Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Fatigue-resistant high-performance elastocaloric materials via additive manufacturing

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Additive manufacturing of a nickel-rich Ti-Ni alloy produces a nanocomposite whose elastocaloric efficiency is five times that of melt-cast material and whose cooling performance is unchanged after one million cycles.

desk verdict L-DED Ti-Ni nanocomposite shows a real gain in hysteresis and fatigue life, but the control comparison doesn't isolate the intended architecture mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07900 v1 pith:CZJ5W2MZ submitted 2019-08-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Huilong Hou , Emrah Simsek , Tao Ma , Nathan S. Johnson , Suxin Qian , Cheikh Cisse , Drew Stasak , Naila Al Hasan
show 10 more authors
Lin Zhou Yunho Hwang Reinhard Radermacher Valery I. Levitas Matthew J. Kramer Mohsen Asle Zaeem Aaron P. Stebner Ryan T. Ott Jun Cui Ichiro Takeuchi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords additivemanufacturingelastocaloriccoolingshapememoryalloysnickel-titaniumhysteresisnanocompositefatigueintermetallicphases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that laser-directed energy deposition of a nickel-rich Ti-Ni alloy creates a nanocomposite of transforming TiNi and non-transforming TiNi3 phases, and argues that this architecture, not the alloy chemistry alone, is what breaks the usual trade-off between hysteresis and fatigue in shape-memory coolants. The material shows quasi-linear stress-strain recovery with very small hysteresis, a materials efficiency about five times that of melt-cast controls, and unchanged elastocaloric response after one million compression cycles. The authors' point is that intermetallic precipitates, usually considered harmful in Ti-Ni metallurgy, become beneficial when they are arranged as a sub-micrometer load-transfer network. If right, this opens a direct additive-manufacturing route to efficient solid-state cooling elements with long functional life.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the L-DED nanocomposite microstructure: a two-phase mixture of transforming B2 TiNi and non-transforming D024 TiNi3 in comparable volume fractions, with curved semi-coherent interfaces decorated by dislocations. These dislocations act as pre-existing nucleation sites for martensite and for the reverse transformation, while the intermetallic phase's higher stiffness carries elastic load and guides transformation, producing quasi-linear behavior and small hysteresis. A micromechanics finite-element model with 40 to 60 percent non-transforming phase reproduces the crossover from regular superelastic to quasi-linear behavior.

