REVIEW 2 cited by
A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models of Code
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LMs) of code have recently shown tremendous promise in completing code and synthesizing code from natural language descriptions. However, the current state-of-the-art code LMs (e.g., Codex (Chen et al., 2021)) are not publicly available, leaving many questions about their model and data design decisions. We aim to fill in some of these blanks through a systematic evaluation of the largest existing models: Codex, GPT-J, GPT-Neo, GPT-NeoX-20B, and CodeParrot, across various programming languages. Although Codex itself is not open-source, we find that existing open-source models do achieve close results in some programming languages, although targeted mainly for natural language modeling. We further identify an important missing piece in the form of a large open-source model trained exclusively on a multi-lingual corpus of code. We release a new model, PolyCoder, with 2.7B parameters based on the GPT-2 architecture, which was trained on 249GB of code across 12 programming languages on a single machine. In the C programming language, PolyCoder outperforms all models including Codex. Our trained models are open-source and publicly available at https://github.com/VHellendoorn/Code-LMs, which enables future research and application in this area.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SwiftEval: Developing a Language-Specific Benchmark for LLM-generated Code Evaluation
SwiftEval, a 28-problem hand-crafted Swift benchmark, evaluates 44 code LLMs and shows large performance drops on Swift tasks, especially for smaller models.
-
Analyzing Prominent LLMs: An Empirical Study of Performance and Complexity in Solving LeetCode Problems
A comparative benchmark of four LLMs on LeetCode reports that ChatGPT generates the fastest and most memory-efficient solutions, with Java faster and Python more memory-efficient.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.