Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Penalized regression adjusted causal effect estimates in high dimensional randomized experiments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.08732 v1 pith:CWH3VZXY submitted 2018-09-24 math.ST stat.TH

classification math.STstat.TH
keywords causaleffectestimatorspenalizedregressionadjustedasymptoticrandomized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Regression adjustments are often considered by investigators to improve the estimation efficiency of causal effect in randomized experiments when there exists many pre-experiment covariates. In this paper, we provide conditions that guarantee the penalized regression including the Ridge, Elastic Net and Adapive Lasso adjusted causal effect estimators are asymptotic normal and we show that their asymptotic variances are no greater than that of the simple difference-in-means estimator, as long as the penalized estimators are risk consistent. We also provide conservative estimators for the asymptotic variance which can be used to construct asymptotically conservative confidence intervals for the average causal effect (ACE). Our results are obtained under the Neyman-Rubin potential outcomes model of randomized experiment when the number of covariates is large. Simulation study shows the advantages of the penalized regression adjusted ACE estimators over the difference-in-means estimator.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Regression-adjusted average treatment effect estimates in stratified randomized experiments

    math.ST 2019-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Regression-adjusted average treatment effect estimators are consistent, asymptotically normal, and asymptotically no less efficient than the unadjusted stratified difference-in-means estimator.

Pith tools