What would settle it

A melt-cast or conventionally processed Ti48.5Ni51.5 alloy with the same nickel-rich composition but no nanocomposite structure, showing the same low hysteresis and million-cycle stability, would falsify the architectural mechanism; conversely, an L-DED near-equiatomic alloy without substantial TiNi3 that reproduces the low hysteresis would falsify the claim that intermetallic phases are required.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a Ti48.5Ni51.5 alloy built by laser-directed energy deposition, after brief aging at 923 K, consists of roughly equal volumes of B2 TiNi and D024 TiNi3 with small amounts of Ti4Ni2O and Ni, arranged with curved semi-coherent interfaces decorated by dislocations. Under compression this composite transforms almost fully reversibly with a quasi-linear stress-strain curve and an adiabatic temperature change of about 4.1 K; the hysteresis per cycle is small and nearly rate-independent between 0.0002 and 0.2 s−1, and the hysteretic energy loss as a fraction of input work is about 6.9%, compared with 33.8% for the melt-cast control. The paper claims this is a five-fold improvement in the ratio of materials coefficient of performance to Carnot COP, and that the mechanism is load transfer: the stiff non-transforming TiNi3 phase elastically carries load while TiNi transforms, with distributed nucleation sites reducing interfacial friction.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the five-fold efficiency gain comes from the TiNi/TiNi3 nanocomposite architecture rather than from the nickel-rich composition itself, since the only reported comparison pairs the L-DED Ni-rich alloy with a melt-cast near-equiatomic control.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Elastocaloric cooling elements can be printed directly in complex heat-exchanger geometries such as tubes and honeycombs rather than machined from bulk material.
  • The low rate-independent hysteresis enables high-frequency Brayton-like cooling cycles without the efficiency penalty usually associated with fast operation.
  • The reported energy-based correlation between dissipated fraction of input work and cycles to functional failure suggests that reducing this fraction, not just absolute hysteresis, is the key to long fatigue life across caloric materials.
  • One million cycles at roughly 0.05 to 0.1 Hz corresponds to about ten years of service in commercial cooling products, assuming operation below one hertz.
  • Because the nanocomposite is more than half non-transforming intermetallic phase, low-cost elemental powders and simple processing routes become viable for mass production.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The claim that intermetallic phases are beneficial rests on comparing the L-DED Ni-rich Ti48.5Ni51.5 alloy with a melt-cast near-equiatomic Ti49.2Ni50.8 control; a melt-cast sample of the same Ni-rich composition would separate the composition effect from the nanocomposite architecture effect.
  • If the dissipated-energy-fraction versus cycles correlation holds for magnetocaloric and electrocaloric materials, processing routes that reduce hysteresis fraction should extend functional life in those families as well, a consequence the paper only hints at.
  • The interfacial-dislocation nucleation mechanism implies that shakedown protocols and aging treatments could be tuned further to reduce frictional dissipation below the reported 6.9 percent, possibly pushing efficiency even higher, though this is not tested in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports laser-directed-energy-deposition (L-DED) fabrication of Ni-rich Ti–Ni alloys with a nanocomposite microstructure consisting of transforming TiNi and non-transforming TiNi3 phases. The authors report quasi-linear stress-strain behavior with small hysteresis, an approximately five-fold improvement in materials COP relative to a melt-cast near-equiatomic TiNi control, and stable elastocaloric response over one million compression cycles. They attribute these properties to load transfer between the transforming and non-transforming phases, supported by a finite-element model, in situ synchrotron XRD, and TEM characterization.

