Should one compute the Temporal Difference fix point or minimize the Bellman Residual? The unified oblique projection view
read the original abstract
We investigate projection methods, for evaluating a linear approximation of the value function of a policy in a Markov Decision Process context. We consider two popular approaches, the one-step Temporal Difference fix-point computation (TD(0)) and the Bellman Residual (BR) minimization. We describe examples, where each method outperforms the other. We highlight a simple relation between the objective function they minimize, and show that while BR enjoys a performance guarantee, TD(0) does not in general. We then propose a unified view in terms of oblique projections of the Bellman equation, which substantially simplifies and extends the characterization of (schoknecht,2002) and the recent analysis of (Yu & Bertsekas, 2008). Eventually, we describe some simulations that suggest that if the TD(0) solution is usually slightly better than the BR solution, its inherent numerical instability makes it very bad in some cases, and thus worse on average.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Contraction-Aligned Analysis of Soft Bellman Residual Minimization with Weighted Lp-Norm for Markov Decision Problem
Soft Bellman residual minimization with weighted Lp-norm aligns the objective with Bellman contraction as p increases and yields performance error bounds.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.