Controlling Atom Array in an Ultra-high-cooperativity Optical Cavity

Jiazhong Hu; Jilai Ye; Shuyao Mei; Wenjun Zhang; Wenlan Chen; Xiaoyu Li; Yajuan Zhao; Ye Tian; Zhihao Chi

Controlling Atom Array in an Ultra-high-cooperativity Optical Cavity

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A millimeter-scale optical cavity with single-atom cooperativity above 100 holds and couples an array of individually trapped atoms at once.

desk verdict Solid experimental platform paper: mm-scale Fabry–Pérot with η_cav≈125, NA=0.65 side access, and 16 rearranged atoms, enabled by a two-step mirror process that actually works. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.04090 v1 pith:CVUPAWRQ submitted 2026-07-05 quant-ph

Jilai Ye , Zhihao Chi , Ye Tian , Shuyao Mei , Xiaoyu Li , Wenjun Zhang , Yajuan Zhao , Jiazhong Hu

show 1 more author

Wenlan Chen

This is my paper

classification quant-ph

keywords neutral-atomarraycavityQEDcooperativityopticaltweezersFabry-Pérotmirrorfabricationstrongcouplingrubidium

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Neutral-atom arrays give scalable, reconfigurable qubits; cavity QED gives strong coherent light–matter coupling. Putting both in one machine has been hard because high-cooperativity cavities are usually tiny and optically closed, while atom arrays need millimeter-scale space and side access for tweezers, imaging, and rearrangement. This paper builds a 1.67 mm Fabry–Pérot cavity whose optically measured single-atom cooperativity reaches about 125, then loads and rearranges atoms so that transmission spectra confirm an in-situ spectroscopic cooperativity of about 112 and up to 16 atoms sit simultaneously at the cavity antinode. The enabling step is a two-step mirror process—mechanical shaping plus CO2-laser polishing—that yields sub-millimeter radii of curvature and residual roughness below 2 Å, keeping finesse near 95 000 while leaving the cavity open. The result is a working regime that combines high cooperativity, large mode volume, and individual atom control, aimed at cavity-assisted readout and long-range entanglement in atom-array platforms.

What carries the argument

Two-step mirror fabrication: precision mechanical shaping of fused silica followed by controlled carbon-dioxide laser polishing. The process produces concave mirrors with ~1 mm radius of curvature and residual roughness below 2 Å, delivering high finesse (~95 000) and a ~10 µm mode waist inside a millimeter-scale cavity that still allows high-NA side access for optical tweezers.

What would settle it

An independent thermometry measurement (tighter release-and-recapture or sideband spectroscopy) showing the atoms are substantially hotter than 30 µK, or fluorescence/lattice diagnostics showing systematic axial displacements of one or more lattice sites from the intended antinode, would push the true on-antinode cooperativity well below the reported spectroscopic figures and undercut the strong-coupling claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

An atomic array has been integrated with a millimeter-scale Fabry–Pérot cavity whose optically characterized single-atom cooperativity is η_cav = 125 ± 13. Transmission spectra of trapped atoms give an effective spectroscopic cooperativity η_spec = 112.3 ± 3.3, verifying strong coupling under actual array conditions, and up to 16 individually trapped atoms are shown to couple simultaneously to the cavity antinode.