Significance. The direct experimental dataset—stress-strain loops, adiabatic temperature changes, and one-million-cycle stability—combined with in situ synchrotron XRD and atomic-scale TEM is valuable and will be of interest to the elastocaloric and additive-manufacturing communities. If the causal interpretation were fully established, the claim that a nanocomposite architecture with more than 50% intermetallic phase can yield efficient, fatigue-resistant elastocaloric response would be a notable advance. The energy-based (ΔE/E)-N correlation across caloric materials, if it holds, is also a useful empirical trend. However, the key causal attribution is not yet established because the headline comparison conflates composition and processing, and the efficiency ratio lacks statistical quantification.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, Figs. 2F–2H and Table S1] The central claim that the TiNi3 intermetallic nanocomposite architecture causes the five-fold efficiency improvement is confounded by the choice of control. The L-DED material is Ti48.5Ni51.5, while the melt-cast control is Ti49.2Ni50.8; these differ by 0.7 at.% Ni, which the paper itself (Fig. S6 and refs. 29, 50) indicates strongly affects transformation temperatures and hysteresis in NiTi. In addition, the L-DED samples were aged at 923 K for 3 h, while the melt-cast sample is described as purchased with no reported heat treatment, so processing and thermal history are also varied. The comparison therefore cannot isolate the 'nanocomposite architecture' variable. The authors should report a melt-cast sample of the same Ti48.5Ni51.5 composition with the same heat treatment, or an L-DED near-equiatomic sample; without one of these controls, the causal claim that intermetallic phases are beneficial is not supported.
  2. [Fig. 2H and thermodynamic analysis in Methods] The 'factor of five' improvement in COPmaterials/Carnot is presented without error bars, sample size, or absolute values for either material. The hysteresis area and ΔT_ad are directly measured quantities, so the authors should report means and standard deviations for at least three specimens per condition, and specify the strain amplitude and strain rate at which the comparison is made. As written, the reader cannot determine whether the factor of five is statistically significant or whether the isothermal and adiabatic hysteresis areas differ within scatter, which is important because the rate-independence claim and the efficiency ratio both rest on these numbers.
  3. [Methods, Constitutive modeling, and Fig. 2C] The finite-element simulation is stated to 'confirm' the load-transfer mechanism, but the model uses literature-based superelastic parameters for TiNi and volume-averaged elastic properties for the non-transforming phase, and the phase fractions are inputs from the same diffraction data used to characterize the sample. This is a consistency check that a load-transfer mechanism can produce quasi-linear behavior, not an independent confirmation of the mechanism in these specific specimens. The in situ XRD data quantify phase evolution with load but do not directly measure stress partitioning between phases, so the load-transfer mechanism remains primarily inferred from bulk behavior, microstructure, and simulation. The text should be revised to describe the simulation as illustrative support rather than proof.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The symbols in Eq. (1) are not fully defined at first use: Δs is used before being defined as the specific entropy change, and the text should state explicitly that ΔE is the hysteresis area divided by density so that the dimensions are consistent.
  2. [Fig. 2H] Please include units (e.g., MJ m^-3) on the hysteresis-area axis and add a legend to the figure so that the color code for each material is unambiguous without reference to the text.
  3. [Introduction, p. 4] The phrase 'nearly rate-independent' should be quantified: report the hysteresis areas at 0.0002 s^-1 and 0.2 s^-1 with error bars, rather than only stating that the difference is negligible.
  4. [Fig. 3C and Table S1] Provide the linear fit equation and coefficient of determination for the (ΔE/E)-N correlation, and state the criterion used for 'functional failure' in the literature data, since the definition in the text as 'onset of loss of their functionality' is not quantitative.
  5. [Thermodynamic analysis, Methods] Define COPmaterials at its first use in the main text (it is currently defined only in the Methods) and clarify the sign convention in Eq. (S1), particularly the role of the ΔE/2 term.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central efficiency and stability claims are direct experimental measurements, and the supporting FEM is a consistency check rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical: the quasi-linear stress-strain curves, the small hysteresis area, the five-fold materials-efficiency ratio, and the one-million-cycle stability are all obtained from direct mechanical, calorimetric, and cyclic tests, not derived from fitted parameters or from self-citations. The FEM simulation in Fig. 2C is a consistency check: it uses phase fractions measured by Rietveld refinement of synchrotron diffraction and literature-based superelastic parameters, then varies the non-transforming-phase volume fraction to show that a stiff, non-transforming phase can produce quasi-linear macroscopic behavior. The quasi-linear output is built into the model's assumption of an elastically load-carrying intermetallic phase, so the simulation does not independently prove the causal mechanism; however, the measured efficiency and stability numbers do not reduce to the simulation's inputs. The comparison of L-DED Ti48.5Ni51.5 with melt-cast Ti49.2Ni50.8 changes both composition and processing, which is a legitimate experimental-design concern about causal attribution, but it is not circularity: the reported five-fold improvement is a measured comparison, not an input recycled as an output. The Delta E/E versus N correlation in Fig. 3C is a post-hoc empirical fit that includes the paper's own data point, and the one-million-cycle endurance was measured directly, not predicted from the correlation. Self-citations such as refs. 29 and 34 for lattice-compatibility hysteresis reduction and ref. 46 for the thermodynamic COP equation provide context and standard analysis tools, but the load-bearing efficiency and fatigue results are self-contained experimental observations. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggled by citation, or definitional equivalence is present. The main scientific risks here are confounding and model overinterpretation, not circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claims rest on careful measurements, but the efficiency comparison and mechanism interpretation rely on a thermodynamic formula from the authors' prior work, literature-based constitutive parameters, and a two-sample comparison that is confounded by composition. The fatigue correlation is an empirical fit, not a derivation.

