Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models of Code

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.13169 v3 pith:CVICRCRJ submitted 2022-02-26 cs.PL cs.CL

classification cs.PLcs.CL
keywords codemodelslanguagecodexopen-sourceprogramminglanguageslarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LMs) of code have recently shown tremendous promise in completing code and synthesizing code from natural language descriptions. However, the current state-of-the-art code LMs (e.g., Codex (Chen et al., 2021)) are not publicly available, leaving many questions about their model and data design decisions. We aim to fill in some of these blanks through a systematic evaluation of the largest existing models: Codex, GPT-J, GPT-Neo, GPT-NeoX-20B, and CodeParrot, across various programming languages. Although Codex itself is not open-source, we find that existing open-source models do achieve close results in some programming languages, although targeted mainly for natural language modeling. We further identify an important missing piece in the form of a large open-source model trained exclusively on a multi-lingual corpus of code. We release a new model, PolyCoder, with 2.7B parameters based on the GPT-2 architecture, which was trained on 249GB of code across 12 programming languages on a single machine. In the C programming language, PolyCoder outperforms all models including Codex. Our trained models are open-source and publicly available at https://github.com/VHellendoorn/Code-LMs, which enables future research and application in this area.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 17 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. SwiftEval: Developing a Language-Specific Benchmark for LLM-generated Code Evaluation

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SwiftEval, a 28-problem hand-crafted Swift benchmark, evaluates 44 code LLMs and shows large performance drops on Swift tasks, especially for smaller models.

  2. Analyzing Prominent LLMs: An Empirical Study of Performance and Complexity in Solving LeetCode Problems

    cs.SE 2025-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A comparative benchmark of four LLMs on LeetCode reports that ChatGPT generates the fastest and most memory-efficient solutions, with Java faster and Python more memory-efficient.

Pith tools