Load-bearing premise

The spectral fits that report the in-situ cooperativity assume an average atomic temperature of 30 µK fully accounts for the thermal position spread and AC-Stark inhomogeneity that separate the spectroscopic value from the pure optical value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Cavity-assisted quantum-state readout becomes available for reconfigurable atom-array platforms.
Long-range entanglement can be engineered across the array through the shared cavity mode.
Collective cavity-QED signatures (normal-mode splitting that grows with atom number) can be studied with individually addressable atoms.
The same geometry in principle accommodates on the order of 200 atoms while retaining high single-atom cooperativity.
The platform supports cavity-mediated many-body dynamics, metrology, and quantum-information protocols that need both local control and global coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Further reduction of residual thermal spread and lattice-site misplacement should close most of the remaining gap between optical and spectroscopic cooperativity, tightening readout fidelity.
The existing NA-0.65 side access already supports rearrangement; adding real-time cavity feedback could enable mid-circuit measurements without destroying the array.
The observed 1.3 MHz polarization splitting from coating birefringence is a practical limit for larger-N spectroscopy; stress-relieved coatings would simplify multi-atom spectra.
The same two-step polish process is transferable to other wavelengths or multi-mode cavities for frequency-multiplexed networking between arrays.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a clean experimental demonstration, not a theory claim. They built a 1.67 mm Fabry–Pérot with R≈0.99 mm mirrors, F≈9.5×10^4, w0≈9.5 µm, and get optically characterized single-atom cooperativity η_cav=125±13 from independent FSR, transverse-mode, and ring-down data. In-situ transmission spectra with 1–16 rearranged 87Rb atoms give η_spec=112.3±3.3 for N=1, falling only modestly at higher N, and they show simultaneous coupling of 16 atoms to the antinode under full tweezer control (NA=0.65 side access). That combination—high η, large enough mode volume for an array, and open side access—is the real product.

What is new is the concrete geometry plus the two-step fabrication (mechanical shaping + CO2 laser polish) that delivers sub-mm ROC and <2 Å roughness on fused silica. Prior fiber, bow-tie, and lens-array cavities are cited and do different trade-offs; this one hits the open-access, high-η sweet spot that people have been chasing for cavity-assisted readout and long-range entanglement in atom arrays. The data look solid: empty-cavity doublet is handled, spectra are fitted with a standard cavity-QED model including thermal spread at the measured 30 µK, and they correctly report both the optical benchmark and the in-situ effective value rather than papering over the difference.

Soft spots are minor and already flagged by the authors. The 30 µK thermal model and possible lattice-site misplacement explain the η_cav–η_spec gap; they do not invent a higher number. Projected capacity of ~200 atoms is an extrapolation from mode volume and current 21-atom loading, not a demonstrated result. Fabrication reproducibility is not quantified beyond this pair of mirrors. None of that undercuts the measured platform.

This is for experimentalists building cavity–array systems and for theorists who need realistic numbers for cavity-mediated gates or readout. Math and citations are standard and honest. I would send it to peer review without hesitation; it is ready for a serious referee. Engage with it if you care about the hardware path.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an integrated platform that places a reconfigurable optical-tweezer array of 87Rb atoms inside a millimeter-scale Fabry–Pérot cavity (L = 1.67 mm). Concave fused-silica mirrors fabricated by a two-step mechanical-shaping plus CO2-laser-polishing process yield sub-millimeter radii of curvature (R̄ ≈ 0.99 mm), residual roughness < 2 Å, finesse F ≈ 9.5 × 10^4 and mode waist w0 ≈ 9.5 µm. Independent optical characterization (FSR, transverse-mode spacings, ring-down) gives a single-atom cooperativity η_cav = 125 ± 13. Transmission spectra of atoms prepared in the stretched cycling transition and loaded into an 808 nm intracavity lattice yield an effective spectroscopic cooperativity η_spec = 112.3 ± 3.3 for N = 1, remaining high (≈ 96) for N = 16, with normal-mode splitting that scales with atom number. Up to 21 atoms can be rearranged into the cavity mode; the authors project capacity for ~200 atoms. The work therefore demonstrates simultaneous high cooperativity, large mode volume and side optical access for individual-atom control.

Significance. If the reported numbers hold, the platform occupies a previously difficult operating regime: cavity QED with η ~ 100 together with a geometry that supports tens-to-hundreds of individually addressable atoms and high-NA side access. This combination is directly relevant for cavity-assisted mid-circuit readout, long-range entanglement generation and collective many-body protocols in atom-array architectures. Strengths include independent optical benchmarks (FSR, Gouy-phase radii, ring-down κ) that do not rely on the atom-cavity spectra, explicit reporting of both η_cav and the lower in-situ η_spec, and multi-atom spectra that remain consistent with collective strong coupling. The two-step mirror process is a concrete technical contribution that others can attempt to reproduce. These elements make the result a solid experimental advance for the cavity-array community.

