pith. sign in

arxiv: 1311.4091 · v1 · pith:CUAKYSTYnew · submitted 2013-11-16 · 🪐 quant-ph · stat.ME

Maximum likelihood versus likelihood-free quantum system identification in the atom maser

classification 🪐 quant-ph stat.ME
keywords statisticsatomdatasystemdistributionlikelihoodmasermeasurement
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We consider the system identification problem of estimating a dynamical parameter of a Markovian quantum open system (the atom maser), by performing continuous time measurements in the system's output (outgoing atoms). Two estimation methods are investigated and compared. On the one hand, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) takes into account the full measurement data and is asymptotically optimal in terms of its mean square error. On the other hand, the `likelihood-free' method of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) produces an approximation of the posterior distribution for a given set of summary statistics, by sampling trajectories at different parameter values and comparing them with the measurement data via chosen statistics. Our analysis is performed on the atom maser model, which exhibits interesting features such as bistability and dynamical phase transitions, and has connections with the classical theory of hidden Markov processes. Building on previous results which showed that atom counts are poor statistics for certain values of the Rabi angle, we apply MLE to the full measurement data and estimate its Fisher information. We then select several correlation statistics such as waiting times, distribution of successive identical detections, and use them as input of the ABC algorithm. The resulting posterior distribution follows closely the data likelihood, showing that the selected statistics contain `most' statistical information about the Rabi angle.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.