Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Testing tests on AGN microvariability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1001.2543 v1 pith:CYND4OZJ submitted 2010-01-14 astro-ph.CO

Testing tests on AGN microvariability

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords lightcurvesmethodologiesmicrovariabilitystatisticaltestsbeenresultsvariances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Literature on optical and infrared microvariability in Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) reflects a diversity of statistical tests and strategies to detect tiny variations in the lightcurves of these sources. Comparison between the results obtained using different methodologies is difficult, and the pros and cons of each statistical method are often badly understood or even ignored. Even worse, not properly tested methodologies are becoming more and more common, and biased results may be misleading to realize the origin of the AGN microvariability. This paper intends to point future research on AGN microvariability to the use of powerful and well tested statistical methodologies, providing a reference for choosing the best strategy to obtain unbiased results. Lightcurves monitoring have been simulated for quasars, reference and comparison stars. Changes for the quasar lightcurves include both Gaussian fluctuations and linear variations. Simulated lightcurves have been analyzed using chi-squaretests, F tests for variances, One-Way Analysis of Variances and C-statistics methodologies. Statistical Type I and Type II errors, which indicate the robustness and the power of the tests, have been obtained in each case. One-Way Analysis of Variances and chi-square show to be powerful and robust estimators for microvariations, while the C-statistics is not a reliable methodology and its use should be avoided.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PKS 2155-304: Long-Term Optical Photometric Monitoring and Variability Analysis

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    Long-term BVR I monitoring of PKS 2155-304 finds significant multi-timescale variability, spectral hardening, a 2023 flare, weak optical-X-ray correlations, and no significant short-term quasi-periodicity once red noi...