minor comments (6)

The abstract and main text state residual roughness “below 2 Å,” yet no AFM or white-light interferometry data, scan size or rms value are shown. A brief methods sentence or supplementary figure would strengthen the fabrication claim.
Fig. 3 caption and surrounding text invoke an average temperature of 30 µK measured by lattice release-and-recapture. The release-and-recapture data themselves are not shown; a short supplementary panel would allow readers to judge the thermal model used in the spectral fits.
The projected capacity of “up to 200” atoms is stated without an explicit calculation of usable mode volume versus tweezer spacing and Rayleigh range. A one-sentence estimate would clarify the scaling.
Polarization splitting of 1.3 MHz is attributed mainly to coating birefringence; the geometric ellipticity contribution is correctly calculated as ~72 kHz. A brief remark on whether the coating stress can be mitigated in future mirrors would be useful.
Minor typographical issues: “caviy linewidth,” “numerical apperture,” and repeated “Several eﬀects contribute/can contribute” in the multi-atom discussion. These are easily corrected.
Equation (1) for the Gouy phase uses ψ_gi = arccos(1 − L/R_i); a parenthetical note that this is the standard half-angle form for a near-concentric cavity would aid non-specialist readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: η_cav and η_spec are independent optical and spectroscopic measurements using standard cavity-QED formulas.

full rationale

This is an experimental platform paper. The load-bearing quantities are obtained independently: η_cav = 24F/[π(kw0)^{2}] ≈ 125 is computed from measured FSR (89.7 GHz), transverse-mode spacings (yielding R̄ ≈ 0.99 mm and w0 = 9.5 µm), and ring-down linewidth κ = 0.94 ± 0.09 MHz (F = 9.5 imes 10^{4}). η_spec is extracted by fitting standard cavity-QED transmission models (including a measured 30 µK thermal distribution) to atom-loaded spectra; the modest difference from η_cav is attributed to thermal spreading and AC-Stark inhomogeneity rather than being forced by construction. Multi-atom spectra are consistent with collective strong coupling and are not used to redefine the single-atom figure of merit. Self-citations ([32] viewport, [33] rearrangement, [30,31] polishing methods) supply technical methods only and do not underwrite the cooperativity values. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness import, or ansatz smuggling appears in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Experimental platform paper. Load-bearing numbers are measured or fitted from spectra; background physics is standard cavity QED and atomic physics. No new particles or forces are postulated. Free parameters are those introduced in the spectral model or projected capacity claims.

free parameters (3)

average atomic temperature used in spectral fit = 30 µK
Fixed at 30 µK from release-and-recapture; enters the thermal position distribution that reduces extracted η_spec relative to η_cav.
effective single-atom cooperativity η_spec(N) = 112.3±3.3 (N=1) down to 95.7±0.9 (N=16)
Fitted independently for each atom number from transmission spectra; central reported values.
projected maximum atom number = ~200
Stated capacity of ~200 atoms is a geometric estimate, not demonstrated; only 16–21 atoms are shown.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Standard cavity-QED input–output theory relating cooperativity η=4g²/(κΓ) to transmission spectra of N atoms
Used throughout the spectral fitting (Fig. 3 and refs. [26,36]); assumed valid for the stretched-state cycling transition under the applied bias field.
standard math Gouy-phase formula relating measured transverse-mode spacings to mirror radii of curvature
Eqs. (1)–(2); used to extract R≈0.99 mm and mode waist 9.5 µm.
domain assumption Mirror surface roughness <2 Å after CO2-laser polishing is sufficient to reach finesse 9.5×10^4
Invoked to explain the high finesse; roughness value is stated but not independently re-measured in the present text.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Controlling Atom Array in an Ultra-high-cooperativity Optical Cavity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CVUPAWRQ