free parameters (2)
  • Abaqus NiTi superelastic model parameters = sigma_Ms=300 MPa, sigma_Mf=500 MPa, sigma_As=250 MPa, sigma_Af=50 MPa, epsilon_L=5%
    Chosen literature-typical values for the transforming phase in the FEM demonstration; the model reproduces quasi-linear behavior but is not a parameter-free prediction.
  • Non-transforming phase mixing coefficients = 0.85 TiNi3, 0.10 Ti4Ni2O, 0.05 Ni
    Hand-rounded from measured volume fractions (50.3%, 5.2%, 0.8%); the small discrepancy does not affect the qualitative simulation but is a free choice.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Rietveld-refined phase fractions (TiNi3 50.3%, Ti4Ni2O 5.2%, Ni 0.8%, B2 43.7%) are representative of the bulk specimens used for mechanical testing.
    Used to set up the FEM model and to interpret latent heat consistency (Fig S8); if the microstructure varies along the build or within the gauge volume, the mechanism interpretation shifts.
  • domain assumption The Abaqus built-in superelastic model with the specified parameters describes the transforming TiNi phase inside the composite.
    The simulation in Fig 2C assumes homogeneous, rate-independent transformation with preset stresses and strains; this is a standard approximation, not validated against the L-DED material's transformation kinetics.
  • domain assumption The thermodynamic cycle equations (Eq. S1) with full work recovery correctly yield the materials COP from Delta T_ad and hysteresis area.
    The five-fold efficiency claim is computed from this formula; the paper cites its own prior analysis (ref 46) but does not derive Eq. S1 in this text.
  • domain assumption Mechanical pre-treatment ('shakedown') is needed, and the comparison materials were tested under equivalent conditions.
    The L-DED samples were pre-strained for four cycles to reach a shakedown state (Fig S5); the text does not specify whether the melt-cast controls received the same treatment, so the baseline comparison may be uneven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fatigue-resistant high-performance elastocaloric materials via additive manufacturing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CZJ5W2MZ

@misc{pith2026190807900,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fatigue-resistant high-performance elastocaloric materials via additive manufacturing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CZJ5W2MZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07900}
}
read the original abstract

Elastocaloric cooling, which exploits the latent heat released and absorbed as stress-induced phase transformations are reversibly cycled in shape memory alloys, has recently emerged as a frontrunner in non-vapor-compression cooling technologies. The intrinsically high thermodynamic efficiency of elastocaloric materials is limited only by work hysteresis. Here, we report on creating high-performance low-hysteresis elastocaloric cooling materials via additive manufacturing of Titanium-Nickel (Ti-Ni) alloys. Contrary to established knowledge of the physical metallurgy of Ti-Ni alloys, intermetallic phases are found to be beneficial to elastocaloric performances when they are combined with the binary Ti-Ni compound in nanocomposite configurations. The resulting microstructure gives rise to quasi-linear stress-strain behaviors with extremely small hysteresis, leading to enhancement in the materials efficiency by a factor of five. Furthermore, despite being composed of more than 50% intermetallic phases, the reversible, repeatable elastocaloric performance of this material is shown to be stable over one million cycles. This result opens the door for direct implementation of additive manufacturing to elastocaloric cooling systems where versatile design strategy enables both topology optimization of heat exchangers as well as unique microstructural control of metallic refrigerants.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fahler, U

    S. Fahler, U. K. Rossler, O. Kastner, J. Eckert, G. Eggeler, H. Emmerich, P. Entel, S. Muller, E. Quandt, K. Albe, Caloric Effects in Ferroic Materials: New Concepts for Cooling. Adv. Eng. Mater. 14, 10-19 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    X. Moya, S. Kar-Narayan, N. D. Mathur, Caloric materials near ferroic phase transitions. Nat. Mater. 13, 439-450 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Takeuchi, K

    I. Takeuchi, K. Sandeman, Solid-state cooling with caloric materials. Phys. Today 68, 48-54 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Bonnot, R

