REVIEW 3 cited by
Torus reduction of maximal conformal supergravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We consider the dimensional reduction of N=(2,0) conformal supergravity in six dimensions on a two-torus to N=4 conformal supergravity in four dimensions. At the level of kinematics, the six-dimensional Weyl multiplet is shown to reduce to a mixture of the N=4 Weyl and vector multiplets, which can be reinterpreted as a new off-shell multiplet of N=4 conformal supergravity. Similar multiplets have been constructed in other settings and are referred to as dilaton Weyl multiplets. We derive it here for the first time in a maximally supersymmetric context in four dimensions. Furthermore, we present the non-linear relations between all the six- and four-dimensional bosonic and fermionic fields, that are obtained by comparing the off-shell supersymmetry transformation rules.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
$SU(2)\times SU(2)$ dilaton Weyl multiplets for maximal conformal supergravity in four, five, and six dimensions
New SU(2)×SU(2) dilaton Weyl multiplets are constructed for N=4, N=2, and (2,0) conformal supergravity, including the first six-dimensional (2,0) dilaton Weyl multiplet.
-
Scalar-Tensor multiplet in four dimensional N=2 conformal supergravity
A new off-shell 8+8 scalar-tensor multiplet for N=2 conformal supergravity is constructed by supersymmetric truncation of N=3 multiplets and elimination of central charge multiplet fields using hypermultiplet field equations.
-
Dilaton Weyl multiplets for $N = 3$ conformal supergravity in four dimensions
A dilaton Weyl multiplet for four-dimensional N=3 conformal supergravity is constructed in two versions, with R-symmetry SU(2)xU(1)xU(1) and then SU(2)xU(1).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.