@misc{pith2026260704090,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Controlling Atom Array in an Ultra-high-cooperativity Optical Cavity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CVUPAWRQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.04090}
}

abstract

Neutral-atom array and cavity quantum electrodynamics offer complementary strengths for quantum science: scalable, reconfigurable qubit architectures and strong coherent light-matter coupling. Combining them in a single platform requires an optical cavity with simultaneously high cooperativity, sufficient mode volume to accommodate atom array, and ample side optical access for atom trapping, imaging, cooling, and rearrangement, a combination that is challenging to achieve. Here we realize an atomic array integrated with a millimeter-scale Fabry--P\'erot cavity whose optically-characterized single-atom cooperativity reaches $\eta_{\mathrm{cav}}=125\pm13$. Atom-cavity transmission spectra of trapped atoms yield an effective spectroscopic cooperativity $\eta_{\mathrm{spec}}=112.3\pm3.3$, providing an in-situ verification of strong coupling in the integrated platform, and we demonstrate simultaneous coupling of up to 16 individually trapped atoms to the antinode of the cavity mode. The key technical advance is a two-step mirror-fabrication method combining precision mechanical shaping and carbon-dioxide laser polishing, which produces concave fused-silica mirrors with sub-millimeter radii of curvature and residual roughness below 2 \r{A}. Our results establish a regime of cavity-integrated atomic array that simultaneously provides high cooperativity, large mode volume, and flexible manipulation of individual atoms, opening opportunities for cavity-assisted quantum state readout and long-range entanglement-engineering in atom-array platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04090 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Extended Single-Atom Tweezer Arrays in High-Cooperativity Cavity-QED
quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A fiber microcavity now holds up to about 36 individually trapped and imaged atoms with strong single-atom coupling, enabling high-cooperativity atom arrays.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Barredo, S

D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science 354, 1021 (2016)

2016
[2]

Endres, H

M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

2016
[3]

Browaeys and T

A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with 5 individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys. 16, 132 (2020)

2020
[4]

A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nat. Phys. 17, 1324 (2021)

2021
[5]

Saﬀman, T

M. Saﬀman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010)

2010
[6]

H. J. Kimble, Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity QED, Phys. Scr. T76, 127 (1998)

1998
[7]

Miller, T

R. Miller, T. E. Northup, K. M. Birnbaum, A. Boca, A. D. Boozer, and H. J. Kimble, Trapped atoms in cavity QED: Coupling quantized light and matter, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, S551 (2005)

2005
[8]

Reiserer and G

A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum net- works with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015)

2015

Show all 44 references

[9]

Reiserer, Colloquium: Cavity-enhanced quantum net- work nodes, Rev

A. Reiserer, Colloquium: Cavity-enhanced quantum net- work nodes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 041003 (2022)

2022
[10]

Brennecke, T

F. Brennecke, T. Donner, S. Ritter, T. Bourdel, M. Köhl, and T. Esslinger, Cavity QED with a Bose-Einstein con- densate, Nature 450, 268 (2007)

2007
[11]

Deist, Y.-H

E. Deist, Y.-H. Lu, J. Ho, M. K. Pasha, J. Zeiher, Z. Yan, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Mid-circuit cavity measure- ment in a neutral atom array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 203602 (2022)

2022
[12]

Z. Yan, J. Ho, Y.-H. Lu, S. J. Masson, A. Asenjo-Garcia, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Superradiant and subradiant cavity scattering by atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 253603 (2023)

2023
[13]

B. Hu, J. Sinclair, E. Bytyqi, M. Chong, A. Rudelis, J. Ramette, Z. Vendeiro, and V. Vuletić, Site-selective cavity readout and classical error correction of a 5-bit atomic register, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 120801 (2025)

2025
[14]

Grinkemeyer, E

B. Grinkemeyer, E. Guardado-Sanchez, I. Dimitrova, D. Shchepanovich, G. E. Mandopoulou, J. Borregaard, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Error-detected quantum operations with neutral atoms mediated by an optical cavity, Science 387, 1301 (2025)

2025
[15]

Z. Wang, S. Guan, G. Teng, P. Yang, P. Zhang, G. Li, and T. Zhang, A cavity qed system with defect-free single- atom array strongly coupled to an optical cavity, Quan- tum Front. 4, 10 (2025)