    E. Bonnot, R. Romero, L. Manosa, E. Vives, A. Planes, Elastocaloric effect associated with the martensitic transition in shape-memory alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 125901 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    J. Cui, Y. Wu, J. Muehlbauer, Y. Hwang, R. Radermacher, S. Fackler, M. Wuttig, I. Takeuchi, Demonstration of high efficiency elastocaloric cooling with large Delta T using NiTi wires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 073904 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    G. J. Pataky, E. Ertekin, H. Sehitoglu, Elastocaloric cooling potential of NiTi, Ni2FeGa, and CoNiAl. Acta Mater. 96, 420-427 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Energy savings potential and RD&D opportunities for non-vapor-compression HVAC technologies,

    W. Goetzler, R. Zogg, J. Young, C. Johnson, "Energy savings potential and RD&D opportunities for non-vapor-compression HVAC technologies," (Navigant Consulting, Inc. (prepared for U.S. Department of Energy), Washington, D.C., 2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    S. Qian, Y. Geng, Y. Wang, J. Z. Ling, Y. Hwang, R. Radermacher, I. Takeuchi, J. Cui, A review of elastocaloric cooling: Materials, cycles and system integrations. Int. J. Refrig. 64, 1-19 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Tušek, K

    J. Tušek, K. Engelbrecht, D. Eriksen, S. Dall’Olio, J. Tušek, N. Pryds, A regenerative elastocaloric heat pump. Nat. Energ. 1, 16134 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    E. Kurt, T. Jaka, E. Dan, L. Tian, L. Chong-Yi, T. Janez, P. Nini, A regenerative elastocaloric device: experimental results. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 50, 424006 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Elahinia, N

    M. Elahinia, N. S. Moghaddam, M. T. Andani, A. Amerinatanzi, B. A. Bimber, R. F. Hamilton, Fabrication of NiTi through additive manufacturing: A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 83, 630-663 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Dadbakhsh, M

    S. Dadbakhsh, M. Speirs, J. Van Humbeeck, J.-P. Kruth, Laser additive manufacturing of bulk and porous shape-memory NiTi alloys: From processes to potential biomedical applications. MRS Bull. 41, 765-774 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    J. A. Shaw, Simulations of localized thermo-mechanical behavior in a NiTi shape memory alloy. Int. J. Plasticity 16, 541-562 (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    O. P. Bruno, P. H. Leo, F. Reitich, Free-Boundary Conditions at Austenite Martensite Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 746-749 (1995)

    1995

  7. [15]

    DebRoy, H

    T. DebRoy, H. L. Wei, J. S. Zuback, T. Mukherjee, J. W. Elmer, J. O. Milewski, A. M. Beese, A. Wilson-Heid, A. De, W. Zhang, Additive manufacturing of metallic components - Process, structure and properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 92, 112-224 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    S. J. Hao, L. S. Cui, D. Q. Jiang, X. D. Han, Y. Ren, J. Jiang, Y. N. Liu, Z. Y. Liu, S. C. Mao, Y. D. Wang, Y. Li, X. B. Ren, X. D. Ding, S. Wang, C. Yu, X. B. Shi, M. S. Du, F. Yang, Y. J. Zheng, Z. Zhang, X. D. Li, D. E. Brown, J. Li, A transforming metal nanocomposite with...

    2013

  9. [17]

    Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials at the Science website

  10. [18]

    Thomas, G

    M. Thomas, G. J. Baxter, I. Todd, Normalised model-based processing diagrams for additive layer manufacture of engineering alloys. Acta Mater. 108, 26-35 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Kou, Welding metallurgy (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2003)

    S. Kou, Welding metallurgy (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    Debroy, S

    T. Debroy, S. A. David, Physical Processes in Fusion-Welding. Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 85-112 (1995)

    1995

  13. [21]

    J. H. Martin, B. D. Yahata, J. M. Hundley, J. A. Mayer, T. A. Schaedler, T. M. Pollock, 3D printing of high-strength aluminium alloys. Nature 549, 365-369 (2017). 36

    2017

  14. [22]

