, R

    B. Bellomo, R. Lo Franco, and G. Compagno, Non- markovian effects on the dynamics of entanglement, Physical Review Letters99, 160502 (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    J.-d. Shi, D. Wang, and L. Ye, Entanglement revive and information flow within the decoherent environment, Sci- entific reports6, 30710 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum metrology in non-markovian environments, Physical Re- view Letters109, 233601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Altherr and Y

    A. Altherr and Y. Yang, Quantum metrology for non- markovian processes, Physical Review Letters127, 060501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Yang, Memory effects in quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters123, 110501 (2019)

    Y. Yang, Memory effects in quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters123, 110501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    X. Yang, X. Long, R. Liu, K. Tang, Y. Zhai, X. Nie, T. Xin, J. Li, and D. Lu, Control-enhanced non- markovian quantum metrology, Communications Physics 7, 282 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Vasile, S

    R. Vasile, S. Olivares, M. A. Paris, and S. Maniscalco, Continuous-variable quantum key distribution in non- markovian channels, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molec- ular, and Optical Physics83, 042321 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Utagi, R

    S. Utagi, R. Srikanth, and S. Banerjee, Ping-pong quan- tum key distribution with trusted noise: non-markovian advantage, Quantum Information Processing19, 366 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    D. R. Sabogal, D. F. Urrego, J. R. ´Alvarez, A. F. Her- rera, J. P. Torres, and A. Valencia, Decoherence-assisted quantum key distribution, Scientific reports15, 31258 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    N. K. Bernardes, J. P. Peterson, R. S. Sarthour, A. M. Souza, C. H. Monken, I. Roditi, I. S. Oliveira, and M. F. Santos, High resolution non-markovianity in nmr, Scien- tific reports6, 33945 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Khurana, B

    D. Khurana, B. K. Agarwalla, and T. Mahesh, Experi- mental emulation of quantum non-markovian dynamics and coherence protection in the presence of information backflow, Physical Review A99, 022107 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Wittemer, G

    M. Wittemer, G. Clos, H.-P. Breuer, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz, Measurement of quantum memory effects and its fundamental limitations, Physical Review A97, 020102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    J. F. Haase, P. J. Vetter, T. Unden, A. Smirne, J. Rosskopf, B. Naydenov, A. Stacey, F. Jelezko, M. B. Plenio, and S. F. Huelga, Controllable non-markovianity for a spin qubit in diamond, Physical Review Letters121, 060401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Y. Dong, Y. Zheng, S. Li, C.-C. Li, X.-D. Chen, G.- C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, Non-markovianity-assisted high- fidelity deutsch–jozsa algorithm in diamond, npj Quan- tum Information4, 3 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Salles, F

    A. Salles, F. de Melo, M. Almeida, M. Hor-Meyll, S. Wal- born, P. Souto Ribeiro, and L. Davidovich, Experimental investigation of the dynamics of entanglement: Sudden death, complementarity, and continuous monitoring of the environment, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecu- lar, and Optical Physics78, 022322 (2008)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    Chiuri, C

    A. Chiuri, C. Greganti, L. Mazzola, M. Paternostro, and P. Mataloni, Linear optics simulation of quantum non- markovian dynamics, Scientific reports2, 968 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Cuevas, A

    ´A. Cuevas, A. Geraldi, C. Liorni, L. D. Bonavena, A. De Pasquale, F. Sciarrino, V. Giovannetti, and P. Mat- aloni, All-optical implementation of collision-based evo- lutions of open quantum systems, Scientific reports9, 3205 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Cialdi, M

    S. Cialdi, M. A. Rossi, C. Benedetti, B. Vacchini, D. Tamascelli, S. Olivares, and M. G. Paris, All-optical quantum simulator of qubit noisy channels, Applied Physics Letters110(2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    M. A. Rossi, C. Benedetti, D. Tamascelli, S. Cialdi, S. Olivares, B. Vacchini, and M. G. Paris, Non- markovianity by undersampling in quantum optical sim- ulators, International Journal of Quantum Information 15, 1740009 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Uriri, F

    S. Uriri, F. Wudarski, I. Sinayskiy, F. Petruccione, and M. Tame, Experimental investigation of markovian and non-markovian channel addition, Physical Review A101, 052107 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Orieux, A

    A. Orieux, A. d’Arrigo, G. Ferranti, R. L. Franco, G. Be- nenti, E. Paladino, G. Falci, F. Sciarrino, and P. Mat- 9 aloni, Experimental on-demand recovery of entanglement by local operations within non-markovian dynamics, Sci- entific reports5, 8575 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Zou, X.-D