2025
[16]

Zhang, Z

X. Zhang, Z. Yu, H. Zhang, D. Xiang, and H. Zhang, Cav- ity dark mode mediated by atom array without atomic scattering loss, Phys. Rev. Research 6, L042026 (2024)

2024
[17]

A. L. Shaw, A. Soper, D. Shadmany, A. Kumar, L. Palm, D.-Y. Koh, V. Kaxiras, L. Taneja, M. Jaﬀe, D. I. Schus- ter, and J. Simon, A cavity-array microscope for parallel single-atom interfacing, Nature 650, 320 (2026)

2026
[18]

Y.-T. Chen, M. Szurek, B. Hu, J. de Hond, B. Braver- man, and V. Vuletić, High ﬁnesse bow-tie cavity for strong atom-photon coupling in rydberg arrays, Opt. Ex- press 30, 37426 (2022)

2022
[19]

W. Huie, S. G. Menon, H. Bernien, and J. P. Covey, Multiplexed telecommunication-band quantum network- ing with atom arrays in optical cavities, Phys. Rev. Re- search 3, 043154 (2021)

2021
[20]

J. P. Covey, H. Weinfurter, and H. Bernien, Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes, npj Quan- tum Inf. 9, 90 (2023)

2023
[21]

Seubert, L

M. Seubert, L. Hartung, S. Welte, G. Rempe, and E. Distante, Tweezer-assisted subwavelength positioning of atomic arrays in an optical cavity, PRX Quantum 6, 010322 (2025)

2025
[22]

Hartung, M

L. Hartung, M. Seubert, S. Welte, E. Distante, and G. Rempe, A quantum-network register assembled with optical tweezers in an optical cavity, Science 385, 179 (2024)

2024
[23]

De Santis, B

J. De Santis, B. Dura-Kovács, M. Öncü, A. Bouscal, D. Vasileiadis, and J. Zeiher, Realization of a cavity- coupled rydberg array, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12152 (2026)

2026
[24]

Y. Liu, Z. Wang, P. Yang, Q. Wang, Q. Fan, S. Guan, G. Li, P. Zhang, and T. Zhang, Realization of strong coupling between deterministic single-atom arrays and a high-ﬁnesse miniature optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 173601 (2023)

2023
[25]

B. P. Marsh, D. A. Schuller, Y. Ji, H. S. Hunt, G. Z. Socolof, D. P. Bowman, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Mul- timode cavity qed ising spin glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 160403 (2025)

2025
[26]

Tanji-Suzuki, I

H. Tanji-Suzuki, I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, M. Cetina, A. T. Grier, J. Simon, and V. Vuleti, Inter- action between atomic ensembles and optical resonators: Classical description, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , Vol. 60, edited by E. Arimondo, P...

2011
[27]

M. L. Peters, G. Wang, D. C. Spierings, N. Drucker, B. Hu, M.-W. Chen, Y.-T. Chen, and V. Vuletić, Cavity- enabled real-time observation of individual atomic colli- sions, Physical Review Letters 135, 093402 (2025)

2025
[28]

Hunger, T

D. Hunger, T. Steinmetz, Y. Colombe, C. Deutsch, T. W. Hänsch, and J. Reichel, A ﬁber Fabry-Perot cavity with high ﬁnesse, New J. Phys. 12, 065038 (2010)

2010
[29]

Wang, D.-Y

J. Wang, D.-Y. Huang, X.-L. Zhou, Z.-M. Shen, S.-J. He, Q.-Y. Huang, Y.-J. Liu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Ultra- fast high-ﬁdelity state readout of single neutral atom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 240802 (2025)

2025
[30]

Petrak, K

B. Petrak, K. Konthasinghe, S. Perez, and A. Muller, Feedback-controlled laser fabrication of micromirror sub- strates, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 123112 (2011)

2011
[31]

Hunger, C

D. Hunger, C. Deutsch, R. J. Barbour, R. J. Warburton, and J. Reichel, Laser micro-fabrication of concave, low- roughness features in silica, AIP Adv. 2, 012119 (2012)