    Ibarra, D

    A. Ibarra, D. Caillard, J. San Juan, M. L. No, Martensite nucleation on dislocations in Cu-Al-Ni shape memory alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 101907 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    I. W. Chen, Y. H. Chiao, Theory and experiment of martensitic nucleation in ZrO2 containing ceramics and ferrous alloys. Acta Metallurgica 33, 1827-1845 (1985)

    1985

  16. [24]

    M. J. Buehler, A. Misra, Mechanical behavior of nanocomposites. MRS Bull. 44, 19-24 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    S. M. Ueland, C. A. Schuh, Transition from many domain to single domain martensite morphology in small-scale shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 61, 5618-5625 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Y. Chen, C. A. Schuh, Size effects in shape memory alloy microwires. Acta Mater. 59, 537-553 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    R. F. Hamilton, H. Sehitoglu, Y. Chumlyakov, H. J. Maier, Stress dependence of the hysteresis in single crystal NiTi alloys. Acta Mater. 52, 3383-3402 (2004)

    2004

  20. [28]

    Sedmak, J

    P. Sedmak, J. Pilch, L. Heller, J. Kopecek, J. Wright, P. Sedlak, M. Frost, P. Sittner, Grain- resolved analysis of localized deformation in nickel-titanium wire under tensile load. Science 353, 559-562 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    J. Cui, Y. S. Chu, O. O. Famodu, Y. Furuya, J. Hattrick-Simpers, R. D. James, A. Ludwig, S. Thienhaus, M. Wuttig, Z. Zhang, I. Takeuchi, Combinatorial search of thermoelastic shape- memory alloys with extremely small hysteresis width. Nat. Mater. 5, 286-290 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    Chluba, W

    C. Chluba, W. Ge, R. L. de Miranda, J. Strobel, L. Kienle, E. Quandt, M. Wuttig, Ultralow- fatigue shape memory alloy films. Science 348, 1004-1007 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Y. Song, X. Chen, V. Dabade, T. Shield, R. D. James, Enhanced reversibility and unusual microstructure of a phase-transforming material. Nature 502, 85-88 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Kitanovski, J

    A. Kitanovski, J. Tušek, U. Tomc, U. Plaznik, M. Ožbolt, A. Poredoš, Magnetocaloric Energy Conversion (Springer, New York, NY, 2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Tušek, K

    J. Tušek, K. Engelbrecht, R. Millan-Solsona, L. Manosa, E. Vives, L. P. Mikkelsen, N. Pryds, The Elastocaloric Effect: A Way to Cool Efficiently. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500361 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Zarnetta, R

    R. Zarnetta, R. Takahashi, M. L. Young, A. Savan, Y. Furuya, S. Thienhaus, B. Maass, M. Rahim, J. Frenzel, H. Brunken, Y. S. Chu, V. Srivastava, R. D. James, I. Takeuchi, G. Eggeler, A. Ludwig, Identification of Quaternary Shape Memory Alloys with Near-Zero Thermal Hysteresis ...

    2010

  27. [35]

    Ashby, H

    M. Ashby, H. Shercliff, D. Cebon, Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing and Design (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Eggeler, E

    G. Eggeler, E. Hornbogen, A. Yawny, A. Heckmann, M. Wagner, Structural and functional fatigue of NiTi shape memory alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 378, 24-33 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    Tanaka, Y

    Y. Tanaka, Y. Himuro, R. Kainuma, Y. Sutou, T. Omori, K. Ishida, Ferrous polycrystalline shape-memory alloy showing huge superelasticity. Science 327, 1488-1490 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    A. Lai, Z. H. Du, C. L. Gan, C. A. Schuh, Shape memory and superelastic ceramics at small scales. Science 341, 1505-1508 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    Bansiddhi, T

    A. Bansiddhi, T. D. Sargeant, S. I. Stupp, D. C. Dunand, Porous NiTi for bone implants: A review. Acta Biomater. 4, 773-782 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    Omori, T