    C.-L. Zou, X.-D. Chen, X. Xiong, F.-W. Sun, X.- B. Zou, Z.-F. Han, and G.-C. Guo, Photonic simula- tion of system-environment interaction: Non-markovian processes and dynamical decoupling, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics88, 063806 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    J. Jin, V. Giovannetti, R. Fazio, F. Sciarrino, P. Mat- aloni, A. Crespi, and R. Osellame, All-optical non- markovian stroboscopic quantum simulator, Physical Re- view A91, 012122 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    B.-H. Liu, L. Li, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, E.-M. Laine, H.-P. Breuer, and J. Piilo, Experimental control of the transition from markovian to non-markovian dy- namics of open quantum systems, Nature Physics7, 931 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Tang, C.-F

    J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, Y.-L. Li, X.-B. Zou, G.-C. Guo, H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measuring non-markovianity of processes with controllable system- environment interaction, EPL (Europhysics Letters)97, 10002 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Z.-D. Liu, H. Lyyra, Y.-N. Sun, B.-H. Liu, C.-F. Li, G.- C. Guo, S. Maniscalco, and J. Piilo, Experimental im- plementation of fully controlled dephasing dynamics and synthetic spectral densities, Nature Communications9, 3453 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Z.-D. Liu, O. Siltanen, T. Kuusela, R.-H. Miao, C.-X. Ning, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and J. Piilo, Overcoming noise in quantum teleportation with multipartite hybrid entan- glement, Science Advances10, eadj3435 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Lyyra, O

    H. Lyyra, O. Siltanen, J. Piilo, S. Banerjee, and T. Ku- usela, Experimental quantum probing measurements with no knowledge of the system-probe interaction, Phys- ical Review A102, 022232 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Laine, H.-P

    E.-M. Laine, H.-P. Breuer, and J. Piilo, Nonlocal mem- ory effects allow perfect teleportation with mixed states, Scientific reports4, 4620 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Liu, Y.-N

    Z.-D. Liu, Y.-N. Sun, B.-H. Liu, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, S. Hamedani Raja, H. Lyyra, and J. Piilo, Experimen- tal realization of high-fidelity teleportation via a non- markovian open quantum system, Physical Review A 102, 062208 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Liu, X.-M

    B.-H. Liu, X.-M. Hu, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, A. Karlsson, E.-M. Laine, S. Maniscalco, C. Macchi- avello, and J. Piilo, Efficient superdense coding in the presence of non-markovian noise, Europhysics Letters 114, 10005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Hamedani Raja, K

    S. Hamedani Raja, K. Athulya, A. Shaji, and J. Piilo, Photonic dephasing dynamics and the role of initial cor- relations, Physical Review A101, 042127 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Siltanen, T

    O. Siltanen, T. Kuusela, and J. Piilo, Distributing mem- ory effects in an open two-qubit system, Physical Review A102, 022225 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Laine, H.-P

    E.-M. Laine, H.-P. Breuer, J. Piilo, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Nonlocal memory effects in the dynamics of open quantum systems, Physical Review Letters111, 229901 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Liu, D.-Y

    B.-H. Liu, D.-Y. Cao, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, E.-M. Laine, H.-P. Breuer, and J. Piilo, Photonic real- ization of nonlocal memory effects and non-markovian quantum probes, Scientific reports3, 1781 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Siltanen, T

    O. Siltanen, T. Kuusela, and J. Piilo, Interferometric ap- proach to open quantum systems and non-markovian dy- namics, Physical Review A103, 032223 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    R. H. Byrd, P. Lu, J. Nocedal, and C. Zhu, A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization, SIAM Journal on scientific computing16, 1190 (1995)

    work page 1995

  56. [56]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge university press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    Breuer, B

    H.-P. Breuer, B. Kappler, and F. Petruccione, Stochastic wave-function method for non-markovian quantum mas- ter equations, Physical Review A59, 1633 (1999)

    work page 1999

  58. [58]

    Siltanen,Decoherence and Reservoir Engineering in Linear Optical Systems, Ph.D

    O. Siltanen,Decoherence and Reservoir Engineering in Linear Optical Systems, Ph.D. thesis, PhD thesis, Uni- versity of Turku (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Ghosh, Dispersion-equation coefficients for the refrac- tive index and birefringence of calcite and quartz crystals, Optics communications163, 95 (1999)

    G. Ghosh, Dispersion-equation coefficients for the refrac- tive index and birefringence of calcite and quartz crystals, Optics communications163, 95 (1999). 10 Appendix A: Detailed derivation of the output photon state Here we provide a detailed derivation of the single pho- ton output state in our interferometric setup. We start from the input state |ψ(0...

    work page 1999