REVIEW 3 cited by
SwapMoE: Serving Off-the-shelf MoE-based Large Language Models with Tunable Memory Budget
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Mixture of experts (MoE) is a popular technique to improve capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs) with conditionally-activated parallel experts. However, serving MoE models on memory-constrained devices is challenging due to the large parameter size. Typical solutions such as memory swapping or expert pruning may lead to significantly higher latency or severe accuracy loss. In this paper, we introduce SwapMoE, a framework for efficient serving of MoE-based large language models with tunable memory budgets. The main idea of SwapMoE is to keep a small dynamic set of important experts, namely Virtual Experts, in the main memory for inference, while seamlessly maintaining how the Virtual Experts map to the actual experts. Experiments have shown that SwapMoE can reduce the memory footprint while maintaining reasonable accuracy. For example, on text summarization tasks with Switch Transformer, SwapMoE can reduce the memory consumption from 14.2 GiB to 4.7 GiB, together with 50\% latency reduction and a slight Rouge-2 score drop of 0.041.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
VisMMOE: Exploiting Visual-Expert Affinity for Efficient Visual-Language MoE Offloading
VisMMoE exploits visual-expert affinity via token pruning to achieve up to 2.68x faster VL-MoE inference on memory-constrained hardware while keeping accuracy competitive.
-
A Replicate-and-Quantize Strategy for Plug-and-Play Load Balancing of Sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
Replicate-and-Quantize copies the busiest MoE expert as a quantized duplicate and compresses the least important expert, lowering a new Load-Imbalance Score by up to 1.4x while accuracy varies by roughly -1.2 to +3.0 points.
-
MoE-Compression: How the Compression Error of Experts Affects the Inference Accuracy of MoE Model?
In a 26-layer MoE model, injecting Gaussian weight errors into middle-layer experts hurts math accuracy most, while deep-layer errors can sometimes improve instruction compliance.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.