REVIEW 1 cited by
Image Captioners Sometimes Tell More Than Images They See
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Image captioning, a.k.a. "image-to-text," which generates descriptive text from given images, has been rapidly developing throughout the era of deep learning. To what extent is the information in the original image preserved in the descriptive text generated by an image captioner? To answer that question, we have performed experiments involving the classification of images from descriptive text alone, without referring to the images at all, and compared results with those from standard image-based classifiers. We have evaluate several image captioning models with respect to a disaster image classification task, CrisisNLP, and show that descriptive text classifiers can sometimes achieve higher accuracy than standard image-based classifiers. Further, we show that fusing an image-based classifier with a descriptive text classifier can provide improvement in accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Zero-shot Hazard Identification in Autonomous Driving: A Case Study on the COOOL Benchmark
A competition pipeline combining change-point detection, optical flow, ViT classification, and the MOLMO vision-language model to identify and caption out-of-label road hazards, scoring 2nd on the COOOL leaderboard.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.