2012
[32]

Y. Tian, Z. Zhang, J. Ye, Y. Zhao, J. Hu, and W. Chen, Quantum gas microscope assisted with t-shape vacuum viewports, Opt. Express 30, 36912 (2022)

2022
[33]

S. Wang, W. Zhang, T. Zhang, S. Mei, Y. Wang, J. Hu, and W. Chen, Accelerating the assembly of defect-free atomic arrays with maximum parallelisms, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054032 (2023)

2023
[34]

Zhang, H

T. Zhang, H. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Wang, A. Du, Z. Li, Y. Wu, C. Li, J. Hu, H. Zhai, and W. Chen, Observa- tion of near-critical kibble-zurek scaling in rydberg atom arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 093403 (2025)

2025
[35]

Uphoﬀ, M

M. Uphoﬀ, M. Brekenfeld, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, Frequency splitting of polarization eigenmodes in mi- croscopic Fabry-Perot cavities, New J. Phys. 17, 013053 (2015)

2015
[36]

A. Boca, R. Miller, K. M. Birnbaum, A. D. Boozer, J. McKeever, and H. J. Kimble, Observation of the vac- uum rabi spectrum for one trapped atom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 233603 (2004)

2004
[37]

He, B.-D

J. He, B.-D. Yang, T.-C. Zhang, and J.-M. Wang, Ex- tending a release-and-recapture scheme to single atom optical tweezer for eﬀective temperature evaluation, 6 Chin. Phys. B 20, 073701 (2011)

2011
[38]

Fuhrmanek, A

A. Fuhrmanek, A. M. Lance, C. Tuchendler, P. Grangier, Y. R. P. Sortais, and A. Browaeys, Imaging a single atom in a time-of-ﬂight experiment, New J. Phys. 12, 053028 (2010)

2010
[39]

A. M. Kaufman, B. J. Lester, and C. A. Regal, Cooling a single atom in an optical tweezer to its quantum ground state, Phys. Rev. X 2, 041014 (2012)

2012
[40]

R. Wu, B. Yang, P. W. Claeys, and H. Zhao, Engineering Long-Range and Multibody Interactions via Global Ki- netic Constraints, Physical Review Letters 136, 120401 (2026)

2026
[41]

Z. Zhao, Z. Zhang, H. Wang, K. Deng, W. Chen, and J. Hu, Stark many-body localization in one-dimensional bose gas under the continuous limit, PRX Quantum 7, 010307 (2026)

2026
[42]

Ramette, J

J. Ramette, J. Sinclair, Z. Li, and V. Vuleti, Carving en- tangled multiparticle states with exponentially improved ﬁdelity, Physical Review A 111, 052426 (2025)

2025
[43]

J. Yu, S. R. Muleady, Y.-X. Wang, N. Schine, A. V. Gor- shkov, and A. M. Childs, Eﬃcient Preparation of Dicke States, Physical Review Letters 136, 030601 (2026)

2026
[44]

Zhang, Z

T. Zhang, Z. Chi, and J. Hu, Entanglement generation via single-qubit rotations in a torn hilbert space, PRX Quantum 5, 030345 (2024)

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Barredo, S

D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science 354, 1021 (2016)

2016

[2] [2]

Endres, H

M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

2016

[3] [3]

Browaeys and T

A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with 5 individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys. 16, 132 (2020)

2020

[4] [4]

A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nat. Phys. 17, 1324 (2021)

2021

[5] [5]

Saﬀman, T

M. Saﬀman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010)

2010

[6] [6]

H. J. Kimble, Strong interactions of single atoms and photons in cavity QED, Phys. Scr. T76, 127 (1998)

1998

[7] [7]

Miller, T

R. Miller, T. E. Northup, K. M. Birnbaum, A. Boca, A. D. Boozer, and H. J. Kimble, Trapped atoms in cavity QED: Coupling quantized light and matter, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, S551 (2005)

2005

[8] [8]

Reiserer and G

A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum net- works with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015)

2015