    T. Omori, T. Kusama, S. Kawata, I. Ohnuma, Y. Sutou, Y. Araki, K. Ishida, R. Kainuma, Abnormal grain growth induced by cyclic heat treatment. Science 341, 1500-1502 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    S. Qian, A. Alabdulkarem, J. Z. Ling, J. Muehlbauer, Y. Hwang, R. Radermacher, I. Takeuchi, Performance enhancement of a compressive thermoelastic cooling system using multi-objective optimization and novel designs. Int. J. Refrig. 57, 62-76 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    J. C. Schuren, P. A. Shade, J. V. Bernier, S. F. Li, B. Blank, J. Lind, P. Kenesei, U. Lienert, R. M. Suter, T. J. Turner, D. M. Dimiduk, J. Almer, New opportunities for quantitative tracking of polycrystal responses in three dimensions. Curr. Opin. Solid St. M. 19, 235-244 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    P. A. Shade, B. Blank, J. C. Schuren, T. J. Turner, P. Kenesei, K. Goetze, R. M. Suter, J. V. Bernier, S. F. Li, J. Lind, U. Lienert, J. Almer, A rotational and axial motion system load frame insert for in situ high energy x-ray studies. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 093902 (2015). 37

    2015

  36. [44]

    J. H. Lee, C. C. Aydiner, J. Almer, J. Bernier, K. W. Chapman, P. J. Chupas, D. Haeffner, K. Kump, P. L. Lee, U. Lienert, A. Miceli, G. Vera, Synchrotron applications of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. J Synchrotron Radiat 15, 477-488 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    B. H. Toby, R. B. Von Dreele, GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 544-549 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    S. Qian, J. Ling, Y. Hwang, R. Radermacher, I. Takeuchi, Thermodynamics cycle analysis and numerical modeling of thermoelastic cooling systems. Int. J. Refrig. 56, 65-80 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    J. C. Ion, H. R. Shercliff, M. F. Ashby, Diagrams for Laser Materials Processing. Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 1539-1551 (1992)

    1992

  40. [48]

    Y. M. Wang, T. Voisin, J. T. McKeown, J. C. Ye, N. P. Calta, Z. Li, Z. Zeng, Y. Zhang, W. Chen, T. T. Roehling, R. T. Ott, M. K. Santala, P. J. Depond, M. J. Matthews, A. V. Hamza, T. Zhu, Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility. ...

    2018

  41. [49]

    Brandal, G

    G. Brandal, G. Satoh, Y. Lawrence Yao, S. Naveed, Beneficial interface geometry for laser joining of niti to stainless steel wires. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 135, 061006 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Frenzel, E

    J. Frenzel, E. P. George, A. Dlouhy, C. Somsen, M. F. X. Wagner, G. Eggeler, Influence of Ni on martensitic phase transformations in NiTi shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 58, 3444-3458 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    J. W. Simon, D. Weichert, Shakedown analysis of engineering structures with limited kinematical hardening. International Journal of Solids and Structures 49, 2177-2186 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    San Juan, M

    J. San Juan, M. L. No, C. A. Schuh, Superelastic cycling of Cu-Al-Ni shape memory alloy micropillars. Acta Mater. 60, 4093-4106 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Y. Wu, E. Ertekin, H. Sehitoglu, Elastocaloric cooling capacity of shape memory alloys – Role of deformation temperatures, mechanical cycling, stress hysteresis and inhomogeneity of transformation. Acta Mater. 135, 158-176 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Tušek, A

    J. Tušek, A. Žerovnik, M. Čebron, M. Brojan, B. Žužek, K. Engelbrecht, A. Cadelli, Elastocaloric effect vs fatigue life: Exploring the durability limits of Ni-Ti plates under pre-strain conditions for elastocaloric cooling. Acta Mater. 150, 295-307 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Kim, M.-G

