Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Dynamics of Instruction Fine-Tuning for Chinese Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.19651 v3 pith:CV6UPV3V submitted 2023-10-30 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords instructionabilitiesmodelsdatafactorsmodelscalingtuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Instruction tuning is a burgeoning method to elicit the general intelligence of Large Language Models (LLMs). While numerous studies have examined the impact of factors such as data volume and model size on English models, the scaling properties of instruction tuning in other languages remain largely unexplored. In this work, we systematically investigate the effects of data quantity, model size, and data construction methods on instruction tuning for Chinese LLMs. We utilize a newly curated dataset, DoIT, which includes over 40,000 high-quality instruction instances covering ten underlying abilities, such as creative writing, code generation, and logical reasoning. Our experiments, conducted on models ranging from 7b to 33b parameters, yield three key findings: (i) While these factors directly affect overall model performance, some abilities are more responsive to scaling, whereas others demonstrate significant resistance. (ii) The scaling sensitivity of different abilities to these factors can be explained by two features: Complexity and Transference. (iii) By tailoring training strategies to their varying sensitivities, specific abilities can be efficiently learned, enhancing performance on two public benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Many Instructions Can LLMs Follow at Once?

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IFScale measures instruction-following at densities from 10 to 500 constraints and finds that even top frontier models satisfy only about two-thirds of 500 simultaneous keyword instructions.

  2. Enhancing Memory Recall in LLMs with Gauss-Tin: A Hybrid Instructional and Gaussian Replay Approach

    cs.LG 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Gauss-Tin, a replay method using a Gaussian mixture model with prompt-guided exemplar selection, reports positive backward transfer on the Natural Instructions benchmark versus sequential fine-tuning.

Pith tools