    Y. Kim, M.-G. Jo, J.-W. Park, H.-K. Park, H. N. Han, Elastocaloric effect in polycrystalline Ni50Ti45.3V4.7 shape memory alloy. Scr. Mater. 144, 48-51 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    H. Hou, P. Finkel, M. Staruch, J. Cui, I. Takeuchi, Ultra-low-field magneto-elastocaloric cooling in a multiferroic composite device. Nat. Commun. 9, 4075 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    H. Hou, J. Cui, S. Qian, D. Catalini, Y. Hwang, R. Radermacher, I. Takeuchi, Overcoming fatigue through compression for advanced elastocaloric cooling. MRS Bull. 43, 285-290 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Y. Xu, B. F. Lu, W. Sun, A. Yan, J. Liu, Large and reversible elastocaloric effect in dual-phase Ni54Fe19Ga27 superelastic alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 201903 (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    F. Xiao, M. Jin, J. Liu, X. Jin, Elastocaloric effect in Ni50Fe19Ga27Co4 single crystals. Acta Mater. 96, 292-300 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    L. S. Wei, X. X. Zhang, J. Liu, L. Geng, Orientation dependent cyclic stability of the elastocaloric effect in textured Ni-Mn-Ga alloys. AIP Adv. 8, 055312 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Y. J. Huang, Q. D. Hu, N. M. Bruno, J. H. Chen, I. Karaman, J. H. Ross, J. G. Li, Giant elastocaloric effect in directionally solidified Ni-Mn-In magnetic shape memory alloy. Scr. Mater. 105, 42-45 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    Z. Yang, D. Cong, X. Sun, Z. Nie, Y. Wang, Enhanced cyclability of elastocaloric effect in boron-microalloyed Ni-Mn-In magnetic shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 127, 33-42 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    B. Lu, P. Zhang, Y. Xu, W. Sun, J. Liu, Elastocaloric effect in Ni45Mn36.4In13.6Co5 metamagnetic shape memory alloys under mechanical cycling. Mater. Lett. 148, 110-113 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    A. Shen, D. Zhao, W. Sun, J. Liu, C. Li, Elastocaloric effect in a Co50Ni20Ga30 single crystal. Scr. Mater. 127, 1-5 (2017). 38

    2017

  57. [65]

    X. Ni, J. R. Greer, K. Bhattacharya, R. D. James, X. Chen, Exceptional resilience of small-scale Au30Cu25Zn45 under cyclic stress-induced phase transformation. Nano Lett. 16, 7621-7625 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Lyubina, R

    J. Lyubina, R. Schafer, N. Martin, L. Schultz, O. Gutfleisch, Novel design of La(Fe, Si)(13) alloys towards high magnetic refrigeration performance. Adv. Mater. 22, 3735-3739 (2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    Guillou, G

    F. Guillou, G. Porcari, H. Yibole, N. van Dijk, E. Bruck, Taming the first-order transition in giant magnetocaloric materials. Adv. Mater. 26, 2671-2675 (2014)

    2014

  60. [68]

    Yibole, F

    H. Yibole, F. Guillou, L. Caron, E. Jiménez, F. M. F. de Groot, P. Roy, R. de Groot, N. H. van Dijk, E. Brück, Moment evolution across the ferromagnetic phase transition of giant magnetocaloric (Mn, Fe)2(P, Si, B) compounds. Phys. Rev. B 91, 014429 (2015)

    2015

  61. [69]

    Y. Bai, X. Han, X. C. Zheng, L. J. Qiao, Both high reliability and giant electrocaloric strength in BaTiO3 ceramics. Sci. Rep. 3, 2895 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    Weyland, T

    F. Weyland, T. Eisele, S. Steiner, T. Frömling, G. A. Rossetti, J. Rödel, N. Novak, Long term stability of electrocaloric response in barium zirconate titanate. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 38, 551-556 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Stern-Taulats, A

    E. Stern-Taulats, A. Gràcia-Condal, A. Planes, P. Lloveras, M. Barrio, J.-L. Tamarit, S. Pramanick, S. Majumdar, L. Mañosa, Reversible adiabatic temperature changes at the magnetocaloric and barocaloric effects in Fe49Rh51. